TSTP Solution File: LCL893+1 by SInE---0.4

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SInE---0.4
% Problem  : LCL893+1 : TPTP v5.5.0. Released v5.5.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : Source/sine.py -e eprover -t %d %s

% Computer : art11.cs.miami.edu
% Model    : i686 i686
% CPU      : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 3.00GHz @ 3000MHz
% Memory   : 2005MB
% OS       : Linux 2.6.32.26-175.fc12.i686.PAE
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Mon Oct 22 18:23:37 EDT 2012

% Result   : Theorem 0.15s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.15s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   12
%            Number of leaves      :    7
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   36 (  20 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   60 (   9 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   42 (  18   ~;  14   |;   6   &)
%                                         (   1 <=>;   3  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    7 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   39 (   1 sgn  25   !;   2   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(1,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( '>='('+'(X1,X2),X3)
    <=> '>='(X2,'==>'(X1,X3)) ),
    file('/tmp/tmpFxmhBC/sel_LCL893+1.p_1',sos_08) ).

fof(2,axiom,
    ! [X4] : '>='(X4,'0'),
    file('/tmp/tmpFxmhBC/sel_LCL893+1.p_1',sos_09) ).

fof(4,axiom,
    ! [X4] : equal('+'(X4,'0'),X4),
    file('/tmp/tmpFxmhBC/sel_LCL893+1.p_1',sos_03) ).

fof(8,axiom,
    ! [X10,X11] :
      ( ( '>='(X10,X11)
        & '>='(X11,X10) )
     => equal(X10,X11) ),
    file('/tmp/tmpFxmhBC/sel_LCL893+1.p_1',sos_07) ).

fof(10,axiom,
    ! [X4] : '>='(X4,X4),
    file('/tmp/tmpFxmhBC/sel_LCL893+1.p_1',sos_05) ).

fof(12,conjecture,
    ! [X15] :
      ( equal(h(X15),X15)
     => equal(X15,'0') ),
    file('/tmp/tmpFxmhBC/sel_LCL893+1.p_1',goals_15) ).

fof(15,axiom,
    ! [X4] : equal(h(X4),'==>'(h(X4),X4)),
    file('/tmp/tmpFxmhBC/sel_LCL893+1.p_1',sos_14) ).

fof(16,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X15] :
        ( equal(h(X15),X15)
       => equal(X15,'0') ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[12]) ).

fof(17,plain,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( ( ~ '>='('+'(X1,X2),X3)
        | '>='(X2,'==>'(X1,X3)) )
      & ( ~ '>='(X2,'==>'(X1,X3))
        | '>='('+'(X1,X2),X3) ) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[1]) ).

fof(18,plain,
    ! [X4,X5,X6] :
      ( ( ~ '>='('+'(X4,X5),X6)
        | '>='(X5,'==>'(X4,X6)) )
      & ( ~ '>='(X5,'==>'(X4,X6))
        | '>='('+'(X4,X5),X6) ) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[17]) ).

cnf(20,plain,
    ( '>='(X1,'==>'(X2,X3))
    | ~ '>='('+'(X2,X1),X3) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[18]) ).

fof(21,plain,
    ! [X5] : '>='(X5,'0'),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[2]) ).

cnf(22,plain,
    '>='(X1,'0'),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[21]) ).

fof(25,plain,
    ! [X5] : equal('+'(X5,'0'),X5),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[4]) ).

cnf(26,plain,
    '+'(X1,'0') = X1,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[25]) ).

fof(34,plain,
    ! [X10,X11] :
      ( ~ '>='(X10,X11)
      | ~ '>='(X11,X10)
      | equal(X10,X11) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[8]) ).

fof(35,plain,
    ! [X12,X13] :
      ( ~ '>='(X12,X13)
      | ~ '>='(X13,X12)
      | equal(X12,X13) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[34]) ).

cnf(36,plain,
    ( X1 = X2
    | ~ '>='(X2,X1)
    | ~ '>='(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[35]) ).

fof(39,plain,
    ! [X5] : '>='(X5,X5),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[10]) ).

cnf(40,plain,
    '>='(X1,X1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[39]) ).

fof(44,negated_conjecture,
    ? [X15] :
      ( equal(h(X15),X15)
      & ~ equal(X15,'0') ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[16]) ).

fof(45,negated_conjecture,
    ? [X16] :
      ( equal(h(X16),X16)
      & ~ equal(X16,'0') ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[44]) ).

fof(46,negated_conjecture,
    ( equal(h(esk1_0),esk1_0)
    & ~ equal(esk1_0,'0') ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[45]) ).

cnf(47,negated_conjecture,
    esk1_0 != '0',
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[46]) ).

cnf(48,negated_conjecture,
    h(esk1_0) = esk1_0,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[46]) ).

fof(55,plain,
    ! [X5] : equal(h(X5),'==>'(h(X5),X5)),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[15]) ).

cnf(56,plain,
    h(X1) = '==>'(h(X1),X1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[55]) ).

cnf(57,negated_conjecture,
    '==>'(esk1_0,esk1_0) = esk1_0,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[56,48,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(89,plain,
    ( '>='('0','==>'(X1,X2))
    | ~ '>='(X1,X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[20,26,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(110,plain,
    '>='('0','==>'(X1,X1)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[89,40,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(198,negated_conjecture,
    '>='('0',esk1_0),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[110,57,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(221,negated_conjecture,
    ( esk1_0 = '0'
    | ~ '>='(esk1_0,'0') ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[36,198,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(228,negated_conjecture,
    ( esk1_0 = '0'
    | $false ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[221,22,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(229,negated_conjecture,
    esk1_0 = '0',
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[228,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(230,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[229,47,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(231,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    230,
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% /home/graph/tptp/Systems/SInE---0.4/Source/sine.py:10: DeprecationWarning: the sets module is deprecated
%   from sets import Set
% % SZS status Started for /home/graph/tptp/TPTP/Problems/LCL/LCL893+1.p
% --creating new selector for []
% -running prover on /tmp/tmpFxmhBC/sel_LCL893+1.p_1 with time limit 29
% -running prover with command ['/davis/home/graph/tptp/Systems/SInE---0.4/Source/./Source/PROVER/eproof.working', '-s', '-tLPO4', '-xAuto', '-tAuto', '--memory-limit=768', '--tptp3-format', '--cpu-limit=29', '/tmp/tmpFxmhBC/sel_LCL893+1.p_1']
% -prover status Theorem
% Problem LCL893+1.p solved in phase 0.
% % SZS status Theorem for /home/graph/tptp/TPTP/Problems/LCL/LCL893+1.p
% % SZS status Ended for /home/graph/tptp/TPTP/Problems/LCL/LCL893+1.p
% Solved 1 out of 1.
% # Problem is unsatisfiable (or provable), constructing proof object
% # SZS status Theorem
% # SZS output start CNFRefutation.
% See solution above
% # SZS output end CNFRefutation
% 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------