TSTP Solution File: MGT014+1 by Otter---3.3

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Otter---3.3
% Problem  : MGT014+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : otter-tptp-script %s

% Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Jul 27 13:05:59 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 1.79s 2.00s
% Output   : Refutation 1.79s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    8
%            Number of leaves      :   17
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   29 (  19 unt;   3 nHn;  28 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   60 (  10 equ;  30 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    7 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    8 (   6 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    7 (   7 usr;   7 con; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   30 (   1 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(2,axiom,
    ( ~ greater(A,B)
    | ~ greater(B,A) ),
    file('MGT014+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(3,axiom,
    ( ~ organization(A,B)
    | time(B) ),
    file('MGT014+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(4,axiom,
    ( ~ time(A)
    | ~ time(B)
    | greater(A,B)
    | A = B
    | greater(B,A) ),
    file('MGT014+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(5,axiom,
    ( ~ reorganization_free(A,B,C)
    | reorganization_free(A,C,B) ),
    file('MGT014+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(6,axiom,
    ( ~ organization(A,B)
    | ~ organization(A,C)
    | ~ size(A,D,B)
    | ~ size(A,E,C)
    | B != C
    | D = E ),
    file('MGT014+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(7,axiom,
    ( ~ organization(A,B)
    | ~ organization(A,C)
    | ~ reorganization_free(A,B,C)
    | ~ size(A,D,B)
    | ~ size(A,E,C)
    | ~ greater(C,B)
    | ~ greater(D,E) ),
    file('MGT014+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(8,axiom,
    ( ~ organization(A,B)
    | ~ organization(A,C)
    | ~ reorganization_free(A,B,C)
    | ~ complexity(A,D,B)
    | ~ complexity(A,E,C)
    | ~ greater(C,B)
    | ~ greater(D,E) ),
    file('MGT014+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(9,plain,
    ~ greater(A,A),
    inference(factor,[status(thm)],[2]),
    [iquote('factor,2.1.2')] ).

cnf(11,plain,
    ( ~ organization(A,B)
    | ~ size(A,C,B)
    | ~ size(A,D,B)
    | B != B
    | C = D ),
    inference(factor,[status(thm)],[6]),
    [iquote('factor,6.1.2')] ).

cnf(15,axiom,
    A = A,
    file('MGT014+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(16,axiom,
    organization(dollar_c7,dollar_c2),
    file('MGT014+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(17,axiom,
    organization(dollar_c7,dollar_c1),
    file('MGT014+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(18,axiom,
    reorganization_free(dollar_c7,dollar_c2,dollar_c1),
    file('MGT014+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(19,axiom,
    complexity(dollar_c7,dollar_c6,dollar_c2),
    file('MGT014+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(20,axiom,
    complexity(dollar_c7,dollar_c5,dollar_c1),
    file('MGT014+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(21,axiom,
    size(dollar_c7,dollar_c4,dollar_c2),
    file('MGT014+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(22,axiom,
    size(dollar_c7,dollar_c3,dollar_c1),
    file('MGT014+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(23,axiom,
    greater(dollar_c3,dollar_c4),
    file('MGT014+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(24,axiom,
    greater(dollar_c6,dollar_c5),
    file('MGT014+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(25,plain,
    time(dollar_c2),
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[16,3]),
    [iquote('hyper,16,3')] ).

cnf(34,plain,
    time(dollar_c1),
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[17,3]),
    [iquote('hyper,17,3')] ).

cnf(41,plain,
    ( greater(dollar_c2,dollar_c1)
    | dollar_c2 = dollar_c1
    | greater(dollar_c1,dollar_c2) ),
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[34,4,25]),
    [iquote('hyper,34,4,25')] ).

cnf(44,plain,
    reorganization_free(dollar_c7,dollar_c1,dollar_c2),
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[18,5]),
    [iquote('hyper,18,5')] ).

cnf(111,plain,
    ( dollar_c2 = dollar_c1
    | greater(dollar_c1,dollar_c2) ),
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[41,7,17,16,44,22,21,23]),
    [iquote('hyper,41,7,17,16,44,22,21,23')] ).

cnf(114,plain,
    dollar_c2 = dollar_c1,
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[111,8,16,17,18,19,20,24]),
    [iquote('hyper,111,8,16,17,18,19,20,24')] ).

cnf(143,plain,
    size(dollar_c7,dollar_c4,dollar_c1),
    inference(demod,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[inference(back_demod,[status(thm)],[21]),114]),
    [iquote('back_demod,21,demod,114')] ).

cnf(165,plain,
    dollar_c4 = dollar_c3,
    inference(flip,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[143,11,17,22,15])]),
    [iquote('hyper,143,11,17,22,15,flip.1')] ).

cnf(171,plain,
    greater(dollar_c3,dollar_c3),
    inference(demod,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[inference(back_demod,[status(thm)],[23]),165]),
    [iquote('back_demod,23,demod,165')] ).

cnf(172,plain,
    $false,
    inference(binary,[status(thm)],[171,9]),
    [iquote('binary,171.1,9.1')] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12  % Problem  : MGT014+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.0.0.
% 0.03/0.13  % Command  : otter-tptp-script %s
% 0.13/0.33  % Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.33  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.13/0.33  % DateTime : Wed Jul 27 03:57:38 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 1.79/1.99  ----- Otter 3.3f, August 2004 -----
% 1.79/1.99  The process was started by sandbox on n021.cluster.edu,
% 1.79/1.99  Wed Jul 27 03:57:38 2022
% 1.79/1.99  The command was "./otter".  The process ID is 29630.
% 1.79/1.99  
% 1.79/1.99  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 1.79/1.99  set(auto).
% 1.79/1.99     dependent: set(auto1).
% 1.79/1.99     dependent: set(process_input).
% 1.79/1.99     dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 1.79/1.99     dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 1.79/1.99     dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 1.79/1.99     dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 1.79/1.99     dependent: set(control_memory).
% 1.79/1.99     dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 1.79/1.99     dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 1.79/1.99     dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 1.79/1.99     dependent: assign(max_seconds, 10800).
% 1.79/1.99  clear(print_given).
% 1.79/1.99  
% 1.79/1.99  formula_list(usable).
% 1.79/1.99  all A (A=A).
% 1.79/1.99  all X Y (-(greater(X,Y)&X=Y)).
% 1.79/1.99  all X Y (-(greater(X,Y)&greater(Y,X))).
% 1.79/1.99  all X T (organization(X,T)->time(T)).
% 1.79/1.99  all T1 T2 (time(T1)&time(T2)->greater(T1,T2)|T1=T2|greater(T2,T1)).
% 1.79/1.99  all X T1 T2 (reorganization_free(X,T1,T2)->reorganization_free(X,T2,T1)).
% 1.79/1.99  all X S1 S2 T1 T2 (organization(X,T1)&organization(X,T2)&size(X,S1,T1)&size(X,S2,T2)&T1=T2->S1=S2).
% 1.79/1.99  all X S1 S2 T1 T2 (organization(X,T1)&organization(X,T2)&reorganization_free(X,T1,T2)&size(X,S1,T1)&size(X,S2,T2)&greater(T2,T1)-> -greater(S1,S2)).
% 1.79/1.99  all X C1 C2 T1 T2 (organization(X,T1)&organization(X,T2)&reorganization_free(X,T1,T2)&complexity(X,C1,T1)&complexity(X,C2,T2)&greater(T2,T1)-> -greater(C1,C2)).
% 1.79/1.99  -(all X C1 C2 S1 S2 T1 T2 (organization(X,T1)&organization(X,T2)&reorganization_free(X,T1,T2)&complexity(X,C1,T1)&complexity(X,C2,T2)&size(X,S1,T1)&size(X,S2,T2)&greater(S2,S1)-> -greater(C1,C2))).
% 1.79/1.99  end_of_list.
% 1.79/1.99  
% 1.79/1.99  -------> usable clausifies to:
% 1.79/1.99  
% 1.79/1.99  list(usable).
% 1.79/1.99  0 [] A=A.
% 1.79/1.99  0 [] -greater(X,Y)|X!=Y.
% 1.79/1.99  0 [] -greater(X,Y)| -greater(Y,X).
% 1.79/1.99  0 [] -organization(X,T)|time(T).
% 1.79/1.99  0 [] -time(T1)| -time(T2)|greater(T1,T2)|T1=T2|greater(T2,T1).
% 1.79/1.99  0 [] -reorganization_free(X,T1,T2)|reorganization_free(X,T2,T1).
% 1.79/1.99  0 [] -organization(X,T1)| -organization(X,T2)| -size(X,S1,T1)| -size(X,S2,T2)|T1!=T2|S1=S2.
% 1.79/1.99  0 [] -organization(X,T1)| -organization(X,T2)| -reorganization_free(X,T1,T2)| -size(X,S1,T1)| -size(X,S2,T2)| -greater(T2,T1)| -greater(S1,S2).
% 1.79/1.99  0 [] -organization(X,T1)| -organization(X,T2)| -reorganization_free(X,T1,T2)| -complexity(X,C1,T1)| -complexity(X,C2,T2)| -greater(T2,T1)| -greater(C1,C2).
% 1.79/1.99  0 [] organization($c7,$c2).
% 1.79/1.99  0 [] organization($c7,$c1).
% 1.79/1.99  0 [] reorganization_free($c7,$c2,$c1).
% 1.79/1.99  0 [] complexity($c7,$c6,$c2).
% 1.79/1.99  0 [] complexity($c7,$c5,$c1).
% 1.79/1.99  0 [] size($c7,$c4,$c2).
% 1.79/1.99  0 [] size($c7,$c3,$c1).
% 1.79/1.99  0 [] greater($c3,$c4).
% 1.79/1.99  0 [] greater($c6,$c5).
% 1.79/1.99  end_of_list.
% 1.79/1.99  
% 1.79/1.99  SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=7.
% 1.79/1.99  
% 1.79/1.99  This ia a non-Horn set with equality.  The strategy will be
% 1.79/1.99  Knuth-Bendix, ordered hyper_res, factoring, and unit
% 1.79/1.99  deletion, with positive clauses in sos and nonpositive
% 1.79/1.99  clauses in usable.
% 1.79/1.99  
% 1.79/1.99     dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 1.79/1.99     dependent: set(anl_eq).
% 1.79/1.99     dependent: set(para_from).
% 1.79/1.99     dependent: set(para_into).
% 1.79/1.99     dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 1.79/1.99     dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 1.79/1.99     dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 1.79/1.99     dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 1.79/1.99     dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 1.79/1.99     dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 1.79/1.99     dependent: set(order_eq).
% 1.79/1.99     dependent: set(back_demod).
% 1.79/1.99     dependent: set(lrpo).
% 1.79/1.99     dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 1.79/1.99     dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 1.79/1.99     dependent: set(factor).
% 1.79/1.99  
% 1.79/1.99  ------------> process usable:
% 1.79/1.99  ** KEPT (pick-wt=6): 1 [] -greater(A,B)|A!=B.
% 1.79/1.99  ** KEPT (pick-wt=6): 2 [] -greater(A,B)| -greater(B,A).
% 1.79/1.99  ** KEPT (pick-wt=5): 3 [] -organization(A,B)|time(B).
% 1.79/1.99  ** KEPT (pick-wt=13): 4 [] -time(A)| -time(B)|greater(A,B)|A=B|greater(B,A).
% 1.79/1.99  ** KEPT (pick-wt=8): 5 [] -reorganization_free(A,B,C)|reorganization_free(A,C,B).
% 1.79/1.99  ** KEPT (pick-wt=20): 6 [] -organization(A,B)| -organization(A,C)| -size(A,D,B)| -size(A,E,C)|B!=C|D=E.
% 1.79/1.99  ** KEPT (pick-wt=24): 7 [] -organization(A,B)| -organization(A,C)| -reorganization_free(A,B,C)| -size(A,D,B)| -size(A,E,C)| -greater(C,B)| -greater(D,E).
% 1.79/1.99  ** KEPT (pick-wt=24): 8 [] -organization(A,B)| -organization(A,C)| -reorganization_free(A,B,C)| -complexity(A,D,B)| -complexity(A,E,C)| -greater(C,B)| -greater(D,E).
% 1.79/1.99  
% 1.79/1.99  ------------> process sos:
% 1.79/1.99  ** KEPT (pick-wt=3): 15 [] A=A.
% 1.79/1.99  ** KEPT (pick-wt=3): 16 [] organization($c7,$c2).
% 1.79/2.00  ** KEPT (pick-wt=3): 17 [] organization($c7,$c1).
% 1.79/2.00  ** KEPT (pick-wt=4): 18 [] reorganization_free($c7,$c2,$c1).
% 1.79/2.00  ** KEPT (pick-wt=4): 19 [] complexity($c7,$c6,$c2).
% 1.79/2.00  ** KEPT (pick-wt=4): 20 [] complexity($c7,$c5,$c1).
% 1.79/2.00  ** KEPT (pick-wt=4): 21 [] size($c7,$c4,$c2).
% 1.79/2.00  ** KEPT (pick-wt=4): 22 [] size($c7,$c3,$c1).
% 1.79/2.00  ** KEPT (pick-wt=3): 23 [] greater($c3,$c4).
% 1.79/2.00  ** KEPT (pick-wt=3): 24 [] greater($c6,$c5).
% 1.79/2.00    Following clause subsumed by 15 during input processing: 0 [copy,15,flip.1] A=A.
% 1.79/2.00  15 back subsumes 12.
% 1.79/2.00  15 back subsumes 10.
% 1.79/2.00  
% 1.79/2.00  ======= end of input processing =======
% 1.79/2.00  
% 1.79/2.00  =========== start of search ===========
% 1.79/2.00  
% 1.79/2.00  -------- PROOF -------- 
% 1.79/2.00  
% 1.79/2.00  ----> UNIT CONFLICT at   0.01 sec ----> 172 [binary,171.1,9.1] $F.
% 1.79/2.00  
% 1.79/2.00  Length of proof is 11.  Level of proof is 7.
% 1.79/2.00  
% 1.79/2.00  ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 1.79/2.00  % SZS status Theorem
% 1.79/2.00  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 1.79/2.00  ------------ end of proof -------------
% 1.79/2.00  
% 1.79/2.00  
% 1.79/2.00  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 1.79/2.00  
% 1.79/2.00  
% 1.79/2.00  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 1.79/2.00  
% 1.79/2.00  ============ end of search ============
% 1.79/2.00  
% 1.79/2.00  -------------- statistics -------------
% 1.79/2.00  clauses given                 19
% 1.79/2.00  clauses generated            392
% 1.79/2.00  clauses kept                 169
% 1.79/2.00  clauses forward subsumed     309
% 1.79/2.00  clauses back subsumed          3
% 1.79/2.00  Kbytes malloced              976
% 1.79/2.00  
% 1.79/2.00  ----------- times (seconds) -----------
% 1.79/2.00  user CPU time          0.01          (0 hr, 0 min, 0 sec)
% 1.79/2.00  system CPU time        0.00          (0 hr, 0 min, 0 sec)
% 1.79/2.00  wall-clock time        1             (0 hr, 0 min, 1 sec)
% 1.79/2.00  
% 1.79/2.00  That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 1.79/2.00  
% 1.79/2.00  Process 29630 finished Wed Jul 27 03:57:39 2022
% 1.79/2.00  Otter interrupted
% 1.79/2.00  PROOF FOUND
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------