TSTP Solution File: MGT034-2 by CSE---1.6
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CSE---1.6
% Problem : MGT034-2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %s %d
% Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 09:06:54 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 61.83s 61.90s
% Output : CNFRefutation 61.83s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.12 % Problem : MGT034-2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.04/0.13 % Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %s %d
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Mon Aug 28 06:11:05 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.48/0.62 start to proof:theBenchmark
% 61.83/61.89 %-------------------------------------------
% 61.83/61.89 % File :CSE---1.6
% 61.83/61.89 % Problem :theBenchmark
% 61.83/61.89 % Transform :cnf
% 61.83/61.89 % Format :tptp:raw
% 61.83/61.89 % Command :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 61.83/61.89
% 61.83/61.89 % Result :Theorem 61.220000s
% 61.83/61.89 % Output :CNFRefutation 61.220000s
% 61.83/61.89 %-------------------------------------------
% 61.83/61.89 %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 61.83/61.89 % File : MGT034-2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.4.0.
% 61.83/61.89 % Domain : Management (Organisation Theory)
% 61.83/61.89 % Problem : Selection favors FMs above EPs until critical point reached
% 61.83/61.89 % Version : [PM93] axioms.
% 61.83/61.89 % English : Selection favors first movers above efficient producers past
% 61.83/61.89 % the appearance of efficient producers until the critical
% 61.83/61.89 % point is reached.
% 61.83/61.89
% 61.83/61.89 % Refs : [PM93] Peli & Masuch (1993), The Logic of Propogation Strateg
% 61.83/61.89 % : [PM94] Peli & Masuch (1994), The Logic of Propogation Strateg
% 61.83/61.89 % : [PB+94] Peli et al. (1994), A Logical Approach to Formalizing
% 61.83/61.89 % Source : [TPTP]
% 61.83/61.89 % Names :
% 61.83/61.89
% 61.83/61.89 % Status : Unsatisfiable
% 61.83/61.89 % Rating : 0.10 v8.1.0, 0.00 v7.5.0, 0.05 v7.4.0, 0.06 v7.3.0, 0.08 v7.1.0, 0.00 v7.0.0, 0.07 v6.4.0, 0.00 v6.2.0, 0.10 v6.1.0, 0.21 v6.0.0, 0.20 v5.5.0, 0.30 v5.3.0, 0.22 v5.2.0, 0.12 v5.0.0, 0.07 v4.1.0, 0.00 v4.0.0, 0.09 v3.7.0, 0.00 v3.5.0, 0.09 v3.4.0, 0.17 v3.3.0, 0.21 v3.2.0, 0.15 v3.1.0, 0.27 v2.7.0, 0.25 v2.6.0, 0.22 v2.4.0
% 61.83/61.89 % Syntax : Number of clauses : 30 ( 5 unt; 3 nHn; 30 RR)
% 61.83/61.89 % Number of literals : 90 ( 4 equ; 60 neg)
% 61.83/61.89 % Maximal clause size : 7 ( 3 avg)
% 61.83/61.89 % Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% 61.83/61.89 % Number of predicates : 8 ( 7 usr; 0 prp; 1-4 aty)
% 61.83/61.89 % Number of functors : 13 ( 13 usr; 5 con; 0-2 aty)
% 61.83/61.89 % Number of variables : 49 ( 0 sgn)
% 61.83/61.89 % SPC : CNF_UNS_RFO_SEQ_NHN
% 61.83/61.89
% 61.83/61.89 % Comments : Created with tptp2X -f tptp -t clausify:otter MGT034+2.p
% 61.83/61.89 %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 61.83/61.89 cnf(mp1_high_growth_rates_33,axiom,
% 61.83/61.89 ( ~ environment(A)
% 61.83/61.89 | ~ subpopulations(B,C,A,D)
% 61.83/61.89 | ~ greater(growth_rate(C,D),growth_rate(B,D))
% 61.83/61.89 | selection_favors(C,B,D) ) ).
% 61.83/61.89
% 61.83/61.89 cnf(l3_34,axiom,
% 61.83/61.89 ( ~ environment(A)
% 61.83/61.89 | ~ subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,A,B)
% 61.83/61.89 | ~ decreases(difference(disbanding_rate(first_movers,B),disbanding_rate(efficient_producers,B))) ) ).
% 61.83/61.89
% 61.83/61.89 cnf(mp_critical_point_means_FM_and_EP_35,axiom,
% 61.83/61.89 ( ~ environment(A)
% 61.83/61.89 | ~ in_environment(A,critical_point(A))
% 61.83/61.89 | subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,A,critical_point(A)) ) ).
% 61.83/61.89
% 61.83/61.89 cnf(mp_FM_and_EP_when_EP_appears_36,axiom,
% 61.83/61.89 ( ~ environment(A)
% 61.83/61.89 | ~ in_environment(A,appear(efficient_producers,A))
% 61.83/61.89 | subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,A,appear(efficient_producers,A)) ) ).
% 61.83/61.89
% 61.83/61.89 cnf(mp_difference_between_founding_rates_37,axiom,
% 61.83/61.89 ( ~ decreases(difference(founding_rate(first_movers,A),founding_rate(efficient_producers,A)))
% 61.83/61.89 | decreases(difference(disbanding_rate(first_movers,A),disbanding_rate(efficient_producers,A)))
% 61.83/61.89 | decreases(difference(growth_rate(first_movers,A),growth_rate(efficient_producers,A))) ) ).
% 61.83/61.89
% 61.83/61.89 cnf(mp_decreasing_function_38,axiom,
% 61.83/61.89 ( ~ environment(A)
% 61.83/61.89 | ~ in_environment(A,B)
% 61.83/61.89 | ~ greater_or_equal(difference(growth_rate(first_movers,B),growth_rate(efficient_producers,B)),zero)
% 61.83/61.89 | ~ greater_or_equal(C,appear(efficient_producers,A))
% 61.83/61.89 | ~ greater(B,C)
% 61.83/61.89 | ~ decreases(difference(growth_rate(first_movers,C),growth_rate(efficient_producers,C)))
% 61.83/61.89 | greater(difference(growth_rate(first_movers,C),growth_rate(efficient_producers,C)),zero) ) ).
% 61.83/61.89
% 61.83/61.89 cnf(mp_negative_growth_rate_difference_39,axiom,
% 61.83/61.89 ( ~ greater(zero,difference(growth_rate(first_movers,A),growth_rate(efficient_producers,A)))
% 61.83/61.89 | greater(growth_rate(efficient_producers,A),growth_rate(first_movers,A)) ) ).
% 61.83/61.89
% 61.83/61.89 cnf(mp_negative_growth_rate_difference_40,axiom,
% 61.83/61.89 ( ~ greater(growth_rate(efficient_producers,A),growth_rate(first_movers,A))
% 61.83/61.89 | greater(zero,difference(growth_rate(first_movers,A),growth_rate(efficient_producers,A))) ) ).
% 61.83/61.89
% 61.83/61.89 cnf(mp_positive_growth_rate_difference_41,axiom,
% 61.83/61.89 ( ~ greater(difference(growth_rate(first_movers,A),growth_rate(efficient_producers,A)),zero)
% 61.83/61.89 | greater(growth_rate(first_movers,A),growth_rate(efficient_producers,A)) ) ).
% 61.83/61.89
% 61.83/61.89 cnf(mp_positive_growth_rate_difference_42,axiom,
% 61.83/61.89 ( ~ greater(growth_rate(first_movers,A),growth_rate(efficient_producers,A))
% 61.83/61.89 | greater(difference(growth_rate(first_movers,A),growth_rate(efficient_producers,A)),zero) ) ).
% 61.83/61.89
% 61.83/61.89 cnf(mp_durations_are_time_intervals_43,axiom,
% 61.83/61.89 ( ~ environment(A)
% 61.83/61.89 | ~ in_environment(A,B)
% 61.83/61.89 | ~ in_environment(A,C)
% 61.83/61.89 | ~ greater_or_equal(C,D)
% 61.83/61.89 | ~ greater_or_equal(D,B)
% 61.83/61.89 | in_environment(A,D) ) ).
% 61.83/61.89
% 61.83/61.89 cnf(mp_opening_time_in_duration_44,axiom,
% 61.83/61.89 ( ~ environment(A)
% 61.83/61.89 | in_environment(A,start_time(A)) ) ).
% 61.83/61.89
% 61.83/61.89 cnf(mp_no_FM_before_opening_45,axiom,
% 61.83/61.89 ( ~ environment(A)
% 61.83/61.89 | greater_or_equal(appear(first_movers,A),start_time(A)) ) ).
% 61.83/61.89
% 61.83/61.89 cnf(mp_critical_time_points_46,axiom,
% 61.83/61.89 ( ~ environment(A)
% 61.83/61.89 | ~ in_environment(A,critical_point(A))
% 61.83/61.89 | ~ greater_or_equal(B,appear(efficient_producers,A))
% 61.83/61.89 | ~ greater(critical_point(A),B)
% 61.83/61.89 | in_environment(A,B) ) ).
% 61.83/61.89
% 61.83/61.89 cnf(mp_contains_FM_and_EP_47,axiom,
% 61.83/61.89 ( ~ environment(A)
% 61.83/61.89 | ~ in_environment(A,B)
% 61.83/61.89 | ~ greater(cardinality_at_time(first_movers,B),zero)
% 61.83/61.89 | ~ greater(cardinality_at_time(efficient_producers,B),zero)
% 61.83/61.89 | subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,A,B) ) ).
% 61.83/61.89
% 61.83/61.89 cnf(mp_symmetry_of_subpopulations_48,axiom,
% 61.83/61.89 ( ~ environment(A)
% 61.83/61.89 | ~ subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,A,B)
% 61.83/61.89 | subpopulations(efficient_producers,first_movers,A,B) ) ).
% 61.83/61.89
% 61.83/61.89 cnf(mp_FM_and_EP_members_EP_appeared_49,axiom,
% 61.83/61.89 ( ~ environment(A)
% 61.83/61.89 | ~ subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,A,B)
% 61.83/61.89 | greater_or_equal(B,appear(efficient_producers,A)) ) ).
% 61.83/61.89
% 61.83/61.89 cnf(mp_greater_or_equal_50,axiom,
% 61.83/61.89 ( ~ greater_or_equal(A,B)
% 61.83/61.89 | greater(A,B)
% 61.83/61.89 | A = B ) ).
% 61.83/61.89
% 61.83/61.89 cnf(mp_greater_or_equal_51,axiom,
% 61.83/61.89 ( ~ greater(A,B)
% 61.83/61.89 | greater_or_equal(A,B) ) ).
% 61.83/61.89
% 61.83/61.89 cnf(mp_greater_or_equal_52,axiom,
% 61.83/61.89 ( A != B
% 61.83/61.89 | greater_or_equal(A,B) ) ).
% 61.83/61.89
% 61.83/61.89 cnf(mp_relationship_of_growth_rates_53,axiom,
% 61.83/61.89 ( ~ environment(A)
% 61.83/61.89 | ~ subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,A,B)
% 61.83/61.89 | greater(zero,difference(growth_rate(first_movers,B),growth_rate(efficient_producers,B)))
% 61.83/61.89 | greater_or_equal(difference(growth_rate(first_movers,B),growth_rate(efficient_producers,B)),zero) ) ).
% 61.83/61.89
% 61.83/61.89 cnf(d1_54,hypothesis,
% 61.83/61.89 ( ~ environment(A)
% 61.83/61.89 | B != critical_point(A)
% 61.83/61.89 | ~ greater(growth_rate(efficient_producers,B),growth_rate(first_movers,B)) ) ).
% 61.83/61.89
% 61.83/61.89 cnf(d1_55,hypothesis,
% 61.83/61.89 ( ~ environment(A)
% 61.83/61.89 | B != critical_point(A)
% 61.83/61.89 | ~ subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,A,C)
% 61.83/61.89 | ~ greater(C,B)
% 61.83/61.89 | greater(growth_rate(efficient_producers,C),growth_rate(first_movers,C)) ) ).
% 61.83/61.89
% 61.83/61.89 cnf(a10_56,hypothesis,
% 61.83/61.89 ( ~ environment(A)
% 61.83/61.89 | ~ subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,A,B)
% 61.83/61.89 | ~ subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,A,C)
% 61.83/61.89 | ~ greater_or_equal(D,B)
% 61.83/61.89 | ~ greater_or_equal(C,D)
% 61.83/61.89 | subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,A,D) ) ).
% 61.83/61.89
% 61.83/61.89 cnf(a12_57,hypothesis,
% 61.83/61.89 ( ~ environment(A)
% 61.83/61.89 | ~ subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,A,B)
% 61.83/61.89 | decreases(difference(founding_rate(first_movers,B),founding_rate(efficient_producers,B))) ) ).
% 61.83/61.90
% 61.83/61.90 cnf(prove_t3_58,negated_conjecture,
% 61.83/61.90 environment(sk1) ).
% 61.83/61.90
% 61.83/61.90 cnf(prove_t3_59,negated_conjecture,
% 61.83/61.90 in_environment(sk1,critical_point(sk1)) ).
% 61.83/61.90
% 61.83/61.90 cnf(prove_t3_60,negated_conjecture,
% 61.83/61.90 greater_or_equal(sk2,appear(efficient_producers,sk1)) ).
% 61.83/61.90
% 61.83/61.90 cnf(prove_t3_61,negated_conjecture,
% 61.83/61.90 greater(critical_point(sk1),sk2) ).
% 61.83/61.90
% 61.83/61.90 cnf(prove_t3_62,negated_conjecture,
% 61.83/61.90 ~ selection_favors(first_movers,efficient_producers,sk2) ).
% 61.83/61.90
% 61.83/61.90 %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 61.83/61.90 %-------------------------------------------
% 61.83/61.90 % Proof found
% 61.83/61.90 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 61.83/61.90 % SZS output start Proof
% 61.83/61.90 %ClaNum:62(EqnAxiom:32)
% 61.83/61.90 %VarNum:156(SingletonVarNum:49)
% 61.83/61.90 %MaxLitNum:7
% 61.83/61.90 %MaxfuncDepth:2
% 61.83/61.90 %SharedTerms:12
% 61.83/61.90 %goalClause: 33 34 35 36 37
% 61.83/61.90 %singleGoalClaCount:5
% 61.83/61.90 [33]P1(a1)
% 61.83/61.90 [37]~P6(a8,a5,a11)
% 61.83/61.90 [34]P3(a1,f2(a1))
% 61.83/61.90 [35]P4(f2(a1),a11)
% 61.83/61.90 [36]P5(a11,f3(a5,a1))
% 61.83/61.90 [39]~P1(x391)+P3(x391,f12(x391))
% 61.83/61.90 [42]~P1(x421)+P5(f3(a8,x421),f12(x421))
% 61.83/61.90 [46]~P4(f9(a5,x461),f9(a8,x461))+P4(a13,f6(f9(a8,x461),f9(a5,x461)))
% 61.83/61.90 [47]~P4(f9(a8,x471),f9(a5,x471))+P4(f6(f9(a8,x471),f9(a5,x471)),a13)
% 61.83/61.90 [48]P4(f9(a5,x481),f9(a8,x481))+~P4(a13,f6(f9(a8,x481),f9(a5,x481)))
% 61.83/61.90 [49]P4(f9(a8,x491),f9(a5,x491))+~P4(f6(f9(a8,x491),f9(a5,x491)),a13)
% 61.83/61.90 [38]~E(x381,x382)+P5(x381,x382)
% 61.83/61.90 [40]~P4(x401,x402)+P5(x401,x402)
% 61.83/61.90 [50]~P1(x501)+~P3(x501,f2(x501))+P7(a8,a5,x501,f2(x501))
% 61.83/61.90 [51]~P1(x511)+~P3(x511,f3(a5,x511))+P7(a8,a5,x511,f3(a5,x511))
% 61.83/61.90 [54]P2(f6(f7(a8,x541),f7(a5,x541)))+~P2(f6(f10(a8,x541),f10(a5,x541)))+P2(f6(f9(a8,x541),f9(a5,x541)))
% 61.83/61.90 [41]P4(x411,x412)+~P5(x411,x412)+E(x411,x412)
% 61.83/61.90 [59]~P1(x591)+~P7(a8,a5,x591,x592)+P7(a5,a8,x591,x592)
% 61.83/61.90 [43]~P1(x432)+~E(x431,f2(x432))+~P4(f9(a5,x431),f9(a8,x431))
% 61.83/61.90 [53]~P1(x532)+~P7(a8,a5,x532,x531)+P5(x531,f3(a5,x532))
% 61.83/61.90 [56]~P1(x562)+~P7(a8,a5,x562,x561)+P2(f6(f10(a8,x561),f10(a5,x561)))
% 61.83/61.90 [58]~P1(x581)+~P7(a8,a5,x581,x582)+~P2(f6(f7(a8,x582),f7(a5,x582)))
% 61.83/61.90 [61]~P1(x612)+~P7(a8,a5,x612,x611)+P5(f6(f9(a8,x611),f9(a5,x611)),a13)+P4(a13,f6(f9(a8,x611),f9(a5,x611)))
% 61.83/61.90 [57]~P7(x572,x571,x574,x573)+P6(x571,x572,x573)+~P1(x574)+~P4(f9(x571,x573),f9(x572,x573))
% 61.83/61.90 [45]~P1(x451)+P3(x451,x452)+~P3(x451,f2(x451))+~P4(f2(x451),x452)+~P5(x452,f3(a5,x451))
% 61.83/61.90 [52]~P1(x521)+~P3(x521,x522)+P7(a8,a5,x521,x522)+~P4(f4(a8,x522),a13)+~P4(f4(a5,x522),a13)
% 61.83/61.90 [55]~P1(x553)+~P4(x551,x552)+~P7(a8,a5,x553,x551)+~E(x552,f2(x553))+P4(f9(a5,x551),f9(a8,x551))
% 61.83/61.90 [44]~P1(x441)+~P5(x442,x444)+~P5(x443,x442)+P3(x441,x442)+~P3(x441,x443)+~P3(x441,x444)
% 61.83/61.90 [62]~P1(x621)+~P5(x622,x623)+~P5(x624,x622)+~P7(a8,a5,x621,x624)+~P7(a8,a5,x621,x623)+P7(a8,a5,x621,x622)
% 61.83/61.90 [60]~P3(x602,x603)+~P4(x603,x601)+~P1(x602)+~P5(x601,f3(a5,x602))+~P5(f6(f9(a8,x603),f9(a5,x603)),a13)+P4(f6(f9(a8,x601),f9(a5,x601)),a13)+~P2(f6(f9(a8,x601),f9(a5,x601)))
% 61.83/61.90 %EqnAxiom
% 61.83/61.90 [1]E(x11,x11)
% 61.83/61.90 [2]E(x22,x21)+~E(x21,x22)
% 61.83/61.90 [3]E(x31,x33)+~E(x31,x32)+~E(x32,x33)
% 61.83/61.90 [4]~E(x41,x42)+E(f2(x41),f2(x42))
% 61.83/61.90 [5]~E(x51,x52)+E(f6(x51,x53),f6(x52,x53))
% 61.83/61.90 [6]~E(x61,x62)+E(f6(x63,x61),f6(x63,x62))
% 61.83/61.90 [7]~E(x71,x72)+E(f3(x71,x73),f3(x72,x73))
% 61.83/61.90 [8]~E(x81,x82)+E(f3(x83,x81),f3(x83,x82))
% 61.83/61.90 [9]~E(x91,x92)+E(f12(x91),f12(x92))
% 61.83/61.90 [10]~E(x101,x102)+E(f9(x101,x103),f9(x102,x103))
% 61.83/61.90 [11]~E(x111,x112)+E(f9(x113,x111),f9(x113,x112))
% 61.83/61.90 [12]~E(x121,x122)+E(f7(x121,x123),f7(x122,x123))
% 61.83/61.90 [13]~E(x131,x132)+E(f7(x133,x131),f7(x133,x132))
% 61.83/61.90 [14]~E(x141,x142)+E(f10(x141,x143),f10(x142,x143))
% 61.83/61.90 [15]~E(x151,x152)+E(f10(x153,x151),f10(x153,x152))
% 61.83/61.90 [16]~E(x161,x162)+E(f4(x161,x163),f4(x162,x163))
% 61.83/61.90 [17]~E(x171,x172)+E(f4(x173,x171),f4(x173,x172))
% 61.83/61.90 [18]~P1(x181)+P1(x182)+~E(x181,x182)
% 61.83/61.90 [19]P3(x192,x193)+~E(x191,x192)+~P3(x191,x193)
% 61.83/61.90 [20]P3(x203,x202)+~E(x201,x202)+~P3(x203,x201)
% 61.83/61.90 [21]P4(x212,x213)+~E(x211,x212)+~P4(x211,x213)
% 61.83/61.90 [22]P4(x223,x222)+~E(x221,x222)+~P4(x223,x221)
% 61.83/61.90 [23]P5(x232,x233)+~E(x231,x232)+~P5(x231,x233)
% 61.83/61.90 [24]P5(x243,x242)+~E(x241,x242)+~P5(x243,x241)
% 61.83/61.90 [25]P6(x252,x253,x254)+~E(x251,x252)+~P6(x251,x253,x254)
% 61.83/61.90 [26]P6(x263,x262,x264)+~E(x261,x262)+~P6(x263,x261,x264)
% 61.83/61.90 [27]P6(x273,x274,x272)+~E(x271,x272)+~P6(x273,x274,x271)
% 61.83/61.90 [28]P7(x282,x283,x284,x285)+~E(x281,x282)+~P7(x281,x283,x284,x285)
% 61.83/61.90 [29]P7(x293,x292,x294,x295)+~E(x291,x292)+~P7(x293,x291,x294,x295)
% 61.83/61.90 [30]P7(x303,x304,x302,x305)+~E(x301,x302)+~P7(x303,x304,x301,x305)
% 61.83/61.90 [31]P7(x313,x314,x315,x312)+~E(x311,x312)+~P7(x313,x314,x315,x311)
% 61.83/61.90 [32]~P2(x321)+P2(x322)+~E(x321,x322)
% 61.83/61.90
% 61.83/61.90 %-------------------------------------------
% 61.83/61.90 cnf(63,plain,
% 61.83/61.90 (P3(a1,a11)),
% 61.83/61.90 inference(scs_inference,[],[33,34,35,36,45])).
% 61.83/61.90 cnf(64,plain,
% 61.83/61.90 (P5(f2(a1),a11)),
% 61.83/61.90 inference(scs_inference,[],[33,34,35,36,45,40])).
% 61.83/61.90 cnf(70,plain,
% 61.83/61.90 (P7(a8,a5,a1,f2(a1))),
% 61.83/61.90 inference(scs_inference,[],[33,37,34,35,36,45,40,39,42,27,50])).
% 61.83/61.90 cnf(74,plain,
% 61.83/61.90 (P5(f2(a1),f3(a5,a1))),
% 61.83/61.90 inference(scs_inference,[],[33,37,34,35,36,45,40,39,42,27,50,59,53])).
% 61.83/61.90 cnf(76,plain,
% 61.83/61.90 (~E(x761,f2(a1))+~P4(f9(a5,x761),f9(a8,x761))),
% 61.83/61.90 inference(scs_inference,[],[33,37,34,35,36,45,40,39,42,27,50,59,53,43])).
% 61.83/61.90 cnf(78,plain,
% 61.83/61.90 (~P3(a1,f3(a5,a1))+P7(a8,a5,a1,f3(a5,a1))),
% 61.83/61.90 inference(scs_inference,[],[33,37,34,35,36,45,40,39,42,27,50,59,53,43,51])).
% 61.83/61.90 cnf(85,plain,
% 61.83/61.90 (~P4(f9(a5,f2(a1)),f9(a8,f2(a1)))),
% 61.83/61.90 inference(equality_inference,[],[76])).
% 61.83/61.90 cnf(96,plain,
% 61.83/61.90 (~P7(a5,a8,a1,a11)+~P4(f9(a8,a11),f9(a5,a11))),
% 61.83/61.90 inference(scs_inference,[],[33,37,35,36,85,70,63,55,26,2,41,62,60,57])).
% 61.83/61.90 cnf(102,plain,
% 61.83/61.90 (~P7(a8,a5,a1,f3(a5,a1))+P7(a8,a5,a1,a11)),
% 61.83/61.90 inference(scs_inference,[],[63,37,36,64,70,33,25,52,62])).
% 61.83/61.90 cnf(114,plain,
% 61.83/61.90 (~E(a1,x1141)+P1(x1141)),
% 61.83/61.90 inference(scs_inference,[],[33,18])).
% 61.83/61.90 cnf(269,plain,
% 61.83/61.90 (~P4(f9(a8,a11),f9(a5,a11))+~P7(a8,a5,a1,a11)),
% 61.83/61.90 inference(scs_inference,[],[33,96,59])).
% 61.83/61.90 cnf(331,plain,
% 61.83/61.90 (~E(x3311,x3312)+~P2(x3312)+P2(x3311)),
% 61.83/61.90 inference(scs_inference,[],[32,2])).
% 61.83/61.90 cnf(387,plain,
% 61.83/61.90 (~P2(f6(f7(a8,f2(a1)),f7(a5,f2(a1))))),
% 61.83/61.90 inference(scs_inference,[],[70,114,58])).
% 61.83/61.90 cnf(392,plain,
% 61.83/61.90 (~P5(f6(f9(a8,f2(a1)),f9(a5,f2(a1))),a13)+P4(f6(f9(a8,a11),f9(a5,a11)),a13)+~P2(f6(f9(a8,a11),f9(a5,a11)))),
% 61.83/61.90 inference(scs_inference,[],[35,36,34,114,60])).
% 61.83/61.90 cnf(483,plain,
% 61.83/61.90 (P5(x4831,x4832)+~E(x4832,x4831)),
% 61.83/61.90 inference(scs_inference,[],[38,2])).
% 61.83/61.90 cnf(484,plain,
% 61.83/61.90 (P5(x4841,x4841)),
% 61.83/61.90 inference(equality_inference,[],[483])).
% 61.83/61.90 cnf(493,plain,
% 61.83/61.90 (P3(a1,f3(a5,a1))),
% 61.83/61.90 inference(scs_inference,[],[484,74,34,33,45,41,20])).
% 61.83/61.90 cnf(494,plain,
% 61.83/61.90 (P7(a8,a5,a1,f3(a5,a1))),
% 61.83/61.90 inference(scs_inference,[],[493,78])).
% 61.83/61.90 cnf(497,plain,
% 61.83/61.90 (P7(a8,a5,a1,a11)),
% 61.83/61.90 inference(scs_inference,[],[494,102])).
% 61.83/61.90 cnf(498,plain,
% 61.83/61.90 (P7(a5,a8,a1,f3(a5,a1))),
% 61.83/61.90 inference(scs_inference,[],[494,33,59])).
% 61.83/61.90 cnf(504,plain,
% 61.83/61.90 (~P4(f9(a8,a11),f9(a5,a11))),
% 61.83/61.90 inference(scs_inference,[],[497,269])).
% 61.83/61.90 cnf(506,plain,
% 61.83/61.90 (~P4(f6(f9(a8,a11),f9(a5,a11)),a13)),
% 61.83/61.90 inference(scs_inference,[],[504,49])).
% 61.83/61.90 cnf(508,plain,
% 61.83/61.90 (P2(f6(f10(a8,a11),f10(a5,a11)))),
% 61.83/61.90 inference(scs_inference,[],[497,504,33,49,56])).
% 61.83/61.90 cnf(510,plain,
% 61.83/61.90 (P7(a5,a8,a1,a11)),
% 61.83/61.90 inference(scs_inference,[],[497,504,33,49,56,59])).
% 61.83/61.90 cnf(524,plain,
% 61.83/61.90 (~P5(f6(f9(a8,f2(a1)),f9(a5,f2(a1))),a13)+~P2(f6(f9(a8,a11),f9(a5,a11)))),
% 61.83/61.90 inference(scs_inference,[],[506,392])).
% 61.83/61.90 cnf(528,plain,
% 61.83/61.90 (P4(a13,f6(f9(a8,a11),f9(a5,a11)))+P5(f6(f9(a8,a11),f9(a5,a11)),a13)),
% 61.83/61.90 inference(scs_inference,[],[498,497,33,57,61])).
% 61.83/61.90 cnf(530,plain,
% 61.83/61.90 (P2(f6(f9(a8,a11),f9(a5,a11)))+P2(f6(f7(a8,a11),f7(a5,a11)))),
% 61.83/61.90 inference(scs_inference,[],[508,54])).
% 61.83/61.90 cnf(534,plain,
% 61.83/61.90 (E(f6(f9(a8,a11),f9(a5,a11)),a13)+~P5(f6(f9(a8,a11),f9(a5,a11)),a13)),
% 61.83/61.90 inference(scs_inference,[],[506,41])).
% 61.83/61.90 cnf(572,plain,
% 61.83/61.90 (P2(f6(f9(a8,a11),f9(a5,a11)))),
% 61.83/61.90 inference(scs_inference,[],[510,508,497,33,58,32,331,31,530])).
% 61.83/61.90 cnf(579,plain,
% 61.83/61.90 (~P5(f6(f9(a8,f2(a1)),f9(a5,f2(a1))),a13)),
% 61.83/61.90 inference(scs_inference,[],[572,524])).
% 61.83/61.90 cnf(1079,plain,
% 61.83/61.90 (P5(a13,f6(f9(a8,a11),f9(a5,a11)))+~P5(f6(f9(a8,a11),f9(a5,a11)),a13)),
% 61.83/61.90 inference(scs_inference,[],[483,534])).
% 61.83/61.90 cnf(1080,plain,
% 61.83/61.90 (P4(a13,f6(f9(a8,a11),f9(a5,a11)))+P5(a13,f6(f9(a8,a11),f9(a5,a11)))),
% 61.83/61.90 inference(scs_inference,[],[1079,528])).
% 61.83/61.90 cnf(1081,plain,
% 61.83/61.90 (P5(a13,f6(f9(a8,a11),f9(a5,a11)))),
% 61.83/61.90 inference(scs_inference,[],[1080,40])).
% 61.83/61.91 cnf(1191,plain,
% 61.83/61.91 (E(a13,x11911)+P4(a13,x11911)+~E(f6(f9(a8,a11),f9(a5,a11)),x11911)),
% 61.83/61.91 inference(scs_inference,[],[1081,24,41])).
% 61.83/61.91 cnf(1199,plain,
% 61.83/61.91 (~E(a13,f6(f9(a8,f2(a1)),f9(a5,f2(a1))))),
% 61.83/61.91 inference(scs_inference,[],[35,572,506,36,33,34,483,60])).
% 61.83/61.91 cnf(1962,plain,
% 61.83/61.91 ($false),
% 61.83/61.91 inference(scs_inference,[],[33,70,85,508,579,387,1199,48,331,32,1191,61]),
% 61.83/61.91 ['proof']).
% 61.83/61.91 % SZS output end Proof
% 61.83/61.91 % Total time :61.220000s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------