TSTP Solution File: LDA001-1 by SnakeForV-SAT---1.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SnakeForV-SAT---1.0
% Problem : LDA001-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_sat --cores 0 -t %d %s
% Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Aug 31 17:50:35 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 1.38s 0.55s
% Output : Refutation 1.38s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 10
% Number of leaves : 5
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 24 ( 24 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 24 ( 23 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 5 ( 5 ~; 0 |; 0 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 4 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 0 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 5 ( 5 usr; 4 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 9 ( 9 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f178,plain,
$false,
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f177,f12]) ).
fof(f12,plain,
! [X2] : f(n2,f(X2,n2)) = f(f(n2,X2),u),
inference(superposition,[],[f1,f4]) ).
fof(f4,axiom,
u = f(n2,n2),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clause_4) ).
fof(f1,axiom,
! [X2,X0,X1] : f(X0,f(X1,X2)) = f(f(X0,X1),f(X0,X2)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',a1) ).
fof(f177,plain,
f(n2,f(u,n2)) != f(f(n2,u),u),
inference(forward_demodulation,[],[f176,f33]) ).
fof(f33,plain,
f(u,u) = f(n2,u),
inference(superposition,[],[f8,f4]) ).
fof(f8,plain,
! [X2] : f(n2,f(n2,X2)) = f(u,f(n2,X2)),
inference(superposition,[],[f1,f4]) ).
fof(f176,plain,
f(f(u,u),u) != f(n2,f(u,n2)),
inference(forward_demodulation,[],[f175,f51]) ).
fof(f51,plain,
f(n1,n3) = f(u,n2),
inference(forward_demodulation,[],[f45,f3]) ).
fof(f3,axiom,
n3 = f(n2,n1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clause_3) ).
fof(f45,plain,
f(n1,f(n2,n1)) = f(u,n2),
inference(superposition,[],[f10,f18]) ).
fof(f18,plain,
u = f(n1,n2),
inference(forward_demodulation,[],[f14,f4]) ).
fof(f14,plain,
f(n2,n2) = f(n1,n2),
inference(superposition,[],[f6,f2]) ).
fof(f2,axiom,
n2 = f(n1,n1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clause_2) ).
fof(f6,plain,
! [X0] : f(n2,f(n1,X0)) = f(n1,f(n1,X0)),
inference(superposition,[],[f1,f2]) ).
fof(f10,plain,
! [X0] : f(f(n1,X0),n2) = f(n1,f(X0,n1)),
inference(superposition,[],[f1,f2]) ).
fof(f175,plain,
f(f(u,u),u) != f(n2,f(n1,n3)),
inference(forward_demodulation,[],[f164,f7]) ).
fof(f7,plain,
! [X1] : f(n2,f(n1,X1)) = f(n3,f(n2,X1)),
inference(superposition,[],[f1,f3]) ).
fof(f164,plain,
f(f(u,u),u) != f(n3,f(n2,n3)),
inference(superposition,[],[f5,f29]) ).
fof(f29,plain,
! [X0] : f(f(n3,X0),u) = f(n3,f(X0,n3)),
inference(superposition,[],[f1,f24]) ).
fof(f24,plain,
u = f(n3,n3),
inference(forward_demodulation,[],[f23,f4]) ).
fof(f23,plain,
f(n2,n2) = f(n3,n3),
inference(forward_demodulation,[],[f19,f2]) ).
fof(f19,plain,
f(n2,f(n1,n1)) = f(n3,n3),
inference(superposition,[],[f7,f3]) ).
fof(f5,axiom,
f(f(n3,n2),u) != f(f(u,u),u),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_equation) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.13 % Problem : LDA001-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.03/0.14 % Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_sat --cores 0 -t %d %s
% 0.14/0.35 % Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % DateTime : Tue Aug 30 03:21:35 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 0.21/0.50 % (29440)ott+10_1:32_bd=off:fsr=off:newcnf=on:tgt=full:i=100:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/100Mi)
% 0.21/0.50 % (29435)fmb+10_1:1_fmbsr=2.0:nm=4:skr=on:i=51:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/51Mi)
% 0.21/0.50 TRYING [1]
% 0.21/0.50 TRYING [2]
% 0.21/0.50 TRYING [3]
% 0.21/0.51 TRYING [4]
% 0.21/0.51 % (29443)ins+10_1:1_awrs=decay:awrsf=30:bsr=unit_only:foolp=on:igrr=8/457:igs=10:igwr=on:nwc=1.5:sp=weighted_frequency:to=lpo:uhcvi=on:i=68:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/68Mi)
% 0.21/0.51 % (29455)ott+10_1:5_bd=off:tgt=full:i=500:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/500Mi)
% 0.21/0.52 % (29431)ott+4_1:1_av=off:bd=off:nwc=5.0:s2a=on:s2at=2.0:slsq=on:slsqc=2:slsql=off:slsqr=1,2:sp=frequency:i=37:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/37Mi)
% 0.21/0.53 TRYING [5]
% 0.21/0.53 % (29448)ott+4_1:1_av=off:bd=off:nwc=5.0:rp=on:s2a=on:s2at=2.0:slsq=on:slsqc=2:slsql=off:slsqr=1,2:sp=frequency:i=100:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/100Mi)
% 0.21/0.53 % (29441)ott+10_1:28_bd=off:bs=on:tgt=ground:i=101:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/101Mi)
% 0.21/0.53 % (29448)First to succeed.
% 0.21/0.53 % (29435)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.21/0.53 % (29435)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.53 % (29435)Version: Vampire 4.7 (commit 807e37dd9 on 2022-08-23 09:55:27 +0200)
% 1.38/0.54 % (29434)dis+34_1:32_abs=on:add=off:bsr=on:gsp=on:sp=weighted_frequency:i=48:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/48Mi)
% 1.38/0.54 % (29435)Linked with Z3 4.8.13.0 f03d756e086f81f2596157241e0decfb1c982299 z3-4.8.4-5390-gf03d756e0
% 1.38/0.54 % (29435)Termination reason: Unknown
% 1.38/0.54 % (29435)Termination phase: Finite model building constraint generation
% 1.38/0.54
% 1.38/0.54 % (29435)Memory used [KB]: 6652
% 1.38/0.54 % (29435)Time elapsed: 0.098 s
% 1.38/0.54 % (29435)Instructions burned: 51 (million)
% 1.38/0.54 % (29435)------------------------------
% 1.38/0.54 % (29435)------------------------------
% 1.38/0.54 % (29432)ott+10_1:32_bd=off:fsr=off:newcnf=on:tgt=full:i=51:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/51Mi)
% 1.38/0.54 % (29437)dis+2_1:64_add=large:bce=on:bd=off:i=2:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/2Mi)
% 1.38/0.55 % (29437)Instruction limit reached!
% 1.38/0.55 % (29437)------------------------------
% 1.38/0.55 % (29437)Version: Vampire 4.7 (commit 807e37dd9 on 2022-08-23 09:55:27 +0200)
% 1.38/0.55 % (29437)Linked with Z3 4.8.13.0 f03d756e086f81f2596157241e0decfb1c982299 z3-4.8.4-5390-gf03d756e0
% 1.38/0.55 % (29437)Termination reason: Unknown
% 1.38/0.55 % (29437)Termination phase: Saturation
% 1.38/0.55
% 1.38/0.55 % (29437)Memory used [KB]: 5373
% 1.38/0.55 % (29437)Time elapsed: 0.126 s
% 1.38/0.55 % (29437)Instructions burned: 3 (million)
% 1.38/0.55 % (29437)------------------------------
% 1.38/0.55 % (29437)------------------------------
% 1.38/0.55 % (29429)fmb+10_1:1_bce=on:fmbsr=1.5:nm=4:skr=on:i=191324:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/191324Mi)
% 1.38/0.55 TRYING [1]
% 1.38/0.55 TRYING [2]
% 1.38/0.55 TRYING [3]
% 1.38/0.55 % (29451)dis+21_1:1_av=off:er=filter:slsq=on:slsqc=0:slsqr=1,1:sp=frequency:to=lpo:i=498:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/498Mi)
% 1.38/0.55 % (29448)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 1.38/0.55 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark
% 1.38/0.55 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 1.38/0.55 % (29448)------------------------------
% 1.38/0.55 % (29448)Version: Vampire 4.7 (commit 807e37dd9 on 2022-08-23 09:55:27 +0200)
% 1.38/0.55 % (29448)Linked with Z3 4.8.13.0 f03d756e086f81f2596157241e0decfb1c982299 z3-4.8.4-5390-gf03d756e0
% 1.38/0.55 % (29448)Termination reason: Refutation
% 1.38/0.55
% 1.38/0.55 % (29448)Memory used [KB]: 1151
% 1.38/0.55 % (29448)Time elapsed: 0.134 s
% 1.38/0.55 % (29448)Instructions burned: 11 (million)
% 1.38/0.55 % (29448)------------------------------
% 1.38/0.55 % (29448)------------------------------
% 1.38/0.55 % (29426)Success in time 0.183 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------