TSTP Solution File: MGT022+1 by ConnectPP---0.2.2
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : ConnectPP---0.2.2
% Problem : MGT022+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : connect++ --verbosity 0 --no-colour --tptp-proof --schedule default %s
% Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Mar 6 09:10:54 EST 2024
% Result : Theorem 0.13s 0.35s
% Output : Proof 0.13s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.13 % Problem : MGT022+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.0.0.
% 0.07/0.13 % Command : connect++ --verbosity 0 --no-colour --tptp-proof --schedule default %s
% 0.13/0.35 % Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % DateTime : Mon Mar 4 04:24:03 EST 2024
% 0.13/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.13/0.35 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.13/0.35 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% 0.13/0.35
% 0.13/0.35 % Formula: mp_constant_not_decrease ( axiom ) converted to clauses:
% 0.13/0.35 cnf(mp_constant_not_decrease-1, axiom, ( ~constant(_u0) | ~decreases(_u0) )).
% 0.13/0.35
% 0.13/0.35 % Formula: a5 ( hypothesis ) converted to clauses:
% 0.13/0.35 cnf(a5-1, hypothesis, ( ~environment(_u4) | ~subpopulations(_u3, _u2, _u4, _u1) | ~greater(resilience(_u2), resilience(_u3)) | ~decreases(resources(_u4, _u1)) | increases(difference(disbanding_rate(_u3, _u1), disbanding_rate(_u2, _u1))) )).
% 0.13/0.35 cnf(a5-2, hypothesis, ( ~environment(_u4) | ~subpopulations(_u3, _u2, _u4, _u1) | ~greater(resilience(_u2), resilience(_u3)) | ~constant(resources(_u4, _u1)) | constant(difference(disbanding_rate(_u3, _u1), disbanding_rate(_u2, _u1))) )).
% 0.13/0.35
% 0.13/0.35 % Formula: a2 ( hypothesis ) converted to clauses:
% 0.13/0.35 cnf(a2-1, hypothesis, ( greater(resilience(efficient_producers), resilience(first_movers)) )).
% 0.13/0.35
% 0.13/0.35 % Formula: prove_l4 ( conjecture ) converted to clauses:
% 0.13/0.35 cnf(prove_l4-1, negated_conjecture, ( environment(skolem1) )).
% 0.13/0.36 cnf(prove_l4-2, negated_conjecture, ( subpopulations(first_movers, efficient_producers, skolem1, skolem2) )).
% 0.13/0.36 cnf(prove_l4-3, negated_conjecture, ( decreases(resources(skolem1, skolem2)) | constant(resources(skolem1, skolem2)) )).
% 0.13/0.36 cnf(prove_l4-4, negated_conjecture, ( decreases(resources(skolem1, skolem2)) | decreases(difference(disbanding_rate(first_movers, skolem2), disbanding_rate(efficient_producers, skolem2))) )).
% 0.13/0.36 cnf(prove_l4-5, negated_conjecture, ( ~increases(difference(disbanding_rate(first_movers, skolem2), disbanding_rate(efficient_producers, skolem2))) | constant(resources(skolem1, skolem2)) )).
% 0.13/0.36 cnf(prove_l4-6, negated_conjecture, ( ~increases(difference(disbanding_rate(first_movers, skolem2), disbanding_rate(efficient_producers, skolem2))) | decreases(difference(disbanding_rate(first_movers, skolem2), disbanding_rate(efficient_producers, skolem2))) )).
% 0.13/0.36
% 0.13/0.36 % Problem matrix:
% 0.13/0.36 cnf(matrix-0, plain, ( ~constant(_u0) | ~decreases(_u0) )).
% 0.13/0.36 cnf(matrix-1, plain, ( ~environment(_u4) | ~subpopulations(_u3, _u2, _u4, _u1) | ~greater(resilience(_u2), resilience(_u3)) | ~decreases(resources(_u4, _u1)) | increases(difference(disbanding_rate(_u3, _u1), disbanding_rate(_u2, _u1))) )).
% 0.13/0.36 cnf(matrix-2, plain, ( ~environment(_u4) | ~subpopulations(_u3, _u2, _u4, _u1) | ~greater(resilience(_u2), resilience(_u3)) | ~constant(resources(_u4, _u1)) | constant(difference(disbanding_rate(_u3, _u1), disbanding_rate(_u2, _u1))) )).
% 0.13/0.36 cnf(matrix-3, plain, ( greater(resilience(efficient_producers), resilience(first_movers)) )).
% 0.13/0.36 cnf(matrix-4, plain, ( environment(skolem1) )).
% 0.13/0.36 cnf(matrix-5, plain, ( subpopulations(first_movers, efficient_producers, skolem1, skolem2) )).
% 0.13/0.36 cnf(matrix-6, plain, ( decreases(resources(skolem1, skolem2)) | constant(resources(skolem1, skolem2)) )).
% 0.13/0.36 cnf(matrix-7, plain, ( decreases(resources(skolem1, skolem2)) | decreases(difference(disbanding_rate(first_movers, skolem2), disbanding_rate(efficient_producers, skolem2))) )).
% 0.13/0.36 cnf(matrix-8, plain, ( ~increases(difference(disbanding_rate(first_movers, skolem2), disbanding_rate(efficient_producers, skolem2))) | constant(resources(skolem1, skolem2)) )).
% 0.13/0.36 cnf(matrix-9, plain, ( ~increases(difference(disbanding_rate(first_movers, skolem2), disbanding_rate(efficient_producers, skolem2))) | decreases(difference(disbanding_rate(first_movers, skolem2), disbanding_rate(efficient_producers, skolem2))) )).
% 0.13/0.36
% 0.13/0.36 % Proof stack:
% 0.13/0.36 cnf(proof-stack, plain,
% 0.13/0.36 proof_stack(
% 0.13/0.36 start(0),
% 0.13/0.36 left_branch(0, 8, 1, 2),
% 0.13/0.36 left_branch(0, 1, 4, 3),
% 0.13/0.36 left_branch(0, 4, 0, 4),
% 0.13/0.36 right_branch(4),
% 0.13/0.36 left_branch(0, 6, 0, 5),
% 0.13/0.36 reduction(0, 0),
% 0.13/0.36 right_branch(5),
% 0.13/0.36 left_branch(0, 3, 0, 6),
% 0.13/0.36 right_branch(6),
% 0.13/0.36 left_branch(0, 5, 0, 7),
% 0.13/0.36 right_branch(7),
% 0.13/0.36 right_branch(3),
% 0.13/0.36 right_branch(2),
% 0.13/0.36 left_branch(0, 7, 0, 3),
% 0.13/0.36 left_branch(0, 0, 1, 4),
% 0.13/0.36 left_branch(0, 2, 4, 5),
% 0.13/0.36 left_branch(0, 4, 0, 6),
% 0.13/0.36 right_branch(6),
% 0.13/0.36 lemmata(0, 0),
% 0.13/0.36 left_branch(0, 3, 0, 8),
% 0.13/0.36 right_branch(8),
% 0.13/0.36 left_branch(0, 5, 0, 9),
% 0.13/0.36 right_branch(9),
% 0.13/0.36 right_branch(5),
% 0.13/0.36 right_branch(4),
% 0.13/0.36 right_branch(3)
% 0.13/0.36 )).
% 0.13/0.36 % SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------