TSTP Solution File: MGT032+2 by SOS---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SOS---2.0
% Problem : MGT032+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : sos-script %s
% Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 22:25:54 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.18s 0.54s
% Output : Refutation 0.18s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.11 % Problem : MGT032+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.0.0.
% 0.11/0.12 % Command : sos-script %s
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Thu Jun 9 12:04:49 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.12/0.34 ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.12/0.34 The process was started by sandbox on n022.cluster.edu,
% 0.12/0.34 Thu Jun 9 12:04:49 2022
% 0.12/0.34 The command was "./sos". The process ID is 12072.
% 0.12/0.34
% 0.12/0.34 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.12/0.34 set(auto).
% 0.12/0.34 dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.12/0.34 dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.12/0.35 clear(print_given).
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 formula_list(usable).
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=1, equality=0, symmetry=0, max_lits=5.
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 This is a Horn set without equality. The strategy will
% 0.12/0.35 be hyperresolution, with satellites in sos and nuclei
% 0.12/0.35 in usable.
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: clear(order_hyper).
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 ------------> process usable:
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 ------------> process sos:
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.12/0.37
% 0.12/0.37 Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.12/0.37
% 0.12/0.37 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.12/0.37
% 0.12/0.37
% 0.12/0.37 -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.12/0.37
% 0.12/0.37 UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.12/0.37 SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.12/0.37 SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.12/0.37 number of clauses in intial UL: 6
% 0.12/0.37 number of clauses initially in problem: 8
% 0.12/0.37 percentage of clauses intially in UL: 75
% 0.12/0.37 percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 100
% 0.12/0.37 percent of all initial clauses that are short: 87
% 0.12/0.37 absolute distinct symbol count: 13
% 0.12/0.37 distinct predicate count: 7
% 0.12/0.37 distinct function count: 3
% 0.12/0.37 distinct constant count: 3
% 0.12/0.37
% 0.12/0.37 ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.12/0.37
% 0.12/0.37
% 0.12/0.37
% 0.12/0.37 =========== start of search ===========
% 0.18/0.54
% 0.18/0.54 -------- PROOF --------
% 0.18/0.54 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.18/0.54 % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.18/0.54
% 0.18/0.54 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.18/0.54
% 0.18/0.54 Model 2 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.18/0.54
% 0.18/0.54 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.18/0.54
% 0.18/0.54 -----> EMPTY CLAUSE at 0.17 sec ----> 14 [hyper,13,6,9] {-} $F.
% 0.18/0.54
% 0.18/0.54 Length of proof is 5. Level of proof is 4.
% 0.18/0.54
% 0.18/0.54 ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 0.18/0.54 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.18/0.54 % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.18/0.54
% 0.18/0.54 1 [] {+} -environment(A)| -subpopulations(B,C,A,D)| -greater(growth_rate(C,D),growth_rate(B,D))|selection_favors(C,B,D).
% 0.18/0.54 2 [] {+} -environment(A)| -stable(A)|in_environment(A,$f1(A)).
% 0.18/0.54 3 [] {+} -environment(A)| -stable(A)| -subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,A,B)| -greater_or_equal(B,$f1(A))|greater(growth_rate(efficient_producers,B),growth_rate(first_movers,B)).
% 0.18/0.54 4 [] {+} -in_environment($c1,A)|subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,$c1,$f2(A)).
% 0.18/0.54 5 [] {+} -in_environment($c1,A)|greater_or_equal($f2(A),A).
% 0.18/0.54 6 [] {+} -in_environment($c1,A)| -selection_favors(efficient_producers,first_movers,$f2(A)).
% 0.18/0.54 7 [] {+} environment($c1).
% 0.18/0.54 8 [] {-} stable($c1).
% 0.18/0.54 9 [hyper,8,2,7] {+} in_environment($c1,$f1($c1)).
% 0.18/0.54 10 [hyper,9,5] {+} greater_or_equal($f2($f1($c1)),$f1($c1)).
% 0.18/0.54 11 [hyper,9,4] {+} subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,$c1,$f2($f1($c1))).
% 0.18/0.54 12 [hyper,11,3,7,8,10] {-} greater(growth_rate(efficient_producers,$f2($f1($c1))),growth_rate(first_movers,$f2($f1($c1)))).
% 0.18/0.54 13 [hyper,12,1,7,11] {-} selection_favors(efficient_producers,first_movers,$f2($f1($c1))).
% 0.18/0.54 14 [hyper,13,6,9] {-} $F.
% 0.18/0.54
% 0.18/0.54 % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.18/0.54 ------------ end of proof -------------
% 0.18/0.54
% 0.18/0.54
% 0.18/0.54 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 0.18/0.54
% 0.18/0.54
% 0.18/0.54 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 0.18/0.54
% 0.18/0.54 ============ end of search ============
% 0.18/0.54
% 0.18/0.54 ----------- soft-scott stats ----------
% 0.18/0.54
% 0.18/0.54 true clauses given 3 (42.9%)
% 0.18/0.54 false clauses given 4
% 0.18/0.54
% 0.18/0.54 FALSE TRUE
% 0.18/0.54 tot: 0 0 (-nan% true)
% 0.18/0.54
% 0.18/0.54
% 0.18/0.54 Model 2 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.18/0.54
% 0.18/0.54 That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 0.18/0.54
% 0.18/0.54 Process 12072 finished Thu Jun 9 12:04:49 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------