TSTP Solution File: MGT006-1 by SOS---2.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SOS---2.0
% Problem  : MGT006-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : sos-script %s

% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 22:25:46 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 1.36s 1.56s
% Output   : Refutation 1.36s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.12  % Problem  : MGT006-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.04/0.13  % Command  : sos-script %s
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Thu Jun  9 08:33:02 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.19/0.36  ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.19/0.36  The process was started by sandbox2 on n026.cluster.edu,
% 0.19/0.36  Thu Jun  9 08:33:02 2022
% 0.19/0.36  The command was "./sos".  The process ID is 31734.
% 0.19/0.36  
% 0.19/0.36  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.19/0.36  set(auto).
% 0.19/0.36     dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.19/0.36     dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.19/0.36     dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.19/0.36     dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.19/0.36     dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.19/0.36     dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.19/0.36     dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.19/0.36     dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.19/0.36     dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.19/0.36     dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.19/0.36     dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.19/0.36     dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.19/0.36     dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.19/0.36  clear(print_given).
% 0.19/0.36  
% 0.19/0.36  list(usable).
% 0.19/0.36  
% 0.19/0.36  SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=1, equality=0, symmetry=0, max_lits=11.
% 0.19/0.36  
% 0.19/0.36  This is a Horn set without equality.  The strategy will
% 0.19/0.36  be hyperresolution, with satellites in sos and nuclei
% 0.19/0.36  in usable.
% 0.19/0.36  
% 0.19/0.36     dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.19/0.36     dependent: clear(order_hyper).
% 0.19/0.36  
% 0.19/0.36  ------------> process usable:
% 0.19/0.36  
% 0.19/0.36  ------------> process sos:
% 0.19/0.36  
% 0.19/0.36  ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.19/0.49  
% 0.19/0.49  Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.19/0.49  
% 0.19/0.49  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.19/0.49  
% 0.19/0.49  
% 0.19/0.49  -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.19/0.49  
% 0.19/0.49  UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.19/0.49  SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.19/0.49  SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.19/0.49  number of clauses in intial UL: 6
% 0.19/0.49  number of clauses initially in problem: 14
% 0.19/0.49  percentage of clauses intially in UL: 42
% 0.19/0.49  percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 78
% 0.19/0.49  percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.19/0.49  absolute distinct symbol count: 14
% 0.19/0.49     distinct predicate count: 6
% 0.19/0.49     distinct function count: 1
% 0.19/0.49     distinct constant count: 7
% 0.19/0.49  
% 0.19/0.49  ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.19/0.49  
% 0.19/0.49  
% 0.19/0.49  
% 0.19/0.49  Model 2 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.19/0.49  
% 0.19/0.49  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.19/0.49  
% 0.19/0.49  =========== start of search ===========
% 1.36/1.56  
% 1.36/1.56  -------- PROOF -------- 
% 1.36/1.56  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 1.36/1.56  % SZS output start Refutation
% 1.36/1.56  
% 1.36/1.56  Model 3 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 1.36/1.56  
% 1.36/1.56  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 1.36/1.56  
% 1.36/1.56  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.36/1.56  
% 1.36/1.56  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.36/1.56  
% 1.36/1.56  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.36/1.56  
% 1.36/1.56  Model 4 [ 1 2 280 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.36/1.56  
% 1.36/1.56  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.36/1.56  
% 1.36/1.56  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.36/1.56  
% 1.36/1.56  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.36/1.56  
% 1.36/1.56  -----> EMPTY CLAUSE at   1.06 sec ----> 20 [hyper,19,6,18] {-} $F.
% 1.36/1.56  
% 1.36/1.56  Length of proof is 5.  Level of proof is 3.
% 1.36/1.56  
% 1.36/1.56  ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 1.36/1.56  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 1.36/1.56  % SZS output start Refutation
% 1.36/1.56  
% 1.36/1.56  1 [] {+} -organization(A,B)|reproducibility(A,sk1(B,A),B).
% 1.36/1.56  2 [] {+} -organization(A,B)| -organization(C,D)| -reliability(A,E,B)| -reliability(C,F,D)| -accountability(A,G,B)| -accountability(C,H,D)| -reproducibility(A,I,B)| -reproducibility(C,J,D)| -greater(J,I)|greater(F,E).
% 1.36/1.56  3 [] {+} -organization(A,B)| -organization(C,D)| -reliability(A,E,B)| -reliability(C,F,D)| -accountability(A,G,B)| -accountability(C,H,D)| -reproducibility(A,I,B)| -reproducibility(C,J,D)| -greater(J,I)|greater(H,G).
% 1.36/1.56  5 [] {+} -organization(A,B)| -organization(A,C)| -reorganization_free(A,B,C)| -reproducibility(A,D,B)| -reproducibility(A,E,C)| -greater(C,B)|greater(E,D).
% 1.36/1.56  6 [] {+} -greater(sk4,sk3)| -greater(sk6,sk5).
% 1.36/1.56  7 [] {+} organization(sk2,sk7).
% 1.36/1.56  8 [] {+} organization(sk2,sk8).
% 1.36/1.56  9 [] {-} reorganization_free(sk2,sk7,sk8).
% 1.36/1.56  10 [] {-} reliability(sk2,sk3,sk7).
% 1.36/1.56  11 [] {+} reliability(sk2,sk4,sk8).
% 1.36/1.56  12 [] {+} accountability(sk2,sk5,sk7).
% 1.36/1.56  13 [] {+} accountability(sk2,sk6,sk8).
% 1.36/1.56  14 [] {-} greater(sk8,sk7).
% 1.36/1.56  15 [hyper,7,1] {+} reproducibility(sk2,sk1(sk7,sk2),sk7).
% 1.36/1.56  16 [hyper,8,1] {+} reproducibility(sk2,sk1(sk8,sk2),sk8).
% 1.36/1.56  17 [hyper,16,5,7,8,9,15,14] {-} greater(sk1(sk8,sk2),sk1(sk7,sk2)).
% 1.36/1.56  18 [hyper,17,3,7,8,10,11,12,13,15,16] {-} greater(sk6,sk5).
% 1.36/1.56  19 [hyper,17,2,7,8,10,11,12,13,15,16] {-} greater(sk4,sk3).
% 1.36/1.56  20 [hyper,19,6,18] {-} $F.
% 1.36/1.56  
% 1.36/1.56  % SZS output end Refutation
% 1.36/1.56  ------------ end of proof -------------
% 1.36/1.56  
% 1.36/1.56  
% 1.36/1.56  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 1.36/1.56  
% 1.36/1.56  
% 1.36/1.56  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 1.36/1.56  
% 1.36/1.56  ============ end of search ============
% 1.36/1.56  
% 1.36/1.56  ----------- soft-scott stats ----------
% 1.36/1.56  
% 1.36/1.56  true clauses given           4      (30.8%)
% 1.36/1.56  false clauses given          9
% 1.36/1.56  
% 1.36/1.56        FALSE     TRUE
% 1.36/1.56  tot:  0         0      (-nan% true)
% 1.36/1.56  
% 1.36/1.56  
% 1.36/1.56  Model 4 [ 1 -42 280 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.36/1.56  
% 1.36/1.56  That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 1.36/1.56  
% 1.36/1.56  Process 31734 finished Thu Jun  9 08:33:04 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------