TSTP Solution File: MGT020+1 by SOS---2.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SOS---2.0
% Problem  : MGT020+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : sos-script %s

% Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 22:25:50 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.20s 0.56s
% Output   : Refutation 0.20s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12  % Problem  : MGT020+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.0.0.
% 0.07/0.12  % Command  : sos-script %s
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Thu Jun  9 12:43:12 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.13/0.35  ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.13/0.35  The process was started by sandbox on n027.cluster.edu,
% 0.13/0.35  Thu Jun  9 12:43:12 2022
% 0.13/0.35  The command was "./sos".  The process ID is 9349.
% 0.13/0.35  
% 0.13/0.35  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.13/0.35  set(auto).
% 0.13/0.35     dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.13/0.35     dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.13/0.35     dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.13/0.35     dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.13/0.35     dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.13/0.35     dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.13/0.35     dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.13/0.35     dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.13/0.35     dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.13/0.35     dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.13/0.35     dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.13/0.35     dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.13/0.35     dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.13/0.35  clear(print_given).
% 0.13/0.35  
% 0.13/0.35  formula_list(usable).
% 0.13/0.35  
% 0.13/0.35  SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=7.
% 0.13/0.35  
% 0.13/0.35  This ia a non-Horn set with equality.  The strategy will be
% 0.13/0.35  Knuth-Bendix, ordered hyper_res, ur_res, factoring, and
% 0.13/0.35  unit deletion, with positive clauses in sos and nonpositive
% 0.13/0.35  clauses in usable.
% 0.13/0.35  
% 0.13/0.35     dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 0.13/0.35     dependent: set(para_from).
% 0.13/0.35     dependent: set(para_into).
% 0.13/0.35     dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 0.13/0.35     dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 0.13/0.35     dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 0.13/0.35     dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 0.13/0.35     dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 0.13/0.35     dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 0.13/0.35     dependent: set(order_eq).
% 0.13/0.35     dependent: set(back_demod).
% 0.13/0.35     dependent: set(lrpo).
% 0.13/0.35     dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.13/0.35     dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.13/0.35     dependent: set(factor).
% 0.13/0.35  
% 0.13/0.35  ------------> process usable:
% 0.13/0.35  
% 0.13/0.35  ------------> process sos:
% 0.13/0.35    Following clause subsumed by 16 during input processing: 0 [copy,16,flip.1] {-} A=A.
% 0.13/0.35  
% 0.13/0.35  ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.20/0.56  
% 0.20/0.56  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.20/0.56  
% 0.20/0.56  
% 0.20/0.56  Failed to model usable list: disabling FINDER
% 0.20/0.56  
% 0.20/0.56  
% 0.20/0.56  
% 0.20/0.56  -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.20/0.56  
% 0.20/0.56  UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.20/0.56  SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.20/0.56  SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.20/0.56  number of clauses in intial UL: 13
% 0.20/0.56  number of clauses initially in problem: 16
% 0.20/0.56  percentage of clauses intially in UL: 81
% 0.20/0.56  percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 93
% 0.20/0.56  percent of all initial clauses that are short: 93
% 0.20/0.56  absolute distinct symbol count: 15
% 0.20/0.56     distinct predicate count: 7
% 0.20/0.56     distinct function count: 4
% 0.20/0.56     distinct constant count: 4
% 0.20/0.56  
% 0.20/0.56  ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.20/0.56  
% 0.20/0.56  
% 0.20/0.56  
% 0.20/0.56  =========== start of search ===========
% 0.20/0.56  
% 0.20/0.56  -------- PROOF -------- 
% 0.20/0.56  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.20/0.56  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.20/0.56  
% 0.20/0.56  -----> EMPTY CLAUSE at   0.19 sec ----> 254 [hyper,242,1,14,217] {-} $F.
% 0.20/0.56  
% 0.20/0.56  Length of proof is 10.  Level of proof is 7.
% 0.20/0.56  
% 0.20/0.56  ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 0.20/0.56  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.20/0.56  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.20/0.56  
% 0.20/0.56  1 [] {+} -environment(A)| -subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,A,B)| -decreases(difference(disbanding_rate(first_movers,B),disbanding_rate(efficient_producers,B))).
% 0.20/0.56  2 [] {+} -environment(A)| -in_environment(A,initial_FM_EP(A))|subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,A,initial_FM_EP(A)).
% 0.20/0.56  3 [] {+} -environment(A)| -subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,A,B)|greater_or_equal(B,initial_FM_EP(A)).
% 0.20/0.56  4 [] {+} -environment(A)| -greater_or_equal(B,C)| -greater_or_equal(D,B)| -subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,A,D)| -greater(disbanding_rate(first_movers,C),disbanding_rate(efficient_producers,C))|decreases(difference(disbanding_rate(first_movers,B),disbanding_rate(efficient_producers,B)))|greater(disbanding_rate(first_movers,D),disbanding_rate(efficient_producers,D)).
% 0.20/0.56  5 [] {+} -environment(A)| -subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,A,B)|in_environment(A,B).
% 0.20/0.56  6 [] {+} -environment(A)|greater_or_equal(initial_FM_EP(A),start_time(A)).
% 0.20/0.56  7 [] {+} -environment(A)| -greater_or_equal(B,start_time(A))| -greater(C,B)| -in_environment(A,C)|in_environment(A,B).
% 0.20/0.56  9 [] {+} -greater_or_equal(A,B)|greater(A,B)|A=B.
% 0.20/0.56  10 [] {+} -environment(A)|greater(disbanding_rate(first_movers,initial_FM_EP(A)),disbanding_rate(efficient_producers,initial_FM_EP(A))).
% 0.20/0.56  12 [] {+} -greater(disbanding_rate(first_movers,$c1),disbanding_rate(efficient_producers,$c1)).
% 0.20/0.56  14 [] {-} environment($c2).
% 0.20/0.56  15 [] {-} subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,$c2,$c1).
% 0.20/0.56  17 [hyper,14,10] {-} greater(disbanding_rate(first_movers,initial_FM_EP($c2)),disbanding_rate(efficient_producers,initial_FM_EP($c2))).
% 0.20/0.56  18 [hyper,14,6] {-} greater_or_equal(initial_FM_EP($c2),start_time($c2)).
% 0.20/0.56  20 [hyper,15,5,14] {-} in_environment($c2,$c1).
% 0.20/0.56  21 [hyper,15,3,14] {-} greater_or_equal($c1,initial_FM_EP($c2)).
% 0.20/0.56  28 [hyper,21,9,flip.2] {-} greater($c1,initial_FM_EP($c2))|initial_FM_EP($c2)=$c1.
% 0.20/0.56  47 [hyper,28,7,14,18,20] {-} initial_FM_EP($c2)=$c1|in_environment($c2,initial_FM_EP($c2)).
% 0.20/0.56  70 [hyper,47,2,14] {-} initial_FM_EP($c2)=$c1|subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,$c2,initial_FM_EP($c2)).
% 0.20/0.56  217 [para_from,70.1.1,2.2.2,unit_del,14,20,factor_simp] {-} subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,$c2,initial_FM_EP($c2)).
% 0.20/0.56  219 [hyper,217,3,14] {-} greater_or_equal(initial_FM_EP($c2),initial_FM_EP($c2)).
% 0.20/0.56  242 [hyper,219,4,14,21,15,17,unit_del,12] {-} decreases(difference(disbanding_rate(first_movers,initial_FM_EP($c2)),disbanding_rate(efficient_producers,initial_FM_EP($c2)))).
% 0.20/0.56  254 [hyper,242,1,14,217] {-} $F.
% 0.20/0.56  
% 0.20/0.56  % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.20/0.56  ------------ end of proof -------------
% 0.20/0.56  
% 0.20/0.56  
% 0.20/0.56  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 0.20/0.56  
% 0.20/0.56  
% 0.20/0.56  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 0.20/0.56  
% 0.20/0.56  ============ end of search ============
% 0.20/0.56  
% 0.20/0.56  That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 0.20/0.56  
% 0.20/0.56  Process 9349 finished Thu Jun  9 12:43:13 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------