TSTP Solution File: MGT024-1 by CSE---1.6

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE---1.6
% Problem  : MGT024-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %s %d

% Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 09:06:50 EDT 2023

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 227.94s 227.98s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 227.94s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.10/0.16  % Problem    : MGT024-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.10/0.17  % Command    : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %s %d
% 0.16/0.38  % Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% 0.16/0.38  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.16/0.38  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.16/0.38  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.16/0.38  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.16/0.38  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.16/0.38  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.16/0.38  % DateTime   : Mon Aug 28 06:20:13 EDT 2023
% 0.16/0.38  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.22/0.60  start to proof:theBenchmark
% 227.94/227.97  %-------------------------------------------
% 227.94/227.97  % File        :CSE---1.6
% 227.94/227.97  % Problem     :theBenchmark
% 227.94/227.97  % Transform   :cnf
% 227.94/227.97  % Format      :tptp:raw
% 227.94/227.97  % Command     :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 227.94/227.97  
% 227.94/227.97  % Result      :Theorem 227.310000s
% 227.94/227.97  % Output      :CNFRefutation 227.310000s
% 227.94/227.97  %-------------------------------------------
% 227.94/227.98  %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 227.94/227.98  % File     : MGT024-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.4.0.
% 227.94/227.98  % Domain   : Management (Organisation Theory)
% 227.94/227.98  % Problem  : Subpopulation growth rates are in equilibria
% 227.94/227.98  % Version  : [PB+94] axioms : Reduced & Augmented > Complete.
% 227.94/227.98  % English  : If a subpopulation has positive growth rate, then the other
% 227.94/227.98  %            subpopulation must have negative growth rate in equilibrium.
% 227.94/227.98  
% 227.94/227.98  % Refs     : [PM93]  Peli & Masuch (1993), The Logic of Propogation Strateg
% 227.94/227.98  %          : [PM94]  Peli & Masuch (1994), The Logic of Propogation Strateg
% 227.94/227.98  %          : [Kam95] Kamps (1995), Email to G. Sutcliffe
% 227.94/227.98  % Source   : [TPTP]
% 227.94/227.98  % Names    :
% 227.94/227.98  
% 227.94/227.98  % Status   : Unsatisfiable
% 227.94/227.98  % Rating   : 0.10 v8.1.0, 0.00 v7.5.0, 0.11 v7.4.0, 0.06 v7.3.0, 0.08 v7.1.0, 0.00 v7.0.0, 0.07 v6.4.0, 0.00 v6.3.0, 0.09 v6.2.0, 0.00 v5.5.0, 0.10 v5.3.0, 0.06 v5.2.0, 0.00 v4.0.0, 0.09 v3.7.0, 0.10 v3.5.0, 0.09 v3.4.0, 0.08 v3.3.0, 0.07 v3.2.0, 0.08 v3.1.0, 0.18 v2.7.0, 0.17 v2.6.0, 0.00 v2.4.0
% 227.94/227.98  % Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   21 (   3 unt;   9 nHn;  21 RR)
% 227.94/227.98  %            Number of literals    :   84 (  10 equ;  51 neg)
% 227.94/227.98  %            Maximal clause size   :    6 (   4 avg)
% 227.94/227.98  %            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
% 227.94/227.98  %            Number of predicates  :    8 (   7 usr;   0 prp; 1-4 aty)
% 227.94/227.98  %            Number of functors    :    9 (   9 usr;   5 con; 0-2 aty)
% 227.94/227.98  %            Number of variables   :   30 (   0 sgn)
% 227.94/227.98  % SPC      : CNF_UNS_RFO_SEQ_NHN
% 227.94/227.98  
% 227.94/227.98  % Comments : Created with tptp2X -f tptp -t clausify:otter MGT024+1.p
% 227.94/227.98  %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 227.94/227.98  cnf(mp_time_point_occur_24,axiom,
% 227.94/227.98      ( ~ environment(A)
% 227.94/227.98      | ~ subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,A,B)
% 227.94/227.98      | in_environment(A,B) ) ).
% 227.94/227.98  
% 227.94/227.98  cnf(mp_positive_number_of_organizations_25,axiom,
% 227.94/227.98      ( ~ environment(A)
% 227.94/227.98      | ~ subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,A,B)
% 227.94/227.98      | greater(number_of_organizations(A,B),zero) ) ).
% 227.94/227.98  
% 227.94/227.98  cnf(mp_equilibrium_26,axiom,
% 227.94/227.98      ( ~ environment(A)
% 227.94/227.98      | ~ greater_or_equal(B,equilibrium(A))
% 227.94/227.98      | ~ greater(equilibrium(A),B) ) ).
% 227.94/227.98  
% 227.94/227.98  cnf(a3_27,hypothesis,
% 227.94/227.98      ( ~ environment(A)
% 227.94/227.98      | ~ in_environment(A,B)
% 227.94/227.98      | ~ greater(number_of_organizations(A,B),zero)
% 227.94/227.98      | ~ greater(equilibrium(A),B)
% 227.94/227.98      | decreases(resources(A,B)) ) ).
% 227.94/227.98  
% 227.94/227.98  cnf(a3_28,hypothesis,
% 227.94/227.98      ( ~ environment(A)
% 227.94/227.98      | ~ in_environment(A,B)
% 227.94/227.98      | ~ greater(number_of_organizations(A,B),zero)
% 227.94/227.98      | greater(equilibrium(A),B)
% 227.94/227.98      | constant(resources(A,B)) ) ).
% 227.94/227.98  
% 227.94/227.98  cnf(a6_29,hypothesis,
% 227.94/227.98      ( ~ environment(A)
% 227.94/227.98      | ~ in_environment(A,B)
% 227.94/227.98      | ~ decreases(resources(A,B))
% 227.94/227.98      | ~ decreases(number_of_organizations(A,B)) ) ).
% 227.94/227.98  
% 227.94/227.98  cnf(a6_30,hypothesis,
% 227.94/227.98      ( ~ environment(A)
% 227.94/227.98      | ~ in_environment(A,B)
% 227.94/227.98      | ~ constant(resources(A,B))
% 227.94/227.98      | constant(number_of_organizations(A,B)) ) ).
% 227.94/227.98  
% 227.94/227.98  cnf(l7_31,hypothesis,
% 227.94/227.98      ( ~ environment(A)
% 227.94/227.98      | ~ subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,A,B)
% 227.94/227.98      | ~ constant(number_of_organizations(A,B))
% 227.94/227.98      | growth_rate(first_movers,B) = zero
% 227.94/227.98      | greater(growth_rate(first_movers,B),zero)
% 227.94/227.98      | greater(growth_rate(efficient_producers,B),zero) ) ).
% 227.94/227.98  
% 227.94/227.98  cnf(l7_32,hypothesis,
% 227.94/227.98      ( ~ environment(A)
% 227.94/227.98      | ~ subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,A,B)
% 227.94/227.98      | ~ constant(number_of_organizations(A,B))
% 227.94/227.98      | growth_rate(first_movers,B) = zero
% 227.94/227.98      | greater(growth_rate(first_movers,B),zero)
% 227.94/227.98      | greater(zero,growth_rate(first_movers,B)) ) ).
% 227.94/227.98  
% 227.94/227.98  cnf(l7_33,hypothesis,
% 227.94/227.98      ( ~ environment(A)
% 227.94/227.98      | ~ subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,A,B)
% 227.94/227.98      | ~ constant(number_of_organizations(A,B))
% 227.94/227.98      | growth_rate(first_movers,B) = zero
% 227.94/227.98      | greater(zero,growth_rate(efficient_producers,B))
% 227.94/227.98      | greater(growth_rate(efficient_producers,B),zero) ) ).
% 227.94/227.98  
% 227.94/227.98  cnf(l7_34,hypothesis,
% 227.94/227.98      ( ~ environment(A)
% 227.94/227.98      | ~ subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,A,B)
% 227.94/227.98      | ~ constant(number_of_organizations(A,B))
% 227.94/227.98      | growth_rate(first_movers,B) = zero
% 227.94/227.98      | greater(zero,growth_rate(efficient_producers,B))
% 227.94/227.98      | greater(zero,growth_rate(first_movers,B)) ) ).
% 227.94/227.98  
% 227.94/227.98  cnf(l7_35,hypothesis,
% 227.94/227.98      ( ~ environment(A)
% 227.94/227.98      | ~ subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,A,B)
% 227.94/227.98      | ~ constant(number_of_organizations(A,B))
% 227.94/227.98      | growth_rate(efficient_producers,B) = zero
% 227.94/227.98      | greater(growth_rate(first_movers,B),zero)
% 227.94/227.98      | greater(growth_rate(efficient_producers,B),zero) ) ).
% 227.94/227.98  
% 227.94/227.98  cnf(l7_36,hypothesis,
% 227.94/227.98      ( ~ environment(A)
% 227.94/227.98      | ~ subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,A,B)
% 227.94/227.98      | ~ constant(number_of_organizations(A,B))
% 227.94/227.98      | growth_rate(efficient_producers,B) = zero
% 227.94/227.98      | greater(growth_rate(first_movers,B),zero)
% 227.94/227.98      | greater(zero,growth_rate(first_movers,B)) ) ).
% 227.94/227.98  
% 227.94/227.98  cnf(l7_37,hypothesis,
% 227.94/227.98      ( ~ environment(A)
% 227.94/227.98      | ~ subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,A,B)
% 227.94/227.98      | ~ constant(number_of_organizations(A,B))
% 227.94/227.98      | growth_rate(efficient_producers,B) = zero
% 227.94/227.98      | greater(zero,growth_rate(efficient_producers,B))
% 227.94/227.98      | greater(growth_rate(efficient_producers,B),zero) ) ).
% 227.94/227.98  
% 227.94/227.98  cnf(l7_38,hypothesis,
% 227.94/227.98      ( ~ environment(A)
% 227.94/227.98      | ~ subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,A,B)
% 227.94/227.98      | ~ constant(number_of_organizations(A,B))
% 227.94/227.98      | growth_rate(efficient_producers,B) = zero
% 227.94/227.98      | greater(zero,growth_rate(efficient_producers,B))
% 227.94/227.98      | greater(zero,growth_rate(first_movers,B)) ) ).
% 227.94/227.98  
% 227.94/227.98  cnf(prove_l6_39,negated_conjecture,
% 227.94/227.98      environment(sk1) ).
% 227.94/227.98  
% 227.94/227.98  cnf(prove_l6_40,negated_conjecture,
% 227.94/227.98      subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,sk1,sk2) ).
% 227.94/227.98  
% 227.94/227.98  cnf(prove_l6_41,negated_conjecture,
% 227.94/227.98      greater_or_equal(sk2,equilibrium(sk1)) ).
% 227.94/227.98  
% 227.94/227.98  cnf(prove_l6_42,negated_conjecture,
% 227.94/227.98      ( growth_rate(first_movers,sk2) != zero
% 227.94/227.98      | growth_rate(efficient_producers,sk2) != zero ) ).
% 227.94/227.98  
% 227.94/227.98  cnf(prove_l6_43,negated_conjecture,
% 227.94/227.98      ( ~ greater(growth_rate(first_movers,sk2),zero)
% 227.94/227.98      | ~ greater(zero,growth_rate(efficient_producers,sk2)) ) ).
% 227.94/227.98  
% 227.94/227.98  cnf(prove_l6_44,negated_conjecture,
% 227.94/227.98      ( ~ greater(growth_rate(efficient_producers,sk2),zero)
% 227.94/227.98      | ~ greater(zero,growth_rate(first_movers,sk2)) ) ).
% 227.94/227.98  
% 227.94/227.98  %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 227.94/227.98  %-------------------------------------------
% 227.94/227.98  % Proof found
% 227.94/227.98  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 227.94/227.98  % SZS output start Proof
% 227.94/227.98  %ClaNum:44(EqnAxiom:23)
% 227.94/227.98  %VarNum:111(SingletonVarNum:30)
% 227.94/227.98  %MaxLitNum:6
% 227.94/227.98  %MaxfuncDepth:1
% 227.94/227.98  %SharedTerms:17
% 227.94/227.98  %goalClause: 24 25 26 27 29 30
% 227.94/227.98  %singleGoalClaCount:3
% 227.94/227.98  [24]P1(a1)
% 227.94/227.98  [26]P6(a4,a3,a1,a8)
% 227.94/227.98  [25]P4(a8,f2(a1))
% 227.94/227.98  [27]~E(f5(a4,a8),a9)+~E(f5(a3,a8),a9)
% 227.94/227.98  [29]~P5(a9,f5(a4,a8))+~P5(f5(a3,a8),a9)
% 227.94/227.98  [30]~P5(a9,f5(a3,a8))+~P5(f5(a4,a8),a9)
% 227.94/227.98  [35]~P1(x351)+P7(x351,x352)+~P6(a4,a3,x351,x352)
% 227.94/227.98  [28]~P1(x281)+~P5(f2(x281),x282)+~P4(x282,f2(x281))
% 227.94/227.98  [36]~P1(x361)+~P6(a4,a3,x361,x362)+P5(f6(x361,x362),a9)
% 227.94/227.98  [31]~P1(x311)+~P7(x311,x312)+~P2(f7(x311,x312))+P2(f6(x311,x312))
% 227.94/227.98  [32]~P1(x321)+~P7(x321,x322)+~P3(f6(x321,x322))+~P3(f7(x321,x322))
% 227.94/227.98  [33]~P1(x331)+~P7(x331,x332)+P5(f2(x331),x332)+~P5(f6(x331,x332),a9)+P2(f7(x331,x332))
% 227.94/227.98  [34]~P1(x341)+~P7(x341,x342)+~P5(f2(x341),x342)+~P5(f6(x341,x342),a9)+P3(f7(x341,x342))
% 227.94/227.98  [37]~P1(x372)+~P6(a4,a3,x372,x371)+~P2(f6(x372,x371))+P5(a9,f5(a4,x371))+P5(a9,f5(a3,x371))+E(f5(a4,x371),a9)
% 227.94/227.98  [38]~P1(x382)+~P6(a4,a3,x382,x381)+~P2(f6(x382,x381))+P5(a9,f5(a3,x381))+P5(a9,f5(a4,x381))+E(f5(a3,x381),a9)
% 227.94/227.98  [39]~P1(x392)+~P6(a4,a3,x392,x391)+~P2(f6(x392,x391))+P5(f5(a4,x391),a9)+P5(a9,f5(a4,x391))+E(f5(a4,x391),a9)
% 227.94/227.98  [40]~P1(x402)+~P6(a4,a3,x402,x401)+~P2(f6(x402,x401))+P5(f5(a3,x401),a9)+P5(a9,f5(a3,x401))+E(f5(a4,x401),a9)
% 227.94/227.98  [41]~P1(x412)+~P6(a4,a3,x412,x411)+~P2(f6(x412,x411))+P5(f5(a4,x411),a9)+P5(a9,f5(a4,x411))+E(f5(a3,x411),a9)
% 227.94/227.98  [42]~P1(x422)+~P6(a4,a3,x422,x421)+~P2(f6(x422,x421))+P5(f5(a3,x421),a9)+P5(a9,f5(a3,x421))+E(f5(a3,x421),a9)
% 227.94/227.98  [43]~P1(x432)+~P6(a4,a3,x432,x431)+~P2(f6(x432,x431))+P5(f5(a4,x431),a9)+P5(f5(a3,x431),a9)+E(f5(a4,x431),a9)
% 227.94/227.98  [44]~P1(x442)+~P6(a4,a3,x442,x441)+~P2(f6(x442,x441))+P5(f5(a3,x441),a9)+P5(f5(a4,x441),a9)+E(f5(a3,x441),a9)
% 227.94/227.98  %EqnAxiom
% 227.94/227.98  [1]E(x11,x11)
% 227.94/227.99  [2]E(x22,x21)+~E(x21,x22)
% 227.94/227.99  [3]E(x31,x33)+~E(x31,x32)+~E(x32,x33)
% 227.94/227.99  [4]~E(x41,x42)+E(f2(x41),f2(x42))
% 227.94/227.99  [5]~E(x51,x52)+E(f5(x51,x53),f5(x52,x53))
% 227.94/227.99  [6]~E(x61,x62)+E(f5(x63,x61),f5(x63,x62))
% 227.94/227.99  [7]~E(x71,x72)+E(f6(x71,x73),f6(x72,x73))
% 227.94/227.99  [8]~E(x81,x82)+E(f6(x83,x81),f6(x83,x82))
% 227.94/227.99  [9]~E(x91,x92)+E(f7(x91,x93),f7(x92,x93))
% 227.94/227.99  [10]~E(x101,x102)+E(f7(x103,x101),f7(x103,x102))
% 227.94/227.99  [11]~P1(x111)+P1(x112)+~E(x111,x112)
% 227.94/227.99  [12]P4(x122,x123)+~E(x121,x122)+~P4(x121,x123)
% 227.94/227.99  [13]P4(x133,x132)+~E(x131,x132)+~P4(x133,x131)
% 227.94/227.99  [14]P6(x142,x143,x144,x145)+~E(x141,x142)+~P6(x141,x143,x144,x145)
% 227.94/227.99  [15]P6(x153,x152,x154,x155)+~E(x151,x152)+~P6(x153,x151,x154,x155)
% 227.94/227.99  [16]P6(x163,x164,x162,x165)+~E(x161,x162)+~P6(x163,x164,x161,x165)
% 227.94/227.99  [17]P6(x173,x174,x175,x172)+~E(x171,x172)+~P6(x173,x174,x175,x171)
% 227.94/227.99  [18]~P2(x181)+P2(x182)+~E(x181,x182)
% 227.94/227.99  [19]P5(x192,x193)+~E(x191,x192)+~P5(x191,x193)
% 227.94/227.99  [20]P5(x203,x202)+~E(x201,x202)+~P5(x203,x201)
% 227.94/227.99  [21]P7(x212,x213)+~E(x211,x212)+~P7(x211,x213)
% 227.94/227.99  [22]P7(x223,x222)+~E(x221,x222)+~P7(x223,x221)
% 227.94/227.99  [23]~P3(x231)+P3(x232)+~E(x231,x232)
% 227.94/227.99  
% 227.94/227.99  %-------------------------------------------
% 227.94/227.99  cnf(52,plain,
% 227.94/227.99     (P2(f6(a1,a8))+~P2(f7(a1,a8))),
% 227.94/227.99     inference(scs_inference,[],[24,26,25,35,28,20,36,32,31])).
% 227.94/227.99  cnf(54,plain,
% 227.94/227.99     (P2(f7(a1,a8))),
% 227.94/227.99     inference(scs_inference,[],[24,26,25,35,28,20,36,32,31,33])).
% 227.94/227.99  cnf(57,plain,
% 227.94/227.99     (P2(f6(a1,a8))),
% 227.94/227.99     inference(scs_inference,[],[54,52])).
% 227.94/227.99  cnf(73,plain,
% 227.94/227.99     (P5(a9,f5(a3,a8))+P5(f5(a3,a8),a9)+E(f5(a4,a8),a9)),
% 227.94/227.99     inference(scs_inference,[],[26,57,24,11,40])).
% 227.94/227.99  cnf(75,plain,
% 227.94/227.99     (E(f5(a4,a8),a9)+P5(a9,f5(a4,a8))+P5(f5(a4,a8),a9)),
% 227.94/227.99     inference(scs_inference,[],[26,57,24,11,40,39])).
% 227.94/227.99  cnf(77,plain,
% 227.94/227.99     (E(f5(a3,a8),a9)+P5(a9,f5(a3,a8))+P5(a9,f5(a4,a8))),
% 227.94/227.99     inference(scs_inference,[],[26,57,24,11,40,39,38])).
% 227.94/227.99  cnf(79,plain,
% 227.94/227.99     (E(f5(a4,a8),a9)+P5(a9,f5(a3,a8))+P5(a9,f5(a4,a8))),
% 227.94/227.99     inference(scs_inference,[],[26,57,24,11,40,39,38,37])).
% 227.94/227.99  cnf(86,plain,
% 227.94/227.99     (P5(a9,f5(a4,a8))+P5(f5(a4,a8),a9)+E(f5(a3,a8),a9)),
% 227.94/227.99     inference(scs_inference,[],[26,57,24,44,41])).
% 227.94/227.99  cnf(88,plain,
% 227.94/227.99     (E(f5(a4,a8),a9)+P5(f5(a4,a8),a9)+P5(f5(a3,a8),a9)),
% 227.94/227.99     inference(scs_inference,[],[57,26,24,43])).
% 227.94/227.99  cnf(144,plain,
% 227.94/227.99     (P5(f5(a3,a8),a9)+E(f5(a4,a8),a9)+~P5(f5(a4,a8),a9)),
% 227.94/227.99     inference(scs_inference,[],[73,30])).
% 227.94/227.99  cnf(228,plain,
% 227.94/227.99     (E(a9,f5(a4,a8))+P5(a9,f5(a4,a8))+P5(f5(a4,a8),a9)),
% 227.94/227.99     inference(scs_inference,[],[2,75])).
% 227.94/227.99  cnf(8781,plain,
% 227.94/227.99     (~E(x87811,a9)+~E(f5(a4,a8),x87811)+~E(f5(a3,a8),a9)),
% 227.94/227.99     inference(scs_inference,[],[27,3])).
% 227.94/227.99  cnf(8796,plain,
% 227.94/227.99     (P5(a9,f5(a3,a8))+P5(a9,f5(a4,a8))+~E(f5(a4,a8),a9)),
% 227.94/227.99     inference(scs_inference,[],[27,77])).
% 227.94/227.99  cnf(8905,plain,
% 227.94/227.99     (P5(a9,f5(a4,a8))+P5(f5(a4,a8),a9)+~E(f5(a4,a8),a9)),
% 227.94/227.99     inference(scs_inference,[],[27,86])).
% 227.94/227.99  cnf(8913,plain,
% 227.94/227.99     (P5(a9,f5(a4,a8))+~E(f5(a4,a8),a9)+~P5(a9,f5(a3,a8))),
% 227.94/227.99     inference(scs_inference,[],[8905,30])).
% 227.94/227.99  cnf(9050,plain,
% 227.94/227.99     (P5(f5(a3,a8),a9)+P5(f5(a4,a8),a9)+~E(f5(a3,a8),a9)),
% 227.94/227.99     inference(scs_inference,[],[27,88])).
% 227.94/227.99  cnf(9056,plain,
% 227.94/227.99     (P5(f5(a3,a8),a9)+E(f5(a4,a8),a9)+~E(f5(a3,a8),a9)),
% 227.94/227.99     inference(scs_inference,[],[9050,144])).
% 227.94/227.99  cnf(9058,plain,
% 227.94/227.99     (P5(f5(a3,a8),a9)+~E(f5(a3,a8),a9)),
% 227.94/227.99     inference(scs_inference,[],[9056,8781])).
% 227.94/227.99  cnf(9064,plain,
% 227.94/227.99     (~E(f5(a3,a8),a9)+~P5(a9,f5(a4,a8))),
% 227.94/227.99     inference(scs_inference,[],[9058,29])).
% 227.94/227.99  cnf(9321,plain,
% 227.94/227.99     (E(f5(a3,a8),a9)+P5(a9,f5(a3,a8))+~P5(a9,f5(a4,a8))),
% 227.94/227.99     inference(scs_inference,[],[57,24,26,29,42])).
% 227.94/227.99  cnf(9329,plain,
% 227.94/227.99     (P5(a9,f5(a3,a8))+~P5(a9,f5(a4,a8))),
% 227.94/227.99     inference(scs_inference,[],[9321,9064])).
% 227.94/227.99  cnf(9333,plain,
% 227.94/227.99     (~P5(f5(a4,a8),a9)+~P5(a9,f5(a4,a8))),
% 227.94/227.99     inference(scs_inference,[],[9329,30])).
% 227.94/227.99  cnf(9399,plain,
% 227.94/227.99     (E(f5(a3,a8),a9)+~P5(a9,f5(a4,a8))+P5(f5(a4,a8),a9)),
% 227.94/227.99     inference(scs_inference,[],[57,26,24,29,44])).
% 227.94/227.99  cnf(9401,plain,
% 227.94/227.99     (P5(f5(a4,a8),a9)+~P5(a9,f5(a4,a8))),
% 227.94/227.99     inference(scs_inference,[],[9399,9064])).
% 227.94/227.99  cnf(9412,plain,
% 227.94/227.99     (~P5(a9,f5(a4,a8))),
% 227.94/227.99     inference(scs_inference,[],[9401,9333])).
% 227.94/227.99  cnf(9415,plain,
% 227.94/227.99     (P5(a9,f5(a3,a8))+E(f5(a4,a8),a9)),
% 227.94/227.99     inference(scs_inference,[],[9412,79])).
% 227.94/227.99  cnf(9417,plain,
% 227.94/227.99     (P5(f5(a4,a8),a9)+E(a9,f5(a4,a8))),
% 227.94/227.99     inference(scs_inference,[],[9412,228])).
% 227.94/227.99  cnf(9477,plain,
% 227.94/227.99     (P5(a9,f5(a3,a8))+~E(f5(a4,a8),a9)),
% 227.94/227.99     inference(scs_inference,[],[9412,8796])).
% 227.94/227.99  cnf(9480,plain,
% 227.94/227.99     (~E(f5(a4,a8),a9)+~P5(a9,f5(a3,a8))),
% 227.94/227.99     inference(scs_inference,[],[9412,8913])).
% 227.94/227.99  cnf(9548,plain,
% 227.94/227.99     (~E(a9,f5(a4,a8))+~P5(a9,f5(a3,a8))),
% 227.94/227.99     inference(scs_inference,[],[9480,2])).
% 227.94/227.99  cnf(9570,plain,
% 227.94/227.99     (P5(f5(a4,a8),a9)+~P5(a9,f5(a3,a8))),
% 227.94/227.99     inference(scs_inference,[],[9548,9417])).
% 227.94/227.99  cnf(9579,plain,
% 227.94/227.99     (~P5(a9,f5(a3,a8))),
% 227.94/227.99     inference(scs_inference,[],[9570,30])).
% 227.94/227.99  cnf(9644,plain,
% 227.94/227.99     (E(f5(a4,a8),a9)),
% 227.94/227.99     inference(scs_inference,[],[9579,9415])).
% 227.94/227.99  cnf(9667,plain,
% 227.94/227.99     (~E(f5(a4,a8),a9)),
% 227.94/227.99     inference(scs_inference,[],[9579,9477])).
% 227.94/227.99  cnf(9676,plain,
% 227.94/227.99     ($false),
% 227.94/227.99     inference(scs_inference,[],[9667,9644]),
% 227.94/227.99     ['proof']).
% 227.94/227.99  % SZS output end Proof
% 227.94/227.99  % Total time :227.310000s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------