TSTP Solution File: MGT006+1 by Otter---3.3

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Otter---3.3
% Problem  : MGT006+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : otter-tptp-script %s

% Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Jul 27 13:05:57 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 1.75s 1.95s
% Output   : Refutation 1.75s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    4
%            Number of leaves      :   13
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   19 (  14 unt;   0 nHn;  19 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   45 (   0 equ;  27 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :   10 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    7 (   6 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    8 (   8 usr;   7 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   27 (   4 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(1,axiom,
    ( ~ organization(A,B)
    | reproducibility(A,dollar_f1(A,B),B) ),
    file('MGT006+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(2,axiom,
    ( ~ organization(A,B)
    | ~ organization(C,D)
    | ~ reliability(A,E,B)
    | ~ reliability(C,F,D)
    | ~ accountability(A,G,B)
    | ~ accountability(C,H,D)
    | ~ reproducibility(A,I,B)
    | ~ reproducibility(C,J,D)
    | ~ greater(J,I)
    | greater(F,E) ),
    file('MGT006+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(3,axiom,
    ( ~ organization(A,B)
    | ~ organization(C,D)
    | ~ reliability(A,E,B)
    | ~ reliability(C,F,D)
    | ~ accountability(A,G,B)
    | ~ accountability(C,H,D)
    | ~ reproducibility(A,I,B)
    | ~ reproducibility(C,J,D)
    | ~ greater(J,I)
    | greater(H,G) ),
    file('MGT006+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(5,axiom,
    ( ~ organization(A,B)
    | ~ organization(A,C)
    | ~ reorganization_free(A,B,C)
    | ~ reproducibility(A,D,B)
    | ~ reproducibility(A,E,C)
    | ~ greater(C,B)
    | greater(E,D) ),
    file('MGT006+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(6,axiom,
    ( ~ greater(dollar_c5,dollar_c6)
    | ~ greater(dollar_c3,dollar_c4) ),
    file('MGT006+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(7,axiom,
    organization(dollar_c7,dollar_c2),
    file('MGT006+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(8,axiom,
    organization(dollar_c7,dollar_c1),
    file('MGT006+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(9,axiom,
    reorganization_free(dollar_c7,dollar_c2,dollar_c1),
    file('MGT006+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(10,axiom,
    reliability(dollar_c7,dollar_c6,dollar_c2),
    file('MGT006+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(11,axiom,
    reliability(dollar_c7,dollar_c5,dollar_c1),
    file('MGT006+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(12,axiom,
    accountability(dollar_c7,dollar_c4,dollar_c2),
    file('MGT006+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(13,axiom,
    accountability(dollar_c7,dollar_c3,dollar_c1),
    file('MGT006+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(14,axiom,
    greater(dollar_c1,dollar_c2),
    file('MGT006+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(15,plain,
    reproducibility(dollar_c7,dollar_f1(dollar_c7,dollar_c2),dollar_c2),
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[7,1]),
    [iquote('hyper,7,1')] ).

cnf(16,plain,
    reproducibility(dollar_c7,dollar_f1(dollar_c7,dollar_c1),dollar_c1),
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[8,1]),
    [iquote('hyper,8,1')] ).

cnf(17,plain,
    greater(dollar_f1(dollar_c7,dollar_c1),dollar_f1(dollar_c7,dollar_c2)),
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[16,5,7,8,9,15,14]),
    [iquote('hyper,16,5,7,8,9,15,14')] ).

cnf(18,plain,
    greater(dollar_c3,dollar_c4),
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[17,3,7,8,10,11,12,13,15,16]),
    [iquote('hyper,17,3,7,8,10,11,12,13,15,16')] ).

cnf(19,plain,
    greater(dollar_c5,dollar_c6),
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[17,2,7,8,10,11,12,13,15,16]),
    [iquote('hyper,17,2,7,8,10,11,12,13,15,16')] ).

cnf(20,plain,
    $false,
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[19,6,18]),
    [iquote('hyper,19,6,18')] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12  % Problem  : MGT006+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.0.0.
% 0.11/0.12  % Command  : otter-tptp-script %s
% 0.13/0.33  % Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.33  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.13/0.33  % DateTime : Wed Jul 27 04:08:18 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 1.75/1.95  ----- Otter 3.3f, August 2004 -----
% 1.75/1.95  The process was started by sandbox on n028.cluster.edu,
% 1.75/1.95  Wed Jul 27 04:08:18 2022
% 1.75/1.95  The command was "./otter".  The process ID is 9286.
% 1.75/1.95  
% 1.75/1.95  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 1.75/1.95  set(auto).
% 1.75/1.95     dependent: set(auto1).
% 1.75/1.95     dependent: set(process_input).
% 1.75/1.95     dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 1.75/1.95     dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 1.75/1.95     dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 1.75/1.95     dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 1.75/1.95     dependent: set(control_memory).
% 1.75/1.95     dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 1.75/1.95     dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 1.75/1.95     dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 1.75/1.95     dependent: assign(max_seconds, 10800).
% 1.75/1.95  clear(print_given).
% 1.75/1.95  
% 1.75/1.95  formula_list(usable).
% 1.75/1.95  all X T (organization(X,T)-> (exists Rp reproducibility(X,Rp,T))).
% 1.75/1.95  all X Y T1 T2 R1 R2 A1 A2 Rp1 Rp2 (organization(X,T1)&organization(Y,T2)&reliability(X,R1,T1)&reliability(Y,R2,T2)&accountability(X,A1,T1)&accountability(Y,A2,T2)&reproducibility(X,Rp1,T1)&reproducibility(Y,Rp2,T2)-> (greater(Rp2,Rp1)<->greater(R2,R1)&greater(A2,A1))).
% 1.75/1.95  all X Rp1 Rp2 T1 T2 (organization(X,T1)&organization(X,T2)&reorganization_free(X,T1,T2)&reproducibility(X,Rp1,T1)&reproducibility(X,Rp2,T2)&greater(T2,T1)->greater(Rp2,Rp1)).
% 1.75/1.95  -(all X R1 R2 A1 A2 T1 T2 (organization(X,T1)&organization(X,T2)&reorganization_free(X,T1,T2)&reliability(X,R1,T1)&reliability(X,R2,T2)&accountability(X,A1,T1)&accountability(X,A2,T2)&greater(T2,T1)->greater(R2,R1)&greater(A2,A1))).
% 1.75/1.95  end_of_list.
% 1.75/1.95  
% 1.75/1.95  -------> usable clausifies to:
% 1.75/1.95  
% 1.75/1.95  list(usable).
% 1.75/1.95  0 [] -organization(X,T)|reproducibility(X,$f1(X,T),T).
% 1.75/1.95  0 [] -organization(X,T1)| -organization(Y,T2)| -reliability(X,R1,T1)| -reliability(Y,R2,T2)| -accountability(X,A1,T1)| -accountability(Y,A2,T2)| -reproducibility(X,Rp1,T1)| -reproducibility(Y,Rp2,T2)| -greater(Rp2,Rp1)|greater(R2,R1).
% 1.75/1.95  0 [] -organization(X,T1)| -organization(Y,T2)| -reliability(X,R1,T1)| -reliability(Y,R2,T2)| -accountability(X,A1,T1)| -accountability(Y,A2,T2)| -reproducibility(X,Rp1,T1)| -reproducibility(Y,Rp2,T2)| -greater(Rp2,Rp1)|greater(A2,A1).
% 1.75/1.95  0 [] -organization(X,T1)| -organization(Y,T2)| -reliability(X,R1,T1)| -reliability(Y,R2,T2)| -accountability(X,A1,T1)| -accountability(Y,A2,T2)| -reproducibility(X,Rp1,T1)| -reproducibility(Y,Rp2,T2)|greater(Rp2,Rp1)| -greater(R2,R1)| -greater(A2,A1).
% 1.75/1.95  0 [] -organization(X,T1)| -organization(X,T2)| -reorganization_free(X,T1,T2)| -reproducibility(X,Rp1,T1)| -reproducibility(X,Rp2,T2)| -greater(T2,T1)|greater(Rp2,Rp1).
% 1.75/1.95  0 [] organization($c7,$c2).
% 1.75/1.95  0 [] organization($c7,$c1).
% 1.75/1.95  0 [] reorganization_free($c7,$c2,$c1).
% 1.75/1.95  0 [] reliability($c7,$c6,$c2).
% 1.75/1.95  0 [] reliability($c7,$c5,$c1).
% 1.75/1.95  0 [] accountability($c7,$c4,$c2).
% 1.75/1.95  0 [] accountability($c7,$c3,$c1).
% 1.75/1.95  0 [] greater($c1,$c2).
% 1.75/1.95  0 [] -greater($c5,$c6)| -greater($c3,$c4).
% 1.75/1.95  end_of_list.
% 1.75/1.95  
% 1.75/1.95  SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=1, equality=0, symmetry=0, max_lits=11.
% 1.75/1.95  
% 1.75/1.95  This is a Horn set without equality.  The strategy will
% 1.75/1.95  be hyperresolution, with satellites in sos and nuclei
% 1.75/1.95  in usable.
% 1.75/1.95  
% 1.75/1.95     dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 1.75/1.95     dependent: clear(order_hyper).
% 1.75/1.95  
% 1.75/1.95  ------------> process usable:
% 1.75/1.95  ** KEPT (pick-wt=9): 1 [] -organization(A,B)|reproducibility(A,$f1(A,B),B).
% 1.75/1.95  ** KEPT (pick-wt=36): 2 [] -organization(A,B)| -organization(C,D)| -reliability(A,E,B)| -reliability(C,F,D)| -accountability(A,G,B)| -accountability(C,H,D)| -reproducibility(A,I,B)| -reproducibility(C,J,D)| -greater(J,I)|greater(F,E).
% 1.75/1.95  ** KEPT (pick-wt=36): 3 [] -organization(A,B)| -organization(C,D)| -reliability(A,E,B)| -reliability(C,F,D)| -accountability(A,G,B)| -accountability(C,H,D)| -reproducibility(A,I,B)| -reproducibility(C,J,D)| -greater(J,I)|greater(H,G).
% 1.75/1.95  ** KEPT (pick-wt=39): 4 [] -organization(A,B)| -organization(C,D)| -reliability(A,E,B)| -reliability(C,F,D)| -accountability(A,G,B)| -accountability(C,H,D)| -reproducibility(A,I,B)| -reproducibility(C,J,D)|greater(J,I)| -greater(F,E)| -greater(H,G).
% 1.75/1.95  ** KEPT (pick-wt=24): 5 [] -organization(A,B)| -organization(A,C)| -reorganization_free(A,B,C)| -reproducibility(A,D,B)| -reproducibility(A,E,C)| -greater(C,B)|greater(E,D).
% 1.75/1.95  ** KEPT (pick-wt=6): 6 [] -greater($c5,$c6)| -greater($c3,$c4).
% 1.75/1.95  
% 1.75/1.95  ------------> process sos:
% 1.75/1.95  ** KEPT (pick-wt=3): 7 [] organization($c7,$c2).
% 1.75/1.95  ** KEPT (pick-wt=3): 8 [] organization($c7,$c1).
% 1.75/1.95  ** KEPT (pick-wt=4): 9 [] reorganization_free($c7,$c2,$c1).
% 1.75/1.95  ** KEPT (pick-wt=4): 10 [] reliability($c7,$c6,$c2).
% 1.75/1.95  ** KEPT (pick-wt=4): 11 [] reliability($c7,$c5,$c1).
% 1.75/1.95  ** KEPT (pick-wt=4): 12 [] accountability($c7,$c4,$c2).
% 1.75/1.95  ** KEPT (pick-wt=4): 13 [] accountability($c7,$c3,$c1).
% 1.75/1.95  ** KEPT (pick-wt=3): 14 [] greater($c1,$c2).
% 1.75/1.95  
% 1.75/1.95  ======= end of input processing =======
% 1.75/1.95  
% 1.75/1.95  =========== start of search ===========
% 1.75/1.95  
% 1.75/1.95  -------- PROOF -------- 
% 1.75/1.95  
% 1.75/1.95  -----> EMPTY CLAUSE at   0.00 sec ----> 20 [hyper,19,6,18] $F.
% 1.75/1.95  
% 1.75/1.95  Length of proof is 5.  Level of proof is 3.
% 1.75/1.95  
% 1.75/1.95  ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 1.75/1.95  % SZS status Theorem
% 1.75/1.95  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 1.75/1.95  ------------ end of proof -------------
% 1.75/1.95  
% 1.75/1.95  
% 1.75/1.95  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 1.75/1.95  
% 1.75/1.95  
% 1.75/1.95  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 1.75/1.95  
% 1.75/1.95  ============ end of search ============
% 1.75/1.95  
% 1.75/1.95  -------------- statistics -------------
% 1.75/1.95  clauses given                 13
% 1.75/1.95  clauses generated              6
% 1.75/1.95  clauses kept                  19
% 1.75/1.95  clauses forward subsumed       0
% 1.75/1.95  clauses back subsumed          0
% 1.75/1.95  Kbytes malloced              976
% 1.75/1.95  
% 1.75/1.95  ----------- times (seconds) -----------
% 1.75/1.95  user CPU time          0.00          (0 hr, 0 min, 0 sec)
% 1.75/1.95  system CPU time        0.00          (0 hr, 0 min, 0 sec)
% 1.75/1.95  wall-clock time        2             (0 hr, 0 min, 2 sec)
% 1.75/1.95  
% 1.75/1.95  That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 1.75/1.95  
% 1.75/1.95  Process 9286 finished Wed Jul 27 04:08:20 2022
% 1.75/1.95  Otter interrupted
% 1.75/1.95  PROOF FOUND
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------