TSTP Solution File: MGT017+1 by Otter---3.3

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Otter---3.3
% Problem  : MGT017+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : otter-tptp-script %s

% Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Jul 27 13:06:00 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 1.65s 1.86s
% Output   : Refutation 1.65s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    4
%            Number of leaves      :   16
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   21 (  18 unt;   0 nHn;  21 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   43 (   0 equ;  23 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :   13 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    8 (   7 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   10 (  10 usr;   9 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   20 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(1,axiom,
    ( ~ organization(A,B)
    | inertia(A,dollar_f1(A,B),B) ),
    file('MGT017+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(2,axiom,
    ( ~ organization(A,B)
    | ~ organization(C,D)
    | ~ class(A,E,B)
    | ~ class(C,E,D)
    | ~ size(A,F,B)
    | ~ size(C,G,D)
    | ~ inertia(A,H,B)
    | ~ inertia(C,I,D)
    | ~ greater(G,F)
    | greater(I,H) ),
    file('MGT017+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(3,axiom,
    ( ~ organization(A,B)
    | ~ organization(C,B)
    | ~ organization(C,D)
    | ~ class(A,E,B)
    | ~ class(C,E,B)
    | ~ reorganization(A,B,F)
    | ~ reorganization(C,B,D)
    | ~ reorganization_type(A,G,B)
    | ~ reorganization_type(C,G,B)
    | ~ inertia(A,H,B)
    | ~ inertia(C,I,B)
    | ~ greater(I,H)
    | greater(D,F) ),
    file('MGT017+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(4,axiom,
    ~ greater(dollar_c1,dollar_c2),
    file('MGT017+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(5,axiom,
    organization(dollar_c9,dollar_c3),
    file('MGT017+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(6,axiom,
    organization(dollar_c8,dollar_c3),
    file('MGT017+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(7,axiom,
    organization(dollar_c8,dollar_c1),
    file('MGT017+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(8,axiom,
    class(dollar_c9,dollar_c6,dollar_c3),
    file('MGT017+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(9,axiom,
    class(dollar_c8,dollar_c6,dollar_c3),
    file('MGT017+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(10,axiom,
    reorganization(dollar_c9,dollar_c3,dollar_c2),
    file('MGT017+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(11,axiom,
    reorganization(dollar_c8,dollar_c3,dollar_c1),
    file('MGT017+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(12,axiom,
    reorganization_type(dollar_c9,dollar_c7,dollar_c3),
    file('MGT017+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(13,axiom,
    reorganization_type(dollar_c8,dollar_c7,dollar_c3),
    file('MGT017+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(14,axiom,
    size(dollar_c9,dollar_c5,dollar_c3),
    file('MGT017+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(15,axiom,
    size(dollar_c8,dollar_c4,dollar_c3),
    file('MGT017+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(16,axiom,
    greater(dollar_c4,dollar_c5),
    file('MGT017+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(17,plain,
    inertia(dollar_c9,dollar_f1(dollar_c9,dollar_c3),dollar_c3),
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[5,1]),
    [iquote('hyper,5,1')] ).

cnf(18,plain,
    inertia(dollar_c8,dollar_f1(dollar_c8,dollar_c3),dollar_c3),
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[6,1]),
    [iquote('hyper,6,1')] ).

cnf(20,plain,
    greater(dollar_f1(dollar_c8,dollar_c3),dollar_f1(dollar_c9,dollar_c3)),
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[18,2,5,6,8,9,14,15,17,16]),
    [iquote('hyper,18,2,5,6,8,9,14,15,17,16')] ).

cnf(21,plain,
    greater(dollar_c1,dollar_c2),
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[20,3,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,17,18]),
    [iquote('hyper,20,3,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,17,18')] ).

cnf(22,plain,
    $false,
    inference(binary,[status(thm)],[21,4]),
    [iquote('binary,21.1,4.1')] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.10/0.11  % Problem  : MGT017+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.0.0.
% 0.10/0.12  % Command  : otter-tptp-script %s
% 0.12/0.32  % Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.32  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.32  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.32  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.32  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.32  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.32  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.12/0.32  % DateTime : Wed Jul 27 03:53:09 EDT 2022
% 0.17/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 1.65/1.86  ----- Otter 3.3f, August 2004 -----
% 1.65/1.86  The process was started by sandbox on n010.cluster.edu,
% 1.65/1.86  Wed Jul 27 03:53:10 2022
% 1.65/1.86  The command was "./otter".  The process ID is 15803.
% 1.65/1.86  
% 1.65/1.86  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 1.65/1.86  set(auto).
% 1.65/1.86     dependent: set(auto1).
% 1.65/1.86     dependent: set(process_input).
% 1.65/1.86     dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 1.65/1.86     dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 1.65/1.86     dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 1.65/1.86     dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 1.65/1.86     dependent: set(control_memory).
% 1.65/1.86     dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 1.65/1.86     dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 1.65/1.86     dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 1.65/1.86     dependent: assign(max_seconds, 10800).
% 1.65/1.86  clear(print_given).
% 1.65/1.86  
% 1.65/1.86  formula_list(usable).
% 1.65/1.86  all X T (organization(X,T)-> (exists I inertia(X,I,T))).
% 1.65/1.86  all X Y C S1 S2 I1 I2 T1 T2 (organization(X,T1)&organization(Y,T2)&class(X,C,T1)&class(Y,C,T2)&size(X,S1,T1)&size(Y,S2,T2)&inertia(X,I1,T1)&inertia(Y,I2,T2)&greater(S2,S1)->greater(I2,I1)).
% 1.65/1.86  all X Y Rt C I1 I2 Ta Tb Tc (organization(X,Ta)&organization(Y,Ta)&organization(Y,Tc)&class(X,C,Ta)&class(Y,C,Ta)&reorganization(X,Ta,Tb)&reorganization(Y,Ta,Tc)&reorganization_type(X,Rt,Ta)&reorganization_type(Y,Rt,Ta)&inertia(X,I1,Ta)&inertia(Y,I2,Ta)&greater(I2,I1)->greater(Tc,Tb)).
% 1.65/1.86  -(all X Y Rt C S1 S2 Ta Tb Tc (organization(X,Ta)&organization(Y,Ta)&organization(Y,Tc)&class(X,C,Ta)&class(Y,C,Ta)&reorganization(X,Ta,Tb)&reorganization(Y,Ta,Tc)&reorganization_type(X,Rt,Ta)&reorganization_type(Y,Rt,Ta)&size(X,S1,Ta)&size(Y,S2,Ta)&greater(S2,S1)->greater(Tc,Tb))).
% 1.65/1.86  end_of_list.
% 1.65/1.86  
% 1.65/1.86  -------> usable clausifies to:
% 1.65/1.86  
% 1.65/1.86  list(usable).
% 1.65/1.86  0 [] -organization(X,T)|inertia(X,$f1(X,T),T).
% 1.65/1.86  0 [] -organization(X,T1)| -organization(Y,T2)| -class(X,C,T1)| -class(Y,C,T2)| -size(X,S1,T1)| -size(Y,S2,T2)| -inertia(X,I1,T1)| -inertia(Y,I2,T2)| -greater(S2,S1)|greater(I2,I1).
% 1.65/1.86  0 [] -organization(X,Ta)| -organization(Y,Ta)| -organization(Y,Tc)| -class(X,C,Ta)| -class(Y,C,Ta)| -reorganization(X,Ta,Tb)| -reorganization(Y,Ta,Tc)| -reorganization_type(X,Rt,Ta)| -reorganization_type(Y,Rt,Ta)| -inertia(X,I1,Ta)| -inertia(Y,I2,Ta)| -greater(I2,I1)|greater(Tc,Tb).
% 1.65/1.86  0 [] organization($c9,$c3).
% 1.65/1.86  0 [] organization($c8,$c3).
% 1.65/1.86  0 [] organization($c8,$c1).
% 1.65/1.86  0 [] class($c9,$c6,$c3).
% 1.65/1.86  0 [] class($c8,$c6,$c3).
% 1.65/1.86  0 [] reorganization($c9,$c3,$c2).
% 1.65/1.86  0 [] reorganization($c8,$c3,$c1).
% 1.65/1.86  0 [] reorganization_type($c9,$c7,$c3).
% 1.65/1.86  0 [] reorganization_type($c8,$c7,$c3).
% 1.65/1.86  0 [] size($c9,$c5,$c3).
% 1.65/1.86  0 [] size($c8,$c4,$c3).
% 1.65/1.86  0 [] greater($c4,$c5).
% 1.65/1.86  0 [] -greater($c1,$c2).
% 1.65/1.86  end_of_list.
% 1.65/1.86  
% 1.65/1.86  SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=1, equality=0, symmetry=0, max_lits=13.
% 1.65/1.86  
% 1.65/1.86  This is a Horn set without equality.  The strategy will
% 1.65/1.86  be hyperresolution, with satellites in sos and nuclei
% 1.65/1.86  in usable.
% 1.65/1.86  
% 1.65/1.86     dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 1.65/1.86     dependent: clear(order_hyper).
% 1.65/1.86  
% 1.65/1.86  ------------> process usable:
% 1.65/1.86  ** KEPT (pick-wt=9): 1 [] -organization(A,B)|inertia(A,$f1(A,B),B).
% 1.65/1.86  ** KEPT (pick-wt=36): 2 [] -organization(A,B)| -organization(C,D)| -class(A,E,B)| -class(C,E,D)| -size(A,F,B)| -size(C,G,D)| -inertia(A,H,B)| -inertia(C,I,D)| -greater(G,F)|greater(I,H).
% 1.65/1.86  ** KEPT (pick-wt=47): 3 [] -organization(A,B)| -organization(C,B)| -organization(C,D)| -class(A,E,B)| -class(C,E,B)| -reorganization(A,B,F)| -reorganization(C,B,D)| -reorganization_type(A,G,B)| -reorganization_type(C,G,B)| -inertia(A,H,B)| -inertia(C,I,B)| -greater(I,H)|greater(D,F).
% 1.65/1.86  ** KEPT (pick-wt=3): 4 [] -greater($c1,$c2).
% 1.65/1.86  
% 1.65/1.86  ------------> process sos:
% 1.65/1.86  ** KEPT (pick-wt=3): 5 [] organization($c9,$c3).
% 1.65/1.86  ** KEPT (pick-wt=3): 6 [] organization($c8,$c3).
% 1.65/1.86  ** KEPT (pick-wt=3): 7 [] organization($c8,$c1).
% 1.65/1.86  ** KEPT (pick-wt=4): 8 [] class($c9,$c6,$c3).
% 1.65/1.86  ** KEPT (pick-wt=4): 9 [] class($c8,$c6,$c3).
% 1.65/1.86  ** KEPT (pick-wt=4): 10 [] reorganization($c9,$c3,$c2).
% 1.65/1.86  ** KEPT (pick-wt=4): 11 [] reorganization($c8,$c3,$c1).
% 1.65/1.86  ** KEPT (pick-wt=4): 12 [] reorganization_type($c9,$c7,$c3).
% 1.65/1.86  ** KEPT (pick-wt=4): 13 [] reorganization_type($c8,$c7,$c3).
% 1.65/1.86  ** KEPT (pick-wt=4): 14 [] size($c9,$c5,$c3).
% 1.65/1.86  ** KEPT (pick-wt=4): 15 [] size($c8,$c4,$c3).
% 1.65/1.86  ** KEPT (pick-wt=3): 16 [] greater($c4,$c5).
% 1.65/1.86  
% 1.65/1.86  ======= end of input processing =======
% 1.65/1.86  
% 1.65/1.86  =========== start of search ===========
% 1.65/1.86  
% 1.65/1.86  -------- PROOF -------- 
% 1.65/1.86  
% 1.65/1.86  ----> UNIT CONFLICT at   0.00 sec ----> 22 [binary,21.1,4.1] $F.
% 1.65/1.86  
% 1.65/1.86  Length of proof is 4.  Level of proof is 3.
% 1.65/1.86  
% 1.65/1.86  ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 1.65/1.86  % SZS status Theorem
% 1.65/1.86  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 1.65/1.86  ------------ end of proof -------------
% 1.65/1.86  
% 1.65/1.86  
% 1.65/1.86  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 1.65/1.86  
% 1.65/1.86  
% 1.65/1.86  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 1.65/1.86  
% 1.65/1.86  ============ end of search ============
% 1.65/1.86  
% 1.65/1.86  -------------- statistics -------------
% 1.65/1.86  clauses given                 16
% 1.65/1.86  clauses generated              5
% 1.65/1.86  clauses kept                  21
% 1.65/1.86  clauses forward subsumed       0
% 1.65/1.86  clauses back subsumed          0
% 1.65/1.86  Kbytes malloced              976
% 1.65/1.86  
% 1.65/1.86  ----------- times (seconds) -----------
% 1.65/1.86  user CPU time          0.00          (0 hr, 0 min, 0 sec)
% 1.65/1.86  system CPU time        0.00          (0 hr, 0 min, 0 sec)
% 1.65/1.86  wall-clock time        1             (0 hr, 0 min, 1 sec)
% 1.65/1.86  
% 1.65/1.86  That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 1.65/1.86  
% 1.65/1.86  Process 15803 finished Wed Jul 27 03:53:11 2022
% 1.65/1.86  Otter interrupted
% 1.65/1.86  PROOF FOUND
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------