TSTP Solution File: MGT017-1 by CSE---1.6
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CSE---1.6
% Problem : MGT017-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %s %d
% Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 09:06:46 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.21s 0.61s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.21s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12 % Problem : MGT017-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.00/0.13 % Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %s %d
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Mon Aug 28 06:11:47 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.21/0.54 start to proof:theBenchmark
% 0.21/0.60 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.21/0.60 % File :CSE---1.6
% 0.21/0.60 % Problem :theBenchmark
% 0.21/0.60 % Transform :cnf
% 0.21/0.60 % Format :tptp:raw
% 0.21/0.60 % Command :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.21/0.60
% 0.21/0.60 % Result :Theorem 0.010000s
% 0.21/0.60 % Output :CNFRefutation 0.010000s
% 0.21/0.60 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.21/0.61 %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.21/0.61 % File : MGT017-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.21/0.61 % Domain : Management (Organisation Theory)
% 0.21/0.61 % Problem : Length of reoganisation proportional to organization size
% 0.21/0.61 % Version : [PB+94] axioms.
% 0.21/0.61 % English : The length of reorganizational period grows by the size the
% 0.21/0.61 % organization begins reorganization (if the bigger organization
% 0.21/0.61 % survives it).
% 0.21/0.61
% 0.21/0.61 % Refs : [PB+94] Peli et al. (1994), A Logical Approach to Formalizing
% 0.21/0.61 % : [Kam94] Kamps (1994), Email to G. Sutcliffe
% 0.21/0.61 % : [Kam95] Kamps (1995), Email to G. Sutcliffe
% 0.21/0.61 % Source : [TPTP]
% 0.21/0.61 % Names :
% 0.21/0.61
% 0.21/0.61 % Status : Unsatisfiable
% 0.21/0.61 % Rating : 0.00 v8.1.0, 0.25 v7.4.0, 0.17 v7.3.0, 0.25 v6.2.0, 0.17 v6.1.0, 0.00 v5.4.0, 0.06 v5.3.0, 0.10 v5.2.0, 0.00 v2.4.0
% 0.21/0.61 % Syntax : Number of clauses : 16 ( 13 unt; 0 nHn; 16 RR)
% 0.21/0.61 % Number of literals : 38 ( 0 equ; 23 neg)
% 0.21/0.61 % Maximal clause size : 13 ( 2 avg)
% 0.21/0.61 % Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% 0.21/0.61 % Number of predicates : 7 ( 7 usr; 0 prp; 2-3 aty)
% 0.21/0.61 % Number of functors : 10 ( 10 usr; 9 con; 0-2 aty)
% 0.21/0.61 % Number of variables : 20 ( 0 sgn)
% 0.21/0.61 % SPC : CNF_UNS_RFO_NEQ_HRN
% 0.21/0.61
% 0.21/0.61 % Comments : "Not published due to publication constraints." [Kam95].
% 0.21/0.61 % : Created with tptp2X -f tptp -t clausify:otter MGT017+1.p
% 0.21/0.61 %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.21/0.61 cnf(mp5_1,axiom,
% 0.21/0.61 ( ~ organization(A,B)
% 0.21/0.61 | inertia(A,sk1(B,A),B) ) ).
% 0.21/0.61
% 0.21/0.61 cnf(a5_FOL_2,hypothesis,
% 0.21/0.61 ( ~ organization(A,B)
% 0.21/0.61 | ~ organization(C,D)
% 0.21/0.61 | ~ class(A,E,B)
% 0.21/0.61 | ~ class(C,E,D)
% 0.21/0.61 | ~ size(A,F,B)
% 0.21/0.61 | ~ size(C,G,D)
% 0.21/0.61 | ~ inertia(A,H,B)
% 0.21/0.61 | ~ inertia(C,I,D)
% 0.21/0.61 | ~ greater(G,F)
% 0.21/0.61 | greater(I,H) ) ).
% 0.21/0.61
% 0.21/0.61 cnf(a13_FOL_3,hypothesis,
% 0.21/0.61 ( ~ organization(A,B)
% 0.21/0.61 | ~ organization(C,B)
% 0.21/0.61 | ~ organization(C,D)
% 0.21/0.61 | ~ class(A,E,B)
% 0.21/0.61 | ~ class(C,E,B)
% 0.21/0.61 | ~ reorganization(A,B,F)
% 0.21/0.61 | ~ reorganization(C,B,D)
% 0.21/0.61 | ~ reorganization_type(A,G,B)
% 0.21/0.61 | ~ reorganization_type(C,G,B)
% 0.21/0.61 | ~ inertia(A,H,B)
% 0.21/0.61 | ~ inertia(C,I,B)
% 0.21/0.61 | ~ greater(I,H)
% 0.21/0.61 | greater(D,F) ) ).
% 0.21/0.61
% 0.21/0.61 cnf(t17_FOL_4,negated_conjecture,
% 0.21/0.61 organization(sk2,sk8) ).
% 0.21/0.61
% 0.21/0.61 cnf(t17_FOL_5,negated_conjecture,
% 0.21/0.61 organization(sk3,sk8) ).
% 0.21/0.61
% 0.21/0.61 cnf(t17_FOL_6,negated_conjecture,
% 0.21/0.61 organization(sk3,sk10) ).
% 0.21/0.61
% 0.21/0.61 cnf(t17_FOL_7,negated_conjecture,
% 0.21/0.61 class(sk2,sk5,sk8) ).
% 0.21/0.61
% 0.21/0.61 cnf(t17_FOL_8,negated_conjecture,
% 0.21/0.61 class(sk3,sk5,sk8) ).
% 0.21/0.61
% 0.21/0.61 cnf(t17_FOL_9,negated_conjecture,
% 0.21/0.61 reorganization(sk2,sk8,sk9) ).
% 0.21/0.61
% 0.21/0.61 cnf(t17_FOL_10,negated_conjecture,
% 0.21/0.61 reorganization(sk3,sk8,sk10) ).
% 0.21/0.61
% 0.21/0.61 cnf(t17_FOL_11,negated_conjecture,
% 0.21/0.61 reorganization_type(sk2,sk4,sk8) ).
% 0.21/0.61
% 0.21/0.61 cnf(t17_FOL_12,negated_conjecture,
% 0.21/0.61 reorganization_type(sk3,sk4,sk8) ).
% 0.21/0.61
% 0.21/0.61 cnf(t17_FOL_13,negated_conjecture,
% 0.21/0.61 size(sk2,sk6,sk8) ).
% 0.21/0.61
% 0.21/0.61 cnf(t17_FOL_14,negated_conjecture,
% 0.21/0.61 size(sk3,sk7,sk8) ).
% 0.21/0.61
% 0.21/0.61 cnf(t17_FOL_15,negated_conjecture,
% 0.21/0.61 greater(sk7,sk6) ).
% 0.21/0.61
% 0.21/0.61 cnf(t17_FOL_16,negated_conjecture,
% 0.21/0.61 ~ greater(sk10,sk9) ).
% 0.21/0.61
% 0.21/0.61 %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.21/0.61 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.21/0.61 % Proof found
% 0.21/0.61 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.21/0.61 % SZS output start Proof
% 0.21/0.61 %ClaNum:16(EqnAxiom:0)
% 0.21/0.61 %VarNum:66(SingletonVarNum:20)
% 0.21/0.61 %MaxLitNum:13
% 0.21/0.61 %MaxfuncDepth:1
% 0.21/0.61 %SharedTerms:22
% 0.21/0.61 %goalClause: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
% 0.21/0.61 %singleGoalClaCount:13
% 0.21/0.61 [1]P1(a1,a4)
% 0.21/0.61 [2]P1(a5,a4)
% 0.21/0.61 [3]P1(a5,a2)
% 0.21/0.61 [4]P2(a6,a7)
% 0.21/0.61 [5]P3(a1,a8,a4)
% 0.21/0.61 [6]P3(a5,a8,a4)
% 0.21/0.61 [7]P5(a1,a7,a4)
% 0.21/0.61 [8]P5(a5,a6,a4)
% 0.21/0.61 [9]P6(a1,a4,a10)
% 0.21/0.61 [10]P6(a5,a4,a2)
% 0.21/0.61 [11]P7(a1,a9,a4)
% 0.21/0.61 [12]P7(a5,a9,a4)
% 0.21/0.61 [13]~P2(a2,a10)
% 0.21/0.61 [14]~P1(x141,x142)+P4(x141,f3(x142,x141),x142)
% 0.21/0.61 [15]~P4(x153,x151,x154)+~P4(x155,x152,x156)+~P3(x155,x159,x156)+~P5(x153,x157,x154)+~P5(x155,x158,x156)+P2(x151,x152)+~P1(x153,x154)+~P3(x153,x159,x154)+~P1(x155,x156)+~P2(x157,x158)
% 0.21/0.61 [16]~P4(x163,x166,x164)+~P4(x165,x167,x164)+~P3(x165,x168,x164)+~P6(x163,x164,x161)+~P6(x165,x164,x162)+~P7(x165,x169,x164)+P2(x161,x162)+~P1(x163,x161)+~P1(x163,x164)+~P1(x165,x164)+~P3(x163,x168,x164)+~P7(x163,x169,x164)+~P2(x166,x167)
% 0.21/0.61 %EqnAxiom
% 0.21/0.61
% 0.21/0.61 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.21/0.61 cnf(17,plain,
% 0.21/0.61 (P4(a1,f3(a4,a1),a4)),
% 0.21/0.61 inference(scs_inference,[],[1,14])).
% 0.21/0.61 cnf(37,plain,
% 0.21/0.61 (P2(x371,f3(a4,a1))+~P4(a5,x371,a4)),
% 0.21/0.61 inference(scs_inference,[],[4,17,8,7,6,1,5,2,15])).
% 0.21/0.61 cnf(40,plain,
% 0.21/0.61 (P4(a5,f3(a4,a5),a4)),
% 0.21/0.61 inference(scs_inference,[],[2,14])).
% 0.21/0.61 cnf(43,plain,
% 0.21/0.61 (P2(f3(a4,a5),f3(a4,a1))),
% 0.21/0.61 inference(scs_inference,[],[8,6,2,4,14,15,37])).
% 0.21/0.61 cnf(46,plain,
% 0.21/0.61 ($false),
% 0.21/0.61 inference(scs_inference,[],[5,43,40,17,10,11,12,9,13,6,3,1,2,16]),
% 0.21/0.61 ['proof']).
% 0.21/0.61 % SZS output end Proof
% 0.21/0.61 % Total time :0.010000s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------