TSTP Solution File: MGT032-2 by CSE---1.6
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CSE---1.6
% Problem : MGT032-2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %s %d
% Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 09:06:53 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.19s 0.63s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.19s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12 % Problem : MGT032-2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.00/0.12 % Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %s %d
% 0.13/0.33 % Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.33 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.33 % DateTime : Mon Aug 28 06:35:24 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.58 start to proof:theBenchmark
% 0.19/0.63 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.63 % File :CSE---1.6
% 0.19/0.63 % Problem :theBenchmark
% 0.19/0.63 % Transform :cnf
% 0.19/0.63 % Format :tptp:raw
% 0.19/0.63 % Command :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.19/0.63
% 0.19/0.63 % Result :Theorem 0.000000s
% 0.19/0.63 % Output :CNFRefutation 0.000000s
% 0.19/0.63 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.63 %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.63 % File : MGT032-2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.19/0.63 % Domain : Management (Organisation Theory)
% 0.19/0.63 % Problem : Selection favours EPs above FMs
% 0.19/0.63 % Version : [PM93] axioms.
% 0.19/0.63 % English : In stable environments, selection favors efficient producers
% 0.19/0.63 % above first movers past a certain point in time.
% 0.19/0.63
% 0.19/0.63 % Refs : [PM93] Peli & Masuch (1993), The Logic of Propogation Strateg
% 0.19/0.63 % : [PM94] Peli & Masuch (1994), The Logic of Propogation Strateg
% 0.19/0.63 % : [PB+94] Peli et al. (1994), A Logical Approach to Formalizing
% 0.19/0.63 % : [Kam95] Kamps (1995), Email to G. Sutcliffe
% 0.19/0.63 % Source : [TPTP]
% 0.19/0.63 % Names :
% 0.19/0.63
% 0.19/0.63 % Status : Unsatisfiable
% 0.19/0.63 % Rating : 0.00 v5.4.0, 0.06 v5.3.0, 0.10 v5.2.0, 0.00 v2.4.0
% 0.19/0.63 % Syntax : Number of clauses : 8 ( 2 unt; 0 nHn; 8 RR)
% 0.19/0.63 % Number of literals : 20 ( 0 equ; 13 neg)
% 0.19/0.63 % Maximal clause size : 5 ( 2 avg)
% 0.19/0.63 % Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% 0.19/0.63 % Number of predicates : 7 ( 7 usr; 0 prp; 1-4 aty)
% 0.19/0.63 % Number of functors : 6 ( 6 usr; 3 con; 0-2 aty)
% 0.19/0.63 % Number of variables : 10 ( 0 sgn)
% 0.19/0.63 % SPC : CNF_UNS_RFO_NEQ_HRN
% 0.19/0.63
% 0.19/0.63 % Comments : Created with tptp2X -f tptp -t clausify:otter MGT032+2.p
% 0.19/0.63 %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.63 cnf(mp1_high_growth_rates_1,axiom,
% 0.19/0.63 ( ~ environment(A)
% 0.19/0.63 | ~ subpopulations(B,C,A,D)
% 0.19/0.63 | ~ greater(growth_rate(C,D),growth_rate(B,D))
% 0.19/0.63 | selection_favors(C,B,D) ) ).
% 0.19/0.63
% 0.19/0.63 cnf(l1_2,hypothesis,
% 0.19/0.63 ( ~ environment(A)
% 0.19/0.63 | ~ stable(A)
% 0.19/0.63 | in_environment(A,sk1(A)) ) ).
% 0.19/0.63
% 0.19/0.63 cnf(l1_3,hypothesis,
% 0.19/0.63 ( ~ environment(A)
% 0.19/0.63 | ~ stable(A)
% 0.19/0.63 | ~ subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,A,B)
% 0.19/0.63 | ~ greater_or_equal(B,sk1(A))
% 0.19/0.63 | greater(growth_rate(efficient_producers,B),growth_rate(first_movers,B)) ) ).
% 0.19/0.63
% 0.19/0.63 cnf(prove_t1_4,negated_conjecture,
% 0.19/0.63 environment(sk2) ).
% 0.19/0.63
% 0.19/0.63 cnf(prove_t1_5,negated_conjecture,
% 0.19/0.63 stable(sk2) ).
% 0.19/0.63
% 0.19/0.63 cnf(prove_t1_6,negated_conjecture,
% 0.19/0.63 ( ~ in_environment(sk2,A)
% 0.19/0.63 | subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,sk2,sk3(A)) ) ).
% 0.19/0.63
% 0.19/0.63 cnf(prove_t1_7,negated_conjecture,
% 0.19/0.63 ( ~ in_environment(sk2,A)
% 0.19/0.63 | greater_or_equal(sk3(A),A) ) ).
% 0.19/0.63
% 0.19/0.63 cnf(prove_t1_8,negated_conjecture,
% 0.19/0.63 ( ~ in_environment(sk2,A)
% 0.19/0.63 | ~ selection_favors(efficient_producers,first_movers,sk3(A)) ) ).
% 0.19/0.63
% 0.19/0.63 %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.63 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.63 % Proof found
% 0.19/0.63 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.19/0.63 % SZS output start Proof
% 0.19/0.63 %ClaNum:8(EqnAxiom:0)
% 0.19/0.64 %VarNum:31(SingletonVarNum:10)
% 0.19/0.64 %MaxLitNum:5
% 0.19/0.64 %MaxfuncDepth:1
% 0.19/0.64 %SharedTerms:5
% 0.19/0.64 %goalClause: 1 2 4 5 6
% 0.19/0.64 %singleGoalClaCount:2
% 0.19/0.64 [1]P1(a1)
% 0.19/0.64 [2]P2(a1)
% 0.19/0.64 [4]~P3(a1,x41)+P4(f6(x41),x41)
% 0.19/0.64 [5]~P3(a1,x51)+~P6(a3,a4,f6(x51))
% 0.19/0.64 [6]~P3(a1,x61)+P7(a4,a3,a1,f6(x61))
% 0.19/0.64 [3]~P1(x31)+~P2(x31)+P3(x31,f2(x31))
% 0.19/0.64 [8]~P7(x82,x81,x84,x83)+P6(x81,x82,x83)+~P1(x84)+~P5(f5(x81,x83),f5(x82,x83))
% 0.19/0.64 [7]~P2(x72)+~P1(x72)+~P4(x71,f2(x72))+~P7(a4,a3,x72,x71)+P5(f5(a3,x71),f5(a4,x71))
% 0.19/0.64 %EqnAxiom
% 0.19/0.64
% 0.19/0.64 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.64 cnf(9,plain,
% 0.19/0.64 (P3(a1,f2(a1))),
% 0.19/0.64 inference(scs_inference,[],[1,2,3])).
% 0.19/0.64 cnf(10,plain,
% 0.19/0.64 (P6(x101,x102,x103)+~P7(x102,x101,a1,x103)+~P5(f5(x101,x103),f5(x102,x103))),
% 0.19/0.64 inference(scs_inference,[],[1,2,3,8])).
% 0.19/0.64 cnf(11,plain,
% 0.19/0.64 (P7(a4,a3,a1,f6(f2(a1)))),
% 0.19/0.64 inference(scs_inference,[],[9,6])).
% 0.19/0.64 cnf(13,plain,
% 0.19/0.64 (~P6(a3,a4,f6(f2(a1)))),
% 0.19/0.64 inference(scs_inference,[],[9,6,5])).
% 0.19/0.64 cnf(15,plain,
% 0.19/0.64 (P4(f6(f2(a1)),f2(a1))),
% 0.19/0.64 inference(scs_inference,[],[9,6,5,4])).
% 0.19/0.64 cnf(17,plain,
% 0.19/0.64 ($false),
% 0.19/0.64 inference(scs_inference,[],[13,11,15,1,2,10,7]),
% 0.19/0.64 ['proof']).
% 0.19/0.64 % SZS output end Proof
% 0.19/0.64 % Total time :0.000000s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------