TSTP Solution File: MGT032-2 by Beagle---0.9.51

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Beagle---0.9.51
% Problem  : MGT032-2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s

% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Aug 22 10:49:37 EDT 2023

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 2.75s 1.70s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 2.95s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   10
%            Number of leaves      :   21
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   42 (  10 unt;  13 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   77 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    7 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  101 (  53   ~;  48   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   10 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :   19 (  10   >;   9   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    8 (   7 usr;   1 prp; 0-4 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   25 (;  25   !;   0   ?;   0   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%$ subpopulations > selection_favors > in_environment > greater_or_equal > greater > stable > environment > growth_rate > #nlpp > sk3 > sk1 > sk2 > first_movers > efficient_producers

%Foreground sorts:

%Background operators:

%Foreground operators:
tff(subpopulations,type,
    subpopulations: ( $i * $i * $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(greater,type,
    greater: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(sk1,type,
    sk1: $i > $i ).

tff(in_environment,type,
    in_environment: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(sk2,type,
    sk2: $i ).

tff(efficient_producers,type,
    efficient_producers: $i ).

tff(growth_rate,type,
    growth_rate: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(environment,type,
    environment: $i > $o ).

tff(first_movers,type,
    first_movers: $i ).

tff(greater_or_equal,type,
    greater_or_equal: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(sk3,type,
    sk3: $i > $i ).

tff(selection_favors,type,
    selection_favors: ( $i * $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(stable,type,
    stable: $i > $o ).

tff(f_59,axiom,
    environment(sk2),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_60,axiom,
    stable(sk2),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_44,axiom,
    ! [A] :
      ( ~ environment(A)
      | ~ stable(A)
      | in_environment(A,sk1(A)) ),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_65,axiom,
    ! [A] :
      ( ~ in_environment(sk2,A)
      | subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,sk2,sk3(A)) ),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_70,axiom,
    ! [A] :
      ( ~ in_environment(sk2,A)
      | greater_or_equal(sk3(A),A) ),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_58,axiom,
    ! [A,B] :
      ( ~ environment(A)
      | ~ stable(A)
      | ~ subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,A,B)
      | ~ greater_or_equal(B,sk1(A))
      | greater(growth_rate(efficient_producers,B),growth_rate(first_movers,B)) ),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_36,axiom,
    ! [A,B,C,D] :
      ( ~ environment(A)
      | ~ subpopulations(B,C,A,D)
      | ~ greater(growth_rate(C,D),growth_rate(B,D))
      | selection_favors(C,B,D) ),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_76,axiom,
    ! [A] :
      ( ~ in_environment(sk2,A)
      | ~ selection_favors(efficient_producers,first_movers,sk3(A)) ),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(c_8,plain,
    environment(sk2),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_59]) ).

tff(c_10,plain,
    stable(sk2),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_60]) ).

tff(c_4,plain,
    ! [A_5] :
      ( in_environment(A_5,sk1(A_5))
      | ~ stable(A_5)
      | ~ environment(A_5) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_44]) ).

tff(c_12,plain,
    ! [A_8] :
      ( subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,sk2,sk3(A_8))
      | ~ in_environment(sk2,A_8) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_65]) ).

tff(c_14,plain,
    ! [A_9] :
      ( greater_or_equal(sk3(A_9),A_9)
      | ~ in_environment(sk2,A_9) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_70]) ).

tff(c_22,plain,
    ! [B_19,A_20] :
      ( greater(growth_rate(efficient_producers,B_19),growth_rate(first_movers,B_19))
      | ~ greater_or_equal(B_19,sk1(A_20))
      | ~ subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,A_20,B_19)
      | ~ stable(A_20)
      | ~ environment(A_20) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_58]) ).

tff(c_27,plain,
    ! [A_21] :
      ( greater(growth_rate(efficient_producers,sk3(sk1(A_21))),growth_rate(first_movers,sk3(sk1(A_21))))
      | ~ subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,A_21,sk3(sk1(A_21)))
      | ~ stable(A_21)
      | ~ environment(A_21)
      | ~ in_environment(sk2,sk1(A_21)) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_14,c_22]) ).

tff(c_2,plain,
    ! [C_3,B_2,D_4,A_1] :
      ( selection_favors(C_3,B_2,D_4)
      | ~ greater(growth_rate(C_3,D_4),growth_rate(B_2,D_4))
      | ~ subpopulations(B_2,C_3,A_1,D_4)
      | ~ environment(A_1) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_36]) ).

tff(c_31,plain,
    ! [A_22,A_23] :
      ( selection_favors(efficient_producers,first_movers,sk3(sk1(A_22)))
      | ~ subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,A_23,sk3(sk1(A_22)))
      | ~ environment(A_23)
      | ~ subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,A_22,sk3(sk1(A_22)))
      | ~ stable(A_22)
      | ~ environment(A_22)
      | ~ in_environment(sk2,sk1(A_22)) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_27,c_2]) ).

tff(c_34,plain,
    ! [A_22] :
      ( selection_favors(efficient_producers,first_movers,sk3(sk1(A_22)))
      | ~ environment(sk2)
      | ~ subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,A_22,sk3(sk1(A_22)))
      | ~ stable(A_22)
      | ~ environment(A_22)
      | ~ in_environment(sk2,sk1(A_22)) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_12,c_31]) ).

tff(c_38,plain,
    ! [A_24] :
      ( selection_favors(efficient_producers,first_movers,sk3(sk1(A_24)))
      | ~ subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,A_24,sk3(sk1(A_24)))
      | ~ stable(A_24)
      | ~ environment(A_24)
      | ~ in_environment(sk2,sk1(A_24)) ),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_8,c_34]) ).

tff(c_42,plain,
    ( selection_favors(efficient_producers,first_movers,sk3(sk1(sk2)))
    | ~ stable(sk2)
    | ~ environment(sk2)
    | ~ in_environment(sk2,sk1(sk2)) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_12,c_38]) ).

tff(c_45,plain,
    ( selection_favors(efficient_producers,first_movers,sk3(sk1(sk2)))
    | ~ in_environment(sk2,sk1(sk2)) ),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_8,c_10,c_42]) ).

tff(c_46,plain,
    ~ in_environment(sk2,sk1(sk2)),
    inference(splitLeft,[status(thm)],[c_45]) ).

tff(c_49,plain,
    ( ~ stable(sk2)
    | ~ environment(sk2) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_4,c_46]) ).

tff(c_53,plain,
    $false,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_8,c_10,c_49]) ).

tff(c_55,plain,
    in_environment(sk2,sk1(sk2)),
    inference(splitRight,[status(thm)],[c_45]) ).

tff(c_54,plain,
    selection_favors(efficient_producers,first_movers,sk3(sk1(sk2))),
    inference(splitRight,[status(thm)],[c_45]) ).

tff(c_16,plain,
    ! [A_10] :
      ( ~ selection_favors(efficient_producers,first_movers,sk3(A_10))
      | ~ in_environment(sk2,A_10) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_76]) ).

tff(c_58,plain,
    ~ in_environment(sk2,sk1(sk2)),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_54,c_16]) ).

tff(c_62,plain,
    $false,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_55,c_58]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem  : MGT032-2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.00/0.13  % Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s
% 0.18/0.35  % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.18/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.18/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.18/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.18/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.18/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.18/0.35  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.18/0.35  % DateTime : Thu Aug  3 20:33:31 EDT 2023
% 0.18/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 2.75/1.70  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 2.75/1.70  
% 2.75/1.70  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 2.95/1.73  
% 2.95/1.73  Inference rules
% 2.95/1.73  ----------------------
% 2.95/1.73  #Ref     : 0
% 2.95/1.73  #Sup     : 6
% 2.95/1.73  #Fact    : 0
% 2.95/1.73  #Define  : 0
% 2.95/1.73  #Split   : 1
% 2.95/1.73  #Chain   : 0
% 2.95/1.73  #Close   : 0
% 2.95/1.73  
% 2.95/1.73  Ordering : KBO
% 2.95/1.73  
% 2.95/1.73  Simplification rules
% 2.95/1.73  ----------------------
% 2.95/1.73  #Subsume      : 1
% 2.95/1.73  #Demod        : 6
% 2.95/1.73  #Tautology    : 0
% 2.95/1.73  #SimpNegUnit  : 0
% 2.95/1.74  #BackRed      : 0
% 2.95/1.74  
% 2.95/1.74  #Partial instantiations: 0
% 2.95/1.74  #Strategies tried      : 1
% 2.95/1.74  
% 2.95/1.74  Timing (in seconds)
% 2.95/1.74  ----------------------
% 2.95/1.74  Preprocessing        : 0.43
% 2.95/1.74  Parsing              : 0.24
% 2.95/1.74  CNF conversion       : 0.02
% 2.95/1.74  Main loop            : 0.23
% 2.95/1.74  Inferencing          : 0.11
% 2.95/1.74  Reduction            : 0.05
% 2.95/1.74  Demodulation         : 0.03
% 2.95/1.74  BG Simplification    : 0.01
% 2.95/1.74  Subsumption          : 0.05
% 2.95/1.74  Abstraction          : 0.01
% 2.95/1.74  MUC search           : 0.00
% 2.95/1.74  Cooper               : 0.00
% 2.95/1.74  Total                : 0.72
% 2.95/1.74  Index Insertion      : 0.00
% 2.95/1.74  Index Deletion       : 0.00
% 2.95/1.74  Index Matching       : 0.00
% 2.95/1.74  BG Taut test         : 0.00
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------