TSTP Solution File: MGT036+3 by Beagle---0.9.51

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Beagle---0.9.51
% Problem  : MGT036+3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s

% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Aug 22 10:49:39 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 2.83s 1.68s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 2.83s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    6
%            Number of leaves      :   15
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   31 (   8 unt;  11 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   47 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   49 (  22   ~;  16   |;   8   &)
%                                         (   1 <=>;   2  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   10 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :   14 (   6   >;   8   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    6 (   5 usr;   1 prp; 0-4 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   5 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   26 (;  22   !;   4   ?;   0   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%$ subpopulations > outcompetes > greater_or_equal > greater > environment > growth_rate > #nlpp > zero > first_movers > efficient_producers > #skF_2 > #skF_1

%Foreground sorts:

%Background operators:

%Foreground operators:
tff(subpopulations,type,
    subpopulations: ( $i * $i * $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(greater,type,
    greater: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(efficient_producers,type,
    efficient_producers: $i ).

tff(growth_rate,type,
    growth_rate: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff('#skF_2',type,
    '#skF_2': $i ).

tff('#skF_1',type,
    '#skF_1': $i ).

tff(environment,type,
    environment: $i > $o ).

tff(first_movers,type,
    first_movers: $i ).

tff(greater_or_equal,type,
    greater_or_equal: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(outcompetes,type,
    outcompetes: ( $i * $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(zero,type,
    zero: $i ).

tff(f_56,hypothesis,
    ? [E,T] :
      ( environment(E)
      & subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,E,T)
      & greater_or_equal(growth_rate(first_movers,T),zero)
      & greater(zero,growth_rate(efficient_producers,T)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',a13_star) ).

tff(f_33,axiom,
    ! [E,S1,S2,T] :
      ( ( environment(E)
        & subpopulations(S1,S2,E,T) )
     => subpopulations(S2,S1,E,T) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',mp_symmetry_of_subpopulations) ).

tff(f_65,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ? [E,T] :
        ( environment(E)
        & subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,E,T)
        & outcompetes(first_movers,efficient_producers,T) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_t5_star) ).

tff(f_46,hypothesis,
    ! [E,S1,S2,T] :
      ( ( environment(E)
        & subpopulations(S1,S2,E,T) )
     => ( ( greater_or_equal(growth_rate(S2,T),zero)
          & greater(zero,growth_rate(S1,T)) )
      <=> outcompetes(S2,S1,T) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d2) ).

tff(c_16,plain,
    environment('#skF_1'),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_56]) ).

tff(c_14,plain,
    subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,'#skF_1','#skF_2'),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_56]) ).

tff(c_26,plain,
    ! [S2_13,S1_14,E_15,T_16] :
      ( subpopulations(S2_13,S1_14,E_15,T_16)
      | ~ subpopulations(S1_14,S2_13,E_15,T_16)
      | ~ environment(E_15) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_33]) ).

tff(c_28,plain,
    ( subpopulations(efficient_producers,first_movers,'#skF_1','#skF_2')
    | ~ environment('#skF_1') ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_14,c_26]) ).

tff(c_31,plain,
    subpopulations(efficient_producers,first_movers,'#skF_1','#skF_2'),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_16,c_28]) ).

tff(c_19,plain,
    ! [T_11,E_12] :
      ( ~ outcompetes(first_movers,efficient_producers,T_11)
      | ~ subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,E_12,T_11)
      | ~ environment(E_12) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_65]) ).

tff(c_22,plain,
    ( ~ outcompetes(first_movers,efficient_producers,'#skF_2')
    | ~ environment('#skF_1') ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_14,c_19]) ).

tff(c_25,plain,
    ~ outcompetes(first_movers,efficient_producers,'#skF_2'),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_16,c_22]) ).

tff(c_12,plain,
    greater_or_equal(growth_rate(first_movers,'#skF_2'),zero),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_56]) ).

tff(c_10,plain,
    greater(zero,growth_rate(efficient_producers,'#skF_2')),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_56]) ).

tff(c_60,plain,
    ! [S2_25,S1_26,T_27,E_28] :
      ( outcompetes(S2_25,S1_26,T_27)
      | ~ greater(zero,growth_rate(S1_26,T_27))
      | ~ greater_or_equal(growth_rate(S2_25,T_27),zero)
      | ~ subpopulations(S1_26,S2_25,E_28,T_27)
      | ~ environment(E_28) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_46]) ).

tff(c_64,plain,
    ! [S2_29,E_30] :
      ( outcompetes(S2_29,efficient_producers,'#skF_2')
      | ~ greater_or_equal(growth_rate(S2_29,'#skF_2'),zero)
      | ~ subpopulations(efficient_producers,S2_29,E_30,'#skF_2')
      | ~ environment(E_30) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_10,c_60]) ).

tff(c_66,plain,
    ! [E_30] :
      ( outcompetes(first_movers,efficient_producers,'#skF_2')
      | ~ subpopulations(efficient_producers,first_movers,E_30,'#skF_2')
      | ~ environment(E_30) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_12,c_64]) ).

tff(c_70,plain,
    ! [E_31] :
      ( ~ subpopulations(efficient_producers,first_movers,E_31,'#skF_2')
      | ~ environment(E_31) ),
    inference(negUnitSimplification,[status(thm)],[c_25,c_66]) ).

tff(c_73,plain,
    ~ environment('#skF_1'),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_31,c_70]) ).

tff(c_77,plain,
    $false,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_16,c_73]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.13  % Problem  : MGT036+3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.0.0.
% 0.00/0.14  % Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Thu Aug  3 20:31:46 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 2.83/1.68  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 2.83/1.68  
% 2.83/1.68  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 2.83/1.71  
% 2.83/1.71  Inference rules
% 2.83/1.71  ----------------------
% 2.83/1.71  #Ref     : 0
% 2.83/1.71  #Sup     : 10
% 2.83/1.71  #Fact    : 0
% 2.83/1.71  #Define  : 0
% 2.83/1.71  #Split   : 1
% 2.83/1.71  #Chain   : 0
% 2.83/1.71  #Close   : 0
% 2.83/1.71  
% 2.83/1.71  Ordering : KBO
% 2.83/1.71  
% 2.83/1.71  Simplification rules
% 2.83/1.71  ----------------------
% 2.83/1.71  #Subsume      : 3
% 2.83/1.71  #Demod        : 11
% 2.83/1.71  #Tautology    : 1
% 2.83/1.71  #SimpNegUnit  : 1
% 2.83/1.71  #BackRed      : 0
% 2.83/1.71  
% 2.83/1.71  #Partial instantiations: 0
% 2.83/1.71  #Strategies tried      : 1
% 2.83/1.71  
% 2.83/1.71  Timing (in seconds)
% 2.83/1.71  ----------------------
% 2.83/1.71  Preprocessing        : 0.44
% 2.83/1.71  Parsing              : 0.25
% 2.83/1.71  CNF conversion       : 0.03
% 2.83/1.71  Main loop            : 0.22
% 2.83/1.71  Inferencing          : 0.10
% 2.83/1.71  Reduction            : 0.05
% 2.83/1.71  Demodulation         : 0.04
% 2.83/1.71  BG Simplification    : 0.01
% 2.83/1.71  Subsumption          : 0.05
% 2.83/1.71  Abstraction          : 0.01
% 2.83/1.71  MUC search           : 0.00
% 2.83/1.71  Cooper               : 0.00
% 2.83/1.72  Total                : 0.71
% 2.83/1.72  Index Insertion      : 0.00
% 2.83/1.72  Index Deletion       : 0.00
% 2.83/1.72  Index Matching       : 0.00
% 2.83/1.72  BG Taut test         : 0.00
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------