TSTP Solution File: LCL894+1 by ET---2.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : ET---2.0
% Problem  : LCL894+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v5.5.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_ET %s %d

% Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 10:18:30 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.48s 72.67s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.48s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   13
%            Number of leaves      :   10
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   62 (  28 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  116 (  17 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    7 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   93 (  39   ~;  41   |;   7   &)
%                                         (   3 <=>;   3  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   10 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   4 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   89 (   7 sgn  39   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(goals_13,conjecture,
    ( ( '>='(c,a)
      & '>='(c,b) )
  <=> '>='(c,'+'(a,'==>'(a,b))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p',goals_13) ).

fof(sos_05,axiom,
    ! [X4,X5,X6] :
      ( ( '>='(X4,X5)
        & '>='(X5,X6) )
     => '>='(X4,X6) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p',sos_05) ).

fof(sos_07,axiom,
    ! [X9,X10,X11] :
      ( '>='('+'(X9,X10),X11)
    <=> '>='(X10,'==>'(X9,X11)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p',sos_07) ).

fof(sos_12,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] : '+'(X1,'==>'(X1,X2)) = '+'(X2,'==>'(X2,X1)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p',sos_12) ).

fof(sos_06,axiom,
    ! [X7,X8] :
      ( ( '>='(X7,X8)
        & '>='(X8,X7) )
     => X7 = X8 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p',sos_06) ).

fof(sos_08,axiom,
    ! [X1] : '>='(X1,'0'),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p',sos_08) ).

fof(sos_04,axiom,
    ! [X1] : '>='(X1,X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p',sos_04) ).

fof(sos_03,axiom,
    ! [X1] : '+'(X1,'0') = X1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p',sos_03) ).

fof(sos_02,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] : '+'(X1,X2) = '+'(X2,X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p',sos_02) ).

fof(sos_09,axiom,
    ! [X12,X13,X14] :
      ( '>='(X12,X13)
     => '>='('+'(X12,X14),'+'(X13,X14)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p',sos_09) ).

fof(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( ( '>='(c,a)
        & '>='(c,b) )
    <=> '>='(c,'+'(a,'==>'(a,b))) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[goals_13]) ).

fof(c_0_11,plain,
    ! [X7,X8,X9] :
      ( ~ '>='(X7,X8)
      | ~ '>='(X8,X9)
      | '>='(X7,X9) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[sos_05])]) ).

fof(c_0_12,plain,
    ! [X12,X13,X14,X12,X13,X14] :
      ( ( ~ '>='('+'(X12,X13),X14)
        | '>='(X13,'==>'(X12,X14)) )
      & ( ~ '>='(X13,'==>'(X12,X14))
        | '>='('+'(X12,X13),X14) ) ),
    inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[sos_07])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( ~ '>='(c,a)
      | ~ '>='(c,b)
      | ~ '>='(c,'+'(a,'==>'(a,b))) )
    & ( '>='(c,a)
      | '>='(c,'+'(a,'==>'(a,b))) )
    & ( '>='(c,b)
      | '>='(c,'+'(a,'==>'(a,b))) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_10])]) ).

fof(c_0_14,plain,
    ! [X3,X4] : '+'(X3,'==>'(X3,X4)) = '+'(X4,'==>'(X4,X3)),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[sos_12]) ).

fof(c_0_15,plain,
    ! [X9,X10] :
      ( ~ '>='(X9,X10)
      | ~ '>='(X10,X9)
      | X9 = X10 ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[sos_06])]) ).

fof(c_0_16,plain,
    ! [X2] : '>='(X2,'0'),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[sos_08]) ).

fof(c_0_17,plain,
    ! [X2] : '>='(X2,X2),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[sos_04]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    ( '>='(X1,X2)
    | ~ '>='(X3,X2)
    | ~ '>='(X1,X3) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    ( '>='('+'(X1,X2),X3)
    | ~ '>='(X2,'==>'(X1,X3)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
    ( '>='(c,'+'(a,'==>'(a,b)))
    | '>='(c,b) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    '+'(X1,'==>'(X1,X2)) = '+'(X2,'==>'(X2,X1)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,plain,
    ( X1 = X2
    | ~ '>='(X2,X1)
    | ~ '>='(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,plain,
    '>='(X1,'0'),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,plain,
    ( '>='(X1,'==>'(X2,X3))
    | ~ '>='('+'(X2,X1),X3) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,plain,
    '>='(X1,X1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_17]) ).

fof(c_0_26,plain,
    ! [X2] : '+'(X2,'0') = X2,
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[sos_03]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,plain,
    ( '>='(X1,X2)
    | ~ '>='(X1,'+'(X3,X4))
    | ~ '>='(X4,'==>'(X3,X2)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,negated_conjecture,
    ( '>='(c,'+'(b,'==>'(b,a)))
    | '>='(c,b) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_21]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,plain,
    ( '0' = X1
    | ~ '>='('0',X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_23]) ).

cnf(c_0_30,plain,
    '>='(X1,'==>'(X2,'+'(X2,X1))),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_25]) ).

cnf(c_0_31,plain,
    '+'(X1,'0') = X1,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_26]) ).

fof(c_0_32,plain,
    ! [X3,X4] : '+'(X3,X4) = '+'(X4,X3),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[sos_02]) ).

cnf(c_0_33,negated_conjecture,
    ( '>='(c,b)
    | '>='(c,X1)
    | ~ '>='('==>'(b,a),'==>'(b,X1)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_28]) ).

cnf(c_0_34,plain,
    '==>'(X1,X1) = '0',
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_30]),c_0_31]) ).

fof(c_0_35,plain,
    ! [X15,X16,X17] :
      ( ~ '>='(X15,X16)
      | '>='('+'(X15,X17),'+'(X16,X17)) ),
    inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[sos_09])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_36,plain,
    '+'(X1,X2) = '+'(X2,X1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_32]) ).

cnf(c_0_37,negated_conjecture,
    '>='(c,b),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_33,c_0_34]),c_0_23])]) ).

cnf(c_0_38,plain,
    ( '>='('+'(X1,X2),'+'(X3,X2))
    | ~ '>='(X1,X3) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_35]) ).

cnf(c_0_39,plain,
    '+'('0',X1) = X1,
    inference(pm,[status(thm)],[c_0_31,c_0_36]) ).

cnf(c_0_40,negated_conjecture,
    ( '>='(c,'+'(a,'==>'(a,b)))
    | '>='(c,a) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_41,negated_conjecture,
    ( '>='(X1,b)
    | ~ '>='(X1,c) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_37]) ).

cnf(c_0_42,plain,
    '>='('+'(X1,X2),X2),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_38,c_0_39]),c_0_23])]) ).

cnf(c_0_43,negated_conjecture,
    ( '>='(c,'+'(b,'==>'(b,a)))
    | '>='(c,a) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_40,c_0_21]) ).

cnf(c_0_44,plain,
    ( '>='(X1,'==>'(X2,X3))
    | ~ '>='('+'(X1,X2),X3) ),
    inference(pm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_36]) ).

cnf(c_0_45,negated_conjecture,
    '>='('+'(X1,c),b),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_41,c_0_42]) ).

cnf(c_0_46,negated_conjecture,
    ( '>='(c,a)
    | '>='(c,X1)
    | ~ '>='('==>'(b,a),'==>'(b,X1)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_43]) ).

cnf(c_0_47,negated_conjecture,
    '>='(X1,'==>'(c,b)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_44,c_0_45]) ).

cnf(c_0_48,negated_conjecture,
    '>='(c,a),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_46,c_0_25]) ).

cnf(c_0_49,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ '>='(c,'+'(a,'==>'(a,b)))
    | ~ '>='(c,b)
    | ~ '>='(c,a) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_50,negated_conjecture,
    '==>'(c,b) = '0',
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_47]) ).

cnf(c_0_51,plain,
    ( '>='('==>'(X1,X2),'==>'(X1,X3))
    | ~ '>='('+'(X2,'==>'(X2,X1)),X3) ),
    inference(pm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_21]) ).

cnf(c_0_52,negated_conjecture,
    ( '>='(X1,a)
    | ~ '>='(X1,c) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_48]) ).

cnf(c_0_53,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ '>='(c,'+'(b,'==>'(b,a)))
    | ~ '>='(c,a)
    | ~ '>='(c,b) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_49,c_0_21]) ).

cnf(c_0_54,plain,
    ( '>='('+'(X1,X2),'+'(X3,X1))
    | ~ '>='(X2,X3) ),
    inference(pm,[status(thm)],[c_0_38,c_0_36]) ).

cnf(c_0_55,negated_conjecture,
    '+'(b,'==>'(b,c)) = c,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_50]),c_0_31]) ).

cnf(c_0_56,negated_conjecture,
    ( '>='('==>'(X1,X2),'==>'(X1,a))
    | ~ '>='('+'(X2,'==>'(X2,X1)),c) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_51,c_0_52]) ).

cnf(c_0_57,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ '>='(c,'+'(b,'==>'(b,a)))
    | ~ '>='(c,b) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_53,c_0_48])]) ).

cnf(c_0_58,negated_conjecture,
    ( '>='(c,'+'(X1,b))
    | ~ '>='('==>'(b,c),X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_54,c_0_55]) ).

cnf(c_0_59,negated_conjecture,
    '>='('==>'(b,c),'==>'(b,a)),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_56,c_0_50]),c_0_31]),c_0_25])]) ).

cnf(c_0_60,negated_conjecture,
    ~ '>='(c,'+'(b,'==>'(b,a))),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_57,c_0_37])]) ).

cnf(c_0_61,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_58,c_0_59]),c_0_36]),c_0_60]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.07  % Problem  : LCL894+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v5.5.0.
% 0.00/0.08  % Command  : run_ET %s %d
% 0.07/0.26  % Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% 0.07/0.26  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.07/0.26  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.07/0.26  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.07/0.26  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.07/0.26  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.07/0.26  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.07/0.26  % DateTime : Mon Jul  4 08:49:52 EDT 2022
% 0.07/0.27  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.23/23.31  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.23/23.31  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.23/23.31  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.23/23.32  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.34/46.32  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.34/46.32  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.34/46.34  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.34/46.36  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.46/69.33  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.46/69.36  eprover: eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminatingCPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.46/69.36  
% 0.46/69.37  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.48/72.67  # Running protocol protocol_eprover_63dc1b1eb7d762c2f3686774d32795976f981b97 for 23 seconds:
% 0.48/72.67  
% 0.48/72.67  # Failure: Resource limit exceeded (time)
% 0.48/72.67  # OLD status Res
% 0.48/72.67  # Preprocessing time       : 0.008 s
% 0.48/72.67  # Running protocol protocol_eprover_f6eb5f7f05126ea361481ae651a4823314e3d740 for 23 seconds:
% 0.48/72.67  
% 0.48/72.67  # Failure: Resource limit exceeded (time)
% 0.48/72.67  # OLD status Res
% 0.48/72.67  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,02,20000,1.0)
% 0.48/72.67  # Preprocessing time       : 0.007 s
% 0.48/72.67  # Running protocol protocol_eprover_a172c605141d0894bf6fdc293a5220c6c2a32117 for 23 seconds:
% 0.48/72.67  
% 0.48/72.67  # Failure: Resource limit exceeded (time)
% 0.48/72.67  # OLD status Res
% 0.48/72.67  # Preprocessing time       : 0.014 s
% 0.48/72.67  # Running protocol protocol_eprover_f8b0f932169414d689b89e2a8b18d4600533b975 for 23 seconds:
% 0.48/72.67  # Preprocessing time       : 0.014 s
% 0.48/72.67  
% 0.48/72.67  # Proof found!
% 0.48/72.67  # SZS status Theorem
% 0.48/72.67  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.48/72.67  # Proof object total steps             : 62
% 0.48/72.67  # Proof object clause steps            : 41
% 0.48/72.67  # Proof object formula steps           : 21
% 0.48/72.67  # Proof object conjectures             : 25
% 0.48/72.67  # Proof object clause conjectures      : 22
% 0.48/72.67  # Proof object formula conjectures     : 3
% 0.48/72.67  # Proof object initial clauses used    : 13
% 0.48/72.67  # Proof object initial formulas used   : 10
% 0.48/72.67  # Proof object generating inferences   : 23
% 0.48/72.67  # Proof object simplifying inferences  : 18
% 0.48/72.67  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.48/72.67  # Parsed axioms                        : 13
% 0.48/72.67  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.48/72.67  # Initial clauses                      : 16
% 0.48/72.67  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.48/72.67  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 16
% 0.48/72.67  # Processed clauses                    : 13970
% 0.48/72.67  # ...of these trivial                  : 296
% 0.48/72.67  # ...subsumed                          : 11249
% 0.48/72.67  # ...remaining for further processing  : 2424
% 0.48/72.67  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.48/72.67  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 79496
% 0.48/72.67  # Backward-subsumed                    : 866
% 0.48/72.67  # Backward-rewritten                   : 125
% 0.48/72.67  # Generated clauses                    : 286717
% 0.48/72.67  # ...of the previous two non-trivial   : 271073
% 0.48/72.67  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 5067
% 0.48/72.67  # Paramodulations                      : 286717
% 0.48/72.67  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.48/72.67  # Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.48/72.67  # Current number of processed clauses  : 1433
% 0.48/72.67  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 189
% 0.48/72.67  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 46
% 0.48/72.67  #    Negative unit clauses             : 16
% 0.48/72.67  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 1182
% 0.48/72.67  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 154054
% 0.48/72.67  # ...number of literals in the above   : 406852
% 0.48/72.67  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.48/72.67  # Current number of archived clauses   : 991
% 0.48/72.67  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 868955
% 0.48/72.67  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 730003
% 0.48/72.67  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 13495
% 0.48/72.67  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 6705
% 0.48/72.67  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.48/72.67  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 2972
% 0.48/72.67  # BW rewrite match successes           : 314
% 0.48/72.67  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.48/72.67  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.48/72.67  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 4767403
% 0.48/72.67  
% 0.48/72.67  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.48/72.67  # User time                : 2.858 s
% 0.48/72.67  # System time              : 0.083 s
% 0.48/72.67  # Total time               : 2.941 s
% 0.48/72.67  # Maximum resident set size: 129932 pages
% 0.48/92.38  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.48/92.38  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.48/92.39  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.48/92.40  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.48/92.40  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.48/92.40  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.48/92.40  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.48/92.40  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.48/92.40  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.48/92.40  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.48/92.40  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.48/92.41  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.48/92.41  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.48/92.41  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.48/92.41  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.48/92.41  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.48/92.41  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.48/92.41  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.48/92.41  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.48/92.41  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.48/92.41  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.48/92.41  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.48/92.41  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.48/92.42  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.48/92.42  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.48/92.42  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.48/92.42  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.48/92.42  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.48/92.42  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.48/92.42  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.48/92.42  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.48/92.42  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.48/92.42  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.48/92.42  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.48/92.42  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.48/92.43  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.48/92.43  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.48/92.43  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.48/92.43  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.48/92.43  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.48/92.43  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.48/92.43  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.48/92.43  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.48/92.43  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.48/92.43  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.48/92.44  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.48/92.44  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.48/92.44  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.48/92.44  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.48/92.44  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.48/92.44  eprover: No such file or directory
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------