TSTP Solution File: LDA001-1 by Zipperpin---2.1.9999

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Zipperpin---2.1.9999
% Problem  : LDA001-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : NO INFORMATION
% Format   : NO INFORMATION
% Command  : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.g6aufg9Geh true

% Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 09:05:10 EDT 2023

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.96s 0.76s
% Output   : Refutation 0.96s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem  : LDA001-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.00/0.12  % Command  : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.g6aufg9Geh true
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Sun Aug 27 01:10:42 EDT 2023
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.12/0.33  % Running portfolio for 300 s
% 0.12/0.33  % File         : /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.12/0.33  % Number of cores: 8
% 0.12/0.33  % Python version: Python 3.6.8
% 0.12/0.33  % Running in FO mode
% 0.18/0.60  % Total configuration time : 435
% 0.18/0.60  % Estimated wc time : 1092
% 0.18/0.60  % Estimated cpu time (7 cpus) : 156.0
% 0.18/0.69  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo6_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.18/0.70  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo13.sh running for 50s
% 0.18/0.70  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo3_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.18/0.70  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo1_av.sh running for 75s
% 0.18/0.70  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo5.sh running for 50s
% 0.18/0.71  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo4.sh running for 50s
% 0.18/0.71  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo7.sh running for 63s
% 0.96/0.76  % Solved by fo/fo5.sh.
% 0.96/0.76  % done 22 iterations in 0.032s
% 0.96/0.76  % SZS status Theorem for '/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p'
% 0.96/0.76  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.96/0.76  thf(n1_type, type, n1: $i).
% 0.96/0.76  thf(n2_type, type, n2: $i).
% 0.96/0.76  thf(n3_type, type, n3: $i).
% 0.96/0.76  thf(f_type, type, f: $i > $i > $i).
% 0.96/0.76  thf(u_type, type, u: $i).
% 0.96/0.76  thf(prove_equation, conjecture,
% 0.96/0.76    (( f @ ( f @ n3 @ n2 ) @ u ) = ( f @ ( f @ u @ u ) @ u ))).
% 0.96/0.76  thf(zf_stmt_0, negated_conjecture,
% 0.96/0.76    (( f @ ( f @ n3 @ n2 ) @ u ) != ( f @ ( f @ u @ u ) @ u )),
% 0.96/0.76    inference('cnf.neg', [status(esa)], [prove_equation])).
% 0.96/0.76  thf(zip_derived_cl4, plain,
% 0.96/0.76      (((f @ (f @ n3 @ n2) @ u) != (f @ (f @ u @ u) @ u))),
% 0.96/0.76      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_0])).
% 0.96/0.76  thf(clause_4, axiom, (( u ) = ( f @ n2 @ n2 ))).
% 0.96/0.76  thf(zip_derived_cl3, plain, (((u) = (f @ n2 @ n2))),
% 0.96/0.76      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [clause_4])).
% 0.96/0.76  thf(zip_derived_cl3, plain, (((u) = (f @ n2 @ n2))),
% 0.96/0.76      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [clause_4])).
% 0.96/0.76  thf(a1, axiom,
% 0.96/0.76    (( f @ X @ ( f @ Y @ Z ) ) = ( f @ ( f @ X @ Y ) @ ( f @ X @ Z ) ))).
% 0.96/0.76  thf(zip_derived_cl0, plain,
% 0.96/0.76      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 0.96/0.76         ((f @ X0 @ (f @ X1 @ X2)) = (f @ (f @ X0 @ X1) @ (f @ X0 @ X2)))),
% 0.96/0.76      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [a1])).
% 0.96/0.76  thf(zip_derived_cl8, plain,
% 0.96/0.76      (![X0 : $i]: ((f @ n2 @ (f @ X0 @ n2)) = (f @ (f @ n2 @ X0) @ u))),
% 0.96/0.76      inference('sup+', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl3, zip_derived_cl0])).
% 0.96/0.76  thf(zip_derived_cl17, plain, (((f @ n2 @ (f @ n2 @ n2)) = (f @ u @ u))),
% 0.96/0.76      inference('sup+', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl3, zip_derived_cl8])).
% 0.96/0.76  thf(zip_derived_cl3, plain, (((u) = (f @ n2 @ n2))),
% 0.96/0.76      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [clause_4])).
% 0.96/0.76  thf(zip_derived_cl19, plain, (((f @ n2 @ u) = (f @ u @ u))),
% 0.96/0.76      inference('demod', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl17, zip_derived_cl3])).
% 0.96/0.76  thf(zip_derived_cl8, plain,
% 0.96/0.76      (![X0 : $i]: ((f @ n2 @ (f @ X0 @ n2)) = (f @ (f @ n2 @ X0) @ u))),
% 0.96/0.76      inference('sup+', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl3, zip_derived_cl0])).
% 0.96/0.76  thf(zip_derived_cl20, plain,
% 0.96/0.76      (((f @ (f @ n3 @ n2) @ u) != (f @ n2 @ (f @ u @ n2)))),
% 0.96/0.76      inference('demod', [status(thm)],
% 0.96/0.76                [zip_derived_cl4, zip_derived_cl19, zip_derived_cl8])).
% 0.96/0.76  thf(clause_2, axiom, (( n2 ) = ( f @ n1 @ n1 ))).
% 0.96/0.76  thf(zip_derived_cl1, plain, (((n2) = (f @ n1 @ n1))),
% 0.96/0.76      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [clause_2])).
% 0.96/0.76  thf(clause_3, axiom, (( n3 ) = ( f @ n2 @ n1 ))).
% 0.96/0.76  thf(zip_derived_cl2, plain, (((n3) = (f @ n2 @ n1))),
% 0.96/0.76      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [clause_3])).
% 0.96/0.76  thf(zip_derived_cl0, plain,
% 0.96/0.76      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 0.96/0.76         ((f @ X0 @ (f @ X1 @ X2)) = (f @ (f @ X0 @ X1) @ (f @ X0 @ X2)))),
% 0.96/0.76      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [a1])).
% 0.96/0.76  thf(zip_derived_cl9, plain,
% 0.96/0.76      (![X0 : $i]: ((f @ n2 @ (f @ X0 @ n1)) = (f @ (f @ n2 @ X0) @ n3))),
% 0.96/0.76      inference('sup+', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl2, zip_derived_cl0])).
% 0.96/0.76  thf(zip_derived_cl30, plain, (((f @ n2 @ n2) = (f @ (f @ n2 @ n1) @ n3))),
% 0.96/0.76      inference('sup+', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl1, zip_derived_cl9])).
% 0.96/0.76  thf(zip_derived_cl3, plain, (((u) = (f @ n2 @ n2))),
% 0.96/0.76      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [clause_4])).
% 0.96/0.76  thf(zip_derived_cl2, plain, (((n3) = (f @ n2 @ n1))),
% 0.96/0.76      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [clause_3])).
% 0.96/0.76  thf(zip_derived_cl32, plain, (((u) = (f @ n3 @ n3))),
% 0.96/0.76      inference('demod', [status(thm)],
% 0.96/0.76                [zip_derived_cl30, zip_derived_cl3, zip_derived_cl2])).
% 0.96/0.76  thf(zip_derived_cl32, plain, (((u) = (f @ n3 @ n3))),
% 0.96/0.76      inference('demod', [status(thm)],
% 0.96/0.76                [zip_derived_cl30, zip_derived_cl3, zip_derived_cl2])).
% 0.96/0.76  thf(zip_derived_cl0, plain,
% 0.96/0.76      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 0.96/0.76         ((f @ X0 @ (f @ X1 @ X2)) = (f @ (f @ X0 @ X1) @ (f @ X0 @ X2)))),
% 0.96/0.76      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [a1])).
% 0.96/0.76  thf(zip_derived_cl33, plain,
% 0.96/0.76      (![X0 : $i]: ((f @ n3 @ (f @ n3 @ X0)) = (f @ u @ (f @ n3 @ X0)))),
% 0.96/0.76      inference('sup+', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl32, zip_derived_cl0])).
% 0.96/0.76  thf(zip_derived_cl117, plain, (((f @ n3 @ (f @ n3 @ n3)) = (f @ u @ u))),
% 0.96/0.76      inference('sup+', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl32, zip_derived_cl33])).
% 0.96/0.76  thf(zip_derived_cl32, plain, (((u) = (f @ n3 @ n3))),
% 0.96/0.76      inference('demod', [status(thm)],
% 0.96/0.76                [zip_derived_cl30, zip_derived_cl3, zip_derived_cl2])).
% 0.96/0.76  thf(zip_derived_cl19, plain, (((f @ n2 @ u) = (f @ u @ u))),
% 0.96/0.76      inference('demod', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl17, zip_derived_cl3])).
% 0.96/0.76  thf(zip_derived_cl118, plain, (((f @ n3 @ u) = (f @ n2 @ u))),
% 0.96/0.76      inference('demod', [status(thm)],
% 0.96/0.76                [zip_derived_cl117, zip_derived_cl32, zip_derived_cl19])).
% 0.96/0.76  thf(zip_derived_cl8, plain,
% 0.96/0.76      (![X0 : $i]: ((f @ n2 @ (f @ X0 @ n2)) = (f @ (f @ n2 @ X0) @ u))),
% 0.96/0.76      inference('sup+', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl3, zip_derived_cl0])).
% 0.96/0.76  thf(zip_derived_cl126, plain,
% 0.96/0.76      (((f @ n2 @ (f @ u @ n2)) = (f @ (f @ n3 @ u) @ u))),
% 0.96/0.76      inference('sup+', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl118, zip_derived_cl8])).
% 0.96/0.76  thf(zip_derived_cl145, plain,
% 0.96/0.76      (((f @ (f @ n3 @ n2) @ u) != (f @ (f @ n3 @ u) @ u))),
% 0.96/0.76      inference('demod', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl20, zip_derived_cl126])).
% 0.96/0.76  thf(zip_derived_cl32, plain, (((u) = (f @ n3 @ n3))),
% 0.96/0.76      inference('demod', [status(thm)],
% 0.96/0.76                [zip_derived_cl30, zip_derived_cl3, zip_derived_cl2])).
% 0.96/0.76  thf(zip_derived_cl0, plain,
% 0.96/0.76      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 0.96/0.76         ((f @ X0 @ (f @ X1 @ X2)) = (f @ (f @ X0 @ X1) @ (f @ X0 @ X2)))),
% 0.96/0.76      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [a1])).
% 0.96/0.76  thf(zip_derived_cl34, plain,
% 0.96/0.76      (![X0 : $i]: ((f @ n3 @ (f @ X0 @ n3)) = (f @ (f @ n3 @ X0) @ u))),
% 0.96/0.76      inference('sup+', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl32, zip_derived_cl0])).
% 0.96/0.76  thf(zip_derived_cl34, plain,
% 0.96/0.76      (![X0 : $i]: ((f @ n3 @ (f @ X0 @ n3)) = (f @ (f @ n3 @ X0) @ u))),
% 0.96/0.76      inference('sup+', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl32, zip_derived_cl0])).
% 0.96/0.76  thf(zip_derived_cl2, plain, (((n3) = (f @ n2 @ n1))),
% 0.96/0.76      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [clause_3])).
% 0.96/0.76  thf(zip_derived_cl9, plain,
% 0.96/0.76      (![X0 : $i]: ((f @ n2 @ (f @ X0 @ n1)) = (f @ (f @ n2 @ X0) @ n3))),
% 0.96/0.76      inference('sup+', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl2, zip_derived_cl0])).
% 0.96/0.76  thf(zip_derived_cl29, plain, (((f @ n2 @ n3) = (f @ (f @ n2 @ n2) @ n3))),
% 0.96/0.76      inference('sup+', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl2, zip_derived_cl9])).
% 0.96/0.76  thf(zip_derived_cl3, plain, (((u) = (f @ n2 @ n2))),
% 0.96/0.76      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [clause_4])).
% 0.96/0.76  thf(zip_derived_cl31, plain, (((f @ n2 @ n3) = (f @ u @ n3))),
% 0.96/0.76      inference('demod', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl29, zip_derived_cl3])).
% 0.96/0.76  thf(zip_derived_cl157, plain,
% 0.96/0.76      (((f @ n3 @ (f @ n2 @ n3)) != (f @ n3 @ (f @ n2 @ n3)))),
% 0.96/0.76      inference('demod', [status(thm)],
% 0.96/0.76                [zip_derived_cl145, zip_derived_cl34, zip_derived_cl34, 
% 0.96/0.76                 zip_derived_cl31])).
% 0.96/0.76  thf(zip_derived_cl158, plain, ($false),
% 0.96/0.76      inference('simplify', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl157])).
% 0.96/0.76  
% 0.96/0.76  % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.96/0.76  
% 0.96/0.76  
% 0.96/0.76  % Terminating...
% 0.96/0.80  % Runner terminated.
% 1.57/0.81  % Zipperpin 1.5 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------