TSTP Solution File: MGT003-1 by SOS---2.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SOS---2.0
% Problem  : MGT003-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : sos-script %s

% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 22:25:45 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.37s 0.62s
% Output   : Refutation 0.37s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.11  % Problem  : MGT003-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.06/0.12  % Command  : sos-script %s
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Thu Jun  9 06:57:34 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.12/0.34  ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.12/0.34  The process was started by sandbox2 on n017.cluster.edu,
% 0.12/0.34  Thu Jun  9 06:57:34 2022
% 0.12/0.34  The command was "./sos".  The process ID is 8424.
% 0.12/0.34  
% 0.12/0.34  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.12/0.34  set(auto).
% 0.12/0.34     dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.12/0.34     dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.12/0.34     dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.12/0.34     dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.12/0.34     dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.12/0.34     dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.12/0.34     dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.12/0.34     dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.12/0.34     dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.12/0.34     dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.12/0.34     dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.12/0.34     dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.12/0.34     dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.12/0.34  clear(print_given).
% 0.12/0.34  
% 0.12/0.34  list(usable).
% 0.12/0.34  
% 0.12/0.34  SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=1, equality=0, symmetry=0, max_lits=10.
% 0.12/0.34  
% 0.12/0.34  This is a Horn set without equality.  The strategy will
% 0.12/0.34  be hyperresolution, with satellites in sos and nuclei
% 0.12/0.34  in usable.
% 0.12/0.34  
% 0.12/0.34     dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.12/0.34     dependent: clear(order_hyper).
% 0.12/0.34  
% 0.12/0.34  ------------> process usable:
% 0.12/0.34  
% 0.12/0.34  ------------> process sos:
% 0.12/0.34  
% 0.12/0.34  ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.12/0.37  
% 0.12/0.37  Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.12/0.37  
% 0.12/0.37  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.12/0.37  
% 0.12/0.37  
% 0.12/0.37  -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.12/0.37  
% 0.12/0.37  UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.12/0.37  SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.12/0.37  SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.12/0.37  number of clauses in intial UL: 6
% 0.12/0.37  number of clauses initially in problem: 12
% 0.12/0.37  percentage of clauses intially in UL: 50
% 0.12/0.37  percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 72
% 0.12/0.37  percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.12/0.37  absolute distinct symbol count: 11
% 0.12/0.37     distinct predicate count: 5
% 0.12/0.37     distinct function count: 1
% 0.12/0.37     distinct constant count: 5
% 0.12/0.37  
% 0.12/0.37  ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.12/0.37  
% 0.12/0.37  
% 0.12/0.37  
% 0.12/0.37  =========== start of search ===========
% 0.37/0.62  
% 0.37/0.62  -------- PROOF -------- 
% 0.37/0.62  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.37/0.62  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.37/0.62  
% 0.37/0.62  Model 2 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.37/0.62  
% 0.37/0.62  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.37/0.62  
% 0.37/0.62  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.37/0.62  
% 0.37/0.62  Model 3 [ 1 1 187 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 0.37/0.62  
% 0.37/0.62  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.37/0.62  
% 0.37/0.62  Model 4 [ 1 1 150 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 0.37/0.62  
% 0.37/0.62  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.37/0.62  
% 0.37/0.62  Model 5 [ 1 1 375 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 0.37/0.62  
% 0.37/0.62  ----> UNIT CONFLICT at   0.25 sec ----> 19 [binary,18.1,6.1] {-} $F.
% 0.37/0.62  
% 0.37/0.62  Length of proof is 6.  Level of proof is 3.
% 0.37/0.62  
% 0.37/0.62  ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 0.37/0.62  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.37/0.62  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.37/0.62  
% 0.37/0.62  1 [] {+} -reorganization_free(A,B,C)|reorganization_free(A,B,B).
% 0.37/0.62  2 [] {+} -reorganization_free(A,B,C)|reorganization_free(A,C,C).
% 0.37/0.62  3 [] {+} -organization(A,B)|inertia(A,sk1(B,A),B).
% 0.37/0.62  4 [] {+} -organization(A,B)| -organization(C,D)| -reorganization_free(A,B,B)| -reorganization_free(C,D,D)| -inertia(A,E,B)| -inertia(C,F,D)| -survival_chance(A,G,B)| -survival_chance(C,H,D)| -greater(F,E)|greater(H,G).
% 0.37/0.62  5 [] {+} -organization(A,B)| -organization(A,C)| -reorganization_free(A,B,C)| -inertia(A,D,B)| -inertia(A,E,C)| -greater(C,B)|greater(E,D).
% 0.37/0.62  6 [] {+} -greater(sk4,sk3).
% 0.37/0.62  7 [] {+} organization(sk2,sk5).
% 0.37/0.62  8 [] {+} organization(sk2,sk6).
% 0.37/0.62  9 [] {+} reorganization_free(sk2,sk5,sk6).
% 0.37/0.62  10 [] {+} survival_chance(sk2,sk3,sk5).
% 0.37/0.62  11 [] {+} survival_chance(sk2,sk4,sk6).
% 0.37/0.62  12 [] {+} greater(sk6,sk5).
% 0.37/0.62  13 [hyper,7,3] {+} inertia(sk2,sk1(sk5,sk2),sk5).
% 0.37/0.62  14 [hyper,8,3] {+} inertia(sk2,sk1(sk6,sk2),sk6).
% 0.37/0.62  15 [hyper,9,2] {+} reorganization_free(sk2,sk6,sk6).
% 0.37/0.62  16 [hyper,9,1] {+} reorganization_free(sk2,sk5,sk5).
% 0.37/0.62  17 [hyper,14,5,7,8,9,13,12] {-} greater(sk1(sk6,sk2),sk1(sk5,sk2)).
% 0.37/0.62  18 [hyper,17,4,7,8,16,15,13,14,10,11] {-} greater(sk4,sk3).
% 0.37/0.62  19 [binary,18.1,6.1] {-} $F.
% 0.37/0.62  
% 0.37/0.62  % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.37/0.62  ------------ end of proof -------------
% 0.37/0.62  
% 0.37/0.62  
% 0.37/0.62  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 0.37/0.62  
% 0.37/0.62  
% 0.37/0.62  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 0.37/0.62  
% 0.37/0.62  ============ end of search ============
% 0.37/0.62  
% 0.37/0.62  ----------- soft-scott stats ----------
% 0.37/0.62  
% 0.37/0.62  true clauses given           6      (54.5%)
% 0.37/0.62  false clauses given          5
% 0.37/0.62  
% 0.37/0.62        FALSE     TRUE
% 0.37/0.62  tot:  0         0      (-nan% true)
% 0.37/0.62  
% 0.37/0.62  
% 0.37/0.62  Model 5 [ 1 1 375 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 0.37/0.62  
% 0.37/0.62  That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 0.37/0.62  
% 0.37/0.62  Process 8424 finished Thu Jun  9 06:57:34 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------