TSTP Solution File: LCL853-1 by Otter---3.3

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Otter---3.3
% Problem  : LCL853-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : otter-tptp-script %s

% Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Jul 27 13:05:37 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 1.64s 1.85s
% Output   : Refutation 1.64s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    1
%            Number of leaves      :    2
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :    3 (   3 unt;   0 nHn;   3 RR)
%            Number of literals    :    3 (   0 equ;   1 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    1 (   1 usr;   1 con; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    0 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(28,axiom,
    ~ c_InductTermi_OIT(v_s____),
    file('LCL853-1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(43,axiom,
    c_InductTermi_OIT(v_s____),
    file('LCL853-1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(44,plain,
    $false,
    inference(binary,[status(thm)],[43,28]),
    [iquote('binary,43.1,28.1')] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.12  % Problem  : LCL853-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.04/0.12  % Command  : otter-tptp-script %s
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Wed Jul 27 09:24:11 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 1.64/1.85  ----- Otter 3.3f, August 2004 -----
% 1.64/1.85  The process was started by sandbox2 on n003.cluster.edu,
% 1.64/1.85  Wed Jul 27 09:24:11 2022
% 1.64/1.85  The command was "./otter".  The process ID is 14423.
% 1.64/1.85  
% 1.64/1.85  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 1.64/1.85  set(auto).
% 1.64/1.85     dependent: set(auto1).
% 1.64/1.85     dependent: set(process_input).
% 1.64/1.85     dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 1.64/1.85     dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 1.64/1.85     dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 1.64/1.85     dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 1.64/1.85     dependent: set(control_memory).
% 1.64/1.85     dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 1.64/1.85     dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 1.64/1.85     dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 1.64/1.85     dependent: assign(max_seconds, 10800).
% 1.64/1.85  clear(print_given).
% 1.64/1.85  
% 1.64/1.85  list(usable).
% 1.64/1.85  0 [] A=A.
% 1.64/1.85  0 [] -class_Orderings_Opreorder(T_a)| -c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(V_b,V_a,T_a)| -c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(V_a,V_b,T_a).
% 1.64/1.85  0 [] -class_Orderings_Opreorder(T_a)| -c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(V_y,V_x,T_a)| -c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(V_x,V_y,T_a).
% 1.64/1.85  0 [] -class_Orderings_Olinorder(T_a)| -c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(V_x,V_y,T_a)| -c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(V_y,V_x,T_a).
% 1.64/1.85  0 [] -class_Orderings_Oorder(T_a)| -c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(V_a,V_b,T_a)| -c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(V_b,V_a,T_a).
% 1.64/1.85  0 [] c_Lambda_Osubst(c_Lambda_OdB_OApp(V_t,V_u),V_s,V_k)=c_Lambda_OdB_OApp(c_Lambda_Osubst(V_t,V_s,V_k),c_Lambda_Osubst(V_u,V_s,V_k)).
% 1.64/1.85  0 [] c_Lambda_OdB_OApp(V_dB1,V_dB2)!=c_Lambda_OdB_OAbs(V_dB_H).
% 1.64/1.85  0 [] c_Lambda_OdB_OAbs(V_dB_H)!=c_Lambda_OdB_OApp(V_dB1,V_dB2).
% 1.64/1.85  0 [] c_Lambda_Osubst(c_Lambda_OdB_OVar(V_k),V_u,V_k)=V_u.
% 1.64/1.85  0 [] c_Lambda_Osubst(c_Lambda_OdB_OVar(V_j),V_u,V_i)=c_Lambda_OdB_OVar(V_j)| -c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(V_j,V_i,tc_nat).
% 1.64/1.85  0 [] c_Lambda_OdB_OApp(V_dB1,V_dB2)!=c_Lambda_OdB_OApp(V_dB1_H,V_dB2_H)|V_dB1=V_dB1_H.
% 1.64/1.85  0 [] c_Lambda_OdB_OApp(V_dB1,V_dB2)!=c_Lambda_OdB_OApp(V_dB1_H,V_dB2_H)|V_dB2=V_dB2_H.
% 1.64/1.85  0 [] -class_Orderings_Olinorder(T_a)|V_x=V_y|c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(V_x,V_y,T_a)|c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(V_y,V_x,T_a).
% 1.64/1.85  0 [] -class_Orderings_Olinorder(T_a)|c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(V_y,V_x,T_a)|V_x=V_y|c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(V_x,V_y,T_a).
% 1.64/1.85  0 [] -class_Orderings_Olinorder(T_a)|c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(V_y,V_x,T_a)|c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(V_x,V_y,T_a)|V_x=V_y.
% 1.64/1.85  0 [] c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(V_y,V_x,tc_nat)|c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(V_x,V_y,tc_nat)|V_x=V_y.
% 1.64/1.85  0 [] c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(V_n,V_m,tc_nat)|c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(V_m,V_n,tc_nat)|V_m=V_n.
% 1.64/1.85  0 [] -class_Orderings_Olinorder(T_a)|V_x=V_y|c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(V_y,V_x,T_a)|c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(V_x,V_y,T_a).
% 1.64/1.85  0 [] -class_Ring__and__Field_Oordered__idom(T_a)|c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(V_y,V_x,T_a)|c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(V_x,V_y,T_a)|V_x=V_y.
% 1.64/1.85  0 [] -class_Orderings_Opreorder(T_a)| -c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(V_x,V_x,T_a).
% 1.64/1.85  0 [] -class_Orderings_Olinorder(T_a)| -c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(V_x,V_x,T_a).
% 1.64/1.85  0 [] -class_Orderings_Oorder(T_a)| -c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(V_x,V_x,T_a).
% 1.64/1.85  0 [] -c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(V_n,V_n,tc_nat).
% 1.64/1.85  0 [] -c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(V_x,V_x,tc_nat).
% 1.64/1.85  0 [] c_Lambda_OdB_OVar(V_nat)!=c_Lambda_OdB_OApp(V_dB1_H,V_dB2_H).
% 1.64/1.85  0 [] c_Lambda_Olift(c_Lambda_OdB_OApp(V_s,V_t),V_k)=c_Lambda_OdB_OApp(c_Lambda_Olift(V_s,V_k),c_Lambda_Olift(V_t,V_k)).
% 1.64/1.85  0 [] c_Lambda_Osubst(c_Lambda_OdB_OVar(V_i),V_s,V_k)=c_Lambda_OdB_OVar(V_i)|V_i=V_k|c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(V_k,V_i,tc_nat).
% 1.64/1.85  0 [] -class_Orderings_Opreorder(T_a)|c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(V_x,V_z,T_a)| -c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(V_y,V_z,T_a)| -c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(V_x,V_y,T_a).
% 1.64/1.85  0 [] -class_Orderings_Oorder(T_a)|c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(V_z,V_x,T_a)| -c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(V_z,V_y,T_a)| -c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(V_y,V_x,T_a).
% 1.64/1.85  0 [] c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(V_x,V_x,tc_nat)|c_Lambda_Osubst(c_Lambda_OdB_OVar(V_x),V_s,V_x)=V_s.
% 1.64/1.85  0 [] c_Lambda_Osubst(c_Lambda_Olift(V_t,V_k),V_s,V_k)=V_t.
% 1.64/1.85  0 [] c_Lambda_OdB_OApp(V_dB1_H,V_dB2_H)!=c_Lambda_OdB_OVar(V_nat).
% 1.64/1.85  0 [] c_InductTermi_OIT(c_Lambda_OdB_OApp(V_t,c_Lambda_OdB_OVar(V_i)))| -c_InductTermi_OIT(V_t).
% 1.64/1.85  0 [] c_Lambda_Olift(c_Lambda_OdB_OVar(V_i),V_k)=c_Lambda_OdB_OVar(V_i)| -c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(V_i,V_k,tc_nat).
% 1.64/1.85  0 [] c_Lambda_OdB_OVar(V_nat)!=c_Lambda_OdB_OAbs(V_dB_H).
% 1.64/1.85  0 [] c_Lambda_OdB_OAbs(V_dB)!=c_Lambda_OdB_OAbs(V_dB_H)|V_dB=V_dB_H.
% 1.64/1.85  0 [] c_InductTermi_OIT(c_Lambda_Osubst(V_r,c_Lambda_OdB_OVar(V_i),V_j))| -c_InductTermi_OIT(V_r).
% 1.64/1.85  0 [] c_Lambda_OdB_OVar(V_nat)!=c_Lambda_OdB_OVar(V_nat_H)|V_nat=V_nat_H.
% 1.64/1.85  0 [] c_Lambda_OdB_OAbs(V_dB_H)!=c_Lambda_OdB_OVar(V_nat).
% 1.64/1.85  0 [] c_InductTermi_OIT(v_s____).
% 1.64/1.85  0 [] c_InductTermi_OIT(c_Lambda_Olift(V_t,V_i))| -c_InductTermi_OIT(V_t).
% 1.64/1.85  0 [] c_InductTermi_OIT(c_Lambda_OdB_OVar(V_n)).
% 1.64/1.85  0 [] c_InductTermi_OIT(v_ta____).
% 1.64/1.85  0 [] c_InductTermi_OIT(c_Lambda_OdB_OAbs(V_r))| -c_InductTermi_OIT(V_r).
% 1.64/1.85  0 [] -c_InductTermi_OIT(v_s____).
% 1.64/1.85  0 [] class_Orderings_Opreorder(tc_nat).
% 1.64/1.85  0 [] class_Orderings_Olinorder(tc_nat).
% 1.64/1.85  0 [] class_Orderings_Oorder(tc_nat).
% 1.64/1.85  end_of_list.
% 1.64/1.85  
% 1.64/1.85  SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=4.
% 1.64/1.85  
% 1.64/1.85  This ia a non-Horn set with equality.  The strategy will be
% 1.64/1.85  Knuth-Bendix, ordered hyper_res, factoring, and unit
% 1.64/1.85  deletion, with positive clauses in sos and nonpositive
% 1.64/1.85  clauses in usable.
% 1.64/1.85  
% 1.64/1.85     dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 1.64/1.85     dependent: set(anl_eq).
% 1.64/1.85     dependent: set(para_from).
% 1.64/1.85     dependent: set(para_into).
% 1.64/1.85     dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 1.64/1.85     dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 1.64/1.85     dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 1.64/1.85     dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 1.64/1.85     dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 1.64/1.85     dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 1.64/1.85     dependent: set(order_eq).
% 1.64/1.85     dependent: set(back_demod).
% 1.64/1.85     dependent: set(lrpo).
% 1.64/1.85     dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 1.64/1.85     dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 1.64/1.85     dependent: set(factor).
% 1.64/1.85  
% 1.64/1.85  ------------> process usable:
% 1.64/1.85  ** KEPT (pick-wt=10): 1 [] -class_Orderings_Opreorder(A)| -c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(B,C,A)| -c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(C,B,A).
% 1.64/1.85    Following clause subsumed by 1 during input processing: 0 [] -class_Orderings_Opreorder(A)| -c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(B,C,A)| -c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(C,B,A).
% 1.64/1.85  ** KEPT (pick-wt=10): 2 [] -class_Orderings_Olinorder(A)| -c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(B,C,A)| -c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(C,B,A).
% 1.64/1.85  ** KEPT (pick-wt=10): 3 [] -class_Orderings_Oorder(A)| -c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(B,C,A)| -c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(C,B,A).
% 1.64/1.85  ** KEPT (pick-wt=6): 4 [] c_Lambda_OdB_OApp(A,B)!=c_Lambda_OdB_OAbs(C).
% 1.64/1.85  ** KEPT (pick-wt=6): 5 [] c_Lambda_OdB_OAbs(A)!=c_Lambda_OdB_OApp(B,C).
% 1.64/1.85  ** KEPT (pick-wt=12): 6 [] c_Lambda_Osubst(c_Lambda_OdB_OVar(A),B,C)=c_Lambda_OdB_OVar(A)| -c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(A,C,tc_nat).
% 1.64/1.85  ** KEPT (pick-wt=10): 7 [] c_Lambda_OdB_OApp(A,B)!=c_Lambda_OdB_OApp(C,D)|A=C.
% 1.64/1.85  ** KEPT (pick-wt=10): 8 [] c_Lambda_OdB_OApp(A,B)!=c_Lambda_OdB_OApp(C,D)|B=D.
% 1.64/1.85  ** KEPT (pick-wt=13): 9 [] -class_Orderings_Olinorder(A)|B=C|c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(B,C,A)|c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(C,B,A).
% 1.64/1.85    Following clause subsumed by 9 during input processing: 0 [] -class_Orderings_Olinorder(A)|c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(B,C,A)|C=B|c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(C,B,A).
% 1.64/1.85    Following clause subsumed by 9 during input processing: 0 [] -class_Orderings_Olinorder(A)|c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(B,C,A)|c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(C,B,A)|C=B.
% 1.64/1.85    Following clause subsumed by 9 during input processing: 0 [] -class_Orderings_Olinorder(A)|B=C|c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(C,B,A)|c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(B,C,A).
% 1.64/1.85  ** KEPT (pick-wt=13): 10 [] -class_Ring__and__Field_Oordered__idom(A)|c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(B,C,A)|c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(C,B,A)|C=B.
% 1.64/1.85  ** KEPT (pick-wt=6): 11 [] -class_Orderings_Opreorder(A)| -c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(B,B,A).
% 1.64/1.85  ** KEPT (pick-wt=6): 12 [] -class_Orderings_Olinorder(A)| -c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(B,B,A).
% 1.64/1.85  ** KEPT (pick-wt=6): 13 [] -class_Orderings_Oorder(A)| -c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(B,B,A).
% 1.64/1.85  ** KEPT (pick-wt=4): 14 [] -c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(A,A,tc_nat).
% 1.64/1.85    Following clause subsumed by 14 during input processing: 0 [] -c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(A,A,tc_nat).
% 1.64/1.85  ** KEPT (pick-wt=6): 15 [] c_Lambda_OdB_OVar(A)!=c_Lambda_OdB_OApp(B,C).
% 1.64/1.85  ** KEPT (pick-wt=14): 16 [] -class_Orderings_Opreorder(A)|c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(B,C,A)| -c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(D,C,A)| -c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(B,D,A).
% 1.64/1.85  ** KEPT (pick-wt=14): 17 [] -class_Orderings_Oorder(A)|c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(B,C,A)| -c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(B,D,A)| -c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(D,C,A).
% 1.64/1.85  ** KEPT (pick-wt=6): 18 [] c_Lambda_OdB_OApp(A,B)!=c_Lambda_OdB_OVar(C).
% 1.64/1.85  ** KEPT (pick-wt=7): 19 [] c_InductTermi_OIT(c_Lambda_OdB_OApp(A,c_Lambda_OdB_OVar(B)))| -c_InductTermi_OIT(
% 1.64/1.85  -------- PROOF -------- 
% 1.64/1.85  A).
% 1.64/1.85  ** KEPT (pick-wt=11): 20 [] c_Lambda_Olift(c_Lambda_OdB_OVar(A),B)=c_Lambda_OdB_OVar(A)| -c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(A,B,tc_nat).
% 1.64/1.85  ** KEPT (pick-wt=5): 21 [] c_Lambda_OdB_OVar(A)!=c_Lambda_OdB_OAbs(B).
% 1.64/1.85  ** KEPT (pick-wt=8): 22 [] c_Lambda_OdB_OAbs(A)!=c_Lambda_OdB_OAbs(B)|A=B.
% 1.64/1.85  ** KEPT (pick-wt=8): 23 [] c_InductTermi_OIT(c_Lambda_Osubst(A,c_Lambda_OdB_OVar(B),C))| -c_InductTermi_OIT(A).
% 1.64/1.85  ** KEPT (pick-wt=8): 24 [] c_Lambda_OdB_OVar(A)!=c_Lambda_OdB_OVar(B)|A=B.
% 1.64/1.85  ** KEPT (pick-wt=5): 25 [] c_Lambda_OdB_OAbs(A)!=c_Lambda_OdB_OVar(B).
% 1.64/1.85  ** KEPT (pick-wt=6): 26 [] c_InductTermi_OIT(c_Lambda_Olift(A,B))| -c_InductTermi_OIT(A).
% 1.64/1.85  ** KEPT (pick-wt=5): 27 [] c_InductTermi_OIT(c_Lambda_OdB_OAbs(A))| -c_InductTermi_OIT(A).
% 1.64/1.85  ** KEPT (pick-wt=2): 28 [] -c_InductTermi_OIT(v_s____).
% 1.64/1.85    Following clause subsumed by 5 during input processing: 0 [copy,4,flip.1] c_Lambda_OdB_OAbs(A)!=c_Lambda_OdB_OApp(B,C).
% 1.64/1.85    Following clause subsumed by 4 during input processing: 0 [copy,5,flip.1] c_Lambda_OdB_OApp(A,B)!=c_Lambda_OdB_OAbs(C).
% 1.64/1.85    Following clause subsumed by 18 during input processing: 0 [copy,15,flip.1] c_Lambda_OdB_OApp(A,B)!=c_Lambda_OdB_OVar(C).
% 1.64/1.85    Following clause subsumed by 15 during input processing: 0 [copy,18,flip.1] c_Lambda_OdB_OVar(A)!=c_Lambda_OdB_OApp(B,C).
% 1.64/1.85    Following clause subsumed by 25 during input processing: 0 [copy,21,flip.1] c_Lambda_OdB_OAbs(A)!=c_Lambda_OdB_OVar(B).
% 1.64/1.85    Following clause subsumed by 21 during input processing: 0 [copy,25,flip.1] c_Lambda_OdB_OVar(A)!=c_Lambda_OdB_OAbs(B).
% 1.64/1.85  
% 1.64/1.85  ------------> process sos:
% 1.64/1.85  ** KEPT (pick-wt=3): 31 [] A=A.
% 1.64/1.85  ** KEPT (pick-wt=16): 33 [copy,32,flip.1] c_Lambda_OdB_OApp(c_Lambda_Osubst(A,B,C),c_Lambda_Osubst(D,B,C))=c_Lambda_Osubst(c_Lambda_OdB_OApp(A,D),B,C).
% 1.64/1.85  ---> New Demodulator: 34 [new_demod,33] c_Lambda_OdB_OApp(c_Lambda_Osubst(A,B,C),c_Lambda_Osubst(D,B,C))=c_Lambda_Osubst(c_Lambda_OdB_OApp(A,D),B,C).
% 1.64/1.85  ** KEPT (pick-wt=7): 35 [] c_Lambda_Osubst(c_Lambda_OdB_OVar(A),B,A)=B.
% 1.64/1.85  ---> New Demodulator: 36 [new_demod,35] c_Lambda_Osubst(c_Lambda_OdB_OVar(A),B,A)=B.
% 1.64/1.85  ** KEPT (pick-wt=11): 37 [] c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(A,B,tc_nat)|c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(B,A,tc_nat)|B=A.
% 1.64/1.85    Following clause subsumed by 37 during input processing: 0 [] c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(A,B,tc_nat)|c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(B,A,tc_nat)|B=A.
% 1.64/1.85  ** KEPT (pick-wt=13): 38 [] c_Lambda_Olift(c_Lambda_OdB_OApp(A,B),C)=c_Lambda_OdB_OApp(c_Lambda_Olift(A,C),c_Lambda_Olift(B,C)).
% 1.64/1.85  ---> New Demodulator: 39 [new_demod,38] c_Lambda_Olift(c_Lambda_OdB_OApp(A,B),C)=c_Lambda_OdB_OApp(c_Lambda_Olift(A,C),c_Lambda_Olift(B,C)).
% 1.64/1.85  ** KEPT (pick-wt=15): 40 [] c_Lambda_Osubst(c_Lambda_OdB_OVar(A),B,C)=c_Lambda_OdB_OVar(A)|A=C|c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(C,A,tc_nat).
% 1.64/1.85    Following clause subsumed by 31 during input processing: 0 [demod,36,unit_del,14] B=B.
% 1.64/1.85  ** KEPT (pick-wt=8): 41 [] c_Lambda_Osubst(c_Lambda_Olift(A,B),C,B)=A.
% 1.64/1.85  ---> New Demodulator: 42 [new_demod,41] c_Lambda_Osubst(c_Lambda_Olift(A,B),C,B)=A.
% 1.64/1.85  ** KEPT (pick-wt=2): 43 [] c_InductTermi_OIT(v_s____).
% 1.64/1.85  
% 1.64/1.85  ----> UNIT CONFLICT at   0.00 sec ----> 44 [binary,43.1,28.1] $F.
% 1.64/1.85  
% 1.64/1.85  Length of proof is 0.  Level of proof is 0.
% 1.64/1.85  
% 1.64/1.85  ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 1.64/1.85  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 1.64/1.85  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 1.64/1.85  ------------ end of proof -------------
% 1.64/1.85  
% 1.64/1.85  
% 1.64/1.85  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 1.64/1.85  
% 1.64/1.85  
% 1.64/1.85  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 1.64/1.85  
% 1.64/1.85  ============ end of search ============
% 1.64/1.85  
% 1.64/1.85  -------------- statistics -------------
% 1.64/1.85  clauses given                  0
% 1.64/1.85  clauses generated              7
% 1.64/1.85  clauses kept                  38
% 1.64/1.85  clauses forward subsumed      16
% 1.64/1.85  clauses back subsumed          0
% 1.64/1.85  Kbytes malloced              976
% 1.64/1.85  
% 1.64/1.85  ----------- times (seconds) -----------
% 1.64/1.85  user CPU time          0.00          (0 hr, 0 min, 0 sec)
% 1.64/1.85  system CPU time        0.00          (0 hr, 0 min, 0 sec)
% 1.64/1.85  wall-clock time        2             (0 hr, 0 min, 2 sec)
% 1.64/1.85  
% 1.64/1.85  That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 1.64/1.85  
% 1.64/1.85  Process 14423 finished Wed Jul 27 09:24:13 2022
% 1.64/1.85  Otter interrupted
% 1.64/1.85  PROOF FOUND
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------