TSTP Solution File: MGT018-1 by Prover9---1109a

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Prover9---1109a
% Problem  : MGT018-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : tptp2X_and_run_prover9 %d %s

% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 22:22:51 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.42s 0.98s
% Output   : Refutation 0.42s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.11  % Problem  : MGT018-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.06/0.12  % Command  : tptp2X_and_run_prover9 %d %s
% 0.13/0.33  % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.33  % DateTime : Thu Jun  9 07:20:34 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.42/0.98  ============================== Prover9 ===============================
% 0.42/0.98  Prover9 (32) version 2009-11A, November 2009.
% 0.42/0.98  Process 1110 was started by sandbox2 on n017.cluster.edu,
% 0.42/0.98  Thu Jun  9 07:20:34 2022
% 0.42/0.98  The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/prover9 -t 300 -f /tmp/Prover9_921_n017.cluster.edu".
% 0.42/0.98  ============================== end of head ===========================
% 0.42/0.98  
% 0.42/0.98  ============================== INPUT =================================
% 0.42/0.98  
% 0.42/0.98  % Reading from file /tmp/Prover9_921_n017.cluster.edu
% 0.42/0.98  
% 0.42/0.98  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.42/0.98  set(auto2).
% 0.42/0.98      % set(auto2) -> set(auto).
% 0.42/0.98      % set(auto) -> set(auto_inference).
% 0.42/0.98      % set(auto) -> set(auto_setup).
% 0.42/0.98      % set(auto_setup) -> set(predicate_elim).
% 0.42/0.98      % set(auto_setup) -> assign(eq_defs, unfold).
% 0.42/0.98      % set(auto) -> set(auto_limits).
% 0.42/0.98      % set(auto_limits) -> assign(max_weight, "100.000").
% 0.42/0.98      % set(auto_limits) -> assign(sos_limit, 20000).
% 0.42/0.98      % set(auto) -> set(auto_denials).
% 0.42/0.98      % set(auto) -> set(auto_process).
% 0.42/0.98      % set(auto2) -> assign(new_constants, 1).
% 0.42/0.98      % set(auto2) -> assign(fold_denial_max, 3).
% 0.42/0.98      % set(auto2) -> assign(max_weight, "200.000").
% 0.42/0.98      % set(auto2) -> assign(max_hours, 1).
% 0.42/0.98      % assign(max_hours, 1) -> assign(max_seconds, 3600).
% 0.42/0.98      % set(auto2) -> assign(max_seconds, 0).
% 0.42/0.98      % set(auto2) -> assign(max_minutes, 5).
% 0.42/0.98      % assign(max_minutes, 5) -> assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.42/0.98      % set(auto2) -> set(sort_initial_sos).
% 0.42/0.98      % set(auto2) -> assign(sos_limit, -1).
% 0.42/0.98      % set(auto2) -> assign(lrs_ticks, 3000).
% 0.42/0.98      % set(auto2) -> assign(max_megs, 400).
% 0.42/0.98      % set(auto2) -> assign(stats, some).
% 0.42/0.98      % set(auto2) -> clear(echo_input).
% 0.42/0.98      % set(auto2) -> set(quiet).
% 0.42/0.98      % set(auto2) -> clear(print_initial_clauses).
% 0.42/0.98      % set(auto2) -> clear(print_given).
% 0.42/0.98  assign(lrs_ticks,-1).
% 0.42/0.98  assign(sos_limit,10000).
% 0.42/0.98  assign(order,kbo).
% 0.42/0.98  set(lex_order_vars).
% 0.42/0.98  clear(print_given).
% 0.42/0.98  
% 0.42/0.98  % formulas(sos).  % not echoed (16 formulas)
% 0.42/0.98  
% 0.42/0.98  ============================== end of input ==========================
% 0.42/0.98  
% 0.42/0.98  % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.42/0.98  
% 0.42/0.98  ============================== PROCESS NON-CLAUSAL FORMULAS ==========
% 0.42/0.98  
% 0.42/0.98  % Formulas that are not ordinary clauses:
% 0.42/0.98  
% 0.42/0.98  ============================== end of process non-clausal formulas ===
% 0.42/0.98  
% 0.42/0.98  ============================== PROCESS INITIAL CLAUSES ===============
% 0.42/0.98  
% 0.42/0.98  ============================== PREDICATE ELIMINATION =================
% 0.42/0.98  
% 0.42/0.98  ============================== end predicate elimination =============
% 0.42/0.98  
% 0.42/0.98  Auto_denials:  (non-Horn, no changes).
% 0.42/0.98  
% 0.42/0.98  Term ordering decisions:
% 0.42/0.98  Function symbol KB weights:  sk8=1. sk2=1. sk3=1. sk4=1. sk5=1. sk6=1. sk7=1. sk10=1. sk9=1. sk1=1.
% 0.42/0.98  
% 0.42/0.98  ============================== end of process initial clauses ========
% 0.42/0.98  
% 0.42/0.98  ============================== CLAUSES FOR SEARCH ====================
% 0.42/0.98  
% 0.42/0.98  ============================== end of clauses for search =============
% 0.42/0.98  
% 0.42/0.98  ============================== SEARCH ================================
% 0.42/0.98  
% 0.42/0.98  % Starting search at 0.01 seconds.
% 0.42/0.98  
% 0.42/0.98  ============================== PROOF =================================
% 0.42/0.98  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.42/0.98  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.42/0.98  
% 0.42/0.98  % Proof 1 at 0.02 (+ 0.00) seconds.
% 0.42/0.98  % Length of proof is 20.
% 0.42/0.98  % Level of proof is 3.
% 0.42/0.98  % Maximum clause weight is 47.000.
% 0.42/0.98  % Given clauses 31.
% 0.42/0.98  
% 0.42/0.98  1 organization(sk2,sk8) # label(t18_FOL_4) # label(negated_conjecture).  [assumption].
% 0.42/0.98  2 organization(sk3,sk8) # label(t18_FOL_5) # label(negated_conjecture).  [assumption].
% 0.42/0.98  3 greater(sk7,sk6) # label(t18_FOL_15) # label(negated_conjecture).  [assumption].
% 0.42/0.98  4 class(sk2,sk5,sk8) # label(t18_FOL_7) # label(negated_conjecture).  [assumption].
% 0.42/0.98  5 class(sk3,sk5,sk8) # label(t18_FOL_8) # label(negated_conjecture).  [assumption].
% 0.42/0.98  6 reorganization(sk2,sk8,sk9) # label(t18_FOL_9) # label(negated_conjecture).  [assumption].
% 0.42/0.98  7 reorganization(sk3,sk8,sk10) # label(t18_FOL_10) # label(negated_conjecture).  [assumption].
% 0.42/0.98  8 reorganization_type(sk2,sk4,sk8) # label(t18_FOL_11) # label(negated_conjecture).  [assumption].
% 0.42/0.98  9 reorganization_type(sk3,sk4,sk8) # label(t18_FOL_12) # label(negated_conjecture).  [assumption].
% 0.42/0.98  10 size(sk2,sk6,sk8) # label(t18_FOL_13) # label(negated_conjecture).  [assumption].
% 0.42/0.98  11 size(sk3,sk7,sk8) # label(t18_FOL_14) # label(negated_conjecture).  [assumption].
% 0.42/0.98  12 -organization(sk3,sk10) # label(t18_FOL_6) # label(negated_conjecture).  [assumption].
% 0.42/0.98  13 -greater(sk9,sk10) # label(t18_FOL_16) # label(negated_conjecture).  [assumption].
% 0.42/0.98  14 -organization(A,B) | inertia(A,sk1(B,A),B) # label(mp5_1) # label(axiom).  [assumption].
% 0.42/0.98  15 -organization(A,B) | -organization(C,D) | -class(A,E,B) | -class(C,E,D) | -size(A,F,B) | -size(C,V6,D) | -inertia(A,V7,B) | -inertia(C,V8,D) | -greater(V6,F) | greater(V8,V7) # label(a5_FOL_2) # label(hypothesis).  [assumption].
% 0.42/0.98  16 -organization(A,B) | -organization(C,B) | organization(C,D) | -class(A,E,B) | -class(C,E,B) | -reorganization(A,B,F) | -reorganization(C,B,D) | -reorganization_type(A,V6,B) | -reorganization_type(C,V6,B) | -inertia(A,V7,B) | -inertia(C,V8,B) | -greater(V8,V7) | greater(F,D) # label(a14_FOL_3) # label(hypothesis).  [assumption].
% 0.42/0.98  25 inertia(sk3,sk1(sk8,sk3),sk8).  [resolve(14,a,2,a)].
% 0.42/0.98  26 inertia(sk2,sk1(sk8,sk2),sk8).  [resolve(14,a,1,a)].
% 0.42/0.98  55 -greater(sk1(sk8,sk3),sk1(sk8,sk2)).  [ur(16,a,1,a,b,2,a,c,12,a,d,4,a,e,5,a,f,6,a,g,7,a,h,8,a,i,9,a,j,26,a,k,25,a,m,13,a)].
% 0.42/0.98  60 $F.  [ur(15,b,2,a,c,4,a,d,5,a,e,10,a,f,11,a,g,26,a,h,25,a,i,3,a,j,55,a),unit_del(a,1)].
% 0.42/0.98  
% 0.42/0.98  % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.42/0.98  ============================== end of proof ==========================
% 0.42/0.98  
% 0.42/0.98  ============================== STATISTICS ============================
% 0.42/0.98  
% 0.42/0.98  Given=31. Generated=104. Kept=59. proofs=1.
% 0.42/0.98  Usable=30. Sos=28. Demods=0. Limbo=0, Disabled=17. Hints=0.
% 0.42/0.98  Megabytes=0.12.
% 0.42/0.98  User_CPU=0.02, System_CPU=0.00, Wall_clock=0.
% 0.42/0.98  
% 0.42/0.98  ============================== end of statistics =====================
% 0.42/0.98  
% 0.42/0.98  ============================== end of search =========================
% 0.42/0.98  
% 0.42/0.98  THEOREM PROVED
% 0.42/0.98  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.42/0.98  
% 0.42/0.98  Exiting with 1 proof.
% 0.42/0.98  
% 0.42/0.98  Process 1110 exit (max_proofs) Thu Jun  9 07:20:34 2022
% 0.42/0.98  Prover9 interrupted
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------