TSTP Solution File: MGT028-1 by CARINE---0.734
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CARINE---0.734
% Problem : MGT028-1 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm : add_equality
% Format : carine
% Command : carine %s t=%d xo=off uct=32000
% Computer : art06.cs.miami.edu
% Model : i686 i686
% CPU : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory : 2018MB
% OS : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Nov 28 01:55:21 EST 2010
% Result : Timeout 300.04s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 0
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----NO SOLUTION OUTPUT BY SYSTEM
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% Command entered:
% /home/graph/tptp/Systems/CARINE---0.734/carine /tmp/SystemOnTPTP5207/MGT/MGT028-1+noeq.car t=300 xo=off uct=32000
% CARINE version 0.734 (Dec 2003)
% Initializing tables ... done.
% Parsing .............. done.
% Calculating time slices ... done.
% Building Lookup Tables ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 2] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 8] [nf = 0] [nu = 2] [ut = 3]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 24] [nf = 0] [nu = 4] [ut = 3]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 205] [nf = 0] [nu = 6] [ut = 3]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 672] [nf = 40] [nu = 8] [ut = 3]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 2389] [nf = 146] [nu = 10] [ut = 3]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 9141] [nf = 540] [nu = 24] [ut = 4]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 24383] [nf = 2404] [nu = 146] [ut = 4]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 96990] [nf = 11614] [nu = 268] [ut = 4]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 10 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 392236] [nf = 58141] [nu = 390] [ut = 4]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 11 ...
% t = 5 secs [nr = 2935170] [nf = 257463] [nu = 512] [ut = 4]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 12 ...
% t = 33 secs [nr = 18251820] [nf = 1187431] [nu = 634] [ut = 4]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 13 ...
% TIME IS UP!
% ---------------------------------------------
% | Statistics |
% ---------------------------------------------
% Profile 3: Performance Statistics:
% ==================================
% Total number of generated clauses: 162390381
% resolvents: 159100184 factors: 3290197
% Number of unit clauses generated: 41847390
% % unit clauses generated to total clauses generated: 25.77
% Number of unit clauses constructed and retained at depth [x]:
% =============================================================
% [0] = 2 [2] = 1 [7] = 1
% [13] = 8
% Total = 12
% Number of generated clauses having [x] literals:
% ------------------------------------------------
% [1] = 41847390 [2] = 56119086 [3] = 32305006 [4] = 16965510 [5] = 7635067 [6] = 5245009
% [7] = 1733171 [8] = 448398 [9] = 78007 [10] = 12577 [11] = 1160
% Average size of a generated clause: 3.0
% Number of unit clauses per predicate list:
% ==========================================
% [0] environment_1 (+)1 (-)0
% [1] stable_1 (+)1 (-)0
% [2] greater_2 (+)0 (-)4
% [3] greater_or_equal_2 (+)2 (-)1
% [4] in_environment_2 (+)1 (-)0
% [5] subpopulations_4 (+)2 (-)0
% ------------------
% Total: (+)7 (-)5
% Total number of unit clauses retained: 12
% Number of clauses skipped because of their length: 224640678
% N base clauses skippped in resolve-with-all-base-clauses
% because of the shortest resolvents table: 185418775
% Number of successful unifications: 162390381
% Number of unification failures: 114983767
% Number of unit to unit unification failures: 2
% N literal unification failure due to lookup root_id table: 508335884
% N base clause resolution failure due to lookup table: 138639757
% N UC-BCL resolution dropped due to lookup table: 0
% Max entries in substitution set: 8
% N unit clauses dropped because they exceeded max values: 28689220
% N unit clauses dropped because too much nesting: 0
% N unit clauses not constrcuted because table was full: 0
% N unit clauses dropped because UCFA table was full: 0
% Max number of terms in a unit clause: 7
% Max term depth in a unit clause: 4
% Number of states in UCFA table: 49
% Total number of terms of all unit clauses in table: 57
% Max allowed number of states in UCFA: 96000
% Ratio n states used/total allowed states: 0.00
% Ratio n states used/total unit clauses terms: 0.86
% Number of symbols (columns) in UCFA: 50
% Profile 2: Number of calls to:
% ==============================
% PTUnify() = 277374148
% ConstructUnitClause() = 28689230
% Profile 1: Time spent in:
% =========================
% ConstructUnitClause() : 34.13 secs
% --------------------------------------------------------
% | |
% Inferences per sec: 541301
% | |
% --------------------------------------------------------
% Elapsed time: 302 secs
% CPU time: 300.00 secs
%
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------