TSTP Solution File: MGT011-1 by CSE---1.6
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CSE---1.6
% Problem : MGT011-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %s %d
% Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 09:06:43 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.21s 0.68s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.21s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12 % Problem : MGT011-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.00/0.13 % Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %s %d
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Mon Aug 28 06:25:13 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.21/0.58 start to proof:theBenchmark
% 0.21/0.68 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.21/0.68 % File :CSE---1.6
% 0.21/0.68 % Problem :theBenchmark
% 0.21/0.68 % Transform :cnf
% 0.21/0.68 % Format :tptp:raw
% 0.21/0.68 % Command :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.21/0.68
% 0.21/0.68 % Result :Theorem 0.040000s
% 0.21/0.68 % Output :CNFRefutation 0.040000s
% 0.21/0.68 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.21/0.68 %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.21/0.68 % File : MGT011-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.21/0.68 % Domain : Management (Organisation Theory)
% 0.21/0.68 % Problem : Organizational size cannot decrease without reorganization
% 0.21/0.68 % Version : [PB+94] axioms.
% 0.21/0.68 % English :
% 0.21/0.68
% 0.21/0.68 % Refs : [PB+92] Peli et al. (1992), A Logical Approach to Formalizing
% 0.21/0.68 % : [PB+94] Peli et al. (1994), A Logical Approach to Formalizing
% 0.21/0.68 % : [Kam94] Kamps (1994), Email to G. Sutcliffe
% 0.21/0.68 % Source : [TPTP]
% 0.21/0.68 % Names :
% 0.21/0.68
% 0.21/0.68 % Status : Unsatisfiable
% 0.21/0.68 % Rating : 0.00 v6.1.0, 0.20 v6.0.0, 0.22 v5.5.0, 0.12 v5.4.0, 0.13 v5.3.0, 0.17 v5.2.0, 0.25 v5.1.0, 0.29 v5.0.0, 0.14 v4.1.0, 0.11 v4.0.1, 0.17 v4.0.0, 0.33 v3.5.0, 0.17 v3.3.0, 0.00 v3.1.0, 0.11 v2.7.0, 0.00 v2.4.0
% 0.21/0.68 % Syntax : Number of clauses : 14 ( 7 unt; 0 nHn; 14 RR)
% 0.21/0.68 % Number of literals : 38 ( 2 equ; 26 neg)
% 0.21/0.68 % Maximal clause size : 10 ( 2 avg)
% 0.21/0.68 % Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% 0.21/0.68 % Number of predicates : 7 ( 6 usr; 0 prp; 2-3 aty)
% 0.21/0.68 % Number of functors : 7 ( 7 usr; 5 con; 0-2 aty)
% 0.21/0.68 % Number of variables : 27 ( 0 sgn)
% 0.21/0.68 % SPC : CNF_UNS_RFO_SEQ_HRN
% 0.21/0.68
% 0.21/0.68 % Comments : Created with tptp2X -f tptp -t clausify:otter MGT011+1.p
% 0.21/0.68 %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.21/0.68 cnf(mp5_20,axiom,
% 0.21/0.68 ( ~ organization(A,B)
% 0.21/0.68 | inertia(A,sk1(B,A),B) ) ).
% 0.21/0.68
% 0.21/0.68 cnf(mp6_1_21,axiom,
% 0.21/0.68 ( ~ greater(A,B)
% 0.21/0.68 | A != B ) ).
% 0.21/0.68
% 0.21/0.68 cnf(mp6_2_22,axiom,
% 0.21/0.68 ( ~ greater(A,B)
% 0.21/0.68 | ~ greater(B,A) ) ).
% 0.21/0.68
% 0.21/0.68 cnf(mp9_23,axiom,
% 0.21/0.68 ( ~ organization(A,B)
% 0.21/0.68 | class(A,sk2(B,A),B) ) ).
% 0.21/0.68
% 0.21/0.68 cnf(mp10_24,axiom,
% 0.21/0.68 ( ~ organization(A,B)
% 0.21/0.68 | ~ organization(A,C)
% 0.21/0.68 | ~ reorganization_free(A,B,C)
% 0.21/0.68 | ~ class(A,D,B)
% 0.21/0.68 | ~ class(A,E,C)
% 0.21/0.68 | D = E ) ).
% 0.21/0.68
% 0.21/0.68 cnf(a5_FOL_25,hypothesis,
% 0.21/0.68 ( ~ organization(A,B)
% 0.21/0.68 | ~ organization(C,D)
% 0.21/0.68 | ~ class(A,E,B)
% 0.21/0.68 | ~ class(C,E,D)
% 0.21/0.68 | ~ size(A,F,B)
% 0.21/0.68 | ~ size(C,G,D)
% 0.21/0.68 | ~ inertia(A,H,B)
% 0.21/0.68 | ~ inertia(C,I,D)
% 0.21/0.68 | ~ greater(G,F)
% 0.21/0.68 | greater(I,H) ) ).
% 0.21/0.68
% 0.21/0.68 cnf(t2_FOL_26,hypothesis,
% 0.21/0.68 ( ~ organization(A,B)
% 0.21/0.68 | ~ organization(A,C)
% 0.21/0.68 | ~ reorganization_free(A,B,C)
% 0.21/0.68 | ~ inertia(A,D,B)
% 0.21/0.68 | ~ inertia(A,E,C)
% 0.21/0.68 | ~ greater(C,B)
% 0.21/0.68 | greater(E,D) ) ).
% 0.21/0.68
% 0.21/0.68 cnf(t11_FOL_27,negated_conjecture,
% 0.21/0.68 organization(sk3,sk6) ).
% 0.21/0.68
% 0.21/0.68 cnf(t11_FOL_28,negated_conjecture,
% 0.21/0.68 organization(sk3,sk7) ).
% 0.21/0.68
% 0.21/0.68 cnf(t11_FOL_29,negated_conjecture,
% 0.21/0.68 reorganization_free(sk3,sk6,sk7) ).
% 0.21/0.68
% 0.21/0.68 cnf(t11_FOL_30,negated_conjecture,
% 0.21/0.68 size(sk3,sk4,sk6) ).
% 0.21/0.68
% 0.21/0.68 cnf(t11_FOL_31,negated_conjecture,
% 0.21/0.68 size(sk3,sk5,sk7) ).
% 0.21/0.68
% 0.21/0.68 cnf(t11_FOL_32,negated_conjecture,
% 0.21/0.68 greater(sk7,sk6) ).
% 0.21/0.68
% 0.21/0.68 cnf(t11_FOL_33,negated_conjecture,
% 0.21/0.68 greater(sk4,sk5) ).
% 0.21/0.68
% 0.21/0.68 %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.21/0.68 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.21/0.68 % Proof found
% 0.21/0.68 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.21/0.68 % SZS output start Proof
% 0.21/0.68 %ClaNum:37(EqnAxiom:23)
% 0.21/0.68 %VarNum:78(SingletonVarNum:27)
% 0.21/0.68 %MaxLitNum:10
% 0.21/0.68 %MaxfuncDepth:1
% 0.21/0.68 %SharedTerms:12
% 0.21/0.68 %goalClause: 24 25 26 27 28 29 30
% 0.21/0.69 %singleGoalClaCount:7
% 0.21/0.69 [24]P1(a1,a4)
% 0.21/0.69 [25]P1(a1,a7)
% 0.21/0.69 [26]P2(a7,a4)
% 0.21/0.69 [27]P2(a5,a6)
% 0.21/0.69 [28]P5(a1,a4,a7)
% 0.21/0.69 [29]P6(a1,a5,a4)
% 0.21/0.69 [30]P6(a1,a6,a7)
% 0.21/0.69 [31]~P2(x311,x312)+~E(x311,x312)
% 0.21/0.69 [32]~P2(x322,x321)+~P2(x321,x322)
% 0.21/0.69 [33]~P1(x331,x332)+P4(x331,f2(x332,x331),x332)
% 0.21/0.69 [34]~P1(x341,x342)+P3(x341,f3(x342,x341),x342)
% 0.21/0.69 [35]~P3(x353,x352,x354)+~P3(x353,x351,x355)+~P5(x353,x355,x354)+E(x351,x352)+~P1(x353,x354)+~P1(x353,x355)
% 0.21/0.69 [36]~P2(x364,x365)+~P4(x363,x361,x364)+~P4(x363,x362,x365)+~P5(x363,x365,x364)+P2(x361,x362)+~P1(x363,x364)+~P1(x363,x365)
% 0.21/0.69 [37]~P4(x373,x371,x374)+~P4(x375,x372,x376)+~P3(x375,x379,x376)+~P6(x373,x377,x374)+~P6(x375,x378,x376)+P2(x371,x372)+~P1(x373,x374)+~P3(x373,x379,x374)+~P1(x375,x376)+~P2(x377,x378)
% 0.21/0.69 %EqnAxiom
% 0.21/0.69 [1]E(x11,x11)
% 0.21/0.69 [2]E(x22,x21)+~E(x21,x22)
% 0.21/0.69 [3]E(x31,x33)+~E(x31,x32)+~E(x32,x33)
% 0.21/0.69 [4]~E(x41,x42)+E(f2(x41,x43),f2(x42,x43))
% 0.21/0.69 [5]~E(x51,x52)+E(f2(x53,x51),f2(x53,x52))
% 0.21/0.69 [6]~E(x61,x62)+E(f3(x61,x63),f3(x62,x63))
% 0.21/0.69 [7]~E(x71,x72)+E(f3(x73,x71),f3(x73,x72))
% 0.21/0.69 [8]P1(x82,x83)+~E(x81,x82)+~P1(x81,x83)
% 0.21/0.69 [9]P1(x93,x92)+~E(x91,x92)+~P1(x93,x91)
% 0.21/0.69 [10]P6(x102,x103,x104)+~E(x101,x102)+~P6(x101,x103,x104)
% 0.21/0.69 [11]P6(x113,x112,x114)+~E(x111,x112)+~P6(x113,x111,x114)
% 0.21/0.69 [12]P6(x123,x124,x122)+~E(x121,x122)+~P6(x123,x124,x121)
% 0.21/0.69 [13]P2(x132,x133)+~E(x131,x132)+~P2(x131,x133)
% 0.21/0.69 [14]P2(x143,x142)+~E(x141,x142)+~P2(x143,x141)
% 0.21/0.69 [15]P4(x152,x153,x154)+~E(x151,x152)+~P4(x151,x153,x154)
% 0.21/0.69 [16]P4(x163,x162,x164)+~E(x161,x162)+~P4(x163,x161,x164)
% 0.21/0.69 [17]P4(x173,x174,x172)+~E(x171,x172)+~P4(x173,x174,x171)
% 0.21/0.69 [18]P5(x182,x183,x184)+~E(x181,x182)+~P5(x181,x183,x184)
% 0.21/0.69 [19]P5(x193,x192,x194)+~E(x191,x192)+~P5(x193,x191,x194)
% 0.21/0.69 [20]P5(x203,x204,x202)+~E(x201,x202)+~P5(x203,x204,x201)
% 0.21/0.69 [21]P3(x212,x213,x214)+~E(x211,x212)+~P3(x211,x213,x214)
% 0.21/0.69 [22]P3(x223,x222,x224)+~E(x221,x222)+~P3(x223,x221,x224)
% 0.21/0.69 [23]P3(x233,x234,x232)+~E(x231,x232)+~P3(x233,x234,x231)
% 0.21/0.69
% 0.21/0.69 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.21/0.69 cnf(40,plain,
% 0.21/0.69 (P3(a1,f3(a4,a1),a4)),
% 0.21/0.69 inference(scs_inference,[],[24,26,32,31,34])).
% 0.21/0.69 cnf(42,plain,
% 0.21/0.69 (P4(a1,f2(a4,a1),a4)),
% 0.21/0.69 inference(scs_inference,[],[24,26,32,31,34,33])).
% 0.21/0.69 cnf(82,plain,
% 0.21/0.69 (P3(a1,f3(a7,a1),a7)),
% 0.21/0.69 inference(scs_inference,[],[26,28,27,42,25,24,33,36,32,31,34])).
% 0.21/0.69 cnf(84,plain,
% 0.21/0.69 (~P3(a1,f3(a7,a1),a4)),
% 0.21/0.69 inference(scs_inference,[],[26,29,30,28,27,42,25,24,33,36,32,31,34,37])).
% 0.21/0.69 cnf(90,plain,
% 0.21/0.69 (~E(f3(a4,a1),f3(a7,a1))),
% 0.21/0.69 inference(scs_inference,[],[84,40,22])).
% 0.21/0.69 cnf(112,plain,
% 0.21/0.69 ($false),
% 0.21/0.69 inference(scs_inference,[],[28,40,90,82,24,25,35]),
% 0.21/0.69 ['proof']).
% 0.21/0.69 % SZS output end Proof
% 0.21/0.69 % Total time :0.040000s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------