TSTP Solution File: MGT013-1 by CSE---1.6
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CSE---1.6
% Problem : MGT013-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %s %d
% Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 09:06:44 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.20s 0.61s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.20s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12 % Problem : MGT013-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.00/0.12 % Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %s %d
% 0.13/0.33 % Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.33 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Mon Aug 28 06:15:32 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.54 start to proof:theBenchmark
% 0.20/0.60 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.60 % File :CSE---1.6
% 0.20/0.60 % Problem :theBenchmark
% 0.20/0.60 % Transform :cnf
% 0.20/0.60 % Format :tptp:raw
% 0.20/0.60 % Command :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.20/0.60
% 0.20/0.60 % Result :Theorem 0.000000s
% 0.20/0.60 % Output :CNFRefutation 0.000000s
% 0.20/0.60 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.60 %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.60 % File : MGT013-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.20/0.60 % Domain : Management (Organisation Theory)
% 0.20/0.60 % Problem : If organization complexity increases, its size cannot decrease
% 0.20/0.60 % Version : [PB+94] axioms.
% 0.20/0.60 % English : If the complexity of an organization gets bigger, its size
% 0.20/0.60 % cannot get smaller (in lack of reorganization).
% 0.20/0.60
% 0.20/0.60 % Refs : [PB+94] Peli et al. (1994), A Logical Approach to Formalizing
% 0.20/0.60 % : [Kam94] Kamps (1994), Email to G. Sutcliffe
% 0.20/0.60 % : [Kam95] Kamps (1995), Email to G. Sutcliffe
% 0.20/0.60 % Source : [TPTP]
% 0.20/0.60 % Names :
% 0.20/0.60
% 0.20/0.60 % Status : Unsatisfiable
% 0.20/0.60 % Rating : 0.00 v2.6.0, 0.11 v2.5.0, 0.00 v2.4.0
% 0.20/0.60 % Syntax : Number of clauses : 17 ( 9 unt; 1 nHn; 17 RR)
% 0.20/0.60 % Number of literals : 42 ( 4 equ; 27 neg)
% 0.20/0.60 % Maximal clause size : 7 ( 2 avg)
% 0.20/0.60 % Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% 0.20/0.60 % Number of predicates : 7 ( 6 usr; 0 prp; 1-3 aty)
% 0.20/0.60 % Number of functors : 7 ( 7 usr; 7 con; 0-0 aty)
% 0.20/0.60 % Number of variables : 26 ( 1 sgn)
% 0.20/0.60 % SPC : CNF_UNS_EPR_SEQ_NHN
% 0.20/0.60
% 0.20/0.60 % Comments : "Not published due to publication constraints." [Kam95].
% 0.20/0.60 % : Created with tptp2X -f tptp -t clausify:otter MGT013+1.p
% 0.20/0.60 %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.60 cnf(mp6_1_18,axiom,
% 0.20/0.60 ( ~ greater(A,B)
% 0.20/0.60 | A != B ) ).
% 0.20/0.60
% 0.20/0.60 cnf(mp6_2_19,axiom,
% 0.20/0.60 ( ~ greater(A,B)
% 0.20/0.60 | ~ greater(B,A) ) ).
% 0.20/0.60
% 0.20/0.60 cnf(mp15_20,axiom,
% 0.20/0.60 ( ~ organization(A,B)
% 0.20/0.60 | time(B) ) ).
% 0.20/0.60
% 0.20/0.60 cnf(mp16_21,axiom,
% 0.20/0.60 ( ~ time(A)
% 0.20/0.60 | ~ time(B)
% 0.20/0.60 | greater(A,B)
% 0.20/0.60 | A = B
% 0.20/0.60 | greater(B,A) ) ).
% 0.20/0.60
% 0.20/0.60 cnf(mp17_22,axiom,
% 0.20/0.60 ( ~ reorganization_free(A,B,C)
% 0.20/0.60 | reorganization_free(A,C,B) ) ).
% 0.20/0.61
% 0.20/0.61 cnf(mp18_23,axiom,
% 0.20/0.61 ( ~ organization(A,B)
% 0.20/0.61 | ~ organization(A,C)
% 0.20/0.61 | ~ complexity(A,D,B)
% 0.20/0.61 | ~ complexity(A,E,C)
% 0.20/0.61 | B != C
% 0.20/0.61 | D = E ) ).
% 0.20/0.61
% 0.20/0.61 cnf(t11_FOL_24,hypothesis,
% 0.20/0.61 ( ~ organization(A,B)
% 0.20/0.61 | ~ organization(A,C)
% 0.20/0.61 | ~ reorganization_free(A,B,C)
% 0.20/0.61 | ~ size(A,D,B)
% 0.20/0.61 | ~ size(A,E,C)
% 0.20/0.61 | ~ greater(C,B)
% 0.20/0.61 | ~ greater(D,E) ) ).
% 0.20/0.61
% 0.20/0.61 cnf(t12_FOL_25,hypothesis,
% 0.20/0.61 ( ~ organization(A,B)
% 0.20/0.61 | ~ organization(A,C)
% 0.20/0.61 | ~ reorganization_free(A,B,C)
% 0.20/0.61 | ~ complexity(A,D,B)
% 0.20/0.61 | ~ complexity(A,E,C)
% 0.20/0.61 | ~ greater(C,B)
% 0.20/0.61 | ~ greater(D,E) ) ).
% 0.20/0.61
% 0.20/0.61 cnf(t13_FOL_26,negated_conjecture,
% 0.20/0.61 organization(sk1,sk6) ).
% 0.20/0.61
% 0.20/0.61 cnf(t13_FOL_27,negated_conjecture,
% 0.20/0.61 organization(sk1,sk7) ).
% 0.20/0.61
% 0.20/0.61 cnf(t13_FOL_28,negated_conjecture,
% 0.20/0.61 reorganization_free(sk1,sk6,sk7) ).
% 0.20/0.61
% 0.20/0.61 cnf(t13_FOL_29,negated_conjecture,
% 0.20/0.61 complexity(sk1,sk2,sk6) ).
% 0.20/0.61
% 0.20/0.61 cnf(t13_FOL_30,negated_conjecture,
% 0.20/0.61 complexity(sk1,sk3,sk7) ).
% 0.20/0.61
% 0.20/0.61 cnf(t13_FOL_31,negated_conjecture,
% 0.20/0.61 size(sk1,sk4,sk6) ).
% 0.20/0.61
% 0.20/0.61 cnf(t13_FOL_32,negated_conjecture,
% 0.20/0.61 size(sk1,sk5,sk7) ).
% 0.20/0.61
% 0.20/0.61 cnf(t13_FOL_33,negated_conjecture,
% 0.20/0.61 greater(sk3,sk2) ).
% 0.20/0.61
% 0.20/0.61 cnf(t13_FOL_34,negated_conjecture,
% 0.20/0.61 greater(sk4,sk5) ).
% 0.20/0.61
% 0.20/0.61 %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.61 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.61 % Proof found
% 0.20/0.61 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.20/0.61 % SZS output start Proof
% 0.20/0.61 %ClaNum:34(EqnAxiom:17)
% 0.20/0.61 %VarNum:73(SingletonVarNum:26)
% 0.20/0.61 %MaxLitNum:7
% 0.20/0.61 %MaxfuncDepth:0
% 0.20/0.61 %SharedTerms:16
% 0.20/0.61 %goalClause: 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
% 0.20/0.61 %singleGoalClaCount:9
% 0.20/0.61 [18]P1(a1,a2)
% 0.20/0.61 [19]P1(a4,a5)
% 0.20/0.61 [20]P3(a3,a6)
% 0.20/0.61 [21]P3(a3,a7)
% 0.20/0.61 [22]P4(a3,a6,a7)
% 0.20/0.61 [23]P2(a3,a2,a6)
% 0.20/0.61 [24]P2(a3,a1,a7)
% 0.20/0.61 [25]P5(a3,a4,a6)
% 0.20/0.61 [26]P5(a3,a5,a7)
% 0.20/0.61 [27]~P1(x271,x272)+~E(x271,x272)
% 0.20/0.61 [28]P6(x281)+~P3(x282,x281)
% 0.20/0.61 [29]~P1(x292,x291)+~P1(x291,x292)
% 0.20/0.61 [31]~P4(x311,x313,x312)+P4(x311,x312,x313)
% 0.20/0.61 [30]P1(x302,x301)+P1(x301,x302)+~P6(x302)+~P6(x301)+E(x301,x302)
% 0.20/0.61 [32]~P3(x325,x323)+~P2(x325,x322,x324)+~P2(x325,x321,x323)+E(x321,x322)+~E(x323,x324)+~P3(x325,x324)
% 0.20/0.61 [33]~P3(x335,x334)+~P4(x335,x334,x333)+~P2(x335,x332,x333)+~P2(x335,x331,x334)+~P1(x331,x332)+~P1(x333,x334)+~P3(x335,x333)
% 0.20/0.61 [34]~P3(x345,x344)+~P4(x345,x344,x343)+~P5(x345,x342,x343)+~P5(x345,x341,x344)+~P1(x341,x342)+~P1(x343,x344)+~P3(x345,x343)
% 0.20/0.61 %EqnAxiom
% 0.20/0.61 [1]E(x11,x11)
% 0.20/0.61 [2]E(x22,x21)+~E(x21,x22)
% 0.20/0.61 [3]E(x31,x33)+~E(x31,x32)+~E(x32,x33)
% 0.20/0.61 [4]P1(x42,x43)+~E(x41,x42)+~P1(x41,x43)
% 0.20/0.61 [5]P1(x53,x52)+~E(x51,x52)+~P1(x53,x51)
% 0.20/0.61 [6]P5(x62,x63,x64)+~E(x61,x62)+~P5(x61,x63,x64)
% 0.20/0.61 [7]P5(x73,x72,x74)+~E(x71,x72)+~P5(x73,x71,x74)
% 0.20/0.61 [8]P5(x83,x84,x82)+~E(x81,x82)+~P5(x83,x84,x81)
% 0.20/0.61 [9]P3(x92,x93)+~E(x91,x92)+~P3(x91,x93)
% 0.20/0.61 [10]P3(x103,x102)+~E(x101,x102)+~P3(x103,x101)
% 0.20/0.61 [11]P2(x112,x113,x114)+~E(x111,x112)+~P2(x111,x113,x114)
% 0.20/0.61 [12]P2(x123,x122,x124)+~E(x121,x122)+~P2(x123,x121,x124)
% 0.20/0.61 [13]P2(x133,x134,x132)+~E(x131,x132)+~P2(x133,x134,x131)
% 0.20/0.61 [14]P4(x142,x143,x144)+~E(x141,x142)+~P4(x141,x143,x144)
% 0.20/0.61 [15]P4(x153,x152,x154)+~E(x151,x152)+~P4(x153,x151,x154)
% 0.20/0.61 [16]P4(x163,x164,x162)+~E(x161,x162)+~P4(x163,x164,x161)
% 0.20/0.61 [17]~P6(x171)+P6(x172)+~E(x171,x172)
% 0.20/0.61
% 0.20/0.61 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.61 cnf(35,plain,
% 0.20/0.61 (~P1(a2,a1)),
% 0.20/0.61 inference(scs_inference,[],[18,29])).
% 0.20/0.61 cnf(36,plain,
% 0.20/0.61 (P4(a3,a7,a6)),
% 0.20/0.61 inference(scs_inference,[],[18,22,29,31])).
% 0.20/0.61 cnf(37,plain,
% 0.20/0.61 (P6(a6)),
% 0.20/0.61 inference(scs_inference,[],[18,20,22,29,31,28])).
% 0.20/0.61 cnf(39,plain,
% 0.20/0.61 (~E(a1,a2)),
% 0.20/0.61 inference(scs_inference,[],[18,20,22,29,31,28,27])).
% 0.20/0.61 cnf(53,plain,
% 0.20/0.61 (~P6(a7)),
% 0.20/0.61 inference(scs_inference,[],[18,19,23,24,25,26,21,22,20,35,36,37,39,2,32,34,33,29,5,30])).
% 0.20/0.61 cnf(57,plain,
% 0.20/0.61 ($false),
% 0.20/0.61 inference(scs_inference,[],[21,53,28]),
% 0.20/0.61 ['proof']).
% 0.20/0.61 % SZS output end Proof
% 0.20/0.61 % Total time :0.000000s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------