TSTP Solution File: LCL908+1 by Nitpick---2016
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Nitpick---2016
% Problem : LCL908+1 : TPTP v6.4.0. Released v6.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : isabelle tptp_nitpick %d %s
% Computer : n046.star.cs.uiowa.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2609 0 2.40GHz
% Memory : 32218.75MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-327.36.3.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Jan 17 19:34:29 EST 2017
% Result : Satisfiable 23.86s
% Output : FiniteModel 23.86s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 0
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : LCL908+1 : TPTP v6.4.0. Released v6.4.0.
% 0.00/0.04 % Command : isabelle tptp_nitpick %d %s
% 0.03/0.23 % Computer : n046.star.cs.uiowa.edu
% 0.03/0.23 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.03/0.23 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2609 0 @ 2.40GHz
% 0.03/0.23 % Memory : 32218.75MB
% 0.03/0.23 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-327.36.3.el7.x86_64
% 0.03/0.23 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.03/0.23 % DateTime : Sat Jan 14 15:42:04 CST 2017
% 0.03/0.24 % CPUTime :
% 23.86/9.57 Nitpicking formula...
% 23.86/9.57 Timestamp: 15:42:12
% 23.86/9.57 Using SAT solver "Lingeling_JNI" The following solvers are configured:
% 23.86/9.57 "Lingeling_JNI", "CryptoMiniSat_JNI", "MiniSat_JNI", "SAT4J", "SAT4J_Light"
% 23.86/9.57 Batch 1 of 20: Trying 5 scopes:
% 23.86/9.57 card TPTP_Interpret.ind = 1
% 23.86/9.57 card TPTP_Interpret.ind = 2
% 23.86/9.57 card TPTP_Interpret.ind = 3
% 23.86/9.57 card TPTP_Interpret.ind = 4
% 23.86/9.57 card TPTP_Interpret.ind = 5
% 23.86/9.57 % SZS status Satisfiable % SZS output start FiniteModel
% 23.86/9.57 Nitpick found a model for card TPTP_Interpret.ind = 1:
% 23.86/9.57
% 23.86/9.57 Constants:
% 23.86/9.57 bnd_and = (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := i1))
% 23.86/9.57 bnd_and_1 = True
% 23.86/9.57 bnd_and_2 = True
% 23.86/9.57 bnd_and_3 = True
% 23.86/9.57 bnd_cn1 = True
% 23.86/9.57 bnd_cn2 = True
% 23.86/9.57 bnd_cn3 = True
% 23.86/9.57 bnd_equiv = (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := i1))
% 23.86/9.57 bnd_equivalence_1 = True
% 23.86/9.57 bnd_equivalence_2 = True
% 23.86/9.57 bnd_equivalence_3 = True
% 23.86/9.57 bnd_implies = (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := i1))
% 23.86/9.57 bnd_implies_1 = True
% 23.86/9.57 bnd_implies_2 = True
% 23.86/9.57 bnd_implies_3 = True
% 23.86/9.57 bnd_is_a_theorem = (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := True)
% 23.86/9.57 bnd_kn1 = True
% 23.86/9.57 bnd_kn2 = True
% 23.86/9.57 bnd_kn3 = True
% 23.86/9.57 bnd_modus_ponens = True
% 23.86/9.57 bnd_modus_tollens = True
% 23.86/9.57 bnd_not = (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := i1)
% 23.86/9.57 bnd_op_and = False
% 23.86/9.57 bnd_op_equiv = True
% 23.86/9.57 bnd_op_implies = True
% 23.86/9.57 bnd_op_implies_and = False
% 23.86/9.57 bnd_op_implies_or = False
% 23.86/9.57 bnd_op_or = True
% 23.86/9.57 bnd_or = (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := i1))
% 23.86/9.57 bnd_or_1 = True
% 23.86/9.57 bnd_or_2 = True
% 23.86/9.57 bnd_or_3 = True
% 23.86/9.57 bnd_r1 = True
% 23.86/9.57 bnd_r2 = True
% 23.86/9.57 bnd_r3 = True
% 23.86/9.57 bnd_r4 = True
% 23.86/9.57 bnd_r5 = True
% 23.86/9.57 bnd_substitution_of_equivalents = True
% 23.86/9.57 % SZS output end FiniteModel
% 23.86/9.57 Total time: 861 ms
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------