TSTP Solution File: MGT011-1 by SOS---2.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SOS---2.0
% Problem  : MGT011-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : sos-script %s

% Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 22:25:47 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.99s 1.22s
% Output   : Refutation 0.99s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12  % Problem  : MGT011-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.03/0.13  % Command  : sos-script %s
% 0.14/0.34  % Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.14/0.34  % DateTime : Thu Jun  9 10:26:57 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.14/0.36  ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.14/0.36  The process was started by sandbox2 on n027.cluster.edu,
% 0.14/0.36  Thu Jun  9 10:26:57 2022
% 0.14/0.36  The command was "./sos".  The process ID is 20614.
% 0.14/0.36  
% 0.14/0.36  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.14/0.36  set(auto).
% 0.14/0.36     dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.14/0.36     dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.14/0.36     dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.14/0.36     dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.14/0.36     dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.14/0.36     dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.14/0.36     dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.14/0.36     dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.14/0.36     dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.14/0.36     dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.14/0.36     dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.14/0.36     dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.14/0.36     dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.14/0.36  clear(print_given).
% 0.14/0.36  
% 0.14/0.36  list(usable).
% 0.14/0.36  
% 0.14/0.36  SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=1, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=10.
% 0.14/0.36  
% 0.14/0.36  This is a Horn set with equality.  The strategy will be
% 0.14/0.36  Knuth-Bendix and hyper_res, with positive clauses in
% 0.14/0.36  sos and nonpositive clauses in usable.
% 0.14/0.36  
% 0.14/0.36     dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 0.14/0.36     dependent: set(para_from).
% 0.14/0.36     dependent: set(para_into).
% 0.14/0.36     dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 0.14/0.36     dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 0.14/0.36     dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 0.14/0.36     dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 0.14/0.36     dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 0.14/0.36     dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 0.14/0.36     dependent: set(order_eq).
% 0.14/0.36     dependent: set(back_demod).
% 0.14/0.36     dependent: set(lrpo).
% 0.14/0.36     dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.14/0.36     dependent: clear(order_hyper).
% 0.14/0.36  
% 0.14/0.36  ------------> process usable:
% 0.14/0.36  
% 0.14/0.36  ------------> process sos:
% 0.14/0.36    Following clause subsumed by 15 during input processing: 0 [copy,15,flip.1] {-} A=A.
% 0.14/0.36  
% 0.14/0.36  ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.20/0.46  
% 0.20/0.46  Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.20/0.46  
% 0.20/0.46  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.20/0.46  
% 0.20/0.46  
% 0.20/0.46  -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.20/0.46  
% 0.20/0.46  UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.20/0.46  SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.20/0.46  SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.20/0.46  number of clauses in intial UL: 7
% 0.20/0.46  number of clauses initially in problem: 15
% 0.20/0.46  percentage of clauses intially in UL: 46
% 0.20/0.46  percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 64
% 0.20/0.46  percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.20/0.46  absolute distinct symbol count: 14
% 0.20/0.46     distinct predicate count: 7
% 0.20/0.46     distinct function count: 2
% 0.20/0.46     distinct constant count: 5
% 0.20/0.46  
% 0.20/0.46  ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.20/0.46  
% 0.20/0.46  
% 0.20/0.46  
% 0.20/0.46  =========== start of search ===========
% 0.99/1.22  
% 0.99/1.22  -------- PROOF -------- 
% 0.99/1.22  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.99/1.22  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.99/1.22  
% 0.99/1.22  Model 2 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.99/1.22  
% 0.99/1.22  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.99/1.22  
% 0.99/1.22  Model 3 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.99/1.22  
% 0.99/1.22  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.99/1.22  
% 0.99/1.22  Model 4 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.99/1.22  
% 0.99/1.22  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.99/1.22  
% 0.99/1.22  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.99/1.22  
% 0.99/1.22  Model 5 [ 1 11 1635 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 0.99/1.22  
% 0.99/1.22  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.99/1.22  
% 0.99/1.22  Model 6 [ 1 4 852 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 0.99/1.22  
% 0.99/1.22  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.99/1.22  
% 0.99/1.22  Model 7 [ 1 11 1575 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 0.99/1.22  
% 0.99/1.22  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.99/1.22  
% 0.99/1.22  Model 8 [ 2 2 267 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 0.99/1.22  
% 0.99/1.22  -----> EMPTY CLAUSE at   0.73 sec ----> 99 [hyper,91,3,58] {-} $F.
% 0.99/1.22  
% 0.99/1.22  Length of proof is 8.  Level of proof is 4.
% 0.99/1.22  
% 0.99/1.22  ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 0.99/1.22  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.99/1.22  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.99/1.22  
% 0.99/1.22  1 [] {+} -organization(A,B)|inertia(A,sk1(B,A),B).
% 0.99/1.22  3 [] {+} -greater(A,B)| -greater(B,A).
% 0.99/1.22  4 [] {+} -organization(A,B)|class(A,sk2(B,A),B).
% 0.99/1.22  5 [] {+} -organization(A,B)| -organization(A,C)| -reorganization_free(A,B,C)| -class(A,D,B)| -class(A,E,C)|D=E.
% 0.99/1.22  6 [] {+} -organization(A,B)| -organization(C,D)| -class(A,E,B)| -class(C,E,D)| -size(A,F,B)| -size(C,G,D)| -inertia(A,H,B)| -inertia(C,I,D)| -greater(G,F)|greater(I,H).
% 0.99/1.22  7 [] {+} -organization(A,B)| -organization(A,C)| -reorganization_free(A,B,C)| -inertia(A,D,B)| -inertia(A,E,C)| -greater(C,B)|greater(E,D).
% 0.99/1.22  8 [] {+} organization(sk3,sk6).
% 0.99/1.22  9 [] {+} organization(sk3,sk7).
% 0.99/1.22  10 [] {+} reorganization_free(sk3,sk6,sk7).
% 0.99/1.22  11 [] {+} size(sk3,sk4,sk6).
% 0.99/1.22  12 [] {+} size(sk3,sk5,sk7).
% 0.99/1.22  13 [] {+} greater(sk7,sk6).
% 0.99/1.22  14 [] {+} greater(sk4,sk5).
% 0.99/1.22  16 [hyper,8,4] {+} class(sk3,sk2(sk6,sk3),sk6).
% 0.99/1.22  17 [hyper,8,1] {+} inertia(sk3,sk1(sk6,sk3),sk6).
% 0.99/1.22  24 [hyper,9,4] {+} class(sk3,sk2(sk7,sk3),sk7).
% 0.99/1.22  25 [hyper,9,1] {+} inertia(sk3,sk1(sk7,sk3),sk7).
% 0.99/1.22  51,50 [hyper,24,5,8,9,10,16,flip.1] {+} sk2(sk7,sk3)=sk2(sk6,sk3).
% 0.99/1.22  52 [back_demod,24,demod,51] {+} class(sk3,sk2(sk6,sk3),sk7).
% 0.99/1.22  58 [hyper,25,7,8,9,10,17,13] {-} greater(sk1(sk7,sk3),sk1(sk6,sk3)).
% 0.99/1.22  91 [hyper,52,6,9,8,16,12,11,25,17,14] {-} greater(sk1(sk6,sk3),sk1(sk7,sk3)).
% 0.99/1.22  99 [hyper,91,3,58] {-} $F.
% 0.99/1.22  
% 0.99/1.22  % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.99/1.22  ------------ end of proof -------------
% 0.99/1.22  
% 0.99/1.22  
% 0.99/1.22  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 0.99/1.22  
% 0.99/1.22  
% 0.99/1.22  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 0.99/1.22  
% 0.99/1.22  ============ end of search ============
% 0.99/1.22  
% 0.99/1.22  ----------- soft-scott stats ----------
% 0.99/1.22  
% 0.99/1.22  true clauses given           9      (33.3%)
% 0.99/1.22  false clauses given         18
% 0.99/1.22  
% 0.99/1.22        FALSE     TRUE
% 0.99/1.22     7  0         1
% 0.99/1.22    21  0         1
% 0.99/1.22    22  0         9
% 0.99/1.22    24  0         20
% 0.99/1.22    25  1         0
% 0.99/1.22    39  6         5
% 0.99/1.22    43  20        0
% 0.99/1.22  tot:  27        36      (57.1% true)
% 0.99/1.22  
% 0.99/1.22  
% 0.99/1.22  Model 8 [ 2 2 267 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 0.99/1.22  
% 0.99/1.22  That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 0.99/1.22  
% 0.99/1.22  Process 20614 finished Thu Jun  9 10:26:58 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------