TSTP Solution File: MGT036-3 by Otter---3.3

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Otter---3.3
% Problem  : MGT036-3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : otter-tptp-script %s

% Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Jul 27 13:06:07 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 1.63s 1.85s
% Output   : Refutation 1.63s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    3
%            Number of leaves      :    7
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   10 (   7 unt;   0 nHn;  10 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   18 (   0 equ;   9 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    5 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    6 (   5 usr;   1 prp; 0-4 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   5 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   10 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(1,axiom,
    ( ~ environment(A)
    | ~ subpopulations(B,C,A,D)
    | subpopulations(C,B,A,D) ),
    file('MGT036-3.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(2,axiom,
    ( ~ environment(A)
    | ~ subpopulations(B,C,A,D)
    | ~ greater_or_e_qual(growth_rate(C,D),zero)
    | ~ greater(zero,growth_rate(B,D))
    | outcompetes(C,B,D) ),
    file('MGT036-3.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(5,axiom,
    ( ~ environment(A)
    | ~ subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,A,B)
    | ~ outcompetes(first_movers,efficient_producers,B) ),
    file('MGT036-3.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(6,axiom,
    environment(sk1),
    file('MGT036-3.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(7,axiom,
    subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,sk1,sk2),
    file('MGT036-3.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(8,axiom,
    greater_or_e_qual(growth_rate(first_movers,sk2),zero),
    file('MGT036-3.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(9,axiom,
    greater(zero,growth_rate(efficient_producers,sk2)),
    file('MGT036-3.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(10,plain,
    subpopulations(efficient_producers,first_movers,sk1,sk2),
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[7,1,6]),
    [iquote('hyper,7,1,6')] ).

cnf(11,plain,
    outcompetes(first_movers,efficient_producers,sk2),
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[10,2,6,8,9]),
    [iquote('hyper,10,2,6,8,9')] ).

cnf(12,plain,
    $false,
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[11,5,6,7]),
    [iquote('hyper,11,5,6,7')] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.11  % Problem  : MGT036-3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.06/0.12  % Command  : otter-tptp-script %s
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Wed Jul 27 04:00:35 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 1.63/1.85  ----- Otter 3.3f, August 2004 -----
% 1.63/1.85  The process was started by sandbox2 on n012.cluster.edu,
% 1.63/1.85  Wed Jul 27 04:00:35 2022
% 1.63/1.85  The command was "./otter".  The process ID is 24883.
% 1.63/1.85  
% 1.63/1.85  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 1.63/1.85  set(auto).
% 1.63/1.85     dependent: set(auto1).
% 1.63/1.85     dependent: set(process_input).
% 1.63/1.85     dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 1.63/1.85     dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 1.63/1.85     dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 1.63/1.85     dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 1.63/1.85     dependent: set(control_memory).
% 1.63/1.85     dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 1.63/1.85     dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 1.63/1.85     dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 1.63/1.85     dependent: assign(max_seconds, 10800).
% 1.63/1.85  clear(print_given).
% 1.63/1.85  
% 1.63/1.85  list(usable).
% 1.63/1.85  0 [] -environment(A)| -subpopulations(B,C,A,D)|subpopulations(C,B,A,D).
% 1.63/1.85  0 [] -environment(A)| -subpopulations(B,C,A,D)| -greater_or_e_qual(growth_rate(C,D),zero)| -greater(zero,growth_rate(B,D))|outcompetes(C,B,D).
% 1.63/1.85  0 [] -environment(A)| -subpopulations(B,C,A,D)| -outcompetes(C,B,D)|greater_or_e_qual(growth_rate(C,D),zero).
% 1.63/1.85  0 [] -environment(A)| -subpopulations(B,C,A,D)| -outcompetes(C,B,D)|greater(zero,growth_rate(B,D)).
% 1.63/1.85  0 [] environment(sk1).
% 1.63/1.85  0 [] subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,sk1,sk2).
% 1.63/1.85  0 [] greater_or_e_qual(growth_rate(first_movers,sk2),zero).
% 1.63/1.85  0 [] greater(zero,growth_rate(efficient_producers,sk2)).
% 1.63/1.85  0 [] -environment(A)| -subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,A,B)| -outcompetes(first_movers,efficient_producers,B).
% 1.63/1.85  end_of_list.
% 1.63/1.85  
% 1.63/1.85  SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=1, equality=0, symmetry=0, max_lits=5.
% 1.63/1.85  
% 1.63/1.85  This is a Horn set without equality.  The strategy will
% 1.63/1.85  be hyperresolution, with satellites in sos and nuclei
% 1.63/1.85  in usable.
% 1.63/1.85  
% 1.63/1.85     dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 1.63/1.85     dependent: clear(order_hyper).
% 1.63/1.85  
% 1.63/1.85  ------------> process usable:
% 1.63/1.85  ** KEPT (pick-wt=12): 1 [] -environment(A)| -subpopulations(B,C,A,D)|subpopulations(C,B,A,D).
% 1.63/1.85  ** KEPT (pick-wt=21): 2 [] -environment(A)| -subpopulations(B,C,A,D)| -greater_or_e_qual(growth_rate(C,D),zero)| -greater(zero,growth_rate(B,D))|outcompetes(C,B,D).
% 1.63/1.85  ** KEPT (pick-wt=16): 3 [] -environment(A)| -subpopulations(B,C,A,D)| -outcompetes(C,B,D)|greater_or_e_qual(growth_rate(C,D),zero).
% 1.63/1.85  ** KEPT (pick-wt=16): 4 [] -environment(A)| -subpopulations(B,C,A,D)| -outcompetes(C,B,D)|greater(zero,growth_rate(B,D)).
% 1.63/1.85  ** KEPT (pick-wt=11): 5 [] -environment(A)| -subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,A,B)| -outcompetes(first_movers,efficient_producers,B).
% 1.63/1.85  
% 1.63/1.85  ------------> process sos:
% 1.63/1.85  ** KEPT (pick-wt=2): 6 [] environment(sk1).
% 1.63/1.85  ** KEPT (pick-wt=5): 7 [] subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,sk1,sk2).
% 1.63/1.85  ** KEPT (pick-wt=5): 8 [] greater_or_e_qual(growth_rate(first_movers,sk2),zero).
% 1.63/1.85  ** KEPT (pick-wt=5): 9 [] greater(zero,growth_rate(efficient_producers,sk2)).
% 1.63/1.85  
% 1.63/1.85  ======= end of input processing =======
% 1.63/1.85  
% 1.63/1.85  =========== start of search ===========
% 1.63/1.85  
% 1.63/1.85  -------- PROOF -------- 
% 1.63/1.85  
% 1.63/1.85  -----> EMPTY CLAUSE at   0.00 sec ----> 12 [hyper,11,5,6,7] $F.
% 1.63/1.85  
% 1.63/1.85  Length of proof is 2.  Level of proof is 2.
% 1.63/1.85  
% 1.63/1.85  ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 1.63/1.85  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 1.63/1.85  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 1.63/1.85  ------------ end of proof -------------
% 1.63/1.85  
% 1.63/1.85  
% 1.63/1.85  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 1.63/1.85  
% 1.63/1.85  
% 1.63/1.85  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 1.63/1.85  
% 1.63/1.85  ============ end of search ============
% 1.63/1.85  
% 1.63/1.85  -------------- statistics -------------
% 1.63/1.85  clauses given                  6
% 1.63/1.85  clauses generated              4
% 1.63/1.85  clauses kept                  11
% 1.63/1.85  clauses forward subsumed       1
% 1.63/1.85  clauses back subsumed          0
% 1.63/1.85  Kbytes malloced              976
% 1.63/1.85  
% 1.63/1.85  ----------- times (seconds) -----------
% 1.63/1.85  user CPU time          0.00          (0 hr, 0 min, 0 sec)
% 1.63/1.85  system CPU time        0.00          (0 hr, 0 min, 0 sec)
% 1.63/1.85  wall-clock time        2             (0 hr, 0 min, 2 sec)
% 1.63/1.85  
% 1.63/1.85  That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 1.63/1.85  
% 1.63/1.85  Process 24883 finished Wed Jul 27 04:00:37 2022
% 1.63/1.85  Otter interrupted
% 1.63/1.85  PROOF FOUND
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------