TSTP Solution File: MGT006-1 by CSE---1.6
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CSE---1.6
% Problem : MGT006-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %s %d
% Computer : n031.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 09:06:41 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.21s 0.63s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.21s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.12/0.13 % Problem : MGT006-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.12/0.13 % Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %s %d
% 0.14/0.35 % Computer : n031.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % DateTime : Mon Aug 28 06:37:55 EDT 2023
% 0.14/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.21/0.56 start to proof:theBenchmark
% 0.21/0.62 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.21/0.62 % File :CSE---1.6
% 0.21/0.62 % Problem :theBenchmark
% 0.21/0.62 % Transform :cnf
% 0.21/0.62 % Format :tptp:raw
% 0.21/0.62 % Command :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.21/0.62
% 0.21/0.62 % Result :Theorem 0.010000s
% 0.21/0.62 % Output :CNFRefutation 0.010000s
% 0.21/0.62 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.21/0.63 %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.21/0.63 % File : MGT006-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.21/0.63 % Domain : Management (Organisation Theory)
% 0.21/0.63 % Problem : Reliability and accountability increase with time.
% 0.21/0.63 % Version : Especial.
% 0.21/0.63 % Theorem formulation : Different.
% 0.21/0.63 % English :
% 0.21/0.63
% 0.21/0.63 % Refs : [PB+92] Peli et al. (1992), A Logical Approach to Formalizing
% 0.21/0.63 % : [PB+94] Peli et al. (1994), A Logical Approach to Formalizing
% 0.21/0.63 % : [Kam94] Kamps (1994), Email to G. Sutcliffe
% 0.21/0.63 % Source : [TPTP]
% 0.21/0.63 % Names :
% 0.21/0.63
% 0.21/0.63 % Status : Unsatisfiable
% 0.21/0.63 % Rating : 0.00 v5.5.0, 0.06 v5.4.0, 0.00 v5.3.0, 0.05 v5.2.0, 0.00 v2.4.0
% 0.21/0.63 % Syntax : Number of clauses : 14 ( 8 unt; 0 nHn; 14 RR)
% 0.21/0.63 % Number of literals : 50 ( 0 equ; 37 neg)
% 0.21/0.63 % Maximal clause size : 11 ( 3 avg)
% 0.21/0.63 % Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% 0.21/0.63 % Number of predicates : 6 ( 6 usr; 0 prp; 2-3 aty)
% 0.21/0.63 % Number of functors : 8 ( 8 usr; 7 con; 0-2 aty)
% 0.21/0.63 % Number of variables : 37 ( 4 sgn)
% 0.21/0.63 % SPC : CNF_UNS_RFO_NEQ_HRN
% 0.21/0.63
% 0.21/0.63 % Comments : Contains one less theorem predicate than [Kam94].
% 0.21/0.63 % : Create with tptp2X -f tptp -t clausify:otter MGT006+1.p
% 0.21/0.63 %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.21/0.63 cnf(mp3_1,axiom,
% 0.21/0.63 ( ~ organization(A,B)
% 0.21/0.63 | reproducibility(A,sk1(B,A),B) ) ).
% 0.21/0.63
% 0.21/0.63 cnf(a2_FOL_2,hypothesis,
% 0.21/0.63 ( ~ organization(A,B)
% 0.21/0.63 | ~ organization(C,D)
% 0.21/0.63 | ~ reliability(A,E,B)
% 0.21/0.63 | ~ reliability(C,F,D)
% 0.21/0.63 | ~ accountability(A,G,B)
% 0.21/0.63 | ~ accountability(C,H,D)
% 0.21/0.63 | ~ reproducibility(A,I,B)
% 0.21/0.63 | ~ reproducibility(C,J,D)
% 0.21/0.63 | ~ greater(J,I)
% 0.21/0.63 | greater(F,E) ) ).
% 0.21/0.63
% 0.21/0.63 cnf(a2_FOL_3,hypothesis,
% 0.21/0.63 ( ~ organization(A,B)
% 0.21/0.63 | ~ organization(C,D)
% 0.21/0.63 | ~ reliability(A,E,B)
% 0.21/0.63 | ~ reliability(C,F,D)
% 0.21/0.63 | ~ accountability(A,G,B)
% 0.21/0.63 | ~ accountability(C,H,D)
% 0.21/0.63 | ~ reproducibility(A,I,B)
% 0.21/0.63 | ~ reproducibility(C,J,D)
% 0.21/0.63 | ~ greater(J,I)
% 0.21/0.63 | greater(H,G) ) ).
% 0.21/0.63
% 0.21/0.63 cnf(a2_FOL_4,hypothesis,
% 0.21/0.63 ( ~ organization(A,B)
% 0.21/0.63 | ~ organization(C,D)
% 0.21/0.63 | ~ reliability(A,E,B)
% 0.21/0.63 | ~ reliability(C,F,D)
% 0.21/0.63 | ~ accountability(A,G,B)
% 0.21/0.63 | ~ accountability(C,H,D)
% 0.21/0.63 | ~ reproducibility(A,I,B)
% 0.21/0.63 | ~ reproducibility(C,J,D)
% 0.21/0.63 | ~ greater(F,E)
% 0.21/0.63 | ~ greater(H,G)
% 0.21/0.63 | greater(J,I) ) ).
% 0.21/0.63
% 0.21/0.63 cnf(a4_FOL_5,hypothesis,
% 0.21/0.63 ( ~ organization(A,B)
% 0.21/0.63 | ~ organization(A,C)
% 0.21/0.63 | ~ reorganization_free(A,B,C)
% 0.21/0.63 | ~ reproducibility(A,D,B)
% 0.21/0.63 | ~ reproducibility(A,E,C)
% 0.21/0.63 | ~ greater(C,B)
% 0.21/0.63 | greater(E,D) ) ).
% 0.21/0.63
% 0.21/0.63 cnf(t6_FOL_6,negated_conjecture,
% 0.21/0.63 organization(sk2,sk7) ).
% 0.21/0.63
% 0.21/0.63 cnf(t6_FOL_7,negated_conjecture,
% 0.21/0.63 organization(sk2,sk8) ).
% 0.21/0.63
% 0.21/0.63 cnf(t6_FOL_8,negated_conjecture,
% 0.21/0.63 reorganization_free(sk2,sk7,sk8) ).
% 0.21/0.63
% 0.21/0.63 cnf(t6_FOL_9,negated_conjecture,
% 0.21/0.63 reliability(sk2,sk3,sk7) ).
% 0.21/0.63
% 0.21/0.63 cnf(t6_FOL_10,negated_conjecture,
% 0.21/0.63 reliability(sk2,sk4,sk8) ).
% 0.21/0.63
% 0.21/0.63 cnf(t6_FOL_11,negated_conjecture,
% 0.21/0.63 accountability(sk2,sk5,sk7) ).
% 0.21/0.63
% 0.21/0.63 cnf(t6_FOL_12,negated_conjecture,
% 0.21/0.63 accountability(sk2,sk6,sk8) ).
% 0.21/0.63
% 0.21/0.63 cnf(t6_FOL_13,negated_conjecture,
% 0.21/0.63 greater(sk8,sk7) ).
% 0.21/0.63
% 0.21/0.63 cnf(t6_FOL_14,negated_conjecture,
% 0.21/0.63 ( ~ greater(sk4,sk3)
% 0.21/0.63 | ~ greater(sk6,sk5) ) ).
% 0.21/0.63
% 0.21/0.63 %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.21/0.63 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.21/0.63 % Proof found
% 0.21/0.63 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.21/0.63 % SZS output start Proof
% 0.21/0.63 %ClaNum:14(EqnAxiom:0)
% 0.21/0.63 %VarNum:103(SingletonVarNum:37)
% 0.21/0.63 %MaxLitNum:11
% 0.21/0.63 %MaxfuncDepth:1
% 0.21/0.63 %SharedTerms:17
% 0.21/0.63 %goalClause: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
% 0.21/0.63 %singleGoalClaCount:8
% 0.21/0.63 [1]P1(a1,a3)
% 0.21/0.63 [2]P1(a1,a8)
% 0.21/0.63 [3]P2(a8,a3)
% 0.21/0.63 [4]P4(a1,a4,a3)
% 0.21/0.63 [5]P4(a1,a5,a8)
% 0.21/0.63 [6]P3(a1,a6,a3)
% 0.21/0.63 [7]P3(a1,a7,a8)
% 0.21/0.63 [8]P5(a1,a3,a8)
% 0.21/0.63 [9]~P2(a5,a4)+~P2(a7,a6)
% 0.21/0.63 [10]~P1(x101,x102)+P6(x101,f2(x102,x101),x102)
% 0.21/0.63 [11]~P2(x114,x115)+~P6(x113,x111,x114)+~P6(x113,x112,x115)+~P5(x113,x115,x114)+P2(x111,x112)+~P1(x113,x114)+~P1(x113,x115)
% 0.21/0.63 [12]~P6(x123,x127,x124)+~P6(x125,x128,x126)+~P3(x123,x121,x124)+~P3(x125,x122,x126)+P2(x121,x122)+~P1(x123,x124)+~P4(x123,x129,x124)+~P1(x125,x126)+~P4(x125,x1210,x126)+~P2(x127,x128)
% 0.21/0.63 [13]~P6(x133,x137,x134)+~P6(x135,x138,x136)+~P4(x133,x131,x134)+~P4(x135,x132,x136)+P2(x131,x132)+~P1(x133,x134)+~P3(x133,x139,x134)+~P1(x135,x136)+~P3(x135,x1310,x136)+~P2(x137,x138)
% 0.21/0.63 [14]~P6(x143,x141,x144)+~P6(x145,x142,x146)+~P4(x143,x149,x144)+~P4(x145,x1410,x146)+~P3(x143,x147,x144)+~P3(x145,x148,x146)+P2(x141,x142)+~P1(x143,x144)+~P1(x145,x146)+~P2(x147,x148)+~P2(x149,x1410)
% 0.21/0.63 %EqnAxiom
% 0.21/0.63
% 0.21/0.63 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.21/0.63 cnf(15,plain,
% 0.21/0.63 (P6(a1,f2(a3,a1),a3)),
% 0.21/0.63 inference(scs_inference,[],[1,10])).
% 0.21/0.63 cnf(32,plain,
% 0.21/0.63 (P6(a1,f2(a8,a1),a8)),
% 0.21/0.63 inference(scs_inference,[],[2,10])).
% 0.21/0.63 cnf(34,plain,
% 0.21/0.63 (P2(f2(a8,a1),f2(a3,a1))),
% 0.21/0.63 inference(scs_inference,[],[3,8,15,1,2,10,11])).
% 0.21/0.63 cnf(44,plain,
% 0.21/0.63 (P2(a7,a6)),
% 0.21/0.63 inference(scs_inference,[],[4,34,32,15,6,7,5,1,2,13,12])).
% 0.21/0.63 cnf(46,plain,
% 0.21/0.63 (~P2(a5,a4)),
% 0.21/0.63 inference(scs_inference,[],[44,9])).
% 0.21/0.63 cnf(50,plain,
% 0.21/0.63 ($false),
% 0.21/0.63 inference(scs_inference,[],[5,34,32,15,6,7,46,4,1,2,13]),
% 0.21/0.63 ['proof']).
% 0.21/0.63 % SZS output end Proof
% 0.21/0.63 % Total time :0.010000s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------