TSTP Solution File: MGT002-1 by SPASS---3.9
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SPASS---3.9
% Problem : MGT002-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp
% Command : run_spass %d %s
% Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 22:26:07 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.19s 0.42s
% Output : Refutation 0.19s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 7
% Number of leaves : 12
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 26 ( 13 unt; 0 nHn; 26 RR)
% Number of literals : 76 ( 0 equ; 54 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 10 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 6 ( 5 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 14 ( 14 usr; 13 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 0 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(1,axiom,
( ~ organization(u,v)
| reproducibility(u,sk1(v,u),v) ),
file('MGT002-1.p',unknown),
[] ).
cnf(2,axiom,
( ~ reorganization_free(u,v,w)
| reorganization_free(u,v,v) ),
file('MGT002-1.p',unknown),
[] ).
cnf(3,axiom,
( ~ reorganization_free(u,v,w)
| reorganization_free(u,w,w) ),
file('MGT002-1.p',unknown),
[] ).
cnf(4,axiom,
( ~ greater(u,v)
| ~ organization(w,x)
| ~ organization(y,z)
| ~ inertia(w,x1,x)
| ~ inertia(y,x2,z)
| ~ reproducibility(w,u,x)
| ~ reproducibility(y,v,z)
| ~ reorganization_free(w,x,x)
| ~ reorganization_free(y,z,z)
| greater(x1,x2) ),
file('MGT002-1.p',unknown),
[] ).
cnf(6,axiom,
( ~ greater(u,v)
| ~ organization(w,u)
| ~ organization(w,v)
| ~ reproducibility(w,x,u)
| ~ reproducibility(w,y,v)
| ~ reorganization_free(w,v,u)
| greater(x,y) ),
file('MGT002-1.p',unknown),
[] ).
cnf(7,axiom,
organization(sk2,sk5),
file('MGT002-1.p',unknown),
[] ).
cnf(8,axiom,
organization(sk2,sk6),
file('MGT002-1.p',unknown),
[] ).
cnf(9,axiom,
reorganization_free(sk2,sk5,sk6),
file('MGT002-1.p',unknown),
[] ).
cnf(10,axiom,
inertia(sk2,sk3,sk5),
file('MGT002-1.p',unknown),
[] ).
cnf(11,axiom,
inertia(sk2,sk4,sk6),
file('MGT002-1.p',unknown),
[] ).
cnf(12,axiom,
greater(sk6,sk5),
file('MGT002-1.p',unknown),
[] ).
cnf(13,axiom,
~ greater(sk4,sk3),
file('MGT002-1.p',unknown),
[] ).
cnf(20,plain,
reproducibility(sk2,sk1(sk6,sk2),sk6),
inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[8,1]),
[iquote('0:Res:8.0,1.0')] ).
cnf(26,plain,
( ~ greater(u,sk5)
| ~ organization(sk2,u)
| ~ reproducibility(sk2,v,u)
| ~ reproducibility(sk2,w,sk5)
| ~ reorganization_free(sk2,sk5,u)
| greater(v,w) ),
inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[7,6]),
[iquote('0:Res:7.0,6.0')] ).
cnf(27,plain,
reproducibility(sk2,sk1(sk5,sk2),sk5),
inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[7,1]),
[iquote('0:Res:7.0,1.0')] ).
cnf(31,plain,
reorganization_free(sk2,sk6,sk6),
inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[9,3]),
[iquote('0:Res:9.0,3.0')] ).
cnf(37,plain,
reorganization_free(sk2,sk5,sk5),
inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[9,2]),
[iquote('0:Res:9.0,2.0')] ).
cnf(67,plain,
( ~ greater(u,v)
| ~ organization(sk2,sk6)
| ~ organization(w,x)
| ~ inertia(w,y,x)
| ~ reproducibility(sk2,u,sk6)
| ~ reproducibility(w,v,x)
| ~ reorganization_free(sk2,sk6,sk6)
| ~ reorganization_free(w,x,x)
| greater(sk4,y) ),
inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[11,4]),
[iquote('0:Res:11.0,4.3')] ).
cnf(70,plain,
( ~ greater(u,v)
| ~ organization(w,x)
| ~ inertia(w,y,x)
| ~ reproducibility(sk2,u,sk6)
| ~ reproducibility(w,v,x)
| ~ reorganization_free(w,x,x)
| greater(sk4,y) ),
inference(mrr,[status(thm)],[67,8,31]),
[iquote('0:MRR:67.1,67.6,8.0,31.0')] ).
cnf(77,plain,
( ~ greater(sk6,sk5)
| ~ organization(sk2,sk6)
| ~ reproducibility(sk2,u,sk5)
| ~ reorganization_free(sk2,sk5,sk6)
| greater(sk1(sk6,sk2),u) ),
inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[20,26]),
[iquote('0:Res:20.0,26.2')] ).
cnf(79,plain,
( ~ reproducibility(sk2,u,sk5)
| greater(sk1(sk6,sk2),u) ),
inference(mrr,[status(thm)],[77,12,8,9]),
[iquote('0:MRR:77.0,77.1,77.3,12.0,8.0,9.0')] ).
cnf(120,plain,
( ~ greater(u,v)
| ~ organization(sk2,sk5)
| ~ reproducibility(sk2,u,sk6)
| ~ reproducibility(sk2,v,sk5)
| ~ reorganization_free(sk2,sk5,sk5)
| greater(sk4,sk3) ),
inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[10,70]),
[iquote('0:Res:10.0,70.2')] ).
cnf(121,plain,
( ~ greater(u,v)
| ~ reproducibility(sk2,u,sk6)
| ~ reproducibility(sk2,v,sk5) ),
inference(mrr,[status(thm)],[120,7,37,13]),
[iquote('0:MRR:120.1,120.4,120.5,7.0,37.0,13.0')] ).
cnf(123,plain,
( ~ greater(sk1(sk6,sk2),u)
| ~ reproducibility(sk2,u,sk5) ),
inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[20,121]),
[iquote('0:Res:20.0,121.1')] ).
cnf(125,plain,
~ reproducibility(sk2,u,sk5),
inference(mrr,[status(thm)],[123,79]),
[iquote('0:MRR:123.0,79.1')] ).
cnf(126,plain,
$false,
inference(unc,[status(thm)],[125,27]),
[iquote('0:UnC:125.0,27.0')] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.11 % Problem : MGT002-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.06/0.12 % Command : run_spass %d %s
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Thu Jun 9 12:17:12 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.42
% 0.19/0.42 SPASS V 3.9
% 0.19/0.42 SPASS beiseite: Proof found.
% 0.19/0.42 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.19/0.42 Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.42 SPASS derived 77 clauses, backtracked 0 clauses, performed 0 splits and kept 79 clauses.
% 0.19/0.42 SPASS allocated 63248 KBytes.
% 0.19/0.42 SPASS spent 0:00:00.08 on the problem.
% 0.19/0.42 0:00:00.03 for the input.
% 0.19/0.42 0:00:00.00 for the FLOTTER CNF translation.
% 0.19/0.42 0:00:00.00 for inferences.
% 0.19/0.42 0:00:00.00 for the backtracking.
% 0.19/0.42 0:00:00.01 for the reduction.
% 0.19/0.42
% 0.19/0.42
% 0.19/0.42 Here is a proof with depth 3, length 26 :
% 0.19/0.42 % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 0.19/0.42 Formulae used in the proof : mp3_1 mp4_2 mp4_3 a3_FOL_4 a4_FOL_6 t2_FOL_7 t2_FOL_8 t2_FOL_9 t2_FOL_10 t2_FOL_11 t2_FOL_12 t2_FOL_13
% 0.19/0.42
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------