TSTP Solution File: MGT022-2 by CSE---1.6
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CSE---1.6
% Problem : MGT022-2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %s %d
% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 09:06:49 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.19s 0.63s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.19s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12 % Problem : MGT022-2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.00/0.13 % Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %s %d
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Mon Aug 28 06:17:01 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.56 start to proof:theBenchmark
% 0.19/0.62 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.62 % File :CSE---1.6
% 0.19/0.62 % Problem :theBenchmark
% 0.19/0.62 % Transform :cnf
% 0.19/0.62 % Format :tptp:raw
% 0.19/0.62 % Command :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.19/0.62
% 0.19/0.62 % Result :Theorem 0.010000s
% 0.19/0.62 % Output :CNFRefutation 0.010000s
% 0.19/0.62 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.62 %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.62 % File : MGT022-2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.19/0.62 % Domain : Management (Organisation Theory)
% 0.19/0.62 % Problem : Decreasing resource availability affects FMS more than EPs
% 0.19/0.62 % Version : [PM93] axioms.
% 0.19/0.62 % English : Decreasing resource availability affects the disbanding rate
% 0.19/0.63 % of first movers more than the disbanding rate of efficient
% 0.19/0.63 % producers.
% 0.19/0.63
% 0.19/0.63 % Refs : [PM93] Peli & Masuch (1993), The Logic of Propogation Strateg
% 0.19/0.63 % : [PM94] Peli & Masuch (1994), The Logic of Propogation Strateg
% 0.19/0.63 % : [PB+94] Peli et al. (1994), A Logical Approach to Formalizing
% 0.19/0.63 % Source : [TPTP]
% 0.19/0.63 % Names :
% 0.19/0.63
% 0.19/0.63 % Status : Unsatisfiable
% 0.19/0.63 % Rating : 0.00 v2.4.0
% 0.19/0.63 % Syntax : Number of clauses : 10 ( 3 unt; 2 nHn; 10 RR)
% 0.19/0.63 % Number of literals : 23 ( 0 equ; 12 neg)
% 0.19/0.63 % Maximal clause size : 5 ( 2 avg)
% 0.19/0.63 % Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% 0.19/0.63 % Number of predicates : 6 ( 6 usr; 0 prp; 1-4 aty)
% 0.19/0.63 % Number of functors : 8 ( 8 usr; 4 con; 0-2 aty)
% 0.19/0.63 % Number of variables : 9 ( 0 sgn)
% 0.19/0.63 % SPC : CNF_UNS_RFO_NEQ_NHN
% 0.19/0.63
% 0.19/0.63 % Comments : Created with tptp2X -f tptp -t clausify:otter MGT022+2.p
% 0.19/0.63 %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.63 cnf(mp_constant_not_decrease_1,axiom,
% 0.19/0.63 ( ~ constant(A)
% 0.19/0.63 | ~ decreases(A) ) ).
% 0.19/0.63
% 0.19/0.63 cnf(a6_2,hypothesis,
% 0.19/0.63 ( ~ environment(A)
% 0.19/0.63 | ~ subpopulations(B,C,A,D)
% 0.19/0.63 | ~ greater(resilience(C),resilience(B))
% 0.19/0.63 | ~ decreases(resources(A,D))
% 0.19/0.63 | increases(difference(disbanding_rate(B,D),disbanding_rate(C,D))) ) ).
% 0.19/0.63
% 0.19/0.63 cnf(a6_3,hypothesis,
% 0.19/0.63 ( ~ environment(A)
% 0.19/0.63 | ~ subpopulations(B,C,A,D)
% 0.19/0.63 | ~ greater(resilience(C),resilience(B))
% 0.19/0.63 | ~ constant(resources(A,D))
% 0.19/0.63 | constant(difference(disbanding_rate(B,D),disbanding_rate(C,D))) ) ).
% 0.19/0.63
% 0.19/0.63 cnf(a2_4,hypothesis,
% 0.19/0.63 greater(resilience(efficient_producers),resilience(first_movers)) ).
% 0.19/0.63
% 0.19/0.63 cnf(prove_l4_5,negated_conjecture,
% 0.19/0.63 environment(sk1) ).
% 0.19/0.63
% 0.19/0.63 cnf(prove_l4_6,negated_conjecture,
% 0.19/0.63 subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,sk1,sk2) ).
% 0.19/0.63
% 0.19/0.63 cnf(prove_l4_7,negated_conjecture,
% 0.19/0.63 ( decreases(resources(sk1,sk2))
% 0.19/0.63 | constant(resources(sk1,sk2)) ) ).
% 0.19/0.63
% 0.19/0.63 cnf(prove_l4_8,negated_conjecture,
% 0.19/0.63 ( decreases(resources(sk1,sk2))
% 0.19/0.63 | decreases(difference(disbanding_rate(first_movers,sk2),disbanding_rate(efficient_producers,sk2))) ) ).
% 0.19/0.63
% 0.19/0.63 cnf(prove_l4_9,negated_conjecture,
% 0.19/0.63 ( ~ increases(difference(disbanding_rate(first_movers,sk2),disbanding_rate(efficient_producers,sk2)))
% 0.19/0.63 | constant(resources(sk1,sk2)) ) ).
% 0.19/0.63
% 0.19/0.63 cnf(prove_l4_10,negated_conjecture,
% 0.19/0.63 ( ~ increases(difference(disbanding_rate(first_movers,sk2),disbanding_rate(efficient_producers,sk2)))
% 0.19/0.63 | decreases(difference(disbanding_rate(first_movers,sk2),disbanding_rate(efficient_producers,sk2))) ) ).
% 0.19/0.63
% 0.19/0.63 %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.63 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.63 % Proof found
% 0.19/0.63 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.19/0.63 % SZS output start Proof
% 0.19/0.63 %ClaNum:10(EqnAxiom:0)
% 0.19/0.63 %VarNum:28(SingletonVarNum:9)
% 0.19/0.63 %MaxLitNum:5
% 0.19/0.63 %MaxfuncDepth:2
% 0.19/0.63 %SharedTerms:17
% 0.19/0.63 %goalClause: 1 3 5 6 7 8
% 0.19/0.63 %singleGoalClaCount:2
% 0.19/0.63 [1]P1(a1)
% 0.19/0.63 [3]P5(a6,a2,a1,a8)
% 0.19/0.63 [2]P4(f5(a2),f5(a6))
% 0.19/0.63 [5]P3(f7(a1,a8))+P2(f7(a1,a8))
% 0.19/0.63 [6]P3(f7(a1,a8))+P3(f4(f3(a6,a8),f3(a2,a8)))
% 0.19/0.63 [7]~P6(f4(f3(a6,a8),f3(a2,a8)))+P2(f7(a1,a8))
% 0.19/0.63 [8]~P6(f4(f3(a6,a8),f3(a2,a8)))+P3(f4(f3(a6,a8),f3(a2,a8)))
% 0.19/0.63 [4]~P3(x41)+~P2(x41)
% 0.19/0.63 [9]~P5(x91,x93,x94,x92)+~P1(x94)+~P4(f5(x93),f5(x91))+~P2(f7(x94,x92))+P2(f4(f3(x91,x92),f3(x93,x92)))
% 0.19/0.63 [10]~P5(x101,x103,x104,x102)+~P1(x104)+~P4(f5(x103),f5(x101))+~P3(f7(x104,x102))+P6(f4(f3(x101,x102),f3(x103,x102)))
% 0.19/0.63 %EqnAxiom
% 0.19/0.63
% 0.19/0.63 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.63 cnf(11,plain,
% 0.19/0.63 (~P3(f7(a1,a8))+P6(f4(f3(a6,a8),f3(a2,a8)))),
% 0.19/0.63 inference(scs_inference,[],[1,3,2,10])).
% 0.19/0.63 cnf(12,plain,
% 0.19/0.63 (~P2(f7(a1,a8))+P2(f4(f3(a6,a8),f3(a2,a8)))),
% 0.19/0.63 inference(scs_inference,[],[1,3,2,10,9])).
% 0.19/0.63 cnf(14,plain,
% 0.19/0.63 (~P2(f7(a1,a8))+P3(f4(f3(a6,a8),f3(a2,a8)))),
% 0.19/0.63 inference(scs_inference,[],[6,4])).
% 0.19/0.63 cnf(15,plain,
% 0.19/0.63 (P2(f4(f3(a6,a8),f3(a2,a8)))+~P6(f4(f3(a6,a8),f3(a2,a8)))),
% 0.19/0.63 inference(scs_inference,[],[7,12])).
% 0.19/0.63 cnf(17,plain,
% 0.19/0.63 (~P2(f4(f3(a6,a8),f3(a2,a8)))+~P2(f7(a1,a8))),
% 0.19/0.63 inference(scs_inference,[],[14,4])).
% 0.19/0.63 cnf(19,plain,
% 0.19/0.63 (~P2(f7(a1,a8))+~P6(f4(f3(a6,a8),f3(a2,a8)))),
% 0.19/0.63 inference(scs_inference,[],[17,15])).
% 0.19/0.63 cnf(21,plain,
% 0.19/0.63 (P3(f7(a1,a8))+~P6(f4(f3(a6,a8),f3(a2,a8)))),
% 0.19/0.63 inference(scs_inference,[],[19,5])).
% 0.19/0.63 cnf(25,plain,
% 0.19/0.63 (~P3(f7(a1,a8))+~P6(f4(f3(a6,a8),f3(a2,a8)))),
% 0.19/0.63 inference(scs_inference,[],[4,7])).
% 0.19/0.63 cnf(26,plain,
% 0.19/0.63 (~P6(f4(f3(a6,a8),f3(a2,a8)))),
% 0.19/0.63 inference(scs_inference,[],[25,21])).
% 0.19/0.63 cnf(27,plain,
% 0.19/0.63 (~P3(f7(a1,a8))),
% 0.19/0.63 inference(scs_inference,[],[26,11])).
% 0.19/0.63 cnf(28,plain,
% 0.19/0.63 (P2(f7(a1,a8))),
% 0.19/0.63 inference(scs_inference,[],[27,5])).
% 0.19/0.63 cnf(32,plain,
% 0.19/0.63 (P2(f4(f3(a6,a8),f3(a2,a8)))),
% 0.19/0.63 inference(scs_inference,[],[28,12])).
% 0.19/0.63 cnf(34,plain,
% 0.19/0.63 (~P2(f4(f3(a6,a8),f3(a2,a8)))),
% 0.19/0.63 inference(scs_inference,[],[28,17])).
% 0.19/0.63 cnf(37,plain,
% 0.19/0.63 ($false),
% 0.19/0.63 inference(scs_inference,[],[34,32]),
% 0.19/0.63 ['proof']).
% 0.19/0.63 % SZS output end Proof
% 0.19/0.63 % Total time :0.010000s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------