TSTP Solution File: MGT004-1 by CSE---1.6
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CSE---1.6
% Problem : MGT004-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %s %d
% Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 09:06:40 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.19s 0.61s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.19s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12 % Problem : MGT004-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.00/0.13 % Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %s %d
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Mon Aug 28 06:08:37 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.55 start to proof:theBenchmark
% 0.19/0.60 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.60 % File :CSE---1.6
% 0.19/0.60 % Problem :theBenchmark
% 0.19/0.60 % Transform :cnf
% 0.19/0.60 % Format :tptp:raw
% 0.19/0.60 % Command :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.19/0.60
% 0.19/0.60 % Result :Theorem 0.000000s
% 0.19/0.60 % Output :CNFRefutation 0.000000s
% 0.19/0.60 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.60 %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.60 % File : MGT004-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.19/0.60 % Domain : Management (Organisation Theory)
% 0.19/0.60 % Problem : Attempts at reorganization increase death rates.
% 0.19/0.60 % Version : [PB+94] axioms.
% 0.19/0.61 % English :
% 0.19/0.61
% 0.19/0.61 % Refs : [PB+92] Peli et al. (1992), A Logical Approach to Formalizing
% 0.19/0.61 % : [PB+94] Peli et al. (1994), A Logical Approach to Formalizing
% 0.19/0.61 % : [Kam94] Kamps (1994), Email to G. Sutcliffe
% 0.19/0.61 % Source : [TPTP]
% 0.19/0.61 % Names :
% 0.19/0.61
% 0.19/0.61 % Status : Unsatisfiable
% 0.19/0.61 % Rating : 0.00 v6.3.0, 0.14 v6.2.0, 0.00 v2.4.0
% 0.19/0.61 % Syntax : Number of clauses : 14 ( 9 unt; 2 nHn; 14 RR)
% 0.19/0.61 % Number of literals : 46 ( 0 equ; 31 neg)
% 0.19/0.61 % Maximal clause size : 11 ( 3 avg)
% 0.19/0.61 % Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% 0.19/0.61 % Number of predicates : 6 ( 6 usr; 0 prp; 2-3 aty)
% 0.19/0.61 % Number of functors : 9 ( 9 usr; 7 con; 0-2 aty)
% 0.19/0.61 % Number of variables : 32 ( 4 sgn)
% 0.19/0.61 % SPC : CNF_UNS_RFO_NEQ_NHN
% 0.19/0.61
% 0.19/0.61 % Comments : Created with tptp2X -f tptp -t clausify:otter MGT004+1.p
% 0.19/0.61 %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.61 cnf(mp1_1,axiom,
% 0.19/0.61 ( ~ organization(A,B)
% 0.19/0.61 | reliability(A,sk1(B,A),B) ) ).
% 0.19/0.61
% 0.19/0.61 cnf(mp2_2,axiom,
% 0.19/0.61 ( ~ organization(A,B)
% 0.19/0.61 | accountability(A,sk2(B,A),B) ) ).
% 0.19/0.61
% 0.19/0.61 cnf(a1_FOL_3,hypothesis,
% 0.19/0.61 ( ~ organization(A,B)
% 0.19/0.61 | ~ organization(C,D)
% 0.19/0.61 | ~ reliability(A,E,B)
% 0.19/0.61 | ~ reliability(C,F,D)
% 0.19/0.61 | ~ accountability(A,G,B)
% 0.19/0.61 | ~ accountability(C,H,D)
% 0.19/0.61 | ~ survival_chance(A,I,B)
% 0.19/0.61 | ~ survival_chance(C,J,D)
% 0.19/0.61 | ~ greater(F,E)
% 0.19/0.61 | ~ greater(H,G)
% 0.19/0.61 | greater(J,I) ) ).
% 0.19/0.61
% 0.19/0.61 cnf(a6_FOL_4,hypothesis,
% 0.19/0.61 ( ~ organization(A,B)
% 0.19/0.61 | ~ organization(A,C)
% 0.19/0.61 | ~ reorganization(A,D,E)
% 0.19/0.61 | ~ reliability(A,F,B)
% 0.19/0.61 | ~ reliability(A,G,C)
% 0.19/0.61 | ~ accountability(A,H,B)
% 0.19/0.61 | ~ accountability(A,I,C)
% 0.19/0.61 | greater(D,B)
% 0.19/0.61 | ~ greater(C,B)
% 0.19/0.61 | greater(C,E)
% 0.19/0.61 | greater(F,G) ) ).
% 0.19/0.61
% 0.19/0.61 cnf(a6_FOL_5,hypothesis,
% 0.19/0.61 ( ~ organization(A,B)
% 0.19/0.61 | ~ organization(A,C)
% 0.19/0.61 | ~ reorganization(A,D,E)
% 0.19/0.61 | ~ reliability(A,F,B)
% 0.19/0.61 | ~ reliability(A,G,C)
% 0.19/0.61 | ~ accountability(A,H,B)
% 0.19/0.61 | ~ accountability(A,I,C)
% 0.19/0.61 | greater(D,B)
% 0.19/0.61 | ~ greater(C,B)
% 0.19/0.61 | greater(C,E)
% 0.19/0.61 | greater(H,I) ) ).
% 0.19/0.61
% 0.19/0.61 cnf(t4_FOL_6,negated_conjecture,
% 0.19/0.61 organization(sk3,sk6) ).
% 0.19/0.61
% 0.19/0.61 cnf(t4_FOL_7,negated_conjecture,
% 0.19/0.61 organization(sk3,sk7) ).
% 0.19/0.61
% 0.19/0.61 cnf(t4_FOL_8,negated_conjecture,
% 0.19/0.61 reorganization(sk3,sk8,sk9) ).
% 0.19/0.61
% 0.19/0.61 cnf(t4_FOL_9,negated_conjecture,
% 0.19/0.61 survival_chance(sk3,sk4,sk6) ).
% 0.19/0.61
% 0.19/0.61 cnf(t4_FOL_10,negated_conjecture,
% 0.19/0.61 survival_chance(sk3,sk5,sk7) ).
% 0.19/0.61
% 0.19/0.61 cnf(t4_FOL_11,negated_conjecture,
% 0.19/0.61 ~ greater(sk8,sk6) ).
% 0.19/0.61
% 0.19/0.61 cnf(t4_FOL_12,negated_conjecture,
% 0.19/0.61 greater(sk7,sk6) ).
% 0.19/0.61
% 0.19/0.61 cnf(t4_FOL_13,negated_conjecture,
% 0.19/0.61 ~ greater(sk7,sk9) ).
% 0.19/0.61
% 0.19/0.61 cnf(t4_FOL_14,negated_conjecture,
% 0.19/0.61 ~ greater(sk4,sk5) ).
% 0.19/0.61
% 0.19/0.61 %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.61 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.61 % Proof found
% 0.19/0.61 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.19/0.61 % SZS output start Proof
% 0.19/0.61 %ClaNum:14(EqnAxiom:0)
% 0.19/0.61 %VarNum:94(SingletonVarNum:32)
% 0.19/0.61 %MaxLitNum:11
% 0.19/0.61 %MaxfuncDepth:1
% 0.19/0.61 %SharedTerms:16
% 0.19/0.61 %goalClause: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
% 0.19/0.61 %singleGoalClaCount:9
% 0.19/0.61 [1]P1(a1,a4)
% 0.19/0.61 [2]P1(a1,a7)
% 0.19/0.61 [3]P2(a7,a4)
% 0.19/0.61 [4]P4(a1,a5,a4)
% 0.19/0.61 [5]P4(a1,a6,a7)
% 0.19/0.61 [6]P5(a1,a8,a9)
% 0.19/0.61 [7]~P2(a7,a9)
% 0.19/0.61 [8]~P2(a8,a4)
% 0.19/0.61 [9]~P2(a5,a6)
% 0.19/0.61 [10]~P1(x101,x102)+P6(x101,f2(x102,x101),x102)
% 0.19/0.61 [11]~P1(x111,x112)+P3(x111,f3(x112,x111),x112)
% 0.19/0.61 [12]~P1(x127,x124)+~P2(x125,x124)+~P3(x127,x122,x125)+~P3(x127,x121,x124)+~P5(x127,x123,x126)+P2(x121,x122)+P2(x123,x124)+~P6(x127,x128,x125)+~P6(x127,x129,x124)+P2(x125,x126)+~P1(x127,x125)
% 0.19/0.61 [13]~P1(x137,x134)+~P2(x135,x134)+~P6(x137,x132,x135)+~P6(x137,x131,x134)+~P5(x137,x133,x136)+P2(x131,x132)+P2(x133,x134)+~P3(x137,x138,x135)+~P3(x137,x139,x134)+P2(x135,x136)+~P1(x137,x135)
% 0.19/0.61 [14]~P6(x143,x149,x144)+~P6(x145,x1410,x146)+~P3(x143,x147,x144)+~P3(x145,x148,x146)+~P4(x143,x141,x144)+~P4(x145,x142,x146)+P2(x141,x142)+~P1(x143,x144)+~P1(x145,x146)+~P2(x147,x148)+~P2(x149,x1410)
% 0.19/0.61 %EqnAxiom
% 0.19/0.61
% 0.19/0.61 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.61 cnf(15,plain,
% 0.19/0.61 (P3(a1,f3(a4,a1),a4)),
% 0.19/0.61 inference(scs_inference,[],[1,11])).
% 0.19/0.61 cnf(16,plain,
% 0.19/0.61 (P6(a1,f2(a4,a1),a4)),
% 0.19/0.61 inference(scs_inference,[],[1,11,10])).
% 0.19/0.61 cnf(19,plain,
% 0.19/0.61 (P2(f3(a4,a1),x191)+~P3(a1,x191,a7)+~P6(a1,x192,a7)),
% 0.19/0.61 inference(scs_inference,[],[1,2,3,4,6,7,8,11,10,14,13,12])).
% 0.19/0.61 cnf(28,plain,
% 0.19/0.61 (P3(a1,f3(a7,a1),a7)),
% 0.19/0.61 inference(scs_inference,[],[2,11])).
% 0.19/0.61 cnf(30,plain,
% 0.19/0.61 (P6(a1,f2(a7,a1),a7)),
% 0.19/0.61 inference(scs_inference,[],[2,11,10])).
% 0.19/0.61 cnf(34,plain,
% 0.19/0.61 (P2(f2(a4,a1),f2(a7,a1))),
% 0.19/0.61 inference(scs_inference,[],[3,9,7,4,16,6,8,15,2,1,11,10,12,14,13])).
% 0.19/0.61 cnf(36,plain,
% 0.19/0.61 (P2(f3(a4,a1),x361)+~P3(a1,x361,a7)),
% 0.19/0.61 inference(scs_inference,[],[30,19])).
% 0.19/0.61 cnf(39,plain,
% 0.19/0.61 ($false),
% 0.19/0.61 inference(scs_inference,[],[5,9,4,16,15,34,28,30,2,1,36,14]),
% 0.19/0.61 ['proof']).
% 0.19/0.61 % SZS output end Proof
% 0.19/0.61 % Total time :0.000000s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------