TSTP Solution File: MGT036+1 by SOS---2.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SOS---2.0
% Problem  : MGT036+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : sos-script %s

% Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 22:25:55 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.46s 0.63s
% Output   : Refutation 0.46s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.11  % Problem  : MGT036+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.0.0.
% 0.03/0.12  % Command  : sos-script %s
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Thu Jun  9 09:48:19 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.12/0.34  ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.12/0.34  The process was started by sandbox2 on n022.cluster.edu,
% 0.12/0.34  Thu Jun  9 09:48:19 2022
% 0.12/0.34  The command was "./sos".  The process ID is 10123.
% 0.12/0.34  
% 0.12/0.34  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.12/0.34  set(auto).
% 0.12/0.34     dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.12/0.34     dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.12/0.35  clear(print_given).
% 0.12/0.35  
% 0.12/0.35  formula_list(usable).
% 0.12/0.35  
% 0.12/0.35  SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=0, symmetry=0, max_lits=5.
% 0.12/0.35  
% 0.12/0.35  This is a non-Horn set without equality.  The strategy
% 0.12/0.35  will be ordered hyper_res, ur_res, unit deletion, and
% 0.12/0.35  factoring, with satellites in sos and nuclei in usable.
% 0.12/0.35  
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: set(factor).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.12/0.35  
% 0.12/0.35  ------------> process usable:
% 0.12/0.35  
% 0.12/0.35  ------------> process sos:
% 0.12/0.35  
% 0.12/0.35  ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.19/0.38  
% 0.19/0.38  Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.19/0.38  
% 0.19/0.38  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.19/0.38  
% 0.19/0.38  
% 0.19/0.38  -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.19/0.38  
% 0.19/0.38  UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.19/0.38  SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.19/0.38  SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.19/0.38  number of clauses in intial UL: 10
% 0.19/0.38  number of clauses initially in problem: 14
% 0.19/0.38  percentage of clauses intially in UL: 71
% 0.19/0.38  percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 84
% 0.19/0.38  percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.19/0.38  absolute distinct symbol count: 13
% 0.19/0.38     distinct predicate count: 6
% 0.19/0.38     distinct function count: 2
% 0.19/0.38     distinct constant count: 5
% 0.19/0.38  
% 0.19/0.38  ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.19/0.38  
% 0.19/0.38  
% 0.19/0.38  
% 0.19/0.38  =========== start of search ===========
% 0.46/0.63  
% 0.46/0.63  -------- PROOF -------- 
% 0.46/0.63  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.46/0.63  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.46/0.63  
% 0.46/0.63  Model 2 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.46/0.63  
% 0.46/0.63  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.46/0.63  
% 0.46/0.63  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.46/0.63  
% 0.46/0.63  Model 3 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.46/0.63  
% 0.46/0.63  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.46/0.63  
% 0.46/0.63  -----> EMPTY CLAUSE at   0.26 sec ----> 24 [hyper,19,5,20] {-} $F.
% 0.46/0.63  
% 0.46/0.63  Length of proof is 5.  Level of proof is 3.
% 0.46/0.63  
% 0.46/0.63  ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 0.46/0.63  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.46/0.63  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.46/0.63  
% 0.46/0.63  1 [] {+} -environment(A)| -subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,A,B)|subpopulations(efficient_producers,first_movers,A,B).
% 0.46/0.63  2 [] {+} -environment(A)| -subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,A,B)|in_environment(A,B).
% 0.46/0.63  5 [] {+} -greater_or_equal(growth_rate(A,B),zero)| -greater(zero,growth_rate(A,B)).
% 0.46/0.63  8 [] {+} -environment(A)| -subpopulations(B,C,A,D)|greater_or_equal(growth_rate(C,D),zero)| -outcompetes(C,B,D).
% 0.46/0.63  9 [] {+} -environment(A)| -subpopulations(B,C,A,D)|greater(zero,growth_rate(B,D))| -outcompetes(C,B,D).
% 0.46/0.63  10 [] {+} -environment(A)| -in_environment(A,B)|greater(zero,growth_rate(C,B))| -greater(resilience(D),resilience(C))| -greater(zero,growth_rate(D,B)).
% 0.46/0.63  11 [] {-} greater(resilience(efficient_producers),resilience(first_movers)).
% 0.46/0.63  12 [] {+} environment($c2).
% 0.46/0.63  13 [] {+} subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,$c2,$c1).
% 0.46/0.63  14 [] {-} outcompetes(first_movers,efficient_producers,$c1).
% 0.46/0.63  16 [hyper,13,2,12] {+} in_environment($c2,$c1).
% 0.46/0.63  17 [hyper,13,1,12] {+} subpopulations(efficient_producers,first_movers,$c2,$c1).
% 0.46/0.63  18 [hyper,17,9,12,14] {-} greater(zero,growth_rate(efficient_producers,$c1)).
% 0.46/0.63  19 [hyper,17,8,12,14] {+} greater_or_equal(growth_rate(first_movers,$c1),zero).
% 0.46/0.63  20 [hyper,18,10,12,16,11] {-} greater(zero,growth_rate(first_movers,$c1)).
% 0.46/0.63  24 [hyper,19,5,20] {-} $F.
% 0.46/0.63  
% 0.46/0.63  % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.46/0.63  ------------ end of proof -------------
% 0.46/0.63  
% 0.46/0.63  
% 0.46/0.63  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 0.46/0.63  
% 0.46/0.63  
% 0.46/0.63  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 0.46/0.63  
% 0.46/0.63  ============ end of search ============
% 0.46/0.63  
% 0.46/0.63  ----------- soft-scott stats ----------
% 0.46/0.63  
% 0.46/0.63  true clauses given           5      (45.5%)
% 0.46/0.63  false clauses given          6
% 0.46/0.63  
% 0.46/0.63        FALSE     TRUE
% 0.46/0.63     5  2         0
% 0.46/0.63  tot:  2         0      (0.0% true)
% 0.46/0.63  
% 0.46/0.63  
% 0.46/0.63  Model 3 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.46/0.63  
% 0.46/0.63  That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 0.46/0.63  
% 0.46/0.63  Process 10123 finished Thu Jun  9 09:48:20 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------