TSTP Solution File: MGT017+1 by SOS---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SOS---2.0
% Problem : MGT017+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : sos-script %s
% Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 22:25:49 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 1.46s 1.66s
% Output : Refutation 1.46s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.11 % Problem : MGT017+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.0.0.
% 0.06/0.12 % Command : sos-script %s
% 0.11/0.32 % Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.32 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.32 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.32 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.32 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.32 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.32 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.11/0.32 % DateTime : Thu Jun 9 08:19:49 EDT 2022
% 0.11/0.32 % CPUTime :
% 0.11/0.33 ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.11/0.33 The process was started by sandbox on n024.cluster.edu,
% 0.11/0.33 Thu Jun 9 08:19:49 2022
% 0.11/0.33 The command was "./sos". The process ID is 32612.
% 0.11/0.33
% 0.11/0.33 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.11/0.33 set(auto).
% 0.11/0.33 dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.11/0.33 dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.11/0.33 dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.11/0.33 dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.11/0.33 dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.11/0.33 dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.11/0.33 dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.11/0.33 dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.11/0.33 dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.11/0.33 dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.11/0.33 dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.11/0.33 dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.11/0.33 dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.11/0.33 clear(print_given).
% 0.11/0.33
% 0.11/0.33 formula_list(usable).
% 0.11/0.33
% 0.11/0.33 SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=1, equality=0, symmetry=0, max_lits=13.
% 0.11/0.33
% 0.11/0.33 This is a Horn set without equality. The strategy will
% 0.11/0.33 be hyperresolution, with satellites in sos and nuclei
% 0.11/0.33 in usable.
% 0.11/0.33
% 0.11/0.33 dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.11/0.33 dependent: clear(order_hyper).
% 0.11/0.33
% 0.11/0.33 ------------> process usable:
% 0.11/0.33
% 0.11/0.33 ------------> process sos:
% 0.11/0.33
% 0.11/0.33 ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.17/0.41
% 0.17/0.41 Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.17/0.41
% 0.17/0.41 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.17/0.41
% 0.17/0.41
% 0.17/0.41 -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.17/0.41
% 0.17/0.41 UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.17/0.41 SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.17/0.41 SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.17/0.41 number of clauses in intial UL: 4
% 0.17/0.41 number of clauses initially in problem: 16
% 0.17/0.41 percentage of clauses intially in UL: 25
% 0.17/0.41 percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 58
% 0.17/0.41 percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.17/0.41 absolute distinct symbol count: 17
% 0.17/0.41 distinct predicate count: 7
% 0.17/0.41 distinct function count: 1
% 0.17/0.41 distinct constant count: 9
% 0.17/0.41
% 0.17/0.41 ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.17/0.41
% 0.17/0.41
% 0.17/0.41
% 0.17/0.41 =========== start of search ===========
% 1.46/1.66
% 1.46/1.66 -------- PROOF --------
% 1.46/1.66 % SZS status Theorem
% 1.46/1.66 % SZS output start Refutation
% 1.46/1.66
% 1.46/1.66 Model 2 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 1.46/1.66
% 1.46/1.66 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 1.46/1.66
% 1.46/1.66 Model 3 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 1.46/1.66
% 1.46/1.66 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 1.46/1.66
% 1.46/1.66 Model 4 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 1.46/1.66
% 1.46/1.66 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 1.46/1.66
% 1.46/1.66 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.46/1.66
% 1.46/1.66 Model 5 [ 1 13 1767 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.46/1.66
% 1.46/1.66 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.46/1.66
% 1.46/1.66 Model 6 [ 1 5 1302 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.46/1.66
% 1.46/1.66 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.46/1.66
% 1.46/1.66 Model 7 [ 1 5 1247 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.46/1.66
% 1.46/1.66 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.46/1.66
% 1.46/1.66 Model 8 [ 2 8 1569 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.46/1.66
% 1.46/1.66 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.46/1.66
% 1.46/1.66 Model 9 [ 1 2 304 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.46/1.66
% 1.46/1.66 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.46/1.66
% 1.46/1.66 Model 10 [ 1 3 519 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.46/1.66
% 1.46/1.66 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.46/1.66
% 1.46/1.66 Model 11 [ 1 3 782 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.46/1.66
% 1.46/1.66 ----> UNIT CONFLICT at 1.15 sec ----> 22 [binary,21.1,4.1] {+} $F.
% 1.46/1.66
% 1.46/1.66 Length of proof is 4. Level of proof is 3.
% 1.46/1.66
% 1.46/1.66 ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 1.46/1.66 % SZS status Theorem
% 1.46/1.66 % SZS output start Refutation
% 1.46/1.66
% 1.46/1.66 1 [] {+} -organization(A,B)|inertia(A,$f1(A,B),B).
% 1.46/1.66 2 [] {+} -organization(A,B)| -organization(C,D)| -class(A,E,B)| -class(C,E,D)| -size(A,F,B)| -size(C,G,D)| -inertia(A,H,B)| -inertia(C,I,D)| -greater(G,F)|greater(I,H).
% 1.46/1.66 3 [] {+} -organization(A,B)| -organization(C,B)| -organization(C,D)| -class(A,E,B)| -class(C,E,B)| -reorganization(A,B,F)| -reorganization(C,B,D)| -reorganization_type(A,G,B)| -reorganization_type(C,G,B)| -inertia(A,H,B)| -inertia(C,I,B)| -greater(I,H)|greater(D,F).
% 1.46/1.66 4 [] {+} -greater($c1,$c2).
% 1.46/1.66 5 [] {+} organization($c9,$c3).
% 1.46/1.66 6 [] {+} organization($c8,$c3).
% 1.46/1.66 7 [] {+} organization($c8,$c1).
% 1.46/1.66 8 [] {+} class($c9,$c6,$c3).
% 1.46/1.66 9 [] {+} class($c8,$c6,$c3).
% 1.46/1.66 10 [] {+} reorganization($c9,$c3,$c2).
% 1.46/1.66 11 [] {+} reorganization($c8,$c3,$c1).
% 1.46/1.66 12 [] {+} reorganization_type($c9,$c7,$c3).
% 1.46/1.66 13 [] {+} reorganization_type($c8,$c7,$c3).
% 1.46/1.66 14 [] {+} size($c9,$c5,$c3).
% 1.46/1.66 15 [] {+} size($c8,$c4,$c3).
% 1.46/1.66 16 [] {+} greater($c4,$c5).
% 1.46/1.66 17 [hyper,5,1] {+} inertia($c9,$f1($c9,$c3),$c3).
% 1.46/1.66 19 [hyper,6,1] {+} inertia($c8,$f1($c8,$c3),$c3).
% 1.46/1.66 20 [hyper,19,2,5,6,8,9,14,15,17,16] {-} greater($f1($c8,$c3),$f1($c9,$c3)).
% 1.46/1.66 21 [hyper,20,3,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,17,19] {-} greater($c1,$c2).
% 1.46/1.66 22 [binary,21.1,4.1] {+} $F.
% 1.46/1.66
% 1.46/1.66 % SZS output end Refutation
% 1.46/1.66 ------------ end of proof -------------
% 1.46/1.66
% 1.46/1.66
% 1.46/1.66 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 1.46/1.66
% 1.46/1.66
% 1.46/1.66 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 1.46/1.66
% 1.46/1.66 ============ end of search ============
% 1.46/1.66
% 1.46/1.66 ----------- soft-scott stats ----------
% 1.46/1.66
% 1.46/1.66 true clauses given 4 (26.7%)
% 1.46/1.66 false clauses given 11
% 1.46/1.66
% 1.46/1.66 FALSE TRUE
% 1.46/1.66 6 0 1
% 1.46/1.66 tot: 0 1 (100.0% true)
% 1.46/1.66
% 1.46/1.66
% 1.46/1.66 Model 11 [ 1 3 782 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.46/1.66
% 1.46/1.66 That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 1.46/1.66
% 1.46/1.66 Process 32612 finished Thu Jun 9 08:19:50 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------