TSTP Solution File: MGT005-1 by CSE---1.6
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CSE---1.6
% Problem : MGT005-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %s %d
% Computer : n031.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 09:06:40 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 11.71s 11.86s
% Output : CNFRefutation 11.83s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12 % Problem : MGT005-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.12/0.13 % Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %s %d
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n031.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Mon Aug 28 07:03:09 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.56 start to proof:theBenchmark
% 11.71/11.85 %-------------------------------------------
% 11.71/11.85 % File :CSE---1.6
% 11.71/11.85 % Problem :theBenchmark
% 11.71/11.85 % Transform :cnf
% 11.71/11.85 % Format :tptp:raw
% 11.71/11.85 % Command :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 11.71/11.85
% 11.71/11.85 % Result :Theorem 11.230000s
% 11.71/11.85 % Output :CNFRefutation 11.230000s
% 11.71/11.85 %-------------------------------------------
% 11.71/11.85 %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 11.71/11.85 % File : MGT005-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.4.0.
% 11.71/11.85 % Domain : Management (Organisation Theory)
% 11.71/11.85 % Problem : Complexity increases the risk of death due to reorganization.
% 11.71/11.85 % Version : [PB+94] axioms.
% 11.71/11.85 % English :
% 11.71/11.85
% 11.71/11.85 % Refs : [PB+92] Peli et al. (1992), A Logical Approach to Formalizing
% 11.71/11.85 % : [PB+94] Peli et al. (1994), A Logical Approach to Formalizing
% 11.71/11.85 % : [Kam94] Kamps (1994), Email to G. Sutcliffe
% 11.71/11.85 % Source : [TPTP]
% 11.71/11.85 % Names :
% 11.71/11.85
% 11.71/11.85 % Status : Unsatisfiable
% 11.71/11.85 % Rating : 0.14 v8.1.0, 0.00 v7.5.0, 0.11 v7.4.0, 0.06 v7.3.0, 0.08 v7.1.0, 0.00 v7.0.0, 0.07 v6.4.0, 0.00 v6.2.0, 0.10 v6.1.0, 0.29 v6.0.0, 0.30 v5.3.0, 0.28 v5.2.0, 0.25 v5.1.0, 0.24 v5.0.0, 0.21 v4.1.0, 0.08 v4.0.1, 0.09 v4.0.0, 0.18 v3.7.0, 0.20 v3.5.0, 0.18 v3.4.0, 0.08 v3.3.0, 0.07 v3.2.0, 0.15 v3.1.0, 0.18 v2.7.0, 0.25 v2.6.0, 0.22 v2.5.0, 0.56 v2.4.0
% 11.71/11.85 % Syntax : Number of clauses : 29 ( 19 unt; 2 nHn; 29 RR)
% 11.71/11.85 % Number of literals : 83 ( 2 equ; 54 neg)
% 11.71/11.85 % Maximal clause size : 19 ( 2 avg)
% 11.71/11.85 % Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% 11.71/11.85 % Number of predicates : 9 ( 8 usr; 0 prp; 2-3 aty)
% 11.71/11.85 % Number of functors : 13 ( 13 usr; 12 con; 0-2 aty)
% 11.71/11.85 % Number of variables : 49 ( 2 sgn)
% 11.71/11.85 % SPC : CNF_UNS_RFO_SEQ_NHN
% 11.71/11.85
% 11.71/11.85 % Comments : mp11, mp12 and mp13 corrospond to mp10, mp11 and mp12
% 11.71/11.85 % respectively from [PB+92]
% 11.71/11.85 % : Created with tptp2X -f tptp -t clausify:otter MGT005+1.p
% 11.71/11.85 %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 11.71/11.85 cnf(mp6_1_26,axiom,
% 11.71/11.85 ( ~ greater(A,B)
% 11.71/11.85 | A != B ) ).
% 11.71/11.85
% 11.71/11.85 cnf(mp6_2_27,axiom,
% 11.71/11.85 ( ~ greater(A,B)
% 11.71/11.85 | ~ greater(B,A) ) ).
% 11.71/11.85
% 11.71/11.85 cnf(mp11_28,axiom,
% 11.71/11.85 ( ~ greater(A,B)
% 11.71/11.85 | ~ greater(B,C)
% 11.71/11.85 | greater(A,C) ) ).
% 11.71/11.85
% 11.71/11.85 cnf(mp12_29,axiom,
% 11.71/11.86 ( ~ organization(A,B)
% 11.71/11.86 | survival_chance(A,sk1(B,A),B) ) ).
% 11.71/11.86
% 11.71/11.86 cnf(mp13_30,axiom,
% 11.71/11.86 ( ~ organization(A,B)
% 11.71/11.86 | ~ organization(A,C)
% 11.71/11.86 | ~ greater(D,B)
% 11.71/11.86 | ~ greater(C,D)
% 11.71/11.86 | organization(A,D) ) ).
% 11.71/11.86
% 11.71/11.86 cnf(mp7_31,axiom,
% 11.71/11.86 ( ~ reorganization(A,B,C)
% 11.71/11.86 | greater(C,B) ) ).
% 11.71/11.86
% 11.71/11.86 cnf(t3_FOL_32,hypothesis,
% 11.71/11.86 ( ~ organization(A,B)
% 11.71/11.86 | ~ organization(A,C)
% 11.71/11.86 | ~ reorganization_free(A,B,C)
% 11.71/11.86 | ~ survival_chance(A,D,B)
% 11.71/11.86 | ~ survival_chance(A,E,C)
% 11.71/11.86 | ~ greater(C,B)
% 11.71/11.86 | greater(E,D) ) ).
% 11.71/11.86
% 11.71/11.86 cnf(t4_FOL_33,hypothesis,
% 11.71/11.86 ( ~ organization(A,B)
% 11.71/11.86 | ~ organization(A,C)
% 11.71/11.86 | ~ reorganization(A,D,E)
% 11.71/11.86 | ~ survival_chance(A,F,B)
% 11.71/11.86 | ~ survival_chance(A,G,C)
% 11.71/11.86 | greater(D,B)
% 11.71/11.86 | ~ greater(C,B)
% 11.71/11.86 | greater(C,E)
% 11.71/11.86 | greater(F,G) ) ).
% 11.71/11.86
% 11.71/11.86 cnf(a10_FOL_34,hypothesis,
% 11.71/11.86 ( ~ organization(A,B)
% 11.71/11.86 | ~ organization(C,B)
% 11.71/11.86 | ~ organization(C,D)
% 11.71/11.86 | ~ class(A,E,B)
% 11.71/11.86 | ~ class(C,E,B)
% 11.71/11.86 | ~ reorganization(A,B,F)
% 11.71/11.86 | ~ reorganization(C,B,D)
% 11.71/11.86 | ~ reorganization_type(A,G,B)
% 11.71/11.86 | ~ reorganization_type(C,G,B)
% 11.71/11.86 | ~ complexity(A,H,B)
% 11.71/11.86 | ~ complexity(C,I,B)
% 11.71/11.86 | ~ greater(I,H)
% 11.71/11.86 | greater(D,F) ) ).
% 11.71/11.86
% 11.71/11.86 cnf(a11_FOL_35,hypothesis,
% 11.71/11.86 ( ~ organization(A,B)
% 11.71/11.86 | ~ organization(C,B)
% 11.71/11.86 | ~ organization(A,D)
% 11.71/11.86 | ~ organization(C,D)
% 11.71/11.86 | ~ class(A,E,B)
% 11.71/11.86 | ~ class(C,E,B)
% 11.71/11.86 | ~ survival_chance(A,F,B)
% 11.71/11.86 | ~ survival_chance(C,F,B)
% 11.71/11.86 | ~ reorganization(A,B,D)
% 11.71/11.86 | ~ reorganization(C,B,G)
% 11.71/11.86 | ~ reorganization_type(A,H,B)
% 11.71/11.86 | ~ reorganization_type(C,H,B)
% 11.71/11.86 | ~ survival_chance(A,I,D)
% 11.71/11.86 | ~ survival_chance(C,J,D)
% 11.71/11.86 | ~ complexity(A,K,B)
% 11.71/11.86 | ~ complexity(C,L,B)
% 11.71/11.86 | ~ greater(L,K)
% 11.71/11.86 | greater(I,J)
% 11.71/11.86 | I = J ) ).
% 11.71/11.86
% 11.71/11.86 cnf(t5_FOL_36,negated_conjecture,
% 11.71/11.86 organization(sk2,sk11) ).
% 11.71/11.86
% 11.71/11.86 cnf(t5_FOL_37,negated_conjecture,
% 11.71/11.86 organization(sk3,sk11) ).
% 11.71/11.86
% 11.71/11.86 cnf(t5_FOL_38,negated_conjecture,
% 11.71/11.86 organization(sk2,sk13) ).
% 11.71/11.86
% 11.71/11.86 cnf(t5_FOL_39,negated_conjecture,
% 11.71/11.86 organization(sk3,sk13) ).
% 11.71/11.86
% 11.71/11.86 cnf(t5_FOL_40,negated_conjecture,
% 11.71/11.86 class(sk2,sk5,sk11) ).
% 11.71/11.86
% 11.71/11.86 cnf(t5_FOL_41,negated_conjecture,
% 11.71/11.86 class(sk3,sk5,sk11) ).
% 11.71/11.86
% 11.71/11.86 cnf(t5_FOL_42,negated_conjecture,
% 11.71/11.86 survival_chance(sk2,sk6,sk11) ).
% 11.71/11.86
% 11.71/11.86 cnf(t5_FOL_43,negated_conjecture,
% 11.71/11.86 survival_chance(sk3,sk6,sk11) ).
% 11.71/11.86
% 11.71/11.86 cnf(t5_FOL_44,negated_conjecture,
% 11.71/11.86 reorganization(sk2,sk11,sk12) ).
% 11.71/11.86
% 11.71/11.86 cnf(t5_FOL_45,negated_conjecture,
% 11.71/11.86 reorganization(sk3,sk11,sk13) ).
% 11.71/11.86
% 11.71/11.86 cnf(t5_FOL_46,negated_conjecture,
% 11.71/11.86 reorganization_type(sk2,sk4,sk11) ).
% 11.71/11.86
% 11.71/11.86 cnf(t5_FOL_47,negated_conjecture,
% 11.71/11.86 reorganization_type(sk3,sk4,sk11) ).
% 11.71/11.86
% 11.71/11.86 cnf(t5_FOL_48,negated_conjecture,
% 11.71/11.86 reorganization_free(sk2,sk12,sk13) ).
% 11.71/11.86
% 11.71/11.86 cnf(t5_FOL_49,negated_conjecture,
% 11.71/11.86 survival_chance(sk2,sk7,sk13) ).
% 11.71/11.86
% 11.71/11.86 cnf(t5_FOL_50,negated_conjecture,
% 11.71/11.86 survival_chance(sk3,sk8,sk13) ).
% 11.71/11.86
% 11.71/11.86 cnf(t5_FOL_51,negated_conjecture,
% 11.71/11.86 complexity(sk2,sk9,sk11) ).
% 11.71/11.86
% 11.71/11.86 cnf(t5_FOL_52,negated_conjecture,
% 11.71/11.86 complexity(sk3,sk10,sk11) ).
% 11.71/11.86
% 11.71/11.86 cnf(t5_FOL_53,negated_conjecture,
% 11.71/11.86 greater(sk10,sk9) ).
% 11.71/11.86
% 11.71/11.86 cnf(t5_FOL_54,negated_conjecture,
% 11.71/11.86 ~ greater(sk7,sk8) ).
% 11.71/11.86
% 11.71/11.86 %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 11.71/11.86 %-------------------------------------------
% 11.71/11.86 % Proof found
% 11.71/11.86 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 11.71/11.86 % SZS output start Proof
% 11.71/11.86 %ClaNum:56(EqnAxiom:27)
% 11.71/11.86 %VarNum:157(SingletonVarNum:49)
% 11.71/11.86 %MaxLitNum:19
% 11.71/11.86 %MaxfuncDepth:1
% 11.71/11.86 %SharedTerms:31
% 11.71/11.86 %goalClause: 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46
% 11.71/11.86 %singleGoalClaCount:19
% 11.71/11.86 [28]P1(a1,a3)
% 11.71/11.86 [29]P4(a4,a5)
% 11.71/11.86 [30]P4(a4,a6)
% 11.71/11.86 [31]P4(a8,a5)
% 11.71/11.86 [32]P4(a8,a6)
% 11.71/11.86 [33]P5(a4,a9,a5)
% 11.71/11.86 [34]P5(a4,a12,a6)
% 11.71/11.86 [35]P5(a8,a9,a5)
% 11.71/11.86 [36]P5(a8,a13,a6)
% 11.71/11.86 [37]P6(a4,a5,a7)
% 11.71/11.86 [38]P6(a8,a5,a6)
% 11.71/11.86 [39]P7(a4,a7,a6)
% 11.71/11.86 [40]P2(a4,a10,a5)
% 11.71/11.86 [41]P2(a8,a10,a5)
% 11.71/11.86 [42]P8(a4,a11,a5)
% 11.71/11.86 [43]P8(a8,a11,a5)
% 11.71/11.86 [44]P3(a4,a3,a5)
% 11.71/11.86 [45]P3(a8,a1,a5)
% 11.71/11.86 [46]~P1(a12,a13)
% 11.71/11.86 [47]~P1(x471,x472)+~E(x471,x472)
% 11.71/11.86 [48]~P1(x482,x481)+~P1(x481,x482)
% 11.71/11.86 [51]~P4(x511,x512)+P5(x511,f2(x512,x511),x512)
% 11.71/11.86 [50]P1(x501,x502)+~P6(x503,x502,x501)
% 11.71/11.86 [49]~P1(x491,x493)+P1(x491,x492)+~P1(x493,x492)
% 11.71/11.86 [52]~P4(x521,x524)+~P4(x521,x523)+P4(x521,x522)+~P1(x522,x523)+~P1(x524,x522)
% 11.71/11.86 [53]~P4(x535,x534)+~P5(x535,x531,x533)+~P5(x535,x532,x534)+~P7(x535,x534,x533)+P1(x531,x532)+~P1(x533,x534)+~P4(x535,x533)
% 11.71/11.86 [54]~P1(x545,x544)+~P4(x547,x544)+~P5(x547,x542,x545)+~P5(x547,x541,x544)+~P6(x547,x543,x546)+P1(x541,x542)+P1(x543,x544)+P1(x545,x546)+~P4(x547,x545)
% 11.71/11.86 [55]~P6(x555,x556,x551)+~P6(x557,x556,x552)+~P2(x557,x558,x556)+~P8(x557,x559,x556)+~P3(x555,x553,x556)+~P3(x557,x554,x556)+P1(x551,x552)+~P1(x553,x554)+~P4(x555,x551)+~P2(x555,x558,x556)+~P8(x555,x559,x556)+~P4(x555,x556)+~P4(x557,x556)
% 11.71/11.86 [56]~P5(x568,x561,x566)+~P3(x568,x564,x567)+~P3(x565,x563,x567)+~P8(x568,x5612,x567)+~P2(x568,x5611,x567)+~P6(x568,x567,x566)+~P5(x568,x569,x567)+~P5(x565,x562,x566)+~P4(x568,x567)+P1(x561,x562)+E(x561,x562)+~P1(x563,x564)+~P5(x565,x569,x567)+~P4(x565,x566)+~P6(x565,x567,x5610)+~P4(x565,x567)+~P2(x565,x5611,x567)+~P4(x568,x566)+~P8(x565,x5612,x567)
% 11.71/11.86 %EqnAxiom
% 11.71/11.86 [1]E(x11,x11)
% 11.71/11.86 [2]E(x22,x21)+~E(x21,x22)
% 11.71/11.86 [3]E(x31,x33)+~E(x31,x32)+~E(x32,x33)
% 11.71/11.86 [4]~E(x41,x42)+E(f2(x41,x43),f2(x42,x43))
% 11.71/11.86 [5]~E(x51,x52)+E(f2(x53,x51),f2(x53,x52))
% 11.71/11.86 [6]P1(x62,x63)+~E(x61,x62)+~P1(x61,x63)
% 11.71/11.86 [7]P1(x73,x72)+~E(x71,x72)+~P1(x73,x71)
% 11.71/11.86 [8]P4(x82,x83)+~E(x81,x82)+~P4(x81,x83)
% 11.71/11.86 [9]P4(x93,x92)+~E(x91,x92)+~P4(x93,x91)
% 11.71/11.86 [10]P8(x102,x103,x104)+~E(x101,x102)+~P8(x101,x103,x104)
% 11.71/11.86 [11]P8(x113,x112,x114)+~E(x111,x112)+~P8(x113,x111,x114)
% 11.71/11.86 [12]P8(x123,x124,x122)+~E(x121,x122)+~P8(x123,x124,x121)
% 11.71/11.86 [13]P5(x132,x133,x134)+~E(x131,x132)+~P5(x131,x133,x134)
% 11.71/11.86 [14]P5(x143,x142,x144)+~E(x141,x142)+~P5(x143,x141,x144)
% 11.71/11.86 [15]P5(x153,x154,x152)+~E(x151,x152)+~P5(x153,x154,x151)
% 11.71/11.86 [16]P2(x162,x163,x164)+~E(x161,x162)+~P2(x161,x163,x164)
% 11.71/11.86 [17]P2(x173,x172,x174)+~E(x171,x172)+~P2(x173,x171,x174)
% 11.71/11.86 [18]P2(x183,x184,x182)+~E(x181,x182)+~P2(x183,x184,x181)
% 11.71/11.86 [19]P6(x192,x193,x194)+~E(x191,x192)+~P6(x191,x193,x194)
% 11.71/11.86 [20]P6(x203,x202,x204)+~E(x201,x202)+~P6(x203,x201,x204)
% 11.71/11.86 [21]P6(x213,x214,x212)+~E(x211,x212)+~P6(x213,x214,x211)
% 11.71/11.86 [22]P3(x222,x223,x224)+~E(x221,x222)+~P3(x221,x223,x224)
% 11.71/11.86 [23]P3(x233,x232,x234)+~E(x231,x232)+~P3(x233,x231,x234)
% 11.71/11.86 [24]P3(x243,x244,x242)+~E(x241,x242)+~P3(x243,x244,x241)
% 11.71/11.86 [25]P7(x252,x253,x254)+~E(x251,x252)+~P7(x251,x253,x254)
% 11.71/11.86 [26]P7(x263,x262,x264)+~E(x261,x262)+~P7(x263,x261,x264)
% 11.71/11.86 [27]P7(x273,x274,x272)+~E(x271,x272)+~P7(x273,x274,x271)
% 11.71/11.86
% 11.71/11.86 %-------------------------------------------
% 11.71/11.86 cnf(58,plain,
% 11.71/11.86 (~P1(a3,a1)),
% 11.71/11.86 inference(scs_inference,[],[28,46,50,48])).
% 11.71/11.86 cnf(59,plain,
% 11.71/11.86 (~E(a1,a3)),
% 11.71/11.86 inference(scs_inference,[],[28,46,50,48,47])).
% 11.71/11.86 cnf(61,plain,
% 11.71/11.86 (P5(a4,f2(a5,a4),a5)),
% 11.71/11.86 inference(scs_inference,[],[28,29,46,50,48,47,51])).
% 11.71/11.86 cnf(74,plain,
% 11.71/11.86 (~P1(a5,a6)),
% 11.71/11.86 inference(scs_inference,[],[38,59,2,50,48])).
% 11.71/11.86 cnf(85,plain,
% 11.71/11.86 (P1(a7,a5)),
% 11.71/11.86 inference(scs_inference,[],[37,50])).
% 11.71/11.86 cnf(87,plain,
% 11.71/11.86 (~P1(a5,a7)),
% 11.71/11.86 inference(scs_inference,[],[37,50,48])).
% 11.71/11.86 cnf(106,plain,
% 11.71/11.86 (P1(a6,a7)),
% 11.71/11.86 inference(scs_inference,[],[58,41,44,45,40,42,43,32,31,38,37,29,28,50,55])).
% 11.71/11.86 cnf(109,plain,
% 11.71/11.86 (P5(a4,f2(a6,a4),a6)),
% 11.71/11.86 inference(scs_inference,[],[30,58,41,44,45,40,42,43,32,31,38,37,85,29,28,50,55,47,51])).
% 11.71/11.86 cnf(113,plain,
% 11.71/11.86 (~P1(a7,a6)),
% 11.71/11.86 inference(scs_inference,[],[30,58,41,44,45,40,42,43,32,31,38,37,85,29,28,50,55,47,51,49,48])).
% 11.71/11.86 cnf(121,plain,
% 11.71/11.86 (P4(a4,a7)),
% 11.71/11.86 inference(scs_inference,[],[30,106,85,29,52])).
% 11.83/11.86 cnf(123,plain,
% 11.83/11.86 (~P5(a4,a13,a7)),
% 11.83/11.86 inference(scs_inference,[],[30,39,34,46,106,85,29,52,53])).
% 11.83/11.86 cnf(142,plain,
% 11.83/11.86 (~E(a5,a6)),
% 11.83/11.86 inference(scs_inference,[],[31,113,123,85,51,13,7])).
% 11.83/11.86 cnf(172,plain,
% 11.83/11.86 (P5(a4,f2(a7,a4),a7)),
% 11.83/11.86 inference(scs_inference,[],[121,51])).
% 11.83/11.86 cnf(190,plain,
% 11.83/11.86 (P1(f2(a6,a4),f2(a7,a4))),
% 11.83/11.86 inference(scs_inference,[],[39,172,109,121,106,30,53])).
% 11.83/11.86 cnf(192,plain,
% 11.83/11.87 (~P1(f2(a7,a4),f2(a6,a4))),
% 11.83/11.87 inference(scs_inference,[],[39,172,109,121,106,30,53,48])).
% 11.83/11.87 cnf(194,plain,
% 11.83/11.87 (~P6(a8,a5,a5)),
% 11.83/11.87 inference(scs_inference,[],[39,45,44,42,40,37,43,41,172,109,87,121,106,30,31,28,29,53,48,55])).
% 11.83/11.87 cnf(203,plain,
% 11.83/11.87 (~E(f2(a6,a4),f2(a7,a4))),
% 11.83/11.87 inference(scs_inference,[],[190,194,19,47])).
% 11.83/11.87 cnf(263,plain,
% 11.83/11.87 (~E(f2(a7,a4),f2(a6,a4))),
% 11.83/11.87 inference(scs_inference,[],[203,2])).
% 11.83/11.87 cnf(276,plain,
% 11.83/11.87 (P4(a8,a7)),
% 11.83/11.87 inference(scs_inference,[],[85,106,32,31,52])).
% 11.83/11.87 cnf(278,plain,
% 11.83/11.87 (P5(a8,f2(a7,a8),a7)),
% 11.83/11.87 inference(scs_inference,[],[85,106,32,31,52,51])).
% 11.83/11.87 cnf(397,plain,
% 11.83/11.87 (P1(a9,f2(a7,a8))),
% 11.83/11.87 inference(scs_inference,[],[113,85,278,35,276,38,31,54,47])).
% 11.83/11.87 cnf(400,plain,
% 11.83/11.87 (~P1(f2(a7,a8),a9)),
% 11.83/11.87 inference(scs_inference,[],[397,48])).
% 11.83/11.87 cnf(507,plain,
% 11.83/11.87 (P1(f2(a7,a8),a13)+P1(a6,a6)),
% 11.83/11.87 inference(scs_inference,[],[87,106,278,36,276,32,38,54])).
% 11.83/11.87 cnf(569,plain,
% 11.83/11.87 (P1(f2(a6,a4),x5691)+~E(f2(a7,a4),x5691)),
% 11.83/11.87 inference(scs_inference,[],[85,172,113,121,263,400,192,190,33,45,44,28,40,42,37,29,24,53,56,6,7])).
% 11.83/11.87 cnf(730,plain,
% 11.83/11.87 (P1(a12,f2(a7,a4))),
% 11.83/11.87 inference(scs_inference,[],[172,121,34,39,30,106,53])).
% 11.83/11.87 cnf(732,plain,
% 11.83/11.87 (~P1(f2(a7,a4),a13)),
% 11.83/11.87 inference(scs_inference,[],[172,121,34,39,46,30,106,53,49])).
% 11.83/11.87 cnf(738,plain,
% 11.83/11.87 (~P1(f2(a7,a4),a12)),
% 11.83/11.87 inference(scs_inference,[],[172,121,34,39,46,30,106,53,49,47,50,48])).
% 11.83/11.87 cnf(831,plain,
% 11.83/11.87 (~E(x8311,a6)+~P1(x8312,a13)+~P1(f2(a7,a4),x8312)),
% 11.83/11.87 inference(scs_inference,[],[142,397,732,74,61,42,40,37,31,29,121,3,52,2,56,49])).
% 11.83/11.87 cnf(835,plain,
% 11.83/11.87 (~P1(f2(a7,a4),x8351)+~P1(x8351,a13)),
% 11.83/11.87 inference(equality_inference,[],[831])).
% 11.83/11.87 cnf(1126,plain,
% 11.83/11.87 (E(f2(a7,a4),f2(a7,a8))+P1(f2(a7,a4),f2(a7,a8))),
% 11.83/11.87 inference(scs_inference,[],[738,33,28,32,29,31,278,172,35,45,44,276,42,43,40,41,37,38,121,55,52,56])).
% 11.83/11.87 cnf(1717,plain,
% 11.83/11.87 (P1(f2(a7,a8),a13)),
% 11.83/11.87 inference(scs_inference,[],[507,48])).
% 11.83/11.87 cnf(1720,plain,
% 11.83/11.87 (~P1(f2(a7,a4),f2(a7,a8))),
% 11.83/11.87 inference(scs_inference,[],[1717,48,835])).
% 11.83/11.87 cnf(1722,plain,
% 11.83/11.87 (E(f2(a7,a4),f2(a7,a8))),
% 11.83/11.87 inference(scs_inference,[],[1717,48,835,1126])).
% 11.83/11.87 cnf(1756,plain,
% 11.83/11.87 ($false),
% 11.83/11.87 inference(scs_inference,[],[730,1720,1722,1717,46,569,50,48,20,49,7]),
% 11.83/11.87 ['proof']).
% 11.83/11.87 % SZS output end Proof
% 11.83/11.87 % Total time :11.230000s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------