TSTP Solution File: MGT023+1 by SATCoP---0.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SATCoP---0.1
% Problem : MGT023+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : satcop --statistics %s
% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 22:24:20 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.13s 0.36s
% Output : Proof 0.13s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : ERROR: Analysing output (MakeTreeStats fails)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(g0,plain,
environment(sK2),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_l5)]) ).
cnf(g1,plain,
stable(sK2),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_l5)]) ).
cnf(g2,plain,
~ in_environment(sK2,critical_point(sK2)),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_l5)]) ).
cnf(g3,plain,
( ~ environment(sK2)
| ~ greater(growth_rate(efficient_producers,sK1(sK2)),growth_rate(first_movers,sK1(sK2)))
| ~ stable(sK2) ),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',l12)]) ).
cnf(g4,plain,
( ~ environment(sK2)
| ~ stable(sK2)
| in_environment(sK2,sK1(sK2)) ),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',l12)]) ).
cnf(g5,plain,
( ~ environment(sK2)
| ~ in_environment(sK2,sK1(sK2))
| sPE(sK1(sK2),critical_point(sK2))
| greater(growth_rate(efficient_producers,sK1(sK2)),growth_rate(first_movers,sK1(sK2)))
| subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,sK2,sK0(sK2,sK1(sK2))) ),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d1)]) ).
cnf(g6,plain,
( ~ environment(sK2)
| ~ in_environment(sK2,sK1(sK2))
| sPE(sK1(sK2),critical_point(sK2))
| greater(growth_rate(efficient_producers,sK1(sK2)),growth_rate(first_movers,sK1(sK2)))
| greater(sK0(sK2,sK1(sK2)),sK1(sK2)) ),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d1)]) ).
cnf(g7,plain,
( ~ environment(sK2)
| ~ greater(growth_rate(efficient_producers,sK0(sK2,sK1(sK2))),growth_rate(first_movers,sK0(sK2,sK1(sK2))))
| ~ in_environment(sK2,sK1(sK2))
| sPE(sK1(sK2),critical_point(sK2))
| greater(growth_rate(efficient_producers,sK1(sK2)),growth_rate(first_movers,sK1(sK2))) ),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d1)]) ).
cnf(g8,plain,
( ~ environment(sK2)
| ~ greater(sK0(sK2,sK1(sK2)),sK1(sK2))
| ~ subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,sK2,sK0(sK2,sK1(sK2)))
| ~ stable(sK2)
| greater(growth_rate(efficient_producers,sK0(sK2,sK1(sK2))),growth_rate(first_movers,sK0(sK2,sK1(sK2)))) ),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',l12)]) ).
cnf(g9,plain,
( ~ sPE(sK2,sK2)
| ~ sPE(sK1(sK2),critical_point(sK2))
| ~ in_environment(sK2,sK1(sK2))
| in_environment(sK2,critical_point(sK2)) ),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(g10,plain,
sPE(sK2,sK2),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[theory(equality)]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.13 % Problem : MGT023+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.0.0.
% 0.03/0.13 % Command : satcop --statistics %s
% 0.13/0.35 % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.35 % DateTime : Thu Jun 9 09:49:32 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.13/0.36 % symbols: 14
% 0.13/0.36 % clauses: 21
% 0.13/0.36 % start clauses: 3
% 0.13/0.36 % iterative deepening steps: 18
% 0.13/0.36 % maximum path limit: 2
% 0.13/0.36 % literal attempts: 784
% 0.13/0.36 % depth failures: 539
% 0.13/0.36 % regularity failures: 0
% 0.13/0.36 % tautology failures: 9
% 0.13/0.36 % reductions: 86
% 0.13/0.36 % extensions: 659
% 0.13/0.36 % SAT variables: 344
% 0.13/0.36 % SAT clauses: 268
% 0.13/0.36 % WalkSAT solutions: 264
% 0.13/0.36 % CDCL solutions: 0
% 0.13/0.36 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.13/0.36 % SZS output start ListOfCNF for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------