TSTP Solution File: MGT039+1 by SPASS---3.9
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SPASS---3.9
% Problem : MGT039+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp
% Command : run_spass %d %s
% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 22:26:23 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.20s 0.47s
% Output : Refutation 0.20s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12 % Problem : MGT039+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.0.0.
% 0.03/0.13 % Command : run_spass %d %s
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Thu Jun 9 07:58:23 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.47
% 0.20/0.47 SPASS V 3.9
% 0.20/0.47 SPASS beiseite: Proof found.
% 0.20/0.47 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.20/0.47 Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.20/0.47 SPASS derived 125 clauses, backtracked 7 clauses, performed 1 splits and kept 117 clauses.
% 0.20/0.47 SPASS allocated 97775 KBytes.
% 0.20/0.47 SPASS spent 0:00:00.11 on the problem.
% 0.20/0.47 0:00:00.04 for the input.
% 0.20/0.47 0:00:00.03 for the FLOTTER CNF translation.
% 0.20/0.47 0:00:00.00 for inferences.
% 0.20/0.47 0:00:00.00 for the backtracking.
% 0.20/0.47 0:00:00.01 for the reduction.
% 0.20/0.47
% 0.20/0.47
% 0.20/0.47 Here is a proof with depth 8, length 56 :
% 0.20/0.47 % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.20/0.47 1[0:Inp] || -> observational_period(skc1)*.
% 0.20/0.47 2[0:Inp] || -> slow_change(skc1)*.
% 0.20/0.47 3[0:Inp] || -> propagation_strategy(first_movers)*.
% 0.20/0.47 4[0:Inp] || -> propagation_strategy(efficient_producers)*.
% 0.20/0.47 5[0:Inp] || -> environment(skf2(u))*.
% 0.20/0.47 6[0:Inp] || selection_favors(efficient_producers,first_movers,skc1)* -> .
% 0.20/0.47 7[0:Inp] || greater(u,v) -> greater_or_equal(u,v)*.
% 0.20/0.47 8[0:Inp] || equal(u,v) -> greater_or_equal(u,v)*.
% 0.20/0.47 9[0:Inp] environment(u) || -> greater_or_equal(critical_point(u),start_time(u))*.
% 0.20/0.47 10[0:Inp] || greater_or_equal(u,v)* -> equal(u,v) greater(u,v).
% 0.20/0.47 11[0:Inp] environment(u) || in_environment(u,v) -> greater_or_equal(end_time(u),v)*.
% 0.20/0.47 12[0:Inp] || greater(u,v)* greater(v,w)* -> greater(u,w)*.
% 0.20/0.47 13[0:Inp] environment(u) || greater_or_equal(v,start_time(u))*+ greater_or_equal(end_time(u),v)* -> in_environment(u,v).
% 0.20/0.47 15[0:Inp] environment(u) || in_environment(u,v)* greater(v,critical_point(u))+ -> selection_favors(efficient_producers,first_movers,v)*.
% 0.20/0.47 16[0:Inp] observational_period(u) || propagation_strategy(efficient_producers) propagation_strategy(first_movers) -> in_environment(u,skf2(u))* selection_favors(efficient_producers,first_movers,u)*.
% 0.20/0.47 17[0:Inp] environment(u) slow_change(v) observational_period(v) || in_environment(v,u)*+ -> in_environment(u,skf3(u))*.
% 0.20/0.47 18[0:Inp] environment(u) slow_change(v) observational_period(v) || in_environment(v,u)* -> greater(skf3(u),critical_point(u)).
% 0.20/0.47 19[0:Inp] observational_period(u) || selection_favors(efficient_producers,first_movers,end_time(skf2(u)))* propagation_strategy(efficient_producers) propagation_strategy(first_movers) -> selection_favors(efficient_producers,first_movers,u).
% 0.20/0.47 20[0:MRR:16.1,16.2,4.0,3.0] observational_period(u) || -> in_environment(u,skf2(u))* selection_favors(efficient_producers,first_movers,u)*.
% 0.20/0.47 21[0:MRR:19.2,19.3,4.0,3.0] observational_period(u) || selection_favors(efficient_producers,first_movers,end_time(skf2(u)))* -> selection_favors(efficient_producers,first_movers,u).
% 0.20/0.47 24[0:Res:1.0,18.0] slow_change(skc1) environment(u) || in_environment(skc1,u)* -> greater(skf3(u),critical_point(u)).
% 0.20/0.47 28[0:Res:21.2,6.0] observational_period(skc1) || selection_favors(efficient_producers,first_movers,end_time(skf2(skc1)))* -> .
% 0.20/0.47 29[0:Res:20.2,6.0] observational_period(skc1) || -> in_environment(skc1,skf2(skc1))*.
% 0.20/0.47 31[0:MRR:29.0,1.0] || -> in_environment(skc1,skf2(skc1))*.
% 0.20/0.47 32[0:MRR:28.0,1.0] || selection_favors(efficient_producers,first_movers,end_time(skf2(skc1)))* -> .
% 0.20/0.47 34[0:MRR:24.0,2.0] environment(u) || in_environment(skc1,u)* -> greater(skf3(u),critical_point(u)).
% 0.20/0.47 38[0:Res:11.2,10.0] environment(u) || in_environment(u,v)* -> equal(end_time(u),v) greater(end_time(u),v).
% 0.20/0.47 39[0:Res:9.1,10.0] environment(u) || -> equal(start_time(u),critical_point(u)) greater(critical_point(u),start_time(u))*r.
% 0.20/0.47 40[0:Res:7.1,13.1] environment(u) || greater(v,start_time(u)) greater_or_equal(end_time(u),v)* -> in_environment(u,v).
% 0.20/0.47 48[0:Res:31.0,17.3] environment(skf2(skc1)) slow_change(skc1) observational_period(skc1) || -> in_environment(skf2(skc1),skf3(skf2(skc1)))*.
% 0.20/0.47 52[0:SSi:48.2,48.1,48.0,2.0,1.0,2.0,1.0,5.0,2.0,1.0] || -> in_environment(skf2(skc1),skf3(skf2(skc1)))*.
% 0.20/0.47 63[0:Res:31.0,34.1] environment(skf2(skc1)) || -> greater(skf3(skf2(skc1)),critical_point(skf2(skc1)))*l.
% 0.20/0.47 67[0:SSi:63.0,5.0,2.0,1.0] || -> greater(skf3(skf2(skc1)),critical_point(skf2(skc1)))*l.
% 0.20/0.47 68[0:Res:67.0,15.2] environment(skf2(skc1)) || in_environment(skf2(skc1),skf3(skf2(skc1))) -> selection_favors(efficient_producers,first_movers,skf3(skf2(skc1)))*.
% 0.20/0.47 71[0:SSi:68.0,5.0,2.0,1.0] || in_environment(skf2(skc1),skf3(skf2(skc1))) -> selection_favors(efficient_producers,first_movers,skf3(skf2(skc1)))*.
% 0.20/0.47 72[0:MRR:71.0,52.0] || -> selection_favors(efficient_producers,first_movers,skf3(skf2(skc1)))*.
% 0.20/0.47 91[0:Res:52.0,38.1] environment(skf2(skc1)) || -> equal(skf3(skf2(skc1)),end_time(skf2(skc1))) greater(end_time(skf2(skc1)),skf3(skf2(skc1)))*r.
% 0.20/0.47 93[0:SSi:91.0,5.0,2.0,1.0] || -> equal(skf3(skf2(skc1)),end_time(skf2(skc1))) greater(end_time(skf2(skc1)),skf3(skf2(skc1)))*r.
% 0.20/0.47 102[1:Spt:93.0] || -> equal(skf3(skf2(skc1)),end_time(skf2(skc1)))**.
% 0.20/0.47 105[1:Rew:102.0,72.0] || -> selection_favors(efficient_producers,first_movers,end_time(skf2(skc1)))*.
% 0.20/0.47 108[1:MRR:105.0,32.0] || -> .
% 0.20/0.47 109[1:Spt:108.0,93.0,102.0] || equal(skf3(skf2(skc1)),end_time(skf2(skc1)))** -> .
% 0.20/0.47 110[1:Spt:108.0,93.1] || -> greater(end_time(skf2(skc1)),skf3(skf2(skc1)))*r.
% 0.20/0.47 115[0:Res:8.1,40.2] environment(u) || equal(end_time(u),v) greater(v,start_time(u)) -> in_environment(u,v)*.
% 0.20/0.47 120[1:OCh:12.1,12.0,67.0,110.0] || -> greater(end_time(skf2(skc1)),critical_point(skf2(skc1)))*r.
% 0.20/0.47 123[1:Res:120.0,15.2] environment(skf2(skc1)) || in_environment(skf2(skc1),end_time(skf2(skc1))) -> selection_favors(efficient_producers,first_movers,end_time(skf2(skc1)))*.
% 0.20/0.47 126[1:SSi:123.0,5.0,2.0,1.0] || in_environment(skf2(skc1),end_time(skf2(skc1))) -> selection_favors(efficient_producers,first_movers,end_time(skf2(skc1)))*.
% 0.20/0.47 127[1:MRR:126.1,32.0] || in_environment(skf2(skc1),end_time(skf2(skc1)))* -> .
% 0.20/0.47 167[1:Res:115.3,127.0] environment(skf2(skc1)) || equal(end_time(skf2(skc1)),end_time(skf2(skc1))) greater(end_time(skf2(skc1)),start_time(skf2(skc1)))*r -> .
% 0.20/0.47 170[1:Obv:167.1] environment(skf2(skc1)) || greater(end_time(skf2(skc1)),start_time(skf2(skc1)))*r -> .
% 0.20/0.47 171[1:SSi:170.0,5.0,2.0,1.0] || greater(end_time(skf2(skc1)),start_time(skf2(skc1)))*r -> .
% 0.20/0.47 183[1:NCh:12.2,12.1,171.0,39.2] environment(skf2(skc1)) || greater(end_time(skf2(skc1)),critical_point(skf2(skc1))) -> equal(start_time(skf2(skc1)),critical_point(skf2(skc1)))**.
% 0.20/0.47 186[1:SSi:183.0,5.0,2.0,1.0] || greater(end_time(skf2(skc1)),critical_point(skf2(skc1))) -> equal(start_time(skf2(skc1)),critical_point(skf2(skc1)))**.
% 0.20/0.47 187[1:MRR:186.0,120.0] || -> equal(start_time(skf2(skc1)),critical_point(skf2(skc1)))**.
% 0.20/0.47 190[1:Rew:187.0,171.0] || greater(end_time(skf2(skc1)),critical_point(skf2(skc1)))*r -> .
% 0.20/0.47 193[1:MRR:190.0,120.0] || -> .
% 0.20/0.47 % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.20/0.47 Formulae used in the proof : prove_t8 mp_organizational_sets1 mp_organizational_sets2 mp3_favoured_trategy mp_greater_or_equal mp_time_of_critical_point mp_environment_end_point mp_greater_transitivity mp_time_in_environment l8 mp4_critical_point
% 0.20/0.47
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------