TSTP Solution File: LCL844-1 by Vampire-SAT---4.8
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Vampire-SAT---4.8
% Problem : LCL844-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : vampire --mode casc_sat -m 16384 --cores 7 -t %d %s
% Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sun May 5 07:55:29 EDT 2024
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.21s 0.38s
% Output : Refutation 0.21s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 2
% Number of leaves : 3
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 5 ( 4 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 6 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 4 ( 3 ~; 1 |; 0 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 4 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-1 aty)
% Number of functors : 2 ( 2 usr; 1 con; 0-1 aty)
% Number of variables : 1 ( 1 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f71,plain,
$false,
inference(resolution,[],[f70,f56]) ).
fof(f56,axiom,
c_InductTermi_OIT(v_ta______),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Abs_I2_J_0) ).
fof(f70,plain,
~ c_InductTermi_OIT(v_ta______),
inference(resolution,[],[f61,f63]) ).
fof(f63,axiom,
~ c_InductTermi_OIT(c_Lambda_OdB_OAbs(v_ta______)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).
fof(f61,axiom,
! [X13] :
( c_InductTermi_OIT(c_Lambda_OdB_OAbs(X13))
| ~ c_InductTermi_OIT(X13) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Lambda_0) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12 % Problem : LCL844-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.03/0.14 % Command : vampire --mode casc_sat -m 16384 --cores 7 -t %d %s
% 0.15/0.35 % Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.15/0.35 % DateTime : Fri May 3 14:08:01 EDT 2024
% 0.15/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.15/0.35 % (24797)Running in auto input_syntax mode. Trying TPTP
% 0.15/0.37 % (24798)fmb+10_1_bce=on:fmbas=function:fmbsr=1.2:fde=unused:nm=0_846 on theBenchmark for (846ds/0Mi)
% 0.15/0.37 % (24799)fmb+10_1_bce=on:fmbdsb=on:fmbes=contour:fmbswr=3:fde=none:nm=0_793 on theBenchmark for (793ds/0Mi)
% 0.15/0.37 % (24801)fmb+10_1_bce=on:fmbsr=1.5:nm=32_533 on theBenchmark for (533ds/0Mi)
% 0.15/0.37 % (24802)ott+10_10:1_add=off:afr=on:amm=off:anc=all:bd=off:bs=on:fsr=off:irw=on:lma=on:msp=off:nm=4:nwc=4.0:sac=on:sp=reverse_frequency_531 on theBenchmark for (531ds/0Mi)
% 0.15/0.37 % (24803)ott-10_8_av=off:bd=preordered:bs=on:fsd=off:fsr=off:fde=unused:irw=on:lcm=predicate:lma=on:nm=4:nwc=1.7:sp=frequency_522 on theBenchmark for (522ds/0Mi)
% 0.15/0.37 % (24804)ott+1_64_av=off:bd=off:bce=on:fsd=off:fde=unused:gsp=on:irw=on:lcm=predicate:lma=on:nm=2:nwc=1.1:sims=off:urr=on_497 on theBenchmark for (497ds/0Mi)
% 0.21/0.38 % (24803)First to succeed.
% 0.21/0.38 % (24803)Solution written to "/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/vampire-proof-24797"
% 0.21/0.38 % (24804)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.21/0.38 % (24802)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.21/0.38 TRYING [1]
% 0.21/0.38 % (24803)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.21/0.38 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark
% 0.21/0.38 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.21/0.38 % (24803)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.38 % (24803)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.21/0.38 % (24803)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.21/0.38
% 0.21/0.38 % (24803)Memory used [KB]: 837
% 0.21/0.38 % (24803)Time elapsed: 0.004 s
% 0.21/0.38 % (24803)Instructions burned: 4 (million)
% 0.21/0.38 % (24797)Success in time 0.022 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------