TSTP Solution File: MGT022+1 by SATCoP---0.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SATCoP---0.1
% Problem  : MGT022+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : satcop --statistics %s

% Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 22:24:19 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.10s 0.29s
% Output   : Proof 0.10s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : ERROR: Analysing output (MakeTreeStats fails)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(g0,plain,
    environment(sK0),
    inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_l4)]) ).

cnf(g1,plain,
    subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,sK0,sK1),
    inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_l4)]) ).

cnf(g2,plain,
    ( decreases(resources(sK0,sK1))
    | sP0 ),
    inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_l4)]) ).

cnf(g3,plain,
    ( ~ increases(difference(disbanding_rate(first_movers,sK1),disbanding_rate(efficient_producers,sK1)))
    | sP0 ),
    inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_l4)]) ).

cnf(g4,plain,
    ( ~ constant(resources(sK0,sK1))
    | ~ environment(sK0)
    | ~ subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,sK0,sK1)
    | ~ greater(resilience(efficient_producers),resilience(first_movers))
    | constant(difference(disbanding_rate(first_movers,sK1),disbanding_rate(efficient_producers,sK1))) ),
    inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',a5)]) ).

cnf(g5,plain,
    ( ~ decreases(resources(sK0,sK1))
    | ~ environment(sK0)
    | ~ subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,sK0,sK1)
    | ~ greater(resilience(efficient_producers),resilience(first_movers))
    | increases(difference(disbanding_rate(first_movers,sK1),disbanding_rate(efficient_producers,sK1))) ),
    inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',a5)]) ).

cnf(g6,plain,
    ( constant(resources(sK0,sK1))
    | ~ sP0 ),
    inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_l4)]) ).

cnf(g7,plain,
    ( decreases(difference(disbanding_rate(first_movers,sK1),disbanding_rate(efficient_producers,sK1)))
    | ~ sP0 ),
    inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_l4)]) ).

cnf(g8,plain,
    greater(resilience(efficient_producers),resilience(first_movers)),
    inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',a2)]) ).

cnf(g9,plain,
    ( ~ constant(difference(disbanding_rate(first_movers,sK1),disbanding_rate(efficient_producers,sK1)))
    | ~ decreases(difference(disbanding_rate(first_movers,sK1),disbanding_rate(efficient_producers,sK1))) ),
    inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',mp_constant_not_decrease)]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.02/0.09  % Problem  : MGT022+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.0.0.
% 0.02/0.09  % Command  : satcop --statistics %s
% 0.10/0.28  % Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.28  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.28  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.28  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.10/0.28  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.10/0.28  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.28  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.10/0.28  % DateTime : Thu Jun  9 11:27:07 EDT 2022
% 0.10/0.28  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.10/0.29  % symbols: 17
% 0.10/0.29  % clauses: 10
% 0.10/0.29  % start clauses: 4
% 0.10/0.29  % iterative deepening steps: 28
% 0.10/0.29  % maximum path limit: 1
% 0.10/0.29  % literal attempts: 306
% 0.10/0.29  % depth failures: 158
% 0.10/0.29  % regularity failures: 0
% 0.10/0.29  % tautology failures: 0
% 0.10/0.29  % reductions: 0
% 0.10/0.29  % extensions: 221
% 0.10/0.29  % SAT variables: 128
% 0.10/0.29  % SAT clauses: 111
% 0.10/0.29  % WalkSAT solutions: 103
% 0.10/0.29  % CDCL solutions: 0
% 0.10/0.29  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.10/0.29  % SZS output start ListOfCNF for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------