TSTP Solution File: LCL901+1 by Beagle---0.9.51

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Beagle---0.9.51
% Problem  : LCL901+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v5.5.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s

% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Aug 22 10:49:14 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 28.34s 16.64s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 28.61s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem  : LCL901+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v5.5.0.
% 0.00/0.13  % Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s
% 0.12/0.35  % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.35  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.12/0.35  % DateTime : Thu Aug  3 13:54:22 EDT 2023
% 0.12/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 28.34/16.64  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 28.34/16.65  
% 28.34/16.65  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 28.51/16.67  %$ >= > ==> > + > #nlpp > 1 > 0 > #skF_1
% 28.51/16.67  
% 28.51/16.67  %Foreground sorts:
% 28.51/16.67  
% 28.51/16.67  
% 28.51/16.67  %Background operators:
% 28.51/16.67  
% 28.51/16.67  
% 28.51/16.67  %Foreground operators:
% 28.51/16.67  tff(==>, type, ==>: ($i * $i) > $i).
% 28.51/16.67  tff(+, type, +: ($i * $i) > $i).
% 28.51/16.67  tff(>=, type, >=: ($i * $i) > $o).
% 28.51/16.67  tff(0, type, 0: $i).
% 28.51/16.67  tff('#skF_1', type, '#skF_1': $i).
% 28.51/16.67  tff(1, type, 1: $i).
% 28.51/16.67  
% 28.61/16.70  tff(f_30, axiom, (![A, B]: (+(A, B) = +(B, A))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', sos_02)).
% 28.61/16.70  tff(f_52, axiom, (![A]: >=(A, 0)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', sos_08)).
% 28.61/16.70  tff(f_32, axiom, (![A]: (+(A, 0) = A)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', sos_03)).
% 28.61/16.70  tff(f_56, axiom, (![X8, X9, X10]: (>=(X8, X9) => >=(+(X8, X10), +(X9, X10)))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', sos_09)).
% 28.61/16.70  tff(f_50, axiom, (![X5, X6, X7]: (>=(+(X5, X6), X7) <=> >=(X6, ==>(X5, X7)))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', sos_07)).
% 28.61/16.70  tff(f_46, axiom, (![X3, X4]: ((>=(X3, X4) & >=(X4, X3)) => (X3 = X4))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', sos_06)).
% 28.61/16.70  tff(f_34, axiom, (![A]: >=(A, A)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', sos_04)).
% 28.61/16.70  tff(f_70, axiom, (![A]: (+(A, A) = A)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', sos_14)).
% 28.61/16.70  tff(f_28, axiom, (![A, B, C]: (+(+(A, B), C) = +(A, +(B, C)))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', sos_01)).
% 28.61/16.70  tff(f_66, axiom, (![A]: (+(A, 1) = 1)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', sos_12)).
% 28.61/16.70  tff(f_68, axiom, (![A, B]: (==>(==>(A, B), B) = ==>(==>(B, A), A))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', sos_13)).
% 28.61/16.70  tff(f_64, axiom, (![X14, X15, X16]: (>=(X14, X15) => >=(==>(X16, X14), ==>(X16, X15)))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', sos_11)).
% 28.61/16.70  tff(f_73, negated_conjecture, ~(![X17]: (==>(==>(==>(X17, 1), X17), X17) = 0)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', goals_15)).
% 28.61/16.70  tff(c_4, plain, (![B_5, A_4]: (+(B_5, A_4)=+(A_4, B_5))), inference(cnfTransformation, [status(thm)], [f_30])).
% 28.61/16.70  tff(c_18, plain, (![A_16]: (>=(A_16, 0))), inference(cnfTransformation, [status(thm)], [f_52])).
% 28.61/16.70  tff(c_80, plain, (![B_35, A_36]: (+(B_35, A_36)=+(A_36, B_35))), inference(cnfTransformation, [status(thm)], [f_30])).
% 28.61/16.70  tff(c_6, plain, (![A_6]: (+(A_6, 0)=A_6)), inference(cnfTransformation, [status(thm)], [f_32])).
% 28.61/16.70  tff(c_96, plain, (![A_36]: (+(0, A_36)=A_36)), inference(superposition, [status(thm), theory('equality')], [c_80, c_6])).
% 28.61/16.70  tff(c_1087, plain, (![X8_87, X10_88, X9_89]: (>=(+(X8_87, X10_88), +(X9_89, X10_88)) | ~>=(X8_87, X9_89))), inference(cnfTransformation, [status(thm)], [f_56])).
% 28.61/16.70  tff(c_1118, plain, (![X8_87, A_36]: (>=(+(X8_87, A_36), A_36) | ~>=(X8_87, 0))), inference(superposition, [status(thm), theory('equality')], [c_96, c_1087])).
% 28.61/16.70  tff(c_1160, plain, (![X8_90, A_91]: (>=(+(X8_90, A_91), A_91))), inference(demodulation, [status(thm), theory('equality')], [c_18, c_1118])).
% 28.61/16.70  tff(c_1278, plain, (![B_94, A_95]: (>=(+(B_94, A_95), B_94))), inference(superposition, [status(thm), theory('equality')], [c_4, c_1160])).
% 28.61/16.70  tff(c_14, plain, (![X6_14, X5_13, X7_15]: (>=(X6_14, ==>(X5_13, X7_15)) | ~>=(+(X5_13, X6_14), X7_15))), inference(cnfTransformation, [status(thm)], [f_50])).
% 28.61/16.70  tff(c_1341, plain, (![A_96, B_97]: (>=(A_96, ==>(B_97, B_97)))), inference(resolution, [status(thm)], [c_1278, c_14])).
% 28.61/16.70  tff(c_257, plain, (![X4_39, X3_40]: (X4_39=X3_40 | ~>=(X4_39, X3_40) | ~>=(X3_40, X4_39))), inference(cnfTransformation, [status(thm)], [f_46])).
% 28.61/16.70  tff(c_266, plain, (![A_16]: (A_16=0 | ~>=(0, A_16))), inference(resolution, [status(thm)], [c_18, c_257])).
% 28.61/16.70  tff(c_1381, plain, (![B_97]: (==>(B_97, B_97)=0)), inference(resolution, [status(thm)], [c_1341, c_266])).
% 28.61/16.70  tff(c_8, plain, (![A_7]: (>=(A_7, A_7))), inference(cnfTransformation, [status(thm)], [f_34])).
% 28.61/16.70  tff(c_1206, plain, (![A_91, X8_90]: (>=(A_91, ==>(X8_90, A_91)))), inference(resolution, [status(thm)], [c_1160, c_14])).
% 28.61/16.70  tff(c_1155, plain, (![X8_87, A_36]: (>=(+(X8_87, A_36), A_36))), inference(demodulation, [status(thm), theory('equality')], [c_18, c_1118])).
% 28.61/16.70  tff(c_30, plain, (![A_29]: (+(A_29, A_29)=A_29)), inference(cnfTransformation, [status(thm)], [f_70])).
% 28.61/16.70  tff(c_2153, plain, (![A_120, X9_121]: (>=(A_120, +(X9_121, A_120)) | ~>=(A_120, X9_121))), inference(superposition, [status(thm), theory('equality')], [c_30, c_1087])).
% 28.61/16.70  tff(c_12, plain, (![X4_12, X3_11]: (X4_12=X3_11 | ~>=(X4_12, X3_11) | ~>=(X3_11, X4_12))), inference(cnfTransformation, [status(thm)], [f_46])).
% 28.61/16.70  tff(c_2165, plain, (![X9_121, A_120]: (+(X9_121, A_120)=A_120 | ~>=(+(X9_121, A_120), A_120) | ~>=(A_120, X9_121))), inference(resolution, [status(thm)], [c_2153, c_12])).
% 28.61/16.70  tff(c_2208, plain, (![X9_122, A_123]: (+(X9_122, A_123)=A_123 | ~>=(A_123, X9_122))), inference(demodulation, [status(thm), theory('equality')], [c_1155, c_2165])).
% 28.61/16.70  tff(c_2288, plain, (![X8_90, A_91]: (+(==>(X8_90, A_91), A_91)=A_91)), inference(resolution, [status(thm)], [c_1206, c_2208])).
% 28.61/16.70  tff(c_295, plain, (![X5_48, X6_49, X7_50]: (>=(+(X5_48, X6_49), X7_50) | ~>=(X6_49, ==>(X5_48, X7_50)))), inference(cnfTransformation, [status(thm)], [f_50])).
% 28.61/16.70  tff(c_331, plain, (![A_57, X7_58]: (>=(A_57, X7_58) | ~>=(A_57, ==>(0, X7_58)))), inference(superposition, [status(thm), theory('equality')], [c_96, c_295])).
% 28.61/16.70  tff(c_346, plain, (![X7_58]: (>=(==>(0, X7_58), X7_58))), inference(resolution, [status(thm)], [c_8, c_331])).
% 28.61/16.70  tff(c_359, plain, (![A_60, B_61, C_62]: (+(+(A_60, B_61), C_62)=+(A_60, +(B_61, C_62)))), inference(cnfTransformation, [status(thm)], [f_28])).
% 28.61/16.70  tff(c_429, plain, (![A_29, C_62]: (+(A_29, +(A_29, C_62))=+(A_29, C_62))), inference(superposition, [status(thm), theory('equality')], [c_30, c_359])).
% 28.61/16.70  tff(c_3843, plain, (![B_156, A_157]: (>=(B_156, +(B_156, A_157)) | ~>=(B_156, A_157))), inference(superposition, [status(thm), theory('equality')], [c_4, c_2153])).
% 28.61/16.70  tff(c_2199, plain, (![X9_121, A_120]: (+(X9_121, A_120)=A_120 | ~>=(A_120, X9_121))), inference(demodulation, [status(thm), theory('equality')], [c_1155, c_2165])).
% 28.61/16.70  tff(c_3852, plain, (![B_156, A_157]: (+(+(B_156, A_157), B_156)=B_156 | ~>=(B_156, A_157))), inference(resolution, [status(thm)], [c_3843, c_2199])).
% 28.61/16.70  tff(c_3922, plain, (![B_158, A_159]: (+(B_158, A_159)=B_158 | ~>=(B_158, A_159))), inference(demodulation, [status(thm), theory('equality')], [c_429, c_4, c_3852])).
% 28.61/16.70  tff(c_3988, plain, (![X7_58]: (+(==>(0, X7_58), X7_58)===>(0, X7_58))), inference(resolution, [status(thm)], [c_346, c_3922])).
% 28.61/16.70  tff(c_4027, plain, (![X7_58]: (==>(0, X7_58)=X7_58)), inference(demodulation, [status(thm), theory('equality')], [c_2288, c_3988])).
% 28.61/16.70  tff(c_26, plain, (![A_26]: (+(A_26, 1)=1)), inference(cnfTransformation, [status(thm)], [f_66])).
% 28.61/16.70  tff(c_129, plain, (![A_26]: (+(1, A_26)=1)), inference(superposition, [status(thm), theory('equality')], [c_26, c_80])).
% 28.61/16.70  tff(c_542, plain, (![X7_66, A_67]: (>=(1, X7_66) | ~>=(A_67, ==>(1, X7_66)))), inference(superposition, [status(thm), theory('equality')], [c_129, c_295])).
% 28.61/16.70  tff(c_564, plain, (![X7_66]: (>=(1, X7_66))), inference(resolution, [status(thm)], [c_8, c_542])).
% 28.61/16.70  tff(c_773, plain, (![X6_77, X5_78, X7_79]: (>=(X6_77, ==>(X5_78, X7_79)) | ~>=(+(X5_78, X6_77), X7_79))), inference(cnfTransformation, [status(thm)], [f_50])).
% 28.61/16.70  tff(c_785, plain, (![A_26, X7_79]: (>=(A_26, ==>(1, X7_79)) | ~>=(1, X7_79))), inference(superposition, [status(thm), theory('equality')], [c_129, c_773])).
% 28.61/16.70  tff(c_938, plain, (![A_83, X7_84]: (>=(A_83, ==>(1, X7_84)))), inference(demodulation, [status(thm), theory('equality')], [c_564, c_785])).
% 28.61/16.70  tff(c_974, plain, (![X7_85]: (==>(1, X7_85)=0)), inference(resolution, [status(thm)], [c_938, c_266])).
% 28.61/16.70  tff(c_28, plain, (![B_28, A_27]: (==>(==>(B_28, A_27), A_27)===>(==>(A_27, B_28), B_28))), inference(cnfTransformation, [status(thm)], [f_68])).
% 28.61/16.70  tff(c_988, plain, (![X7_85]: (==>(==>(X7_85, 1), 1)===>(0, X7_85))), inference(superposition, [status(thm), theory('equality')], [c_974, c_28])).
% 28.61/16.70  tff(c_13207, plain, (![X7_85]: (==>(==>(X7_85, 1), 1)=X7_85)), inference(demodulation, [status(thm), theory('equality')], [c_4027, c_988])).
% 28.61/16.70  tff(c_13208, plain, (![X7_271]: (==>(==>(X7_271, 1), 1)=X7_271)), inference(demodulation, [status(thm), theory('equality')], [c_4027, c_988])).
% 28.61/16.70  tff(c_24, plain, (![X16_25, X14_23, X15_24]: (>=(==>(X16_25, X14_23), ==>(X16_25, X15_24)) | ~>=(X14_23, X15_24))), inference(cnfTransformation, [status(thm)], [f_64])).
% 28.61/16.70  tff(c_13292, plain, (![X7_271, X15_24]: (>=(X7_271, ==>(==>(X7_271, 1), X15_24)) | ~>=(1, X15_24))), inference(superposition, [status(thm), theory('equality')], [c_13208, c_24])).
% 28.61/16.70  tff(c_13365, plain, (![X7_271, X15_24]: (>=(X7_271, ==>(==>(X7_271, 1), X15_24)))), inference(demodulation, [status(thm), theory('equality')], [c_564, c_13292])).
% 28.61/16.70  tff(c_288, plain, (![X16_45, X14_46, X15_47]: (>=(==>(X16_45, X14_46), ==>(X16_45, X15_47)) | ~>=(X14_46, X15_47))), inference(cnfTransformation, [status(thm)], [f_64])).
% 28.61/16.70  tff(c_36248, plain, (![X16_469, X15_470, X14_471]: (==>(X16_469, X15_470)===>(X16_469, X14_471) | ~>=(==>(X16_469, X15_470), ==>(X16_469, X14_471)) | ~>=(X14_471, X15_470))), inference(resolution, [status(thm)], [c_288, c_12])).
% 28.61/16.70  tff(c_36370, plain, (![X7_85, X14_471]: (==>(==>(X7_85, 1), X14_471)===>(==>(X7_85, 1), 1) | ~>=(X7_85, ==>(==>(X7_85, 1), X14_471)) | ~>=(X14_471, 1))), inference(superposition, [status(thm), theory('equality')], [c_13207, c_36248])).
% 28.61/16.70  tff(c_36562, plain, (![X7_85, X14_471]: (==>(==>(X7_85, 1), X14_471)=X7_85 | ~>=(X14_471, 1))), inference(demodulation, [status(thm), theory('equality')], [c_13365, c_13207, c_36370])).
% 28.61/16.70  tff(c_2303, plain, (![X8_124, A_125]: (+(==>(X8_124, A_125), A_125)=A_125)), inference(resolution, [status(thm)], [c_1206, c_2208])).
% 28.61/16.70  tff(c_2367, plain, (![A_125, X8_124]: (+(A_125, ==>(X8_124, A_125))=A_125)), inference(superposition, [status(thm), theory('equality')], [c_2303, c_4])).
% 28.61/16.70  tff(c_1193, plain, (![B_5, A_4]: (>=(+(B_5, A_4), B_5))), inference(superposition, [status(thm), theory('equality')], [c_4, c_1160])).
% 28.61/16.70  tff(c_16, plain, (![X5_13, X6_14, X7_15]: (>=(+(X5_13, X6_14), X7_15) | ~>=(X6_14, ==>(X5_13, X7_15)))), inference(cnfTransformation, [status(thm)], [f_50])).
% 28.61/16.70  tff(c_7665, plain, (![A_217, B_218, X7_219]: (>=(A_217, ==>(B_218, X7_219)) | ~>=(+(A_217, B_218), X7_219))), inference(superposition, [status(thm), theory('equality')], [c_4, c_773])).
% 28.61/16.70  tff(c_45036, plain, (![X5_509, X6_510, X7_511]: (>=(X5_509, ==>(X6_510, X7_511)) | ~>=(X6_510, ==>(X5_509, X7_511)))), inference(resolution, [status(thm)], [c_16, c_7665])).
% 28.61/16.70  tff(c_45299, plain, (![X5_509, X7_511, A_4]: (>=(X5_509, ==>(+(==>(X5_509, X7_511), A_4), X7_511)))), inference(resolution, [status(thm)], [c_1193, c_45036])).
% 28.61/16.70  tff(c_17454, plain, (![A_334, B_335, C_336, X7_337]: (>=(+(A_334, +(B_335, C_336)), X7_337) | ~>=(C_336, ==>(+(A_334, B_335), X7_337)))), inference(superposition, [status(thm), theory('equality')], [c_359, c_16])).
% 28.61/16.70  tff(c_17688, plain, (![B_335, C_336, X7_337]: (>=(+(B_335, C_336), X7_337) | ~>=(C_336, ==>(+(+(B_335, C_336), B_335), X7_337)))), inference(superposition, [status(thm), theory('equality')], [c_30, c_17454])).
% 28.61/16.70  tff(c_102487, plain, (![B_785, C_786, X7_787]: (>=(+(B_785, C_786), X7_787) | ~>=(C_786, ==>(+(B_785, C_786), X7_787)))), inference(demodulation, [status(thm), theory('equality')], [c_429, c_4, c_17688])).
% 28.61/16.70  tff(c_102610, plain, (![A_4, X7_511]: (>=(+(==>(A_4, X7_511), A_4), X7_511))), inference(resolution, [status(thm)], [c_45299, c_102487])).
% 28.61/16.70  tff(c_103047, plain, (![A_4, X7_511]: (>=(+(A_4, ==>(A_4, X7_511)), X7_511))), inference(demodulation, [status(thm), theory('equality')], [c_4, c_102610])).
% 28.61/16.70  tff(c_458, plain, (![A_64, C_65]: (+(A_64, +(A_64, C_65))=+(A_64, C_65))), inference(superposition, [status(thm), theory('equality')], [c_30, c_359])).
% 28.61/16.70  tff(c_130744, plain, (![A_915, C_916, X7_917]: (>=(+(A_915, C_916), X7_917) | ~>=(+(A_915, C_916), ==>(A_915, X7_917)))), inference(superposition, [status(thm), theory('equality')], [c_458, c_16])).
% 28.61/16.70  tff(c_136457, plain, (![A_941, X7_942]: (>=(+(A_941, ==>(A_941, ==>(A_941, X7_942))), X7_942))), inference(resolution, [status(thm)], [c_103047, c_130744])).
% 28.61/16.70  tff(c_631, plain, (![X7_70]: (>=(1, X7_70))), inference(resolution, [status(thm)], [c_8, c_542])).
% 28.61/16.70  tff(c_649, plain, (![X7_70]: (X7_70=1 | ~>=(X7_70, 1))), inference(resolution, [status(thm)], [c_631, c_12])).
% 28.61/16.70  tff(c_138338, plain, (![A_944]: (+(A_944, ==>(A_944, ==>(A_944, 1)))=1)), inference(resolution, [status(thm)], [c_136457, c_649])).
% 28.61/16.70  tff(c_817, plain, (![X6_77, X5_78]: (>=(X6_77, ==>(X5_78, +(X5_78, X6_77))))), inference(resolution, [status(thm)], [c_8, c_773])).
% 28.61/16.70  tff(c_2285, plain, (![X5_78, X6_77]: (+(==>(X5_78, +(X5_78, X6_77)), X6_77)=X6_77)), inference(resolution, [status(thm)], [c_817, c_2208])).
% 28.61/16.70  tff(c_138935, plain, (![A_944]: (+(==>(A_944, 1), ==>(A_944, ==>(A_944, 1)))===>(A_944, ==>(A_944, 1)))), inference(superposition, [status(thm), theory('equality')], [c_138338, c_2285])).
% 28.61/16.70  tff(c_140381, plain, (![A_948]: (==>(A_948, ==>(A_948, 1))===>(A_948, 1))), inference(demodulation, [status(thm), theory('equality')], [c_2367, c_138935])).
% 28.61/16.70  tff(c_140941, plain, (![X7_85]: (==>(==>(X7_85, 1), X7_85)===>(==>(X7_85, 1), 1) | ~>=(1, 1))), inference(superposition, [status(thm), theory('equality')], [c_36562, c_140381])).
% 28.61/16.70  tff(c_141201, plain, (![X7_85]: (==>(==>(X7_85, 1), X7_85)=X7_85)), inference(demodulation, [status(thm), theory('equality')], [c_8, c_13207, c_140941])).
% 28.61/16.70  tff(c_32, plain, (==>(==>(==>('#skF_1', 1), '#skF_1'), '#skF_1')!=0), inference(cnfTransformation, [status(thm)], [f_73])).
% 28.61/16.70  tff(c_141231, plain, (==>('#skF_1', '#skF_1')!=0), inference(demodulation, [status(thm), theory('equality')], [c_141201, c_32])).
% 28.61/16.70  tff(c_141234, plain, $false, inference(demodulation, [status(thm), theory('equality')], [c_1381, c_141231])).
% 28.61/16.70  % SZS output end CNFRefutation for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 28.61/16.70  
% 28.61/16.70  Inference rules
% 28.61/16.70  ----------------------
% 28.61/16.70  #Ref     : 0
% 28.61/16.70  #Sup     : 35693
% 28.61/16.70  #Fact    : 0
% 28.61/16.70  #Define  : 0
% 28.61/16.70  #Split   : 4
% 28.61/16.70  #Chain   : 0
% 28.61/16.70  #Close   : 0
% 28.61/16.70  
% 28.61/16.70  Ordering : KBO
% 28.61/16.70  
% 28.61/16.70  Simplification rules
% 28.61/16.70  ----------------------
% 28.61/16.70  #Subsume      : 6927
% 28.61/16.70  #Demod        : 31269
% 28.61/16.70  #Tautology    : 15852
% 28.61/16.70  #SimpNegUnit  : 4
% 28.61/16.70  #BackRed      : 12
% 28.61/16.70  
% 28.61/16.70  #Partial instantiations: 0
% 28.61/16.70  #Strategies tried      : 1
% 28.61/16.70  
% 28.61/16.70  Timing (in seconds)
% 28.61/16.70  ----------------------
% 28.61/16.70  Preprocessing        : 0.47
% 28.61/16.70  Parsing              : 0.26
% 28.61/16.70  CNF conversion       : 0.03
% 28.61/16.70  Main loop            : 15.13
% 28.61/16.70  Inferencing          : 1.73
% 28.61/16.70  Reduction            : 8.40
% 28.61/16.70  Demodulation         : 7.60
% 28.61/16.70  BG Simplification    : 0.15
% 28.61/16.70  Subsumption          : 3.93
% 28.61/16.70  Abstraction          : 0.24
% 28.61/16.70  MUC search           : 0.00
% 28.61/16.70  Cooper               : 0.00
% 28.61/16.70  Total                : 15.68
% 28.61/16.70  Index Insertion      : 0.00
% 28.61/16.70  Index Deletion       : 0.00
% 28.61/16.70  Index Matching       : 0.00
% 28.61/16.70  BG Taut test         : 0.00
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------