TSTP Solution File: MGT026+1 by SPASS---3.9

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SPASS---3.9
% Problem  : MGT026+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : run_spass %d %s

% Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 22:26:15 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.18s 0.44s
% Output   : Refutation 0.18s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.09/0.12  % Problem  : MGT026+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.0.0.
% 0.09/0.12  % Command  : run_spass %d %s
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Thu Jun  9 12:37:08 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.18/0.44  
% 0.18/0.44  SPASS V 3.9 
% 0.18/0.44  SPASS beiseite: Proof found.
% 0.18/0.44  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.18/0.44  Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 
% 0.18/0.44  SPASS derived 96 clauses, backtracked 21 clauses, performed 2 splits and kept 102 clauses.
% 0.18/0.44  SPASS allocated 97731 KBytes.
% 0.18/0.44  SPASS spent	0:00:00.10 on the problem.
% 0.18/0.44  		0:00:00.04 for the input.
% 0.18/0.44  		0:00:00.03 for the FLOTTER CNF translation.
% 0.18/0.44  		0:00:00.00 for inferences.
% 0.18/0.44  		0:00:00.00 for the backtracking.
% 0.18/0.44  		0:00:00.01 for the reduction.
% 0.18/0.44  
% 0.18/0.44  
% 0.18/0.44  Here is a proof with depth 4, length 65 :
% 0.18/0.44  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.18/0.44  1[0:Inp] ||  -> environment(skc3)*.
% 0.18/0.44  2[0:Inp] ||  -> in_environment(skc3,skc2)*.
% 0.18/0.44  3[0:Inp] ||  -> greater(skc2,critical_point(skc3))*r.
% 0.18/0.44  4[0:Inp] || selection_favors(efficient_producers,first_movers,skc2)* -> .
% 0.18/0.44  5[0:Inp] || greater(u,v) -> greater_or_equal(u,v)*.
% 0.18/0.44  7[0:Inp] environment(u) ||  -> greater_or_equal(critical_point(u),appear(efficient_producers,u))*.
% 0.18/0.44  8[0:Inp] || greater_or_equal(u,v)* -> equal(u,v) greater(u,v).
% 0.18/0.44  9[0:Inp] environment(u) || in_environment(u,v) -> subpopulation(first_movers,u,v)*.
% 0.18/0.44  10[0:Inp] environment(u) || in_environment(u,v) -> subpopulation(efficient_producers,u,v)*.
% 0.18/0.44  11[0:Inp] || greater(u,v)* greater(v,w)* -> greater(u,w)*.
% 0.18/0.44  12[0:Inp] environment(u) || in_environment(u,v)*+ -> greater_or_equal(cardinality_at_time(first_movers,v),zero)*.
% 0.18/0.44  14[0:Inp] environment(u) || in_environment(u,v) greater_or_equal(v,appear(efficient_producers,u))* -> greater(cardinality_at_time(efficient_producers,v),zero).
% 0.18/0.44  15[0:Inp] environment(u) || greater(v,critical_point(u)) subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,u,v)* -> greater(growth_rate(efficient_producers,v),growth_rate(first_movers,v)).
% 0.18/0.44  16[0:Inp] environment(u) || greater(growth_rate(v,w),growth_rate(x,w)) subpopulations(x,v,u,w)* -> selection_favors(v,x,w).
% 0.18/0.44  17[0:Inp] environment(u) || in_environment(u,v) greater(cardinality_at_time(first_movers,v),zero) greater(cardinality_at_time(efficient_producers,v),zero) -> subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,u,v)*.
% 0.18/0.44  18[0:Inp] environment(u) || equal(cardinality_at_time(v,w),zero) greater(cardinality_at_time(x,w),zero)+ subpopulation(v,u,w)* subpopulation(x,u,w)* -> selection_favors(x,v,w)*.
% 0.18/0.44  27[0:Res:1.0,10.0] || in_environment(skc3,u) -> subpopulation(efficient_producers,skc3,u)*.
% 0.18/0.44  28[0:Res:1.0,7.0] ||  -> greater_or_equal(critical_point(skc3),appear(efficient_producers,skc3))*.
% 0.18/0.44  29[0:Res:2.0,17.1] environment(skc3) || greater(cardinality_at_time(efficient_producers,skc2),zero) greater(cardinality_at_time(first_movers,skc2),zero) -> subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,skc3,skc2)*.
% 0.18/0.44  30[0:Res:2.0,14.1] environment(skc3) || greater_or_equal(skc2,appear(efficient_producers,skc3))* -> greater(cardinality_at_time(efficient_producers,skc2),zero).
% 0.18/0.44  31[0:Res:2.0,12.1] environment(skc3) ||  -> greater_or_equal(cardinality_at_time(first_movers,skc2),zero)*.
% 0.18/0.44  32[0:Res:2.0,9.1] environment(skc3) ||  -> subpopulation(first_movers,skc3,skc2)*.
% 0.18/0.44  35[0:Res:18.5,4.0] environment(u) || equal(cardinality_at_time(first_movers,skc2),zero) greater(cardinality_at_time(efficient_producers,skc2),zero) subpopulation(first_movers,u,skc2) subpopulation(efficient_producers,u,skc2)* -> .
% 0.18/0.44  36[0:MRR:32.0,1.0] ||  -> subpopulation(first_movers,skc3,skc2)*.
% 0.18/0.44  38[0:MRR:31.0,1.0] ||  -> greater_or_equal(cardinality_at_time(first_movers,skc2),zero)*.
% 0.18/0.44  39[0:MRR:30.0,1.0] || greater_or_equal(skc2,appear(efficient_producers,skc3))* -> greater(cardinality_at_time(efficient_producers,skc2),zero).
% 0.18/0.44  40[0:MRR:29.0,1.0] || greater(cardinality_at_time(first_movers,skc2),zero) greater(cardinality_at_time(efficient_producers,skc2),zero) -> subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,skc3,skc2)*.
% 0.18/0.44  42[0:Res:38.0,8.0] ||  -> equal(cardinality_at_time(first_movers,skc2),zero) greater(cardinality_at_time(first_movers,skc2),zero)*l.
% 0.18/0.44  44[0:Res:28.0,8.0] ||  -> equal(appear(efficient_producers,skc3),critical_point(skc3)) greater(critical_point(skc3),appear(efficient_producers,skc3))*r.
% 0.18/0.44  45[0:Res:7.1,8.0] environment(u) ||  -> equal(appear(efficient_producers,u),critical_point(u)) greater(critical_point(u),appear(efficient_producers,u))*r.
% 0.18/0.44  48[1:Spt:42.0] ||  -> equal(cardinality_at_time(first_movers,skc2),zero)**.
% 0.18/0.44  51[1:Rew:48.0,35.1] environment(u) || equal(zero,zero) greater(cardinality_at_time(efficient_producers,skc2),zero) subpopulation(first_movers,u,skc2) subpopulation(efficient_producers,u,skc2)* -> .
% 0.18/0.44  52[1:Obv:51.1] environment(u) || greater(cardinality_at_time(efficient_producers,skc2),zero) subpopulation(first_movers,u,skc2) subpopulation(efficient_producers,u,skc2)* -> .
% 0.18/0.44  56[0:Res:5.1,39.0] || greater(skc2,appear(efficient_producers,skc3))*r -> greater(cardinality_at_time(efficient_producers,skc2),zero).
% 0.18/0.44  64[2:Spt:44.0] ||  -> equal(appear(efficient_producers,skc3),critical_point(skc3))**.
% 0.18/0.44  69[2:Rew:64.0,56.0] || greater(skc2,critical_point(skc3)) -> greater(cardinality_at_time(efficient_producers,skc2),zero)*l.
% 0.18/0.44  70[2:MRR:69.0,3.0] ||  -> greater(cardinality_at_time(efficient_producers,skc2),zero)*l.
% 0.18/0.44  72[2:MRR:52.1,70.0] environment(u) || subpopulation(first_movers,u,skc2) subpopulation(efficient_producers,u,skc2)* -> .
% 0.18/0.44  78[2:Res:27.1,72.2] environment(skc3) || in_environment(skc3,skc2) subpopulation(first_movers,skc3,skc2)* -> .
% 0.18/0.44  82[2:SSi:78.0,1.0] || in_environment(skc3,skc2) subpopulation(first_movers,skc3,skc2)* -> .
% 0.18/0.44  83[2:MRR:82.0,82.1,2.0,36.0] ||  -> .
% 0.18/0.44  86[2:Spt:83.0,44.0,64.0] || equal(appear(efficient_producers,skc3),critical_point(skc3))** -> .
% 0.18/0.44  87[2:Spt:83.0,44.1] ||  -> greater(critical_point(skc3),appear(efficient_producers,skc3))*r.
% 0.18/0.44  102[2:NCh:11.2,11.1,56.0,87.0] || greater(skc2,critical_point(skc3)) -> greater(cardinality_at_time(efficient_producers,skc2),zero)*l.
% 0.18/0.44  104[0:NCh:11.2,11.1,56.0,45.2] environment(skc3) || greater(skc2,critical_point(skc3)) -> greater(cardinality_at_time(efficient_producers,skc2),zero) equal(appear(efficient_producers,skc3),critical_point(skc3))**.
% 0.18/0.44  106[2:MRR:102.0,3.0] ||  -> greater(cardinality_at_time(efficient_producers,skc2),zero)*l.
% 0.18/0.44  107[2:MRR:52.1,106.0] environment(u) || subpopulation(first_movers,u,skc2) subpopulation(efficient_producers,u,skc2)* -> .
% 0.18/0.44  127[2:Res:27.1,107.2] environment(skc3) || in_environment(skc3,skc2) subpopulation(first_movers,skc3,skc2)* -> .
% 0.18/0.44  131[2:SSi:127.0,1.0] || in_environment(skc3,skc2) subpopulation(first_movers,skc3,skc2)* -> .
% 0.18/0.44  132[2:MRR:131.0,131.1,2.0,36.0] ||  -> .
% 0.18/0.44  135[1:Spt:132.0,42.0,48.0] || equal(cardinality_at_time(first_movers,skc2),zero)** -> .
% 0.18/0.44  136[1:Spt:132.0,42.1] ||  -> greater(cardinality_at_time(first_movers,skc2),zero)*l.
% 0.18/0.44  138[1:MRR:40.0,136.0] || greater(cardinality_at_time(efficient_producers,skc2),zero) -> subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,skc3,skc2)*.
% 0.18/0.44  139[0:SSi:104.0,1.0] || greater(skc2,critical_point(skc3)) -> greater(cardinality_at_time(efficient_producers,skc2),zero) equal(appear(efficient_producers,skc3),critical_point(skc3))**.
% 0.18/0.44  140[0:MRR:139.0,3.0] ||  -> greater(cardinality_at_time(efficient_producers,skc2),zero) equal(appear(efficient_producers,skc3),critical_point(skc3))**.
% 0.18/0.44  143[0:Rew:140.1,56.0] || greater(skc2,critical_point(skc3)) -> greater(cardinality_at_time(efficient_producers,skc2),zero)*l.
% 0.18/0.44  144[0:MRR:143.0,3.0] ||  -> greater(cardinality_at_time(efficient_producers,skc2),zero)*l.
% 0.18/0.44  145[1:MRR:138.0,144.0] ||  -> subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,skc3,skc2)*.
% 0.18/0.44  151[1:Res:145.0,16.2] environment(skc3) || greater(growth_rate(efficient_producers,skc2),growth_rate(first_movers,skc2)) -> selection_favors(efficient_producers,first_movers,skc2)*.
% 0.18/0.44  152[1:Res:145.0,15.2] environment(skc3) || greater(skc2,critical_point(skc3)) -> greater(growth_rate(efficient_producers,skc2),growth_rate(first_movers,skc2))*l.
% 0.18/0.44  153[1:SSi:151.0,1.0] || greater(growth_rate(efficient_producers,skc2),growth_rate(first_movers,skc2)) -> selection_favors(efficient_producers,first_movers,skc2)*.
% 0.18/0.44  154[1:MRR:153.1,4.0] || greater(growth_rate(efficient_producers,skc2),growth_rate(first_movers,skc2))*l -> .
% 0.18/0.44  155[1:SSi:152.0,1.0] || greater(skc2,critical_point(skc3)) -> greater(growth_rate(efficient_producers,skc2),growth_rate(first_movers,skc2))*l.
% 0.18/0.44  156[1:MRR:155.0,3.0] ||  -> greater(growth_rate(efficient_producers,skc2),growth_rate(first_movers,skc2))*l.
% 0.18/0.44  157[1:MRR:156.0,154.0] ||  -> .
% 0.18/0.45  % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.18/0.45  Formulae used in the proof : prove_l8 mp_greater_or_equal mp_critical_point_after_EP mp_subpopulations mp_greater_transitivity mp_first_movers_exist t6 d1 mp1_high_growth_rates mp_non_empty_fm_and_ep mp2_favour_members
% 0.18/0.45  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------