TSTP Solution File: MGT020+1 by SNARK---20120808r022
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SNARK---20120808r022
% Problem : MGT020+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run-snark %s %d
% Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 22:24:44 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.14s 0.40s
% Output : Refutation 0.14s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 8
% Number of leaves : 12
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 25 ( 11 unt; 7 nHn; 25 RR)
% Number of literals : 52 ( 7 equ; 24 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 7 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 8 ( 6 usr; 1 prp; 0-4 aty)
% Number of functors : 8 ( 8 usr; 4 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 18 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(1,axiom,
( ~ environment(X)
| ~ subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,X,Y)
| ~ decreases(difference(disbanding_rate(first_movers,Y),disbanding_rate(efficient_producers,Y))) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',l3) ).
cnf(2,axiom,
( ~ environment(X)
| ~ in_environment(X,initial_FM_EP(X))
| subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,X,initial_FM_EP(X)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',mp_earliest_time_point) ).
cnf(3,axiom,
( ~ environment(X)
| ~ subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,X,Y)
| greater_or_equal(Y,initial_FM_EP(X)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',mp_earliest_time_point) ).
cnf(4,axiom,
( ~ environment(X)
| ~ greater_or_equal(Y,Z)
| ~ greater_or_equal(U,Y)
| ~ subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,X,U)
| ~ greater(disbanding_rate(first_movers,Z),disbanding_rate(efficient_producers,Z))
| decreases(difference(disbanding_rate(first_movers,Y),disbanding_rate(efficient_producers,Y)))
| greater(disbanding_rate(first_movers,U),disbanding_rate(efficient_producers,U)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',mp_positive_function_difference) ).
cnf(5,axiom,
( ~ environment(X)
| ~ subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,X,Y)
| in_environment(X,Y) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',mp_time_point_occurs) ).
cnf(6,axiom,
( ~ environment(X)
| greater_or_equal(initial_FM_EP(X),start_time(X)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',mp_initial_time) ).
cnf(7,axiom,
( ~ environment(X)
| ~ greater_or_equal(Y,start_time(X))
| ~ greater(Z,Y)
| ~ in_environment(X,Z)
| in_environment(X,Y) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',mp_times_in_order) ).
cnf(9,axiom,
( ~ greater_or_equal(X,Y)
| greater(X,Y)
| X = Y ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',mp_greater_or_equal) ).
cnf(10,hypothesis,
( ~ environment(X)
| greater(disbanding_rate(first_movers,initial_FM_EP(X)),disbanding_rate(efficient_producers,initial_FM_EP(X))) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',a8) ).
cnf(12,negated_conjecture,
environment('SKOLEMAAAN1'),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_l2) ).
cnf(13,negated_conjecture,
subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,'SKOLEMAAAN1','SKOLEMAAAN2'),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_l2) ).
cnf(14,negated_conjecture,
~ greater(disbanding_rate(first_movers,'SKOLEMAAAN2'),disbanding_rate(efficient_producers,'SKOLEMAAAN2')),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_l2) ).
cnf(15,plain,
greater_or_equal(initial_FM_EP('SKOLEMAAAN1'),start_time('SKOLEMAAAN1')),
inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[6,12]) ).
cnf(16,plain,
in_environment('SKOLEMAAAN1','SKOLEMAAAN2'),
inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[5,12,13]) ).
cnf(17,plain,
greater_or_equal('SKOLEMAAAN2',initial_FM_EP('SKOLEMAAAN1')),
inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[3,12,13]) ).
cnf(18,plain,
greater(disbanding_rate(first_movers,initial_FM_EP('SKOLEMAAAN1')),disbanding_rate(efficient_producers,initial_FM_EP('SKOLEMAAAN1'))),
inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[10,12]) ).
cnf(19,plain,
~ decreases(difference(disbanding_rate(first_movers,'SKOLEMAAAN2'),disbanding_rate(efficient_producers,'SKOLEMAAAN2'))),
inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[1,12,13]) ).
cnf(20,plain,
( greater('SKOLEMAAAN2',initial_FM_EP('SKOLEMAAAN1'))
| 'SKOLEMAAAN2' = initial_FM_EP('SKOLEMAAAN1') ),
inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[9,17]) ).
cnf(22,plain,
~ greater_or_equal('SKOLEMAAAN2','SKOLEMAAAN2'),
inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[4,18,12,17,13,19,14]) ).
cnf(23,plain,
( 'SKOLEMAAAN2' = initial_FM_EP('SKOLEMAAAN1')
| in_environment('SKOLEMAAAN1',initial_FM_EP('SKOLEMAAAN1')) ),
inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[7,20,12,15,16]) ).
cnf(24,plain,
( 'SKOLEMAAAN2' = initial_FM_EP('SKOLEMAAAN1')
| subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,'SKOLEMAAAN1',initial_FM_EP('SKOLEMAAAN1')) ),
inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[2,23,12]) ).
cnf(26,plain,
( 'SKOLEMAAAN2' = initial_FM_EP('SKOLEMAAAN1')
| greater_or_equal(initial_FM_EP('SKOLEMAAAN1'),initial_FM_EP('SKOLEMAAAN1')) ),
inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[3,24,12]) ).
cnf(27,plain,
( 'SKOLEMAAAN2' = initial_FM_EP('SKOLEMAAAN1')
| decreases(difference(disbanding_rate(first_movers,initial_FM_EP('SKOLEMAAAN1')),disbanding_rate(efficient_producers,initial_FM_EP('SKOLEMAAAN1')))) ),
inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[4,26,12,17,13,18]),14]) ).
cnf(28,plain,
'SKOLEMAAAN2' = initial_FM_EP('SKOLEMAAAN1'),
inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[1,27,12,24]) ).
cnf(30,plain,
$false,
inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[17,22,28,theory(equality)]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.09 % Problem : MGT020+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.0.0.
% 0.00/0.10 % Command : run-snark %s %d
% 0.10/0.29 % Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.29 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.29 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.29 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.10/0.29 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.10/0.29 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.29 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.10/0.29 % DateTime : Thu Jun 9 12:28:07 EDT 2022
% 0.10/0.29 % CPUTime :
% 0.14/0.36 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.14/0.37 *
% 0.14/0.37 *
% 0.14/0.38 #<PACKAGE "SNARK-USER">
% 0.14/0.38 *
% 0.14/0.38 SNARK-TPTP-OPTIONS
% 0.14/0.38 *
% 0.14/0.38 ((AGENDA-LENGTH-LIMIT NIL) (AGENDA-LENGTH-BEFORE-SIMPLIFICATION-LIMIT NIL)
% 0.14/0.38 (USE-HYPERRESOLUTION T) (USE-UR-RESOLUTION T) (USE-PARAMODULATION T)
% 0.14/0.38 (USE-FACTORING :POS)
% 0.14/0.38 (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-HYPERRESOLUTION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.14/0.38 (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-PARAMODULATION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.14/0.38 (ORDERING-FUNCTIONS>CONSTANTS T) (ASSERT-CONTEXT :CURRENT)
% 0.14/0.38 (RUN-TIME-LIMIT 300) (LISTEN-FOR-COMMANDS NIL)
% 0.14/0.38 (USE-CLOSURE-WHEN-SATISFIABLE T) (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-GIVEN NIL)
% 0.14/0.38 (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-DERIVED NIL) (PRINT-UNORIENTABLE-ROWS NIL)
% 0.14/0.38 (PRINT-ROW-WFFS-PRETTILY NIL) (PRINT-FINAL-ROWS :TPTP)
% 0.14/0.38 (PRINT-OPTIONS-WHEN-STARTING NIL) (USE-VARIABLE-NAME-SORTS NIL)
% 0.14/0.38 (USE-PURITY-TEST T) (USE-RELEVANCE-TEST T) (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS1)
% 0.14/0.38 (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS2))
% 0.14/0.38 *
% 0.14/0.38 "."
% 0.14/0.38 *
% 0.14/0.38 ; Begin refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-06-09T12:28:07
% 0.14/0.38 ; Running SNARK from /davis/home/graph/tptp/Systems/SNARK---20120808r022/Source/snark-system.lisp in SBCL 1.0.12 on n032.cluster.edu at 2022-06-09T12:28:07
% 0.14/0.40
% 0.14/0.40
% 0.14/0.40 #||
% 0.14/0.40 % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.14/0.40 % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 0.14/0.40 ||#
% 0.14/0.40
% 0.14/0.40 ; Summary of computation:
% 0.14/0.40 ; 49 formulas have been input or derived (from 28 formulas).
% 0.14/0.40 ; 30 (61%) were retained. Of these,
% 0.14/0.40 ; 10 (33%) were simplified or subsumed later,
% 0.14/0.40 ; 20 (67%) are still being kept.
% 0.14/0.40 ;
% 0.14/0.40 ; Run time in seconds excluding printing time:
% 0.14/0.40 ; 0.002 10% Read assertion file (1 call)
% 0.14/0.40 ; 0.001 5% Assert (11 calls)
% 0.14/0.40 ; 0.001 5% Process new row (34 calls)
% 0.14/0.40 ; 0.001 5% Resolution (54 calls)
% 0.14/0.40 ; 0.000 0% Paramodulation (27 calls)
% 0.14/0.40 ; 0.000 0% Factoring (7 calls)
% 0.14/0.40 ; 0.000 0% Condensing (20 calls)
% 0.14/0.40 ; 0.001 5% Forward subsumption (20 calls)
% 0.14/0.40 ; 0.000 0% Backward subsumption (18 calls)
% 0.14/0.40 ; 0.000 0% Clause clause subsumption (4 calls)
% 0.14/0.40 ; 0.000 0% Forward simplification (34 calls)
% 0.14/0.40 ; 0.000 0% Backward simplification (30 calls)
% 0.14/0.40 ; 0.001 5% Ordering (57 calls)
% 0.14/0.40 ; 0.000 0% Sortal reasoning (32 calls)
% 0.14/0.40 ; 0.000 0% Purity testing (1 call)
% 0.14/0.40 ; 0.014 67% Other
% 0.14/0.40 ; 0.021 Total
% 0.14/0.40 ; 0.024 Real time
% 0.14/0.40 ;
% 0.14/0.40 ; Term-hash-array has 62 terms in all.
% 0.14/0.40 ; Feature-vector-row-index has 11 entries (18 at peak, 18 added, 7 deleted).
% 0.14/0.40 ; Feature-vector-row-index has 82 nodes (151 at peak, 151 added, 69 deleted).
% 0.14/0.40 ; Retrieved 4 possibly forward subsuming rows in 20 calls.
% 0.14/0.40 ; Retrieved 0 possibly backward subsumed rows in 18 calls.
% 0.14/0.40 ; Path-index has 52 entries (65 at peak, 67 added, 15 deleted).
% 0.14/0.40 ; Path-index has 124 nodes (140 at peak, 142 added, 18 deleted).
% 0.14/0.40 ; Trie-index has 52 entries (65 at peak, 67 added, 15 deleted).
% 0.14/0.40 ; Trie-index has 104 nodes (145 at peak, 148 added, 44 deleted).
% 0.14/0.40 ; Retrieved 3 generalization terms in 18 calls.
% 0.14/0.40 ; Retrieved 11 instance terms in 11 calls.
% 0.14/0.40 ; Retrieved 648 unifiable terms in 393 calls.
% 0.14/0.40 ;
% 0.14/0.40 ; The agenda of backward simplifiable rows to process has 8 entries:
% 0.14/0.40 ; 8 with value 0
% 0.14/0.40 ; The agenda of rows to give has 2 entries:
% 0.14/0.40 ; 1 with value (4 7) 1 with value (4 13)
% 0.14/0.40 Evaluation took:
% 0.14/0.40 0.024 seconds of real time
% 0.14/0.40 0.020636 seconds of user run time
% 0.14/0.40 0.003179 seconds of system run time
% 0.14/0.40 0 calls to %EVAL
% 0.14/0.40 0 page faults and
% 0.14/0.40 3,672,496 bytes consed.
% 0.14/0.40 :PROOF-FOUND
% 0.14/0.40 ; End refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-06-09T12:28:07
% 0.14/0.40 :PROOF-FOUND
% 0.14/0.40 *
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------