TSTP Solution File: MGT022-2 by Etableau---0.67
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Etableau---0.67
% Problem : MGT022-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s
% Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 22:10:26 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.12s 0.37s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.12s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.12 % Problem : MGT022-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.06/0.13 % Command : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s
% 0.12/0.34 % Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.34 % DateTime : Thu Jun 9 07:20:23 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.12/0.37 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.12/0.37 # Auto-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.12/0.37 # and selection function SelectComplexExceptUniqMaxHorn.
% 0.12/0.37 #
% 0.12/0.37 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.12/0.37 # Number of axioms: 10 Number of unprocessed: 10
% 0.12/0.37 # Tableaux proof search.
% 0.12/0.37 # APR header successfully linked.
% 0.12/0.37 # Hello from C++
% 0.12/0.37 # The folding up rule is enabled...
% 0.12/0.37 # Local unification is enabled...
% 0.12/0.37 # Any saturation attempts will use folding labels...
% 0.12/0.37 # 10 beginning clauses after preprocessing and clausification
% 0.12/0.37 # Creating start rules for all 6 conjectures.
% 0.12/0.37 # There are 6 start rule candidates:
% 0.12/0.37 # Found 3 unit axioms.
% 0.12/0.37 # Unsuccessfully attempted saturation on 1 start tableaux, moving on.
% 0.12/0.37 # 6 start rule tableaux created.
% 0.12/0.37 # 7 extension rule candidate clauses
% 0.12/0.37 # 3 unit axiom clauses
% 0.12/0.37
% 0.12/0.37 # Requested 8, 32 cores available to the main process.
% 0.12/0.37 # There are not enough tableaux to fork, creating more from the initial 6
% 0.12/0.37 # Returning from population with 11 new_tableaux and 0 remaining starting tableaux.
% 0.12/0.37 # We now have 11 tableaux to operate on
% 0.12/0.37 # There were 2 total branch saturation attempts.
% 0.12/0.37 # There were 0 of these attempts blocked.
% 0.12/0.37 # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts.
% 0.12/0.37 # There were 0 free duplicated saturations.
% 0.12/0.37 # There were 2 total successful branch saturations.
% 0.12/0.37 # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction.
% 0.12/0.37 # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch.
% 0.12/0.37 # There were 2 successful branch saturations after the branch.
% 0.12/0.37 # SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.12/0.37 # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.12/0.37 # Begin clausification derivation
% 0.12/0.37
% 0.12/0.37 # End clausification derivation
% 0.12/0.37 # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion
% 0.12/0.37 cnf(i_0_15, negated_conjecture, (environment(sk1))).
% 0.12/0.37 cnf(i_0_16, negated_conjecture, (subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,sk1,sk2))).
% 0.12/0.37 cnf(i_0_14, hypothesis, (greater(resilience(efficient_producers),resilience(first_movers)))).
% 0.12/0.37 cnf(i_0_17, negated_conjecture, (decreases(resources(sk1,sk2))|constant(resources(sk1,sk2)))).
% 0.12/0.37 cnf(i_0_19, negated_conjecture, (constant(resources(sk1,sk2))|~increases(difference(disbanding_rate(first_movers,sk2),disbanding_rate(efficient_producers,sk2))))).
% 0.12/0.37 cnf(i_0_20, negated_conjecture, (decreases(difference(disbanding_rate(first_movers,sk2),disbanding_rate(efficient_producers,sk2)))|~increases(difference(disbanding_rate(first_movers,sk2),disbanding_rate(efficient_producers,sk2))))).
% 0.12/0.37 cnf(i_0_11, plain, (~decreases(X1)|~constant(X1))).
% 0.12/0.37 cnf(i_0_18, negated_conjecture, (decreases(difference(disbanding_rate(first_movers,sk2),disbanding_rate(efficient_producers,sk2)))|decreases(resources(sk1,sk2)))).
% 0.12/0.37 cnf(i_0_13, hypothesis, (constant(difference(disbanding_rate(X1,X2),disbanding_rate(X3,X2)))|~greater(resilience(X3),resilience(X1))|~subpopulations(X1,X3,X4,X2)|~environment(X4)|~constant(resources(X4,X2)))).
% 0.12/0.37 cnf(i_0_12, hypothesis, (increases(difference(disbanding_rate(X1,X2),disbanding_rate(X3,X2)))|~greater(resilience(X3),resilience(X1))|~subpopulations(X1,X3,X4,X2)|~environment(X4)|~decreases(resources(X4,X2)))).
% 0.12/0.37 # End listing active clauses. There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification!
% 0.12/0.37 # Begin printing tableau
% 0.12/0.37 # Found 8 steps
% 0.12/0.37 cnf(i_0_17, negated_conjecture, (decreases(resources(sk1,sk2))|constant(resources(sk1,sk2))), inference(start_rule)).
% 0.12/0.37 cnf(i_0_27, plain, (decreases(resources(sk1,sk2))), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_12])).
% 0.12/0.37 cnf(i_0_159, plain, (~greater(resilience(efficient_producers),resilience(first_movers))), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_14])).
% 0.12/0.37 cnf(i_0_160, plain, (~subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,sk1,sk2)), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_16])).
% 0.12/0.37 cnf(i_0_161, plain, (~environment(sk1)), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_15])).
% 0.12/0.37 cnf(i_0_158, plain, (increases(difference(disbanding_rate(first_movers,sk2),disbanding_rate(efficient_producers,sk2)))), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_20])).
% 0.12/0.37 cnf(i_0_28, plain, (constant(resources(sk1,sk2))), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_28, ...])).
% 0.12/0.37 cnf(i_0_172, plain, (decreases(difference(disbanding_rate(first_movers,sk2),disbanding_rate(efficient_producers,sk2)))), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_172, ...])).
% 0.12/0.37 # End printing tableau
% 0.12/0.37 # SZS output end
% 0.12/0.37 # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s"
% 0.12/0.37 # There were 2 total branch saturation attempts.
% 0.12/0.37 # There were 0 of these attempts blocked.
% 0.12/0.37 # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts.
% 0.12/0.37 # There were 0 free duplicated saturations.
% 0.12/0.37 # There were 2 total successful branch saturations.
% 0.12/0.37 # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction.
% 0.12/0.37 # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch.
% 0.12/0.37 # There were 2 successful branch saturations after the branch.
% 0.12/0.37 # There were 2 total branch saturation attempts.
% 0.12/0.37 # There were 0 of these attempts blocked.
% 0.12/0.37 # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts.
% 0.12/0.37 # There were 0 free duplicated saturations.
% 0.12/0.37 # There were 2 total successful branch saturations.
% 0.12/0.37 # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction.
% 0.12/0.37 # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch.
% 0.12/0.37 # There were 2 successful branch saturations after the branch.
% 0.12/0.37 # SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.12/0.37 # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.12/0.37 # Begin clausification derivation
% 0.12/0.37
% 0.12/0.37 # End clausification derivation
% 0.12/0.37 # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion
% 0.12/0.37 cnf(i_0_15, negated_conjecture, (environment(sk1))).
% 0.12/0.37 cnf(i_0_16, negated_conjecture, (subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,sk1,sk2))).
% 0.12/0.37 cnf(i_0_14, hypothesis, (greater(resilience(efficient_producers),resilience(first_movers)))).
% 0.12/0.37 cnf(i_0_17, negated_conjecture, (decreases(resources(sk1,sk2))|constant(resources(sk1,sk2)))).
% 0.12/0.37 cnf(i_0_19, negated_conjecture, (constant(resources(sk1,sk2))|~increases(difference(disbanding_rate(first_movers,sk2),disbanding_rate(efficient_producers,sk2))))).
% 0.12/0.37 cnf(i_0_20, negated_conjecture, (decreases(difference(disbanding_rate(first_movers,sk2),disbanding_rate(efficient_producers,sk2)))|~increases(difference(disbanding_rate(first_movers,sk2),disbanding_rate(efficient_producers,sk2))))).
% 0.12/0.37 cnf(i_0_11, plain, (~decreases(X1)|~constant(X1))).
% 0.12/0.37 cnf(i_0_18, negated_conjecture, (decreases(difference(disbanding_rate(first_movers,sk2),disbanding_rate(efficient_producers,sk2)))|decreases(resources(sk1,sk2)))).
% 0.12/0.37 cnf(i_0_13, hypothesis, (constant(difference(disbanding_rate(X1,X2),disbanding_rate(X3,X2)))|~greater(resilience(X3),resilience(X1))|~subpopulations(X1,X3,X4,X2)|~environment(X4)|~constant(resources(X4,X2)))).
% 0.12/0.37 cnf(i_0_12, hypothesis, (increases(difference(disbanding_rate(X1,X2),disbanding_rate(X3,X2)))|~greater(resilience(X3),resilience(X1))|~subpopulations(X1,X3,X4,X2)|~environment(X4)|~decreases(resources(X4,X2)))).
% 0.12/0.37 # End listing active clauses. There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification!
% 0.12/0.37 # Begin printing tableau
% 0.12/0.37 # Found 7 steps
% 0.12/0.37 cnf(i_0_16, negated_conjecture, (subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,sk1,sk2)), inference(start_rule)).
% 0.12/0.37 cnf(i_0_29, plain, (subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,sk1,sk2)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_13])).
% 0.12/0.37 cnf(i_0_154, plain, (~greater(resilience(efficient_producers),resilience(first_movers))), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_14])).
% 0.12/0.37 cnf(i_0_156, plain, (~environment(sk1)), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_15])).
% 0.12/0.37 cnf(i_0_153, plain, (constant(difference(disbanding_rate(first_movers,sk2),disbanding_rate(efficient_producers,sk2)))), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_11])).
% 0.12/0.37 cnf(i_0_157, plain, (~constant(resources(sk1,sk2))), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_157, ...])).
% 0.12/0.37 cnf(i_0_158, plain, (~decreases(difference(disbanding_rate(first_movers,sk2),disbanding_rate(efficient_producers,sk2)))), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_158, ...])).
% 0.12/0.37 # End printing tableau
% 0.12/0.37 # SZS output end
% 0.12/0.37 # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s"
% 0.12/0.37 # SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.12/0.37 # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.12/0.37 # Begin clausification derivation
% 0.12/0.37
% 0.12/0.37 # End clausification derivation
% 0.12/0.37 # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion
% 0.12/0.37 cnf(i_0_15, negated_conjecture, (environment(sk1))).
% 0.12/0.37 cnf(i_0_16, negated_conjecture, (subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,sk1,sk2))).
% 0.12/0.37 cnf(i_0_14, hypothesis, (greater(resilience(efficient_producers),resilience(first_movers)))).
% 0.12/0.37 cnf(i_0_17, negated_conjecture, (decreases(resources(sk1,sk2))|constant(resources(sk1,sk2)))).
% 0.12/0.37 cnf(i_0_19, negated_conjecture, (constant(resources(sk1,sk2))|~increases(difference(disbanding_rate(first_movers,sk2),disbanding_rate(efficient_producers,sk2))))).
% 0.12/0.37 cnf(i_0_20, negated_conjecture, (decreases(difference(disbanding_rate(first_movers,sk2),disbanding_rate(efficient_producers,sk2)))|~increases(difference(disbanding_rate(first_movers,sk2),disbanding_rate(efficient_producers,sk2))))).
% 0.12/0.37 cnf(i_0_11, plain, (~decreases(X1)|~constant(X1))).
% 0.12/0.37 cnf(i_0_18, negated_conjecture, (decreases(difference(disbanding_rate(first_movers,sk2),disbanding_rate(efficient_producers,sk2)))|decreases(resources(sk1,sk2)))).
% 0.12/0.37 cnf(i_0_13, hypothesis, (constant(difference(disbanding_rate(X1,X2),disbanding_rate(X3,X2)))|~greater(resilience(X3),resilience(X1))|~subpopulations(X1,X3,X4,X2)|~environment(X4)|~constant(resources(X4,X2)))).
% 0.12/0.37 cnf(i_0_12, hypothesis, (increases(difference(disbanding_rate(X1,X2),disbanding_rate(X3,X2)))|~greater(resilience(X3),resilience(X1))|~subpopulations(X1,X3,X4,X2)|~environment(X4)|~decreases(resources(X4,X2)))).
% 0.12/0.37 # End listing active clauses. There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification!
% 0.12/0.37 # Begin printing tableau
% 0.12/0.37 # Found 7 steps
% 0.12/0.37 cnf(i_0_15, negated_conjecture, (environment(sk1)), inference(start_rule)).
% 0.12/0.37 cnf(i_0_30, plain, (environment(sk1)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_13])).
% 0.12/0.37 cnf(i_0_154, plain, (~greater(resilience(efficient_producers),resilience(first_movers))), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_14])).
% 0.12/0.37 cnf(i_0_155, plain, (~subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,sk1,sk2)), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_16])).
% 0.12/0.37 cnf(i_0_153, plain, (constant(difference(disbanding_rate(first_movers,sk2),disbanding_rate(efficient_producers,sk2)))), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_11])).
% 0.12/0.37 cnf(i_0_157, plain, (~constant(resources(sk1,sk2))), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_157, ...])).
% 0.12/0.37 cnf(i_0_158, plain, (~decreases(difference(disbanding_rate(first_movers,sk2),disbanding_rate(efficient_producers,sk2)))), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_158, ...])).
% 0.12/0.37 # End printing tableau
% 0.12/0.37 # SZS output end
% 0.12/0.37 # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s"
% 0.12/0.37 # There were 2 total branch saturation attempts.
% 0.12/0.37 # There were 0 of these attempts blocked.
% 0.12/0.37 # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts.
% 0.12/0.37 # There were 0 free duplicated saturations.
% 0.12/0.37 # There were 2 total successful branch saturations.
% 0.12/0.37 # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction.
% 0.12/0.37 # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch.
% 0.12/0.37 # There were 2 successful branch saturations after the branch.
% 0.12/0.37 # There were 2 total branch saturation attempts.
% 0.12/0.37 # There were 0 of these attempts blocked.
% 0.12/0.37 # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts.
% 0.12/0.37 # There were 0 free duplicated saturations.
% 0.12/0.37 # There were 2 total successful branch saturations.
% 0.12/0.37 # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction.
% 0.12/0.37 # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch.
% 0.12/0.37 # There were 2 successful branch saturations after the branch.
% 0.12/0.37 # SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.12/0.37 # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.12/0.37 # Begin clausification derivation
% 0.12/0.37
% 0.12/0.37 # End clausification derivation
% 0.12/0.37 # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion
% 0.12/0.37 cnf(i_0_15, negated_conjecture, (environment(sk1))).
% 0.12/0.37 cnf(i_0_16, negated_conjecture, (subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,sk1,sk2))).
% 0.12/0.37 cnf(i_0_14, hypothesis, (greater(resilience(efficient_producers),resilience(first_movers)))).
% 0.12/0.37 cnf(i_0_17, negated_conjecture, (decreases(resources(sk1,sk2))|constant(resources(sk1,sk2)))).
% 0.12/0.37 cnf(i_0_19, negated_conjecture, (constant(resources(sk1,sk2))|~increases(difference(disbanding_rate(first_movers,sk2),disbanding_rate(efficient_producers,sk2))))).
% 0.12/0.37 cnf(i_0_20, negated_conjecture, (decreases(difference(disbanding_rate(first_movers,sk2),disbanding_rate(efficient_producers,sk2)))|~increases(difference(disbanding_rate(first_movers,sk2),disbanding_rate(efficient_producers,sk2))))).
% 0.12/0.37 cnf(i_0_11, plain, (~decreases(X1)|~constant(X1))).
% 0.12/0.37 cnf(i_0_18, negated_conjecture, (decreases(difference(disbanding_rate(first_movers,sk2),disbanding_rate(efficient_producers,sk2)))|decreases(resources(sk1,sk2)))).
% 0.12/0.37 cnf(i_0_13, hypothesis, (constant(difference(disbanding_rate(X1,X2),disbanding_rate(X3,X2)))|~greater(resilience(X3),resilience(X1))|~subpopulations(X1,X3,X4,X2)|~environment(X4)|~constant(resources(X4,X2)))).
% 0.12/0.37 cnf(i_0_12, hypothesis, (increases(difference(disbanding_rate(X1,X2),disbanding_rate(X3,X2)))|~greater(resilience(X3),resilience(X1))|~subpopulations(X1,X3,X4,X2)|~environment(X4)|~decreases(resources(X4,X2)))).
% 0.12/0.37 # End listing active clauses. There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification!
% 0.12/0.37 # Begin printing tableau
% 0.12/0.37 # Found 8 steps
% 0.12/0.37 cnf(i_0_19, negated_conjecture, (constant(resources(sk1,sk2))|~increases(difference(disbanding_rate(first_movers,sk2),disbanding_rate(efficient_producers,sk2)))), inference(start_rule)).
% 0.12/0.37 cnf(i_0_25, plain, (constant(resources(sk1,sk2))), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_13])).
% 0.12/0.37 cnf(i_0_114, plain, (~greater(resilience(efficient_producers),resilience(first_movers))), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_14])).
% 0.12/0.37 cnf(i_0_115, plain, (~subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,sk1,sk2)), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_16])).
% 0.12/0.37 cnf(i_0_116, plain, (~environment(sk1)), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_15])).
% 0.12/0.37 cnf(i_0_113, plain, (constant(difference(disbanding_rate(first_movers,sk2),disbanding_rate(efficient_producers,sk2)))), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_11])).
% 0.12/0.37 cnf(i_0_26, plain, (~increases(difference(disbanding_rate(first_movers,sk2),disbanding_rate(efficient_producers,sk2)))), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_26, ...])).
% 0.12/0.37 cnf(i_0_151, plain, (~decreases(difference(disbanding_rate(first_movers,sk2),disbanding_rate(efficient_producers,sk2)))), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_151, ...])).
% 0.12/0.37 # End printing tableau
% 0.12/0.37 # SZS output end
% 0.12/0.37 # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s"
% 0.12/0.37 # SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.12/0.37 # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.12/0.37 # Begin clausification derivation
% 0.12/0.37
% 0.12/0.37 # End clausification derivation
% 0.12/0.37 # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion
% 0.12/0.37 cnf(i_0_15, negated_conjecture, (environment(sk1))).
% 0.12/0.37 cnf(i_0_16, negated_conjecture, (subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,sk1,sk2))).
% 0.12/0.37 cnf(i_0_14, hypothesis, (greater(resilience(efficient_producers),resilience(first_movers)))).
% 0.12/0.37 cnf(i_0_17, negated_conjecture, (decreases(resources(sk1,sk2))|constant(resources(sk1,sk2)))).
% 0.12/0.37 cnf(i_0_19, negated_conjecture, (constant(resources(sk1,sk2))|~increases(difference(disbanding_rate(first_movers,sk2),disbanding_rate(efficient_producers,sk2))))).
% 0.12/0.37 cnf(i_0_20, negated_conjecture, (decreases(difference(disbanding_rate(first_movers,sk2),disbanding_rate(efficient_producers,sk2)))|~increases(difference(disbanding_rate(first_movers,sk2),disbanding_rate(efficient_producers,sk2))))).
% 0.12/0.37 cnf(i_0_11, plain, (~decreases(X1)|~constant(X1))).
% 0.12/0.37 cnf(i_0_18, negated_conjecture, (decreases(difference(disbanding_rate(first_movers,sk2),disbanding_rate(efficient_producers,sk2)))|decreases(resources(sk1,sk2)))).
% 0.12/0.37 cnf(i_0_13, hypothesis, (constant(difference(disbanding_rate(X1,X2),disbanding_rate(X3,X2)))|~greater(resilience(X3),resilience(X1))|~subpopulations(X1,X3,X4,X2)|~environment(X4)|~constant(resources(X4,X2)))).
% 0.12/0.37 cnf(i_0_12, hypothesis, (increases(difference(disbanding_rate(X1,X2),disbanding_rate(X3,X2)))|~greater(resilience(X3),resilience(X1))|~subpopulations(X1,X3,X4,X2)|~environment(X4)|~decreases(resources(X4,X2)))).
% 0.12/0.37 # End listing active clauses. There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification!
% 0.12/0.37 # Begin printing tableau
% 0.12/0.37 # Found 8 steps
% 0.12/0.37 cnf(i_0_19, negated_conjecture, (constant(resources(sk1,sk2))|~increases(difference(disbanding_rate(first_movers,sk2),disbanding_rate(efficient_producers,sk2)))), inference(start_rule)).
% 0.12/0.37 cnf(i_0_26, plain, (~increases(difference(disbanding_rate(first_movers,sk2),disbanding_rate(efficient_producers,sk2)))), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_12])).
% 0.12/0.37 cnf(i_0_139, plain, (~greater(resilience(efficient_producers),resilience(first_movers))), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_14])).
% 0.12/0.37 cnf(i_0_140, plain, (~subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,sk1,sk2)), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_16])).
% 0.12/0.37 cnf(i_0_141, plain, (~environment(sk1)), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_15])).
% 0.12/0.37 cnf(i_0_142, plain, (~decreases(resources(sk1,sk2))), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_18])).
% 0.12/0.37 cnf(i_0_25, plain, (constant(resources(sk1,sk2))), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_25, ...])).
% 0.12/0.37 cnf(i_0_163, plain, (decreases(difference(disbanding_rate(first_movers,sk2),disbanding_rate(efficient_producers,sk2)))), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_163, ...])).
% 0.12/0.37 # End printing tableau
% 0.12/0.37 # SZS output end
% 0.12/0.37 # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s"
% 0.12/0.37 # There were 2 total branch saturation attempts.
% 0.12/0.37 # There were 0 of these attempts blocked.
% 0.12/0.37 # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts.
% 0.12/0.37 # There were 0 free duplicated saturations.
% 0.12/0.37 # There were 2 total successful branch saturations.
% 0.12/0.37 # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction.
% 0.12/0.37 # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch.
% 0.12/0.37 # There were 2 successful branch saturations after the branch.
% 0.12/0.37 # SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.12/0.37 # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.12/0.37 # Begin clausification derivation
% 0.12/0.37
% 0.12/0.37 # End clausification derivation
% 0.12/0.37 # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion
% 0.12/0.37 cnf(i_0_15, negated_conjecture, (environment(sk1))).
% 0.12/0.37 cnf(i_0_16, negated_conjecture, (subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,sk1,sk2))).
% 0.12/0.37 cnf(i_0_14, hypothesis, (greater(resilience(efficient_producers),resilience(first_movers)))).
% 0.12/0.37 cnf(i_0_17, negated_conjecture, (decreases(resources(sk1,sk2))|constant(resources(sk1,sk2)))).
% 0.12/0.37 cnf(i_0_19, negated_conjecture, (constant(resources(sk1,sk2))|~increases(difference(disbanding_rate(first_movers,sk2),disbanding_rate(efficient_producers,sk2))))).
% 0.12/0.37 cnf(i_0_20, negated_conjecture, (decreases(difference(disbanding_rate(first_movers,sk2),disbanding_rate(efficient_producers,sk2)))|~increases(difference(disbanding_rate(first_movers,sk2),disbanding_rate(efficient_producers,sk2))))).
% 0.12/0.37 cnf(i_0_11, plain, (~decreases(X1)|~constant(X1))).
% 0.12/0.37 cnf(i_0_18, negated_conjecture, (decreases(difference(disbanding_rate(first_movers,sk2),disbanding_rate(efficient_producers,sk2)))|decreases(resources(sk1,sk2)))).
% 0.12/0.37 cnf(i_0_13, hypothesis, (constant(difference(disbanding_rate(X1,X2),disbanding_rate(X3,X2)))|~greater(resilience(X3),resilience(X1))|~subpopulations(X1,X3,X4,X2)|~environment(X4)|~constant(resources(X4,X2)))).
% 0.12/0.37 cnf(i_0_12, hypothesis, (increases(difference(disbanding_rate(X1,X2),disbanding_rate(X3,X2)))|~greater(resilience(X3),resilience(X1))|~subpopulations(X1,X3,X4,X2)|~environment(X4)|~decreases(resources(X4,X2)))).
% 0.12/0.37 # End listing active clauses. There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification!
% 0.12/0.37 # Begin printing tableau
% 0.12/0.37 # Found 5 steps
% 0.12/0.37 cnf(i_0_19, negated_conjecture, (constant(resources(sk1,sk2))|~increases(difference(disbanding_rate(first_movers,sk2),disbanding_rate(efficient_producers,sk2)))), inference(start_rule)).
% 0.12/0.37 cnf(i_0_25, plain, (constant(resources(sk1,sk2))), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_11])).
% 0.12/0.37 cnf(i_0_111, plain, (~decreases(resources(sk1,sk2))), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_18])).
% 0.12/0.37 cnf(i_0_26, plain, (~increases(difference(disbanding_rate(first_movers,sk2),disbanding_rate(efficient_producers,sk2)))), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_26, ...])).
% 0.12/0.37 cnf(i_0_163, plain, (decreases(difference(disbanding_rate(first_movers,sk2),disbanding_rate(efficient_producers,sk2)))), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_163, ...])).
% 0.12/0.37 # End printing tableau
% 0.12/0.37 # SZS output end
% 0.12/0.37 # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s"
% 0.12/0.37 # There were 2 total branch saturation attempts.
% 0.12/0.37 # There were 0 of these attempts blocked.
% 0.12/0.37 # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts.
% 0.12/0.37 # There were 0 free duplicated saturations.
% 0.12/0.37 # There were 2 total successful branch saturations.
% 0.12/0.37 # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction.
% 0.12/0.37 # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch.
% 0.12/0.37 # There were 2 successful branch saturations after the branch.
% 0.12/0.37 # Child (10340) has found a proof.
% 0.12/0.37 # SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.12/0.37 # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.12/0.37 # Begin clausification derivation
% 0.12/0.37
% 0.12/0.37 # End clausification derivation
% 0.12/0.37 # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion
% 0.12/0.37 cnf(i_0_15, negated_conjecture, (environment(sk1))).
% 0.12/0.37 cnf(i_0_16, negated_conjecture, (subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,sk1,sk2))).
% 0.12/0.37 cnf(i_0_14, hypothesis, (greater(resilience(efficient_producers),resilience(first_movers)))).
% 0.12/0.37 cnf(i_0_17, negated_conjecture, (decreases(resources(sk1,sk2))|constant(resources(sk1,sk2)))).
% 0.12/0.37 cnf(i_0_19, negated_conjecture, (constant(resources(sk1,sk2))|~increases(difference(disbanding_rate(first_movers,sk2),disbanding_rate(efficient_producers,sk2))))).
% 0.12/0.37 cnf(i_0_20, negated_conjecture, (decreases(difference(disbanding_rate(first_movers,sk2),disbanding_rate(efficient_producers,sk2)))|~increases(difference(disbanding_rate(first_movers,sk2),disbanding_rate(efficient_producers,sk2))))).
% 0.12/0.37 cnf(i_0_11, plain, (~decreases(X1)|~constant(X1))).
% 0.12/0.37 cnf(i_0_18, negated_conjecture, (decreases(difference(disbanding_rate(first_movers,sk2),disbanding_rate(efficient_producers,sk2)))|decreases(resources(sk1,sk2)))).
% 0.12/0.37 cnf(i_0_13, hypothesis, (constant(difference(disbanding_rate(X1,X2),disbanding_rate(X3,X2)))|~greater(resilience(X3),resilience(X1))|~subpopulations(X1,X3,X4,X2)|~environment(X4)|~constant(resources(X4,X2)))).
% 0.12/0.37 cnf(i_0_12, hypothesis, (increases(difference(disbanding_rate(X1,X2),disbanding_rate(X3,X2)))|~greater(resilience(X3),resilience(X1))|~subpopulations(X1,X3,X4,X2)|~environment(X4)|~decreases(resources(X4,X2)))).
% 0.12/0.37 # End listing active clauses. There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification!
% 0.12/0.37 # Begin printing tableau
% 0.12/0.37 # Found 8 steps
% 0.12/0.37 cnf(i_0_20, negated_conjecture, (decreases(difference(disbanding_rate(first_movers,sk2),disbanding_rate(efficient_producers,sk2)))|~increases(difference(disbanding_rate(first_movers,sk2),disbanding_rate(efficient_producers,sk2)))), inference(start_rule)).
% 0.12/0.37 cnf(i_0_24, plain, (~increases(difference(disbanding_rate(first_movers,sk2),disbanding_rate(efficient_producers,sk2)))), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_12])).
% 0.12/0.37 cnf(i_0_99, plain, (~greater(resilience(efficient_producers),resilience(first_movers))), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_14])).
% 0.12/0.37 cnf(i_0_100, plain, (~subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,sk1,sk2)), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_16])).
% 0.12/0.37 cnf(i_0_101, plain, (~environment(sk1)), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_15])).
% 0.12/0.37 cnf(i_0_102, plain, (~decreases(resources(sk1,sk2))), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_18])).
% 0.12/0.37 cnf(i_0_23, plain, (decreases(difference(disbanding_rate(first_movers,sk2),disbanding_rate(efficient_producers,sk2)))), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_23, ...])).
% 0.12/0.37 cnf(i_0_163, plain, (decreases(difference(disbanding_rate(first_movers,sk2),disbanding_rate(efficient_producers,sk2)))), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_163, ...])).
% 0.12/0.37 # End printing tableau
% 0.12/0.37 # SZS output end
% 0.12/0.37 # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s"
% 0.12/0.37
% 0.12/0.37 # Proof search is over...
% 0.12/0.37 # Freeing feature tree
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------