TSTP Solution File: MGT007+1 by CSE---1.6
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CSE---1.6
% Problem : MGT007+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %s %d
% Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 09:06:42 EDT 2023
% Result : Theorem 0.20s 0.66s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.20s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.13 % Problem : MGT007+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.0.0.
% 0.14/0.14 % Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %s %d
% 0.14/0.35 % Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % DateTime : Mon Aug 28 06:11:55 EDT 2023
% 0.14/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.58 start to proof:theBenchmark
% 0.20/0.65 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.65 % File :CSE---1.6
% 0.20/0.65 % Problem :theBenchmark
% 0.20/0.65 % Transform :cnf
% 0.20/0.65 % Format :tptp:raw
% 0.20/0.65 % Command :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.20/0.65
% 0.20/0.65 % Result :Theorem 0.010000s
% 0.20/0.65 % Output :CNFRefutation 0.010000s
% 0.20/0.65 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.65 %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.65 % File : MGT007+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.0.0.
% 0.20/0.65 % Domain : Management (Organisation Theory)
% 0.20/0.65 % Problem : Reproducibility decreases during reorganization.
% 0.20/0.65 % Version : [PB+94] axioms.
% 0.20/0.65 % English :
% 0.20/0.65
% 0.20/0.65 % Refs : [PB+92] Peli et al. (1992), A Logical Approach to Formalizing
% 0.20/0.65 % : [PB+94] Peli et al. (1994), A Logical Approach to Formalizing
% 0.20/0.65 % : [Kam94] Kamps (1994), Email to G. Sutcliffe
% 0.20/0.65 % Source : [Kam94]
% 0.20/0.65 % Names : THEOREM 7 [PB+92]
% 0.20/0.65 % : T7FOL1 [PB+94]
% 0.20/0.65
% 0.20/0.65 % Status : Theorem
% 0.20/0.65 % Rating : 0.00 v6.1.0, 0.08 v6.0.0, 0.50 v5.5.0, 0.12 v5.4.0, 0.13 v5.3.0, 0.22 v5.2.0, 0.00 v5.0.0, 0.05 v4.1.0, 0.06 v4.0.1, 0.05 v3.7.0, 0.00 v3.2.0, 0.11 v3.1.0, 0.00 v2.1.0
% 0.20/0.65 % Syntax : Number of formulae : 6 ( 0 unt; 0 def)
% 0.20/0.65 % Number of atoms : 38 ( 0 equ)
% 0.20/0.65 % Maximal formula atoms : 12 ( 6 avg)
% 0.20/0.65 % Number of connectives : 36 ( 4 ~; 0 |; 25 &)
% 0.20/0.65 % ( 1 <=>; 6 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% 0.20/0.65 % Maximal formula depth : 21 ( 12 avg)
% 0.20/0.65 % Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% 0.20/0.65 % Number of predicates : 6 ( 6 usr; 0 prp; 2-3 aty)
% 0.20/0.65 % Number of functors : 0 ( 0 usr; 0 con; --- aty)
% 0.20/0.65 % Number of variables : 35 ( 32 !; 3 ?)
% 0.20/0.65 % SPC : FOF_THM_RFO_NEQ
% 0.20/0.65
% 0.20/0.65 % Comments :
% 0.20/0.65 %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.65 fof(mp1,axiom,
% 0.20/0.65 ! [X,T] :
% 0.20/0.65 ( organization(X,T)
% 0.20/0.65 => ? [R] : reliability(X,R,T) ) ).
% 0.20/0.65
% 0.20/0.65 fof(mp2,axiom,
% 0.20/0.65 ! [X,T] :
% 0.20/0.65 ( organization(X,T)
% 0.20/0.65 => ? [A] : accountability(X,A,T) ) ).
% 0.20/0.65
% 0.20/0.65 fof(mp_not_in_TR,axiom,
% 0.20/0.65 ! [X,T] :
% 0.20/0.65 ( organization(X,T)
% 0.20/0.65 => ? [A] : reproducibility(X,A,T) ) ).
% 0.20/0.65
% 0.20/0.65 %----Reliability and accountability require that organizational
% 0.20/0.65 %----structures be highly reproducible.
% 0.20/0.65 fof(a2_FOL,hypothesis,
% 0.20/0.65 ! [X,Y,T1,T2,R1,R2,A1,A2,Rp1,Rp2] :
% 0.20/0.65 ( ( organization(X,T1)
% 0.20/0.65 & organization(Y,T2)
% 0.20/0.65 & reliability(X,R1,T1)
% 0.20/0.65 & reliability(Y,R2,T2)
% 0.20/0.66 & accountability(X,A1,T1)
% 0.20/0.66 & accountability(Y,A2,T2)
% 0.20/0.66 & reproducibility(X,Rp1,T1)
% 0.20/0.66 & reproducibility(Y,Rp2,T2) )
% 0.20/0.66 => ( greater(Rp2,Rp1)
% 0.20/0.66 <=> ( greater(R2,R1)
% 0.20/0.66 & greater(A2,A1) ) ) ) ).
% 0.20/0.66
% 0.20/0.66 %----The process of attempting reorganization lowers reliability of
% 0.20/0.66 %----performance.
% 0.20/0.66 fof(a6_FOL,hypothesis,
% 0.20/0.66 ! [X,R1,R2,A1,A2,T1,T2,Ta,Tb] :
% 0.20/0.66 ( ( organization(X,T1)
% 0.20/0.66 & organization(X,T2)
% 0.20/0.66 & reorganization(X,Ta,Tb)
% 0.20/0.66 & reliability(X,R1,T1)
% 0.20/0.66 & reliability(X,R2,T2)
% 0.20/0.66 & accountability(X,A1,T1)
% 0.20/0.66 & accountability(X,A2,T2)
% 0.20/0.66 & ~ greater(Ta,T1)
% 0.20/0.66 & greater(T2,T1)
% 0.20/0.66 & ~ greater(T2,Tb) )
% 0.20/0.66 => ( greater(R1,R2)
% 0.20/0.66 & greater(A1,A2) ) ) ).
% 0.20/0.66
% 0.20/0.66 fof(t7_FOL,conjecture,
% 0.20/0.66 ! [X,Rp1,Rp2,T1,T2,Ta,Tb] :
% 0.20/0.66 ( ( organization(X,T1)
% 0.20/0.66 & organization(X,T2)
% 0.20/0.66 & reorganization(X,Ta,Tb)
% 0.20/0.66 & reproducibility(X,Rp1,T1)
% 0.20/0.66 & reproducibility(X,Rp2,T2)
% 0.20/0.66 & ~ greater(Ta,T1)
% 0.20/0.66 & greater(T2,T1)
% 0.20/0.66 & ~ greater(T2,Tb) )
% 0.20/0.66 => greater(Rp1,Rp2) ) ).
% 0.20/0.66
% 0.20/0.66 %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.66 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.66 % Proof found
% 0.20/0.66 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.20/0.66 % SZS output start Proof
% 0.20/0.66 %ClaNum:17(EqnAxiom:0)
% 0.20/0.66 %VarNum:152(SingletonVarNum:54)
% 0.20/0.66 %MaxLitNum:11
% 0.20/0.66 %MaxfuncDepth:1
% 0.20/0.66 %SharedTerms:16
% 0.20/0.66 %goalClause: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
% 0.20/0.66 %singleGoalClaCount:9
% 0.20/0.66 [1]P1(a1,a6)
% 0.20/0.66 [2]P1(a1,a9)
% 0.20/0.66 [3]P2(a9,a6)
% 0.20/0.66 [4]P4(a1,a7,a6)
% 0.20/0.66 [5]P4(a1,a8,a9)
% 0.20/0.66 [6]P5(a1,a10,a2)
% 0.20/0.66 [7]~P2(a7,a8)
% 0.20/0.66 [8]~P2(a9,a2)
% 0.20/0.66 [9]~P2(a10,a6)
% 0.20/0.66 [10]~P1(x101,x102)+P6(x101,f3(x101,x102),x102)
% 0.20/0.66 [11]~P1(x111,x112)+P3(x111,f4(x111,x112),x112)
% 0.20/0.66 [12]~P1(x121,x122)+P4(x121,f5(x121,x122),x122)
% 0.20/0.66 [15]~P3(x153,x151,x154)+~P3(x155,x152,x156)+~P4(x153,x157,x154)+~P4(x155,x158,x156)+P2(x151,x152)+~P1(x153,x154)+~P6(x153,x159,x154)+~P1(x155,x156)+~P6(x155,x1510,x156)+~P2(x157,x158)
% 0.20/0.66 [16]~P6(x163,x161,x164)+~P6(x165,x162,x166)+~P4(x163,x167,x164)+~P4(x165,x168,x166)+P2(x161,x162)+~P1(x163,x164)+~P3(x163,x169,x164)+~P1(x165,x166)+~P3(x165,x1610,x166)+~P2(x167,x168)
% 0.20/0.66 [13]~P1(x137,x132)+~P2(x133,x132)+~P3(x137,x136,x133)+~P3(x137,x135,x132)+~P5(x137,x131,x134)+P2(x131,x132)+P2(x133,x134)+~P6(x137,x138,x133)+~P6(x137,x139,x132)+P2(x135,x136)+~P1(x137,x133)
% 0.20/0.66 [14]~P1(x147,x142)+~P2(x143,x142)+~P6(x147,x146,x143)+~P6(x147,x145,x142)+~P5(x147,x141,x144)+P2(x141,x142)+P2(x143,x144)+~P3(x147,x148,x143)+~P3(x147,x149,x142)+P2(x145,x146)+~P1(x147,x143)
% 0.20/0.66 [17]~P6(x173,x179,x174)+~P6(x175,x1710,x176)+~P3(x173,x177,x174)+~P3(x175,x178,x176)+~P4(x173,x171,x174)+~P4(x175,x172,x176)+P2(x171,x172)+~P1(x173,x174)+~P1(x175,x176)+~P2(x177,x178)+~P2(x179,x1710)
% 0.20/0.66 %EqnAxiom
% 0.20/0.66
% 0.20/0.66 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.66 cnf(19,plain,
% 0.20/0.66 (P3(a1,f4(a1,a6),a6)),
% 0.20/0.66 inference(scs_inference,[],[1,12,11])).
% 0.20/0.66 cnf(20,plain,
% 0.20/0.66 (P6(a1,f3(a1,a6),a6)),
% 0.20/0.66 inference(scs_inference,[],[1,12,11,10])).
% 0.20/0.66 cnf(37,plain,
% 0.20/0.66 (P3(a1,f4(a1,a9),a9)),
% 0.20/0.66 inference(scs_inference,[],[2,12,11])).
% 0.20/0.66 cnf(39,plain,
% 0.20/0.66 (P6(a1,f3(a1,a9),a9)),
% 0.20/0.66 inference(scs_inference,[],[2,12,11,10])).
% 0.20/0.66 cnf(41,plain,
% 0.20/0.66 (P2(f3(a1,a6),f3(a1,a9))),
% 0.20/0.66 inference(scs_inference,[],[3,7,9,6,8,19,2,20,1,12,11,10,13,14])).
% 0.20/0.66 cnf(48,plain,
% 0.20/0.66 ($false),
% 0.20/0.66 inference(scs_inference,[],[3,5,9,6,7,8,4,19,41,37,39,2,20,1,13,17]),
% 0.20/0.66 ['proof']).
% 0.20/0.66 % SZS output end Proof
% 0.20/0.66 % Total time :0.010000s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------