TSTP Solution File: MGT004-1 by SOS---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SOS---2.0
% Problem : MGT004-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : sos-script %s
% Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 22:25:45 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.75s 0.93s
% Output : Refutation 0.75s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.12 % Problem : MGT004-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.06/0.13 % Command : sos-script %s
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Thu Jun 9 08:30:19 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.12/0.35 ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.12/0.35 The process was started by sandbox on n022.cluster.edu,
% 0.12/0.35 Thu Jun 9 08:30:19 2022
% 0.12/0.35 The command was "./sos". The process ID is 7683.
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.12/0.35 set(auto).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.12/0.35 clear(print_given).
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 list(usable).
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=0, symmetry=0, max_lits=11.
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 This is a non-Horn set without equality. The strategy
% 0.12/0.35 will be ordered hyper_res, ur_res, unit deletion, and
% 0.12/0.35 factoring, with satellites in sos and nuclei in usable.
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: set(factor).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 ------------> process usable:
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 ------------> process sos:
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.18/0.45
% 0.18/0.45 Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.18/0.45
% 0.18/0.45 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.18/0.45
% 0.18/0.45
% 0.18/0.45 -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.18/0.45
% 0.18/0.45 UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.18/0.45 SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.18/0.45 SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.18/0.45 number of clauses in intial UL: 33
% 0.18/0.45 number of clauses initially in problem: 39
% 0.18/0.45 percentage of clauses intially in UL: 84
% 0.18/0.45 percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 93
% 0.18/0.45 percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.18/0.45 absolute distinct symbol count: 15
% 0.18/0.45 distinct predicate count: 6
% 0.18/0.45 distinct function count: 2
% 0.18/0.45 distinct constant count: 7
% 0.18/0.45
% 0.18/0.45 ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.18/0.45
% 0.18/0.45
% 0.18/0.45
% 0.18/0.45 Model 2 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.18/0.45
% 0.18/0.45 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.18/0.45
% 0.18/0.45 =========== start of search ===========
% 0.75/0.93
% 0.75/0.93 -------- PROOF --------
% 0.75/0.93 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.75/0.93 % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.75/0.93
% 0.75/0.93 Model 3 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.75/0.93
% 0.75/0.93 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.75/0.93
% 0.75/0.93 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.75/0.93
% 0.75/0.93 Model 4 [ 1 2 1086 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 0.75/0.93
% 0.75/0.93 Model 5 (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 0.75/0.93
% 0.75/0.93 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.75/0.93
% 0.75/0.93 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.75/0.93
% 0.75/0.93 Model 6 [ 1 5 899 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 0.75/0.93
% 0.75/0.93 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.75/0.93
% 0.75/0.93 Model 7 [ 1 4 489 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 0.75/0.93
% 0.75/0.93 ----> UNIT CONFLICT at 0.47 sec ----> 47 [binary,46.1,8.1] {-} $F.
% 0.75/0.93
% 0.75/0.93 Length of proof is 7. Level of proof is 3.
% 0.75/0.93
% 0.75/0.93 ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 0.75/0.93 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.75/0.93 % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.75/0.93
% 0.75/0.93 1 [] {+} -organization(A,B)|reliability(A,sk1(B,A),B).
% 0.75/0.93 2 [] {+} -organization(A,B)|accountability(A,sk2(B,A),B).
% 0.75/0.93 3 [] {+} -organization(A,B)| -organization(C,D)| -reliability(A,E,B)| -reliability(C,F,D)| -accountability(A,G,B)| -accountability(C,H,D)| -survival_chance(A,I,B)| -survival_chance(C,J,D)| -greater(F,E)| -greater(H,G)|greater(J,I).
% 0.75/0.93 4 [] {+} -organization(A,B)| -organization(A,C)| -reorganization(A,D,E)| -reliability(A,F,B)| -reliability(A,G,C)| -accountability(A,H,B)| -accountability(A,I,C)|greater(D,B)| -greater(C,B)|greater(C,E)|greater(F,G).
% 0.75/0.93 5 [] {+} -organization(A,B)| -organization(A,C)| -reorganization(A,D,E)| -reliability(A,F,B)| -reliability(A,G,C)| -accountability(A,H,B)| -accountability(A,I,C)|greater(D,B)| -greater(C,B)|greater(C,E)|greater(H,I).
% 0.75/0.93 6 [] {+} -greater(sk8,sk6).
% 0.75/0.93 7 [] {+} -greater(sk7,sk9).
% 0.75/0.93 8 [] {+} -greater(sk4,sk5).
% 0.75/0.93 34 [] {+} organization(sk3,sk6).
% 0.75/0.93 35 [] {+} organization(sk3,sk7).
% 0.75/0.93 36 [] {+} reorganization(sk3,sk8,sk9).
% 0.75/0.93 37 [] {+} survival_chance(sk3,sk4,sk6).
% 0.75/0.93 38 [] {+} survival_chance(sk3,sk5,sk7).
% 0.75/0.93 39 [] {+} greater(sk7,sk6).
% 0.75/0.93 40 [hyper,34,2] {+} accountability(sk3,sk2(sk6,sk3),sk6).
% 0.75/0.93 41 [hyper,34,1] {+} reliability(sk3,sk1(sk6,sk3),sk6).
% 0.75/0.93 42 [hyper,35,2] {+} accountability(sk3,sk2(sk7,sk3),sk7).
% 0.75/0.93 43 [hyper,35,1] {+} reliability(sk3,sk1(sk7,sk3),sk7).
% 0.75/0.93 44 [hyper,43,5,34,35,36,41,40,42,39,unit_del,6,7] {-} greater(sk2(sk6,sk3),sk2(sk7,sk3)).
% 0.75/0.93 45 [hyper,43,4,34,35,36,41,40,42,39,unit_del,6,7] {-} greater(sk1(sk6,sk3),sk1(sk7,sk3)).
% 0.75/0.93 46 [hyper,45,3,35,34,43,41,42,40,38,37,44] {-} greater(sk4,sk5).
% 0.75/0.93 47 [binary,46.1,8.1] {-} $F.
% 0.75/0.93
% 0.75/0.93 % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.75/0.93 ------------ end of proof -------------
% 0.75/0.93
% 0.75/0.93
% 0.75/0.93 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 0.75/0.93
% 0.75/0.93
% 0.75/0.93 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 0.75/0.93
% 0.75/0.93 ============ end of search ============
% 0.75/0.93
% 0.75/0.93 ----------- soft-scott stats ----------
% 0.75/0.93
% 0.75/0.93 true clauses given 4 (33.3%)
% 0.75/0.93 false clauses given 8
% 0.75/0.93
% 0.75/0.93 FALSE TRUE
% 0.75/0.93 tot: 0 0 (-nan% true)
% 0.75/0.93
% 0.75/0.93
% 0.75/0.93 Model 7 [ 1 4 489 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 0.75/0.93
% 0.75/0.93 That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 0.75/0.93
% 0.75/0.93 Process 7683 finished Thu Jun 9 08:30:20 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------