TSTP Solution File: LCL842-1 by SOS---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SOS---2.0
% Problem : LCL842-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : sos-script %s
% Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 14:33:24 EDT 2022
% Result : Timeout 299.44s 299.64s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.14 % Problem : LCL842-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.03/0.14 % Command : sos-script %s
% 0.14/0.36 % Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.36 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.36 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.36 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.36 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.14/0.36 % DateTime : Sun Jul 3 14:36:16 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 0.23/0.39 ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.23/0.39 The process was started by sandbox on n021.cluster.edu,
% 0.23/0.39 Sun Jul 3 14:36:16 2022
% 0.23/0.39 The command was "./sos". The process ID is 10190.
% 0.23/0.39
% 0.23/0.39 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.23/0.39 set(auto).
% 0.23/0.39 dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.23/0.39 dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.23/0.39 dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.23/0.39 dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.23/0.39 dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.23/0.39 dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.23/0.39 dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.23/0.39 dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.23/0.39 dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.23/0.39 dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.23/0.39 dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.23/0.39 dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.23/0.39 dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.23/0.39 clear(print_given).
% 0.23/0.39
% 0.23/0.39 list(usable).
% 0.23/0.39
% 0.23/0.39 SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=4.
% 0.23/0.39
% 0.23/0.39 This ia a non-Horn set with equality. The strategy will be
% 0.23/0.39 Knuth-Bendix, ordered hyper_res, ur_res, factoring, and
% 0.23/0.39 unit deletion, with positive clauses in sos and nonpositive
% 0.23/0.39 clauses in usable.
% 0.23/0.39
% 0.23/0.39 dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 0.23/0.39 dependent: set(para_from).
% 0.23/0.39 dependent: set(para_into).
% 0.23/0.39 dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 0.23/0.39 dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 0.23/0.39 dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 0.23/0.39 dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 0.23/0.39 dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 0.23/0.39 dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 0.23/0.39 dependent: set(order_eq).
% 0.23/0.39 dependent: set(back_demod).
% 0.23/0.39 dependent: set(lrpo).
% 0.23/0.39 dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.23/0.39 dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.23/0.39 dependent: set(factor).
% 0.23/0.39
% 0.23/0.39 ------------> process usable:
% 0.23/0.39 Following clause subsumed by 1 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -class_Orderings_Opreorder(A)| -c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(B,C,A)| -c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(C,B,A).
% 0.23/0.39 Following clause subsumed by 9 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -class_Orderings_Olinorder(A)|c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(B,C,A)|C=B|c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(C,B,A).
% 0.23/0.39 Following clause subsumed by 9 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -class_Orderings_Olinorder(A)|c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(B,C,A)|c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(C,B,A)|C=B.
% 0.23/0.39 Following clause subsumed by 9 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -class_Orderings_Olinorder(A)|B=C|c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(C,B,A)|c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(B,C,A).
% 0.23/0.39 Following clause subsumed by 14 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(A,A,tc_nat).
% 0.23/0.39 Following clause subsumed by 5 during input processing: 0 [copy,4,flip.1] {-} c_Lambda_OdB_OAbs(A)!=c_Lambda_OdB_OApp(B,C).
% 0.23/0.39 Following clause subsumed by 4 during input processing: 0 [copy,5,flip.1] {-} c_Lambda_OdB_OApp(A,B)!=c_Lambda_OdB_OAbs(C).
% 0.23/0.39 Following clause subsumed by 18 during input processing: 0 [copy,15,flip.1] {-} c_Lambda_OdB_OApp(A,B)!=c_Lambda_OdB_OVar(C).
% 0.23/0.39 Following clause subsumed by 15 during input processing: 0 [copy,18,flip.1] {-} c_Lambda_OdB_OVar(A)!=c_Lambda_OdB_OApp(B,C).
% 0.23/0.39 Following clause subsumed by 25 during input processing: 0 [copy,21,flip.1] {-} c_Lambda_OdB_OAbs(A)!=c_Lambda_OdB_OVar(B).
% 0.23/0.39 Following clause subsumed by 21 during input processing: 0 [copy,25,flip.1] {-} c_Lambda_OdB_OVar(A)!=c_Lambda_OdB_OAbs(B).
% 0.23/0.39
% 0.23/0.39 ------------> process sos:
% 0.23/0.39 Following clause subsumed by 36 during input processing: 0 [] {-} c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(A,B,tc_nat)|c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless(B,A,tc_nat)|B=A.
% 0.23/0.39 Following clause subsumed by 41 during input processing: 0 [] {-} A=A.
% 0.23/0.39 Following clause subsumed by 41 during input processing: 0 [copy,41,flip.1] {-} A=A.
% 0.23/0.39 41 back subsumes 30.
% 0.23/0.39 41 back subsumes 29.
% 0.23/0.39
% 0.23/0.39 ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.23/0.45
% 0.23/0.45
% 0.23/0.45 Failed to model usable list: disabling FINDER
% 0.23/0.45
% 0.23/0.45
% 0.23/0.45
% 0.23/0.45 -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.23/0.45
% 0.23/0.45 UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.23/0.45 SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.23/0.45 SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.23/0.45 number of clauses in intial UL: 28
% 0.23/0.45 number of clauses initially in problem: 44
% 0.23/0.45 percentage of clauses intially in UL: 63
% 0.23/0.45 percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 82
% 0.23/0.45 percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.23/0.45 absolute distinct symbol count: 17
% 0.23/0.45 distinct predicate count: 8
% 0.23/0.45 distinct function count: 5
% 0.23/0.45 distinct constant count: 4
% 0.23/0.45
% 0.23/0.45 ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.23/0.45
% 0.23/0.45
% 0.23/0.45
% 0.23/0.45 =========== start of search ===========
% 1.07/1.25
% 1.07/1.25
% 1.07/1.25 Changing weight limit from 60 to 40.
% 1.07/1.25
% 1.07/1.25 Resetting weight limit to 40 after 135 givens.
% 1.07/1.25
% 1.20/1.42
% 1.20/1.42
% 1.20/1.42 Changing weight limit from 40 to 35.
% 1.20/1.42
% 1.20/1.42 Resetting weight limit to 35 after 140 givens.
% 1.20/1.42
% 1.37/1.56
% 1.37/1.56
% 1.37/1.56 Changing weight limit from 35 to 32.
% 1.37/1.56
% 1.37/1.56 Resetting weight limit to 32 after 145 givens.
% 1.37/1.56
% 1.52/1.69
% 1.52/1.69
% 1.52/1.69 Changing weight limit from 32 to 28.
% 1.52/1.69
% 1.52/1.69 Resetting weight limit to 28 after 150 givens.
% 1.52/1.69
% 1.58/1.76
% 1.58/1.76
% 1.58/1.76 Changing weight limit from 28 to 27.
% 1.58/1.76
% 1.58/1.76 Resetting weight limit to 27 after 155 givens.
% 1.58/1.76
% 1.66/1.83
% 1.66/1.83
% 1.66/1.83 Changing weight limit from 27 to 26.
% 1.66/1.83
% 1.66/1.83 Resetting weight limit to 26 after 160 givens.
% 1.66/1.83
% 1.69/1.92
% 1.69/1.92
% 1.69/1.92 Changing weight limit from 26 to 25.
% 1.69/1.92
% 1.69/1.92 Resetting weight limit to 25 after 165 givens.
% 1.69/1.92
% 2.00/2.17
% 2.00/2.17
% 2.00/2.17 Changing weight limit from 25 to 22.
% 2.00/2.17
% 2.00/2.17 Resetting weight limit to 22 after 170 givens.
% 2.00/2.17
% 2.19/2.39
% 2.19/2.39
% 2.19/2.39 Changing weight limit from 22 to 20.
% 2.19/2.39
% 2.19/2.39 Resetting weight limit to 20 after 175 givens.
% 2.19/2.39
% 2.39/2.56
% 2.39/2.56
% 2.39/2.56 Changing weight limit from 20 to 19.
% 2.39/2.56
% 2.39/2.56 Resetting weight limit to 19 after 195 givens.
% 2.39/2.56
% 2.60/2.77
% 2.60/2.77
% 2.60/2.77 Changing weight limit from 19 to 18.
% 2.60/2.77
% 2.60/2.77 Resetting weight limit to 18 after 210 givens.
% 2.60/2.77
% 2.60/2.84
% 2.60/2.84
% 2.60/2.84 Changing weight limit from 18 to 17.
% 2.60/2.84
% 2.60/2.84 Resetting weight limit to 17 after 215 givens.
% 2.60/2.84
% 3.08/3.26
% 3.08/3.26
% 3.08/3.26 Changing weight limit from 17 to 16.
% 3.08/3.26
% 3.08/3.26 Resetting weight limit to 16 after 265 givens.
% 3.08/3.26
% 4.71/4.95
% 4.71/4.95
% 4.71/4.95 Changing weight limit from 16 to 15.
% 4.71/4.95
% 4.71/4.95 Modelling stopped after 300 given clauses and 0.00 seconds
% 4.71/4.95
% 4.71/4.95
% 4.71/4.95 Resetting weight limit to 15 after 510 givens.
% 4.71/4.95
% 133.98/134.21
% 133.98/134.21
% 133.98/134.21 Changing weight limit from 15 to 16.
% 133.98/134.21
% 133.98/134.21 Resetting weight limit to 16 after 5705 givens.
% 133.98/134.21
% 134.07/134.25
% 134.07/134.25
% 134.07/134.25 Changing weight limit from 16 to 17.
% 134.07/134.25
% 134.07/134.25 Resetting weight limit to 17 after 5710 givens.
% 134.07/134.25
% 134.11/134.30
% 134.11/134.30
% 134.11/134.30 Changing weight limit from 17 to 18.
% 134.11/134.30
% 134.11/134.30 Resetting weight limit to 18 after 5715 givens.
% 134.11/134.30
% 134.11/134.35
% 134.11/134.35
% 134.11/134.35 Changing weight limit from 18 to 19.
% 134.11/134.35
% 134.11/134.35 Resetting weight limit to 19 after 5720 givens.
% 134.11/134.35
% 134.19/134.39
% 134.19/134.39
% 134.19/134.39 Changing weight limit from 19 to 20.
% 134.19/134.39
% 134.19/134.39 Resetting weight limit to 20 after 5725 givens.
% 134.19/134.39
% 160.33/160.53
% 160.33/160.53
% 160.33/160.53 Changing weight limit from 20 to 19.
% 160.33/160.53
% 160.33/160.53 Resetting weight limit to 19 after 5960 givens.
% 160.33/160.53
% 203.37/203.56
% 203.37/203.56
% 203.37/203.56 Changing weight limit from 19 to 18.
% 203.37/203.56
% 203.37/203.56 Resetting weight limit to 18 after 7440 givens.
% 203.37/203.56
% 299.44/299.64
% 299.44/299.64
% 299.44/299.64 Changing weight limit from 18 to 17.
% 299.44/299.64
% 299.44/299.64 Resetting weight limit to 17 after 8295 givens.
% 299.44/299.64
% 300.06/300.26 Wow, sos-wrapper got a signal XCPU
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------