TSTP Solution File: LCL839-1 by SNARK---20120808r022
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SNARK---20120808r022
% Problem : LCL839-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run-snark %s %d
% Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 14:26:35 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.73s 0.89s
% Output : Refutation 0.73s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 2
% Number of leaves : 4
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 6 ( 4 unt; 0 nHn; 6 RR)
% Number of literals : 8 ( 0 equ; 4 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 2 usr; 2 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 12 ( 12 usr; 8 con; 0-4 aty)
% Number of variables : 6 ( 2 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_typing__elims_I2_J_1,axiom,
( c_Type_Otyping(X,Y,c_Type_Osko__Type__Xtyping__elims__2__1(Z,X,U,Y))
| ~ c_Type_Otyping(X,hAPP(hAPP(c_Lambda_OdB_OApp,U),Y),Z) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_typing__elims_I2_J_1) ).
cnf(cls_CHAINED_0,axiom,
c_Type_Otyping(c_Type_Oshift(v_e____,v_i____,v_T____,tc_Type_Otype),hAPP(hAPP(c_Lambda_OdB_OApp,c_Lambda_OdB_OAbs(v_r____)),v_a____),v_Ua____),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_CHAINED_0) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_0,negated_conjecture,
~ v_thesis____,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_1,negated_conjecture,
( v_thesis____
| ~ c_Type_Otyping(c_Type_Oshift(v_e____,v_i____,v_T____,tc_Type_Otype),v_a____,X) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_1) ).
cnf(300,plain,
~ c_Type_Otyping(c_Type_Oshift(v_e____,v_i____,v_T____,tc_Type_Otype),v_a____,X),
inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[cls_conjecture_1,cls_conjecture_0]) ).
cnf(926,plain,
$false,
inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[cls_typing__elims_I2_J_1,300,cls_CHAINED_0]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : LCL839-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.07/0.13 % Command : run-snark %s %d
% 0.14/0.34 % Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.14/0.34 % DateTime : Sun Jul 3 10:53:54 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.21/0.46 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.21/0.47 *
% 0.21/0.47 *
% 0.21/0.48 #<PACKAGE "SNARK-USER">
% 0.21/0.48 *
% 0.21/0.48 SNARK-TPTP-OPTIONS
% 0.21/0.48 *
% 0.21/0.48 ((AGENDA-LENGTH-LIMIT NIL) (AGENDA-LENGTH-BEFORE-SIMPLIFICATION-LIMIT NIL)
% 0.21/0.48 (USE-HYPERRESOLUTION T) (USE-UR-RESOLUTION T) (USE-PARAMODULATION T)
% 0.21/0.48 (USE-FACTORING :POS)
% 0.21/0.48 (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-HYPERRESOLUTION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.21/0.48 (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-PARAMODULATION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.21/0.48 (ORDERING-FUNCTIONS>CONSTANTS T) (ASSERT-CONTEXT :CURRENT)
% 0.21/0.48 (RUN-TIME-LIMIT 300) (LISTEN-FOR-COMMANDS NIL)
% 0.21/0.48 (USE-CLOSURE-WHEN-SATISFIABLE T) (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-GIVEN NIL)
% 0.21/0.48 (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-DERIVED NIL) (PRINT-UNORIENTABLE-ROWS NIL)
% 0.21/0.48 (PRINT-ROW-WFFS-PRETTILY NIL) (PRINT-FINAL-ROWS :TPTP)
% 0.21/0.48 (PRINT-OPTIONS-WHEN-STARTING NIL) (USE-VARIABLE-NAME-SORTS NIL)
% 0.21/0.48 (USE-PURITY-TEST T) (USE-RELEVANCE-TEST T) (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS1)
% 0.21/0.48 (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS2))
% 0.21/0.48 *
% 0.21/0.48 "."
% 0.21/0.48 *
% 0.21/0.48 ; Begin refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-07-03T10:53:54
% 0.21/0.48 ; Running SNARK from /davis/home/graph/tptp/Systems/SNARK---20120808r022/Source/snark-system.lisp in SBCL 1.0.12 on n014.cluster.edu at 2022-07-03T10:53:54
% 0.21/0.57
% 0.21/0.57 ; Recognized possible right inverse assertion (|c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless| ?X (|c_Suc| ?X) |tc_nat|).
% 0.21/0.58 WARNING:
% 0.21/0.58 |class_Ring__and__Field_Oordered__idom| is a 1-ary relation that occurs only negatively; disabling rows that contain it.
% 0.21/0.58 WARNING:
% 0.21/0.58 |class_OrderedGroup_Olordered__ab__group__add| is a 1-ary relation that occurs only negatively; disabling rows that contain it.
% 0.21/0.58 WARNING:
% 0.21/0.58 |class_OrderedGroup_Oab__group__add| is a 1-ary relation that occurs only negatively; disabling rows that contain it.
% 0.21/0.58 WARNING:
% 0.21/0.58 |class_OrderedGroup_Ogroup__add| is a 1-ary relation that occurs only negatively; disabling rows that contain it.
% 0.21/0.58 WARNING:
% 0.21/0.58 |class_Int_Onumber__ring| is a 1-ary relation that occurs only negatively; disabling rows that contain it.
% 0.21/0.58 WARNING:
% 0.21/0.58 |class_Ring__and__Field_Oidom| is a 1-ary relation that occurs only negatively; disabling rows that contain it.
% 0.21/0.58 WARNING:
% 0.21/0.58 |class_OrderedGroup_Opordered__ab__group__add| is a 1-ary relation that occurs only negatively; disabling rows that contain it.
% 0.73/0.89 ; Recognized possible right inverse assertion (|c_HOL_Oord__class_Oless| ?X (|c_Suc| ?X) |tc_nat|).
% 0.73/0.89
% 0.73/0.89 #||
% 0.73/0.89 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.73/0.89 % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 0.73/0.89 ||#
% 0.73/0.89
% 0.73/0.89 ; Summary of computation:
% 0.73/0.89 ; 2584 formulas have been input or derived (from 175 formulas).
% 0.73/0.89 ; 926 (36%) were retained. Of these,
% 0.73/0.89 ; 48 ( 5%) were simplified or subsumed later,
% 0.73/0.89 ; 878 (95%) are still being kept.
% 0.73/0.89 ;
% 0.73/0.89 ; Run time in seconds:
% 0.73/0.89 ; 0.084 20% Read assertion file (1 call)
% 0.73/0.89 ; 0.008 2% Assert (389 calls)
% 0.73/0.89 ; 0.087 21% Process new row (2,176 calls)
% 0.73/0.89 ; 0.046 11% Resolution (348 calls)
% 0.73/0.89 ; 0.006 1% Paramodulation (174 calls)
% 0.73/0.89 ; 0.000 0% Factoring (6 calls)
% 0.73/0.89 ; 0.017 4% Condensing (922 calls)
% 0.73/0.89 ; 0.041 10% Forward subsumption (922 calls)
% 0.73/0.89 ; 0.013 3% Backward subsumption (508 calls)
% 0.73/0.89 ; 0.023 6% Clause clause subsumption (1,944 calls)
% 0.73/0.89 ; 0.048 12% Forward simplification (2,146 calls)
% 0.73/0.89 ; 0.009 2% Backward simplification (905 calls)
% 0.73/0.89 ; 0.007 2% Ordering (3,029 calls)
% 0.73/0.89 ; 0.001 0% Sortal reasoning (32 calls)
% 0.73/0.89 ; 0.001 0% Purity testing (1 call)
% 0.73/0.89 ; 0.026 6% Other
% 0.73/0.89 ; 0.417 Total
% 0.73/0.89 ; 0.416 Real time
% 0.73/0.89 ;
% 0.73/0.89 ; Term-hash-array has 1,911 terms in all.
% 0.73/0.89 ; Feature-vector-row-index has 498 entries (498 at peak, 508 added, 10 deleted).
% 0.73/0.89 ; Feature-vector-row-index has 3,112 nodes (3,112 at peak, 3,226 added, 114 deleted).
% 0.73/0.89 ; Retrieved 2,787 possibly forward subsuming rows in 922 calls.
% 0.73/0.89 ; Retrieved 219 possibly backward subsumed rows in 508 calls.
% 0.73/0.89 ; Path-index has 1,879 entries (1,879 at peak, 1,971 added, 92 deleted).
% 0.73/0.89 ; Path-index has 4,336 nodes (4,336 at peak, 4,488 added, 152 deleted).
% 0.73/0.89 ; Trie-index has 1,879 entries (1,879 at peak, 1,971 added, 92 deleted).
% 0.73/0.89 ; Trie-index has 6,634 nodes (6,634 at peak, 7,075 added, 441 deleted).
% 0.73/0.89 ; Retrieved 6,042 generalization terms in 10,334 calls.
% 0.73/0.89 ; Retrieved 738 instance terms in 456 calls.
% 0.73/0.89 ; Retrieved 37,956 unifiable terms in 1,675 calls.
% 0.73/0.89 ;
% 0.73/0.89 ; The agenda of rows to process has 2 entries:
% 0.73/0.89 ; 1 with value 16 1 with value 21
% 0.73/0.89 ; The agenda of input rows to give has 119 entries:
% 0.73/0.89 ; 10 with value 21 2 with value 29 1 with value 42
% 0.73/0.89 ; 14 with value 22 5 with value 30 1 with value 44
% 0.73/0.89 ; 11 with value 23 6 with value 31 1 with value 45
% 0.73/0.89 ; 12 with value 24 6 with value 32 3 with value 47
% 0.73/0.89 ; 6 with value 25 5 with value 33 1 with value 51
% 0.73/0.89 ; 10 with value 26 1 with value 34 1 with value 52
% 0.73/0.89 ; 10 with value 27 1 with value 36 1 with value 54
% 0.73/0.89 ; 11 with value 28
% 0.73/0.89 ; The agenda of rows to give has 584 entries:
% 0.73/0.89 ; 1 with value (4 6) 31 with value (4 18) 16 with value (4 30)
% 0.73/0.89 ; 4 with value (4 7) 26 with value (4 19) 10 with value (4 31)
% 0.73/0.89 ; 2 with value (4 8) 22 with value (4 20) 17 with value (4 32)
% 0.73/0.89 ; 5 with value (4 9) 40 with value (4 21) 4 with value (4 33)
% 0.73/0.89 ; 13 with value (4 10) 36 with value (4 22) 8 with value (4 34)
% 0.73/0.89 ; 17 with value (4 11) 37 with value (4 23) 6 with value (4 35)
% 0.73/0.89 ; 11 with value (4 12) 29 with value (4 24) 9 with value (4 36)
% 0.73/0.89 ; 17 with value (4 13) 31 with value (4 25) 2 with value (4 37)
% 0.73/0.89 ; 16 with value (4 14) 33 with value (4 26) 9 with value (4 38)
% 0.73/0.89 ; 20 with value (4 15) 14 with value (4 27) 1 with value (4 39)
% 0.73/0.89 ; 24 with value (4 16) 20 with value (4 28) 2 with value (4 40)
% 0.73/0.89 ; 20 with value (4 17) 29 with value (4 29) 2 with value (4 42)
% 0.73/0.89 Evaluation took:
% 0.73/0.89 0.417 seconds of real time
% 0.73/0.89 0.378946 seconds of user run time
% 0.73/0.89 0.038423 seconds of system run time
% 0.73/0.89 [Run times include 0.021 seconds GC run time.]
% 0.73/0.89 0 calls to %EVAL
% 0.73/0.89 0 page faults and
% 0.73/0.89 27,898,560 bytes consed.
% 0.73/0.89 :PROOF-FOUND
% 0.73/0.89 ; End refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-07-03T10:53:55
% 0.73/0.89 :PROOF-FOUND
% 0.73/0.89 *
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------