TSTP Solution File: MGT036-2 by E-SAT---3.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.1
% Problem : MGT036-2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 18:37:09 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.21s 0.50s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.21s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 10
% Number of leaves : 11
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 34 ( 16 unt; 0 nHn; 31 RR)
% Number of literals : 74 ( 0 equ; 45 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 5 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 7 ( 6 usr; 1 prp; 0-4 aty)
% Number of functors : 7 ( 7 usr; 5 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 61 ( 12 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(mp_symmetry_of_subpopulations_1,axiom,
( subpopulations(X3,X2,X1,X4)
| ~ environment(X1)
| ~ subpopulations(X2,X3,X1,X4) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.WW7Y2RqdUv/E---3.1_4794.p',mp_symmetry_of_subpopulations_1) ).
cnf(prove_t5_13,negated_conjecture,
subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,sk1,sk2),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.WW7Y2RqdUv/E---3.1_4794.p',prove_t5_13) ).
cnf(prove_t5_12,negated_conjecture,
environment(sk1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.WW7Y2RqdUv/E---3.1_4794.p',prove_t5_12) ).
cnf(d2_9,hypothesis,
( greater(zero,growth_rate(X2,X4))
| ~ environment(X1)
| ~ subpopulations(X2,X3,X1,X4)
| ~ outcompetes(X3,X2,X4) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.WW7Y2RqdUv/E---3.1_4794.p',d2_9) ).
cnf(prove_t5_14,negated_conjecture,
outcompetes(first_movers,efficient_producers,sk2),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.WW7Y2RqdUv/E---3.1_4794.p',prove_t5_14) ).
cnf(mp_growth_rate_relationships_3,axiom,
( environment(X1)
| ~ greater(zero,growth_rate(X2,X3)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.WW7Y2RqdUv/E---3.1_4794.p',mp_growth_rate_relationships_3) ).
cnf(d2_8,hypothesis,
( greater_or_equal(growth_rate(X3,X4),zero)
| ~ environment(X1)
| ~ subpopulations(X2,X3,X1,X4)
| ~ outcompetes(X3,X2,X4) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.WW7Y2RqdUv/E---3.1_4794.p',d2_8) ).
cnf(a13_11,hypothesis,
( greater(zero,growth_rate(X3,X2))
| ~ environment(X1)
| ~ in_environment(X1,X2)
| ~ greater(resilience(X4),resilience(X3))
| ~ greater(zero,growth_rate(X4,X2)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.WW7Y2RqdUv/E---3.1_4794.p',a13_11) ).
cnf(mp_growth_rate_relationships_5,axiom,
( ~ greater_or_equal(growth_rate(X1,X2),zero)
| ~ greater(zero,growth_rate(X1,X2)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.WW7Y2RqdUv/E---3.1_4794.p',mp_growth_rate_relationships_5) ).
cnf(a2_10,hypothesis,
greater(resilience(efficient_producers),resilience(first_movers)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.WW7Y2RqdUv/E---3.1_4794.p',a2_10) ).
cnf(mp_time_point_occur_2,axiom,
( in_environment(X1,X2)
| ~ environment(X1)
| ~ subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.WW7Y2RqdUv/E---3.1_4794.p',mp_time_point_occur_2) ).
cnf(c_0_11,axiom,
( subpopulations(X3,X2,X1,X4)
| ~ environment(X1)
| ~ subpopulations(X2,X3,X1,X4) ),
mp_symmetry_of_subpopulations_1 ).
cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,sk1,sk2),
prove_t5_13 ).
cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
environment(sk1),
prove_t5_12 ).
cnf(c_0_14,hypothesis,
( greater(zero,growth_rate(X2,X4))
| ~ environment(X1)
| ~ subpopulations(X2,X3,X1,X4)
| ~ outcompetes(X3,X2,X4) ),
d2_9 ).
cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
subpopulations(efficient_producers,first_movers,sk1,sk2),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]),c_0_13])]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
outcompetes(first_movers,efficient_producers,sk2),
prove_t5_14 ).
cnf(c_0_17,axiom,
( environment(X1)
| ~ greater(zero,growth_rate(X2,X3)) ),
mp_growth_rate_relationships_3 ).
cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
greater(zero,growth_rate(efficient_producers,sk2)),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]),c_0_16]),c_0_13])]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,hypothesis,
( greater_or_equal(growth_rate(X3,X4),zero)
| ~ environment(X1)
| ~ subpopulations(X2,X3,X1,X4)
| ~ outcompetes(X3,X2,X4) ),
d2_8 ).
cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
environment(X1),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,hypothesis,
( greater(zero,growth_rate(X3,X2))
| ~ environment(X1)
| ~ in_environment(X1,X2)
| ~ greater(resilience(X4),resilience(X3))
| ~ greater(zero,growth_rate(X4,X2)) ),
a13_11 ).
cnf(c_0_22,hypothesis,
( greater_or_equal(growth_rate(X1,X2),zero)
| ~ outcompetes(X1,X3,X2)
| ~ subpopulations(X3,X1,X4,X2) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_20])]) ).
cnf(c_0_23,hypothesis,
( greater(zero,growth_rate(X1,X2))
| ~ greater(zero,growth_rate(X3,X2))
| ~ greater(resilience(X3),resilience(X1))
| ~ in_environment(X4,X2) ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_17]) ).
cnf(c_0_24,axiom,
( ~ greater_or_equal(growth_rate(X1,X2),zero)
| ~ greater(zero,growth_rate(X1,X2)) ),
mp_growth_rate_relationships_5 ).
cnf(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
greater_or_equal(growth_rate(first_movers,sk2),zero),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_15]),c_0_16])]) ).
cnf(c_0_26,negated_conjecture,
( greater(zero,growth_rate(X1,sk2))
| ~ greater(resilience(efficient_producers),resilience(X1))
| ~ in_environment(X2,sk2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_18]) ).
cnf(c_0_27,hypothesis,
greater(resilience(efficient_producers),resilience(first_movers)),
a2_10 ).
cnf(c_0_28,negated_conjecture,
~ greater(zero,growth_rate(first_movers,sk2)),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_25]) ).
cnf(c_0_29,axiom,
( in_environment(X1,X2)
| ~ environment(X1)
| ~ subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,X1,X2) ),
mp_time_point_occur_2 ).
cnf(c_0_30,hypothesis,
~ in_environment(X1,sk2),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_27]),c_0_28]) ).
cnf(c_0_31,plain,
( in_environment(X1,X2)
| ~ subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,X1,X2) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_20])]) ).
cnf(c_0_32,hypothesis,
~ subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,X1,sk2),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_30,c_0_31]) ).
cnf(c_0_33,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_32]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : MGT036-2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.07/0.14 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.14/0.35 % Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPULimit : 2400
% 0.14/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % DateTime : Tue Oct 3 00:20:05 EDT 2023
% 0.14/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.21/0.49 Running first-order model finding
% 0.21/0.49 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.WW7Y2RqdUv/E---3.1_4794.p
% 0.21/0.50 # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.21/0.50 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.21/0.50 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.21/0.50 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.21/0.50 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.50 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.50 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.50 # new_bool_3 with pid 4951 completed with status 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.21/0.50 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.21/0.50 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.21/0.50 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.21/0.50 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.50 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.21/0.50 # Search class: FGHNF-FFSS21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.21/0.50 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.21/0.50 # Starting G-E--_208_C18C--_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 181s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.50 # G-E--_208_C18C--_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 4957 completed with status 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Result found by G-E--_208_C18C--_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.21/0.50 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.21/0.50 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.21/0.50 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.21/0.50 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.50 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.21/0.50 # Search class: FGHNF-FFSS21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.21/0.50 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.21/0.50 # Starting G-E--_208_C18C--_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 181s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.50 # Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.21/0.50 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.21/0.50
% 0.21/0.50 # Proof found!
% 0.21/0.50 # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.21/0.50 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.21/0.50 # Parsed axioms : 14
% 0.21/0.50 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Initial clauses : 14
% 0.21/0.50 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Initial clauses in saturation : 14
% 0.21/0.50 # Processed clauses : 58
% 0.21/0.50 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # ...subsumed : 8
% 0.21/0.50 # ...remaining for further processing : 50
% 0.21/0.50 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Backward-subsumed : 4
% 0.21/0.50 # Backward-rewritten : 7
% 0.21/0.50 # Generated clauses : 49
% 0.21/0.50 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 40
% 0.21/0.50 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 5
% 0.21/0.50 # Paramodulations : 48
% 0.21/0.50 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # NegExts : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Total rewrite steps : 27
% 0.21/0.50 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.50 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.50 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.50 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.50 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.50 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.50 # Current number of processed clauses : 24
% 0.21/0.50 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 6
% 0.21/0.50 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Negative unit clauses : 4
% 0.21/0.50 # Non-unit-clauses : 14
% 0.21/0.50 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 5
% 0.21/0.50 # ...number of literals in the above : 19
% 0.21/0.50 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Current number of archived clauses : 26
% 0.21/0.50 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 115
% 0.21/0.50 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 77
% 0.21/0.50 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 10
% 0.21/0.50 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 35
% 0.21/0.50 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # BW rewrite match attempts : 4
% 0.21/0.50 # BW rewrite match successes : 4
% 0.21/0.50 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Termbank termtop insertions : 1237
% 0.21/0.50
% 0.21/0.50 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.21/0.50 # User time : 0.004 s
% 0.21/0.50 # System time : 0.003 s
% 0.21/0.50 # Total time : 0.007 s
% 0.21/0.50 # Maximum resident set size: 1624 pages
% 0.21/0.50
% 0.21/0.50 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.21/0.50 # User time : 0.004 s
% 0.21/0.50 # System time : 0.007 s
% 0.21/0.50 # Total time : 0.011 s
% 0.21/0.50 # Maximum resident set size: 1684 pages
% 0.21/0.50 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------