TSTP Solution File: MED003+1 by SPASS---3.9

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SPASS---3.9
% Problem  : MED003+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : run_spass %d %s

% Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 21:55:51 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.19s 0.50s
% Output   : Refutation 0.19s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12  % Problem  : MED003+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.07/0.13  % Command  : run_spass %d %s
% 0.12/0.34  % Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.34  % DateTime : Tue Jul  5 01:32:44 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.19/0.50  
% 0.19/0.50  SPASS V 3.9 
% 0.19/0.50  SPASS beiseite: Proof found.
% 0.19/0.50  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.19/0.50  Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 
% 0.19/0.50  SPASS derived 226 clauses, backtracked 0 clauses, performed 0 splits and kept 144 clauses.
% 0.19/0.50  SPASS allocated 98365 KBytes.
% 0.19/0.50  SPASS spent	0:00:00.15 on the problem.
% 0.19/0.50  		0:00:00.04 for the input.
% 0.19/0.50  		0:00:00.07 for the FLOTTER CNF translation.
% 0.19/0.50  		0:00:00.00 for inferences.
% 0.19/0.50  		0:00:00.00 for the backtracking.
% 0.19/0.50  		0:00:00.01 for the reduction.
% 0.19/0.50  
% 0.19/0.50  
% 0.19/0.50  Here is a proof with depth 4, length 34 :
% 0.19/0.50  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.19/0.50  1[0:Inp] ||  -> bcapacityex(n0)*.
% 0.19/0.50  2[0:Inp] || conditionnormo(skc1)* -> .
% 0.19/0.50  3[0:Inp] || conditionhypo(skc1)* -> .
% 0.19/0.50  4[0:Inp] || gt(n0,skc1)*l -> .
% 0.19/0.50  5[0:Inp] || gt(u,u)* -> .
% 0.19/0.50  6[0:Inp] ||  -> drugi(u)* gt(n0,u).
% 0.19/0.50  7[0:Inp] || gt(u,skf14(u))*r -> .
% 0.19/0.50  17[0:Inp] || gt(u,skf27(u))*r -> .
% 0.19/0.50  18[0:Inp] || gt(u,skf26(u))*r -> .
% 0.19/0.50  19[0:Inp] || gt(n0,u) -> conditionhyper(u)*.
% 0.19/0.50  28[0:Inp] || drugi(skf14(u))* -> SkP0(u).
% 0.19/0.50  32[0:Inp] || uptakelg(skf26(u))* -> SkP5(u).
% 0.19/0.50  33[0:Inp] || uptakepg(skf27(u))* -> SkP6(u).
% 0.19/0.50  34[0:Inp] SkP0(u) ||  -> uptakelg(v)* gt(u,v)*.
% 0.19/0.50  35[0:Inp] SkP0(u) ||  -> uptakepg(v)* gt(u,v)*.
% 0.19/0.50  46[0:Inp] bcapacityex(u) SkP6(u) SkP5(u) || conditionhyper(skf25(v))* -> conditionhypo(w)* conditionnormo(w) gt(u,w)*.
% 0.19/0.50  47[0:Inp] bcapacityex(u) SkP6(u) SkP5(u) ||  -> conditionhypo(v)* conditionnormo(v) gt(u,v)* gt(u,skf25(u))*r.
% 0.19/0.50  64[0:Res:47.4,4.0] SkP5(n0) SkP6(n0) bcapacityex(n0) ||  -> gt(n0,skf25(n0))*r conditionnormo(skc1) conditionhypo(skc1).
% 0.19/0.50  71[0:Res:46.4,4.0] SkP5(n0) SkP6(n0) bcapacityex(n0) || conditionhyper(skf25(u))* -> conditionnormo(skc1) conditionhypo(skc1).
% 0.19/0.50  78[0:Res:6.0,5.0] ||  -> drugi(n0)*.
% 0.19/0.50  88[0:Res:6.0,7.0] ||  -> drugi(skf14(n0))*.
% 0.19/0.50  91[0:MRR:71.2,71.4,71.5,1.0,2.0,3.0] SkP6(n0) SkP5(n0) || conditionhyper(skf25(u))* -> .
% 0.19/0.50  92[0:MRR:64.2,64.4,64.5,1.0,2.0,3.0] SkP6(n0) SkP5(n0) ||  -> gt(n0,skf25(n0))*r.
% 0.19/0.50  156[0:Res:88.0,28.0] ||  -> SkP0(n0)*.
% 0.19/0.50  168[0:Res:35.1,33.0] SkP0(u) ||  -> gt(u,skf27(v))* SkP6(v).
% 0.19/0.50  186[0:Res:34.1,32.0] SkP0(u) ||  -> gt(u,skf26(v))* SkP5(v).
% 0.19/0.50  263[0:Res:168.1,17.0] SkP0(u) ||  -> SkP6(u)*.
% 0.19/0.50  307[0:Res:186.1,18.0] SkP0(u) ||  -> SkP5(u)*.
% 0.19/0.50  330[0:SoR:91.0,91.1,263.1,307.1] SkP0(n0) SkP0(n0) || conditionhyper(skf25(u))* -> .
% 0.19/0.50  331[0:Obv:330.0] SkP0(n0) || conditionhyper(skf25(u))* -> .
% 0.19/0.50  332[0:SSi:331.0,1.0,78.0,156.0] || conditionhyper(skf25(u))* -> .
% 0.19/0.50  333[0:Res:19.1,332.0] || gt(n0,skf25(u))*r -> .
% 0.19/0.50  334[0:MRR:92.2,333.0] SkP6(n0) SkP5(n0) ||  -> .
% 0.19/0.50  335[0:SSi:334.1,334.0,307.0,1.0,78.0,156.1,263.0,1.0,78.0,156.1] ||  -> .
% 0.19/0.50  % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.19/0.50  Formulae used in the proof : treatmentex irreflexivity_gt insulin_effect ex_cure
% 0.19/0.50  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------