TSTP Solution File: MGT019+2 by E-SAT---3.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.1
% Problem : MGT019+2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 18:36:01 EDT 2023
% Result : CounterSatisfiable 0.17s 0.45s
% Output : Saturation 0.17s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : ERROR: Analysing output (Could not find formula named c_0_8)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
( greater(growth_rate(efficient_producers,X1),growth_rate(first_movers,X1))
| ~ greater(disbanding_rate(first_movers,X1),disbanding_rate(efficient_producers,X1))
| ~ greater_or_equal(founding_rate(efficient_producers,X1),founding_rate(first_movers,X1)) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
( greater(X1,X2)
| X1 = X2
| ~ greater_or_equal(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
( ~ greater(growth_rate(efficient_producers,esk3_1(X1)),growth_rate(first_movers,esk3_1(X1)))
| ~ in_environment(esk2_0,X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
( disbanding_rate(efficient_producers,X1) = disbanding_rate(first_movers,X1)
| greater(growth_rate(efficient_producers,X1),growth_rate(first_movers,X1))
| ~ greater_or_equal(founding_rate(efficient_producers,X1),founding_rate(first_movers,X1))
| ~ greater_or_equal(disbanding_rate(first_movers,X1),disbanding_rate(efficient_producers,X1)) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_14,hypothesis,
( greater_or_equal(founding_rate(efficient_producers,X2),founding_rate(first_movers,X2))
| ~ subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,X1,X2)
| ~ greater_or_equal(X2,esk1_1(X1))
| ~ environment(X1)
| ~ stable(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
( greater_or_equal(esk3_1(X1),X1)
| ~ in_environment(esk2_0,X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
( disbanding_rate(efficient_producers,esk3_1(X1)) = disbanding_rate(first_movers,esk3_1(X1))
| ~ in_environment(esk2_0,X1)
| ~ greater_or_equal(founding_rate(efficient_producers,esk3_1(X1)),founding_rate(first_movers,esk3_1(X1)))
| ~ greater_or_equal(disbanding_rate(first_movers,esk3_1(X1)),disbanding_rate(efficient_producers,esk3_1(X1))) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
( greater_or_equal(founding_rate(efficient_producers,esk3_1(esk1_1(X1))),founding_rate(first_movers,esk3_1(esk1_1(X1))))
| ~ in_environment(esk2_0,esk1_1(X1))
| ~ stable(X1)
| ~ subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,X1,esk3_1(esk1_1(X1)))
| ~ environment(X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_19,plain,
~ greater(disbanding_rate(first_movers,esk5_0),disbanding_rate(efficient_producers,esk5_0)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_16]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
( disbanding_rate(efficient_producers,esk3_1(esk1_1(X1))) = disbanding_rate(first_movers,esk3_1(esk1_1(X1)))
| ~ in_environment(esk2_0,esk1_1(X1))
| ~ stable(X1)
| ~ greater_or_equal(disbanding_rate(first_movers,esk3_1(esk1_1(X1))),disbanding_rate(efficient_producers,esk3_1(esk1_1(X1))))
| ~ subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,X1,esk3_1(esk1_1(X1)))
| ~ environment(X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
( growth_rate(efficient_producers,esk3_1(X1)) = growth_rate(first_movers,esk3_1(X1))
| ~ in_environment(esk2_0,X1)
| ~ greater_or_equal(growth_rate(efficient_producers,esk3_1(X1)),growth_rate(first_movers,esk3_1(X1))) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_10]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_22,plain,
( disbanding_rate(efficient_producers,esk5_0) = disbanding_rate(first_movers,esk5_0)
| ~ greater_or_equal(disbanding_rate(first_movers,esk5_0),disbanding_rate(efficient_producers,esk5_0)) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_10]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_23,hypothesis,
( in_environment(X1,esk1_1(X1))
| ~ environment(X1)
| ~ stable(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
( subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,esk2_0,esk3_1(X1))
| ~ in_environment(esk2_0,X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_25,plain,
subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,esk4_0,esk5_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_16]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_26,plain,
environment(esk4_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_16]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_27,negated_conjecture,
stable(esk2_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_28,negated_conjecture,
environment(esk2_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]),
[final] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.11 % Problem : MGT019+2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.0.0.
% 0.03/0.11 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.11/0.32 % Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.32 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.32 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.32 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.32 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.32 % CPULimit : 2400
% 0.11/0.32 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.11/0.32 % DateTime : Tue Oct 3 00:23:54 EDT 2023
% 0.11/0.32 % CPUTime :
% 0.17/0.43 Running first-order model finding
% 0.17/0.43 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.aSQjLhKGGL/E---3.1_26629.p
% 0.17/0.45 # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.17/0.45 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.17/0.45 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.17/0.45 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.17/0.45 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.45 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.45 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.45 # new_bool_3 with pid 26707 completed with status 1
% 0.17/0.45 # Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.17/0.45 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.17/0.45 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.17/0.45 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.17/0.45 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.45 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.17/0.45 # Search class: FGHSF-FFSS21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.17/0.45 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.17/0.45 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.45 # SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with pid 26711 completed with status 1
% 0.17/0.45 # Result found by SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG
% 0.17/0.45 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.17/0.45 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.17/0.45 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.17/0.45 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.45 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.17/0.45 # Search class: FGHSF-FFSS21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.17/0.45 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.17/0.45 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.45 # Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.17/0.45 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.17/0.45
% 0.17/0.45 # No proof found!
% 0.17/0.45 # SZS status CounterSatisfiable
% 0.17/0.45 # SZS output start Saturation
% See solution above
% 0.17/0.45 # Parsed axioms : 5
% 0.17/0.45 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.17/0.45 # Initial clauses : 12
% 0.17/0.45 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.17/0.45 # Initial clauses in saturation : 12
% 0.17/0.45 # Processed clauses : 30
% 0.17/0.45 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.17/0.45 # ...subsumed : 0
% 0.17/0.45 # ...remaining for further processing : 30
% 0.17/0.45 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.17/0.45 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.17/0.45 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.17/0.45 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.17/0.45 # Generated clauses : 6
% 0.17/0.45 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 6
% 0.17/0.45 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.17/0.45 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.17/0.45 # Paramodulations : 6
% 0.17/0.45 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.17/0.45 # NegExts : 0
% 0.17/0.45 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.17/0.45 # Total rewrite steps : 0
% 0.17/0.45 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.17/0.45 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.17/0.45 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.17/0.45 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.17/0.45 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.17/0.45 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.17/0.45 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.17/0.45 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.17/0.45 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.17/0.45 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.17/0.45 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.17/0.45 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.17/0.45 # Current number of processed clauses : 18
% 0.17/0.45 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 4
% 0.17/0.45 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.17/0.45 # Negative unit clauses : 1
% 0.17/0.45 # Non-unit-clauses : 13
% 0.17/0.45 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.17/0.45 # ...number of literals in the above : 0
% 0.17/0.45 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.17/0.45 # Current number of archived clauses : 12
% 0.17/0.45 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 80
% 0.17/0.45 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 29
% 0.17/0.45 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.17/0.45 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2
% 0.17/0.45 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.17/0.45 # BW rewrite match attempts : 2
% 0.17/0.45 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.17/0.45 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.17/0.45 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.17/0.45 # Termbank termtop insertions : 1226
% 0.17/0.45
% 0.17/0.45 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.17/0.45 # User time : 0.003 s
% 0.17/0.45 # System time : 0.002 s
% 0.17/0.45 # Total time : 0.005 s
% 0.17/0.45 # Maximum resident set size: 1756 pages
% 0.17/0.45
% 0.17/0.45 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.17/0.45 # User time : 0.005 s
% 0.17/0.45 # System time : 0.003 s
% 0.17/0.45 # Total time : 0.008 s
% 0.17/0.45 # Maximum resident set size: 1676 pages
% 0.17/0.45 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------