TSTP Solution File: MGT002-1 by Prover9---1109a
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Prover9---1109a
% Problem : MGT002-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : tptp2X_and_run_prover9 %d %s
% Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 22:22:46 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.41s 0.98s
% Output : Refutation 0.41s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.11 % Problem : MGT002-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.06/0.11 % Command : tptp2X_and_run_prover9 %d %s
% 0.11/0.32 % Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.32 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.32 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.32 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.32 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.32 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.32 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.11/0.32 % DateTime : Thu Jun 9 12:11:50 EDT 2022
% 0.11/0.32 % CPUTime :
% 0.41/0.98 ============================== Prover9 ===============================
% 0.41/0.98 Prover9 (32) version 2009-11A, November 2009.
% 0.41/0.98 Process 24942 was started by sandbox on n025.cluster.edu,
% 0.41/0.98 Thu Jun 9 12:11:51 2022
% 0.41/0.98 The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/prover9 -t 300 -f /tmp/Prover9_24584_n025.cluster.edu".
% 0.41/0.98 ============================== end of head ===========================
% 0.41/0.98
% 0.41/0.98 ============================== INPUT =================================
% 0.41/0.98
% 0.41/0.98 % Reading from file /tmp/Prover9_24584_n025.cluster.edu
% 0.41/0.98
% 0.41/0.98 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.41/0.98 set(auto2).
% 0.41/0.98 % set(auto2) -> set(auto).
% 0.41/0.98 % set(auto) -> set(auto_inference).
% 0.41/0.98 % set(auto) -> set(auto_setup).
% 0.41/0.98 % set(auto_setup) -> set(predicate_elim).
% 0.41/0.98 % set(auto_setup) -> assign(eq_defs, unfold).
% 0.41/0.98 % set(auto) -> set(auto_limits).
% 0.41/0.98 % set(auto_limits) -> assign(max_weight, "100.000").
% 0.41/0.98 % set(auto_limits) -> assign(sos_limit, 20000).
% 0.41/0.98 % set(auto) -> set(auto_denials).
% 0.41/0.98 % set(auto) -> set(auto_process).
% 0.41/0.98 % set(auto2) -> assign(new_constants, 1).
% 0.41/0.98 % set(auto2) -> assign(fold_denial_max, 3).
% 0.41/0.98 % set(auto2) -> assign(max_weight, "200.000").
% 0.41/0.98 % set(auto2) -> assign(max_hours, 1).
% 0.41/0.98 % assign(max_hours, 1) -> assign(max_seconds, 3600).
% 0.41/0.98 % set(auto2) -> assign(max_seconds, 0).
% 0.41/0.98 % set(auto2) -> assign(max_minutes, 5).
% 0.41/0.98 % assign(max_minutes, 5) -> assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.41/0.98 % set(auto2) -> set(sort_initial_sos).
% 0.41/0.98 % set(auto2) -> assign(sos_limit, -1).
% 0.41/0.98 % set(auto2) -> assign(lrs_ticks, 3000).
% 0.41/0.98 % set(auto2) -> assign(max_megs, 400).
% 0.41/0.98 % set(auto2) -> assign(stats, some).
% 0.41/0.98 % set(auto2) -> clear(echo_input).
% 0.41/0.98 % set(auto2) -> set(quiet).
% 0.41/0.98 % set(auto2) -> clear(print_initial_clauses).
% 0.41/0.98 % set(auto2) -> clear(print_given).
% 0.41/0.98 assign(lrs_ticks,-1).
% 0.41/0.98 assign(sos_limit,10000).
% 0.41/0.98 assign(order,kbo).
% 0.41/0.98 set(lex_order_vars).
% 0.41/0.98 clear(print_given).
% 0.41/0.98
% 0.41/0.98 % formulas(sos). % not echoed (13 formulas)
% 0.41/0.98
% 0.41/0.98 ============================== end of input ==========================
% 0.41/0.98
% 0.41/0.98 % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.41/0.98
% 0.41/0.98 ============================== PROCESS NON-CLAUSAL FORMULAS ==========
% 0.41/0.98
% 0.41/0.98 % Formulas that are not ordinary clauses:
% 0.41/0.98
% 0.41/0.98 ============================== end of process non-clausal formulas ===
% 0.41/0.98
% 0.41/0.98 ============================== PROCESS INITIAL CLAUSES ===============
% 0.41/0.98
% 0.41/0.98 ============================== PREDICATE ELIMINATION =================
% 0.41/0.98
% 0.41/0.98 ============================== end predicate elimination =============
% 0.41/0.98
% 0.41/0.98 Auto_denials:
% 0.41/0.98 % copying label t2_FOL_13 to answer in negative clause
% 0.41/0.98
% 0.41/0.98 Term ordering decisions:
% 0.41/0.98 Function symbol KB weights: sk2=1. sk5=1. sk6=1. sk3=1. sk4=1. sk1=1.
% 0.41/0.98
% 0.41/0.98 ============================== end of process initial clauses ========
% 0.41/0.98
% 0.41/0.98 ============================== CLAUSES FOR SEARCH ====================
% 0.41/0.98
% 0.41/0.98 ============================== end of clauses for search =============
% 0.41/0.98
% 0.41/0.98 ============================== SEARCH ================================
% 0.41/0.98
% 0.41/0.98 % Starting search at 0.01 seconds.
% 0.41/0.98
% 0.41/0.98 ============================== PROOF =================================
% 0.41/0.98 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.41/0.98 % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.41/0.98
% 0.41/0.98 % Proof 1 at 0.01 (+ 0.00) seconds: t2_FOL_13.
% 0.41/0.98 % Length of proof is 19.
% 0.41/0.98 % Level of proof is 3.
% 0.41/0.98 % Maximum clause weight is 36.000.
% 0.41/0.98 % Given clauses 21.
% 0.41/0.98
% 0.41/0.98 1 organization(sk2,sk5) # label(t2_FOL_7) # label(negated_conjecture). [assumption].
% 0.41/0.98 2 organization(sk2,sk6) # label(t2_FOL_8) # label(negated_conjecture). [assumption].
% 0.41/0.98 3 greater(sk6,sk5) # label(t2_FOL_12) # label(negated_conjecture). [assumption].
% 0.41/0.98 4 reorganization_free(sk2,sk5,sk6) # label(t2_FOL_9) # label(negated_conjecture). [assumption].
% 0.41/0.98 5 inertia(sk2,sk3,sk5) # label(t2_FOL_10) # label(negated_conjecture). [assumption].
% 0.41/0.98 6 inertia(sk2,sk4,sk6) # label(t2_FOL_11) # label(negated_conjecture). [assumption].
% 0.41/0.98 7 -greater(sk4,sk3) # label(t2_FOL_13) # label(negated_conjecture) # answer(t2_FOL_13). [assumption].
% 0.41/0.98 8 -reorganization_free(A,B,C) | reorganization_free(A,B,B) # label(mp4_2) # label(axiom). [assumption].
% 0.41/0.98 9 -reorganization_free(A,B,C) | reorganization_free(A,C,C) # label(mp4_3) # label(axiom). [assumption].
% 0.41/0.98 10 -organization(A,B) | reproducibility(A,sk1(B,A),B) # label(mp3_1) # label(axiom). [assumption].
% 0.41/0.98 11 -organization(A,B) | -organization(A,C) | -reorganization_free(A,B,C) | -reproducibility(A,D,B) | -reproducibility(A,E,C) | -greater(C,B) | greater(E,D) # label(a4_FOL_6) # label(hypothesis). [assumption].
% 0.41/0.98 12 -organization(A,B) | -organization(C,D) | -reorganization_free(A,B,B) | -reorganization_free(C,D,D) | -reproducibility(A,E,B) | -reproducibility(C,F,D) | -inertia(A,V6,B) | -inertia(C,V7,D) | -greater(F,E) | greater(V7,V6) # label(a3_FOL_4) # label(hypothesis). [assumption].
% 0.41/0.98 14 reorganization_free(sk2,sk5,sk5). [ur(8,a,4,a)].
% 0.41/0.98 15 reorganization_free(sk2,sk6,sk6). [ur(9,a,4,a)].
% 0.41/0.98 16 reproducibility(sk2,sk1(sk6,sk2),sk6). [ur(10,a,2,a)].
% 0.41/0.98 17 reproducibility(sk2,sk1(sk5,sk2),sk5). [ur(10,a,1,a)].
% 0.41/0.98 47 greater(sk1(sk6,sk2),sk1(sk5,sk2)). [ur(11,a,1,a,b,2,a,c,4,a,d,17,a,e,16,a,f,3,a)].
% 0.41/0.98 48 -greater(sk1(sk6,sk2),sk1(sk5,sk2)) # answer(t2_FOL_13). [ur(12,a,1,a,b,2,a,c,14,a,d,15,a,e,17,a,f,16,a,g,5,a,h,6,a,j,7,a)].
% 0.41/0.98 49 $F # answer(t2_FOL_13). [resolve(48,a,47,a)].
% 0.41/0.98
% 0.41/0.98 % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.41/0.98 ============================== end of proof ==========================
% 0.41/0.98
% 0.41/0.98 ============================== STATISTICS ============================
% 0.41/0.98
% 0.41/0.98 Given=21. Generated=52. Kept=48. proofs=1.
% 0.41/0.98 Usable=19. Sos=19. Demods=0. Limbo=1, Disabled=21. Hints=0.
% 0.41/0.98 Megabytes=0.09.
% 0.41/0.98 User_CPU=0.01, System_CPU=0.00, Wall_clock=0.
% 0.41/0.98
% 0.41/0.98 ============================== end of statistics =====================
% 0.41/0.98
% 0.41/0.98 ============================== end of search =========================
% 0.41/0.98
% 0.41/0.98 THEOREM PROVED
% 0.41/0.98 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.41/0.98
% 0.41/0.98 Exiting with 1 proof.
% 0.41/0.98
% 0.41/0.98 Process 24942 exit (max_proofs) Thu Jun 9 12:11:51 2022
% 0.41/0.98 Prover9 interrupted
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------