TSTP Solution File: LDA007-2 by E---3.1.00
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.1.00
% Problem : LDA007-2 : TPTP v8.2.0. Bugfixed v2.6.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May 21 00:37:10 EDT 2024
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.22s 0.52s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.22s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 7
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 19 ( 19 unt; 0 nHn; 15 RR)
% Number of literals : 19 ( 18 equ; 3 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 0 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 9 ( 9 usr; 8 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 8 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(a1,axiom,
f(X1,f(X2,X3)) = f(f(X1,X2),f(X1,X3)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',a1) ).
cnf(clause_1,axiom,
tt = f(t,t),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clause_1) ).
cnf(clause_7,axiom,
tk = f(t,k),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clause_7) ).
cnf(clause_3,axiom,
ts = f(t,s),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clause_3) ).
cnf(clause_4,axiom,
tt_ts = f(tt,ts),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clause_4) ).
cnf(prove_equation,negated_conjecture,
f(t,tsk) != f(tt_ts,tk),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_equation) ).
cnf(clause_9,axiom,
tsk = f(ts,k),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clause_9) ).
cnf(c_0_7,axiom,
f(X1,f(X2,X3)) = f(f(X1,X2),f(X1,X3)),
a1 ).
cnf(c_0_8,axiom,
tt = f(t,t),
clause_1 ).
cnf(c_0_9,axiom,
tk = f(t,k),
clause_7 ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
f(tt,f(t,X1)) = f(t,f(t,X1)),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,axiom,
ts = f(t,s),
clause_3 ).
cnf(c_0_12,axiom,
tt_ts = f(tt,ts),
clause_4 ).
cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
f(t,tsk) != f(tt_ts,tk),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[prove_equation]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
f(f(t,X1),tk) = f(t,f(X1,k)),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
f(t,ts) = tt_ts,
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]),c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,axiom,
tsk = f(ts,k),
clause_9 ).
cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
f(t,tsk) != f(tt_ts,tk),
c_0_13 ).
cnf(c_0_18,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]),c_0_16]),c_0_17]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.14/0.14 % Problem : LDA007-2 : TPTP v8.2.0. Bugfixed v2.6.0.
% 0.14/0.15 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.15/0.37 % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.37 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.37 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.37 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.37 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.37 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.37 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.15/0.37 % DateTime : Sat May 18 11:57:53 EDT 2024
% 0.15/0.37 % CPUTime :
% 0.22/0.51 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.22/0.51 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.22/0.52 # Version: 3.1.0
% 0.22/0.52 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.22/0.52 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.22/0.52 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.22/0.52 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.52 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.52 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.52 # G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with pid 28270 completed with status 0
% 0.22/0.52 # Result found by G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI
% 0.22/0.52 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.22/0.52 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.22/0.52 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.22/0.52 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.22/0.52 # Search class: FGUSS-FFSM21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.22/0.52 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.22/0.52 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S0Y with 286s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.52 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 151s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.52 # Starting new_bool_1 with 286s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.52 # Starting sh5l with 286s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.52 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 208s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.52 # G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S0Y with pid 28275 completed with status 0
% 0.22/0.52 # Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S0Y
% 0.22/0.52 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.22/0.52 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.22/0.52 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.22/0.52 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.22/0.52 # Search class: FGUSS-FFSM21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.22/0.52 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.22/0.52 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S0Y with 286s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.52 # Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.22/0.52 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.22/0.52
% 0.22/0.52 # Proof found!
% 0.22/0.52 # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.22/0.52 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.22/0.52 # Parsed axioms : 20
% 0.22/0.52 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.22/0.52 # Initial clauses : 20
% 0.22/0.52 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.22/0.52 # Initial clauses in saturation : 20
% 0.22/0.52 # Processed clauses : 82
% 0.22/0.52 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.22/0.52 # ...subsumed : 4
% 0.22/0.52 # ...remaining for further processing : 78
% 0.22/0.52 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.22/0.52 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.22/0.52 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.22/0.52 # Backward-rewritten : 1
% 0.22/0.52 # Generated clauses : 228
% 0.22/0.52 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 219
% 0.22/0.52 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.22/0.52 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.22/0.52 # Paramodulations : 228
% 0.22/0.52 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.22/0.52 # NegExts : 0
% 0.22/0.52 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.22/0.52 # Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.22/0.52 # Total rewrite steps : 38
% 0.22/0.52 # ...of those cached : 5
% 0.22/0.52 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.22/0.52 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.22/0.52 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.22/0.52 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.22/0.52 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.22/0.52 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.22/0.52 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.22/0.52 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.22/0.52 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.22/0.52 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.22/0.52 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.22/0.52 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.22/0.52 # Current number of processed clauses : 57
% 0.22/0.52 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 30
% 0.22/0.52 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.22/0.52 # Negative unit clauses : 17
% 0.22/0.52 # Non-unit-clauses : 10
% 0.22/0.52 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 171
% 0.22/0.52 # ...number of literals in the above : 246
% 0.22/0.52 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.22/0.52 # Current number of archived clauses : 21
% 0.22/0.52 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 15
% 0.22/0.52 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 15
% 0.22/0.52 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.22/0.52 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 93
% 0.22/0.52 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.22/0.52 # BW rewrite match attempts : 3
% 0.22/0.52 # BW rewrite match successes : 1
% 0.22/0.52 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.22/0.52 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.22/0.52 # Termbank termtop insertions : 2599
% 0.22/0.52 # Search garbage collected termcells : 12
% 0.22/0.52
% 0.22/0.52 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.22/0.52 # User time : 0.004 s
% 0.22/0.52 # System time : 0.002 s
% 0.22/0.52 # Total time : 0.006 s
% 0.22/0.52 # Maximum resident set size: 1644 pages
% 0.22/0.52
% 0.22/0.52 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.22/0.52 # User time : 0.014 s
% 0.22/0.52 # System time : 0.009 s
% 0.22/0.52 # Total time : 0.023 s
% 0.22/0.52 # Maximum resident set size: 1700 pages
% 0.22/0.52 % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.22/0.52 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------